Abstract
International courts and tribunals are firstly and particularly conceived to settle legal disputes between States and/or other organs or individuals admitted as parties according to the statute of the respective court by means of a binding decision. An advisory function is not inherent in the function of a judicial body, but has to be transferred expressly upon a court or tribunal in the constituent instrument. For non-standing judicial bodies, i.e., arbitral tribunals, an advisory function is rather unusual, but not altogether ruled out: The parties to a compromis may empower the tribunal to give an advisory opinion.
Dr Karin Oellers-Frahm, Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oellers-Frahm, K. (2012). Lawmaking Through Advisory Opinions?. In: von Bogdandy, A., Venzke, I. (eds) International Judicial Lawmaking. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 236. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29587-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29587-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29586-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29587-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)