Abstract
Quantitative verification is an established automated technique that can ensure predictability and dependability of software systems which exhibit probabilistic behaviour. Since offline usage of quantitative verification is infeasible for large-scale complex systems that continuously adapt to the changing environment, quantitative runtime verification was proposed as an alternative. Using an illustrative case study of communicating, distributed probabilistic processes, we formulate the problem of quantitative steering, a runtime technique that involves system monitoring, prediction of future errors, and enforcement of system’s behaviour away from the error states. We consider a communication-based variant of steering where enforcement is achieved by modifying the contents of communication channels. Our approach is based on stochastic games, where one player is the system and the other players assume the role of the controller, and hence steering reduces to finding a controller strategy that meets the given quantitative goal. We discuss the solution to the quantitative steering problem and its extensions inspired by complex real-world scenarios.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Calinescu, R., Ghezzi, C., Kwiatkowska, M., Mirandola, R.: Self-adaptive software needs quantitative verification at runtime. Communications of the ACM (to appear, 2012)
Calinescu, R., Kwiatkowska, M.: Using quantitative analysis to implement autonomic it systems. In: Proc. ICSE 2009, pp. 100–110. IEEE (2009)
Chatterjee, K., de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A.: The Complexity of Stochastic Rabin and Streett Games,. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 878–890. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Chatterjee, K., Doyen, L.: Partial-observation stochastic games: How to win when belief fails. In: Proc. LICS 2012 (to appear, 2012)
Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A.: A survey of stochastic omega-regular games. Journal of Computer and System Sciences (2011)
Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Jobstmann, B., Radhakrishna, A.: Gist: A Solver for Probabilistic Games. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 665–669. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Chatterjee, K., Jurdzinski, M., Henzinger, T.: Quantitative stochastic parity games. In: Proc. SODA 2004, pp. 121–130 (2004)
Chen, T., Forejt, V., Kwiatkowska, M., Parker, D., Simaitis, A.: Automatic Verification of Competitive Stochastic Systems. In: Flanagan, C., König, B. (eds.) TACAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7214, pp. 315–330. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Cheng, B.H.C., de Lemos, R., Giese, H., Inverardi, P., Magee, J., Andersson, J., Becker, B., Bencomo, N., Brun, Y., Cukic, B., Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Dustdar, S., Finkelstein, A., Gacek, C., Geihs, K., Grassi, V., Karsai, G., Kienle, H.M., Kramer, J., Litoiu, M., Malek, S., Mirandola, R., Müller, H.A., Park, S., Shaw, M., Tichy, M., Tivoli, M., Weyns, D., Whittle, J.: Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: A Research Roadmap. In: Cheng, B.H.C., de Lemos, R., Giese, H., Inverardi, P., Magee, J. (eds.) Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems. LNCS, vol. 5525, pp. 1–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model Checking. The MIT Press (1999)
Crow, J., Rushby, J., Struss, P.: Model-based reconfiguration: Diagnosis and recovery (1994)
de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T., Majumdar, R.: Discounting the Future in Systems Theory. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 1022–1037. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
de Alfaro, L., Majumdar, R.: Quantitative solution of omega-regular games. In: STOC 2001, pp. 675–683. ACM Press (2001)
Etessami, K., Kwiatkowska, M., Vardi, M., Yannakakis, M.: Multi-objective model checking of Markov decision processes. Logical Methods in Computer Science 4(4), 1–21 (2008)
Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Tamburrelli, G.: Run-time efficient probabilistic model checking. In: Proc. ICSE 2011, pp. 341–350. ACM, New York (2011)
Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Tamburrelli, G.: A formal approach to adaptive software: continuous assurance of non-functional requirements. Formal Aspects of Computing 24, 163–186 (2012)
Forejt, V., Kwiatkowska, M., Parker, D.: Pareto curves for probabilistic model checking. In: Proc. 10th International Symposium on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2012). LNCS. Springer (to appear, 2012)
Giro, S., Rabe, M.: Verification of partial-information probabilistic systems using counterexample-guided refinements. In: Proc. 10th International Symposium on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2012). LNCS. Springer (to appear, 2012)
Kwiatkowska, M.: Quantitative verification: Models, techniques and tools. In: Proc. 6th joint meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE), pp. 449–458. ACM Press (September 2007)
Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., Parker, D.: PRISM 4.0: Verification of Probabilistic Real-Time Systems. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) CAV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 585–591. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Kwiatkowska, M., Parker, D., Qu, H.: Incremental quantitative verification for Markov decision processes. In: Proc. DSN-PDS 2011, pp. 359–370. IEEE (2011)
Oreizy, P., Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: Runtime software adaptation: framework, approaches, and styles. In: Proc. Companion of ICSE 2008, pp. 899–910. ACM (2008)
PRISM-games, http://www.prismmodelchecker.org/games/
Sommerville, I., Cliff, D., Calinescu, R., Keen, J., Kelly, T., Kwiatkowska, M., McDermid, J., Paige, R.: Large-scale Complex IT Systems. Communications of the ACM 55(7), 71–77 (2012)
Stoller, S.D., Bartocci, E., Seyster, J., Grosu, R., Havelund, K., Smolka, S.A., Zadok, E.: Runtime Verification with State Estimation. In: Khurshid, S., Sen, K. (eds.) RV 2011. LNCS, vol. 7186, pp. 193–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Yabandeh, M., Knezevic, N., Kostic, D., Kuncak, V.: Crystalball: predicting and preventing inconsistencies in deployed distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI 2009, pp. 229–244. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dräger, K., Kwiatkowska, M. (2012). Towards Communication-Based Steering of Complex Distributed Systems. In: Calinescu, R., Garlan, D. (eds) Large-Scale Complex IT Systems. Development, Operation and Management. Monterey Workshop 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7539. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34059-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34059-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34058-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34059-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)