Binary relations are at the heart of much of economic theory, both in the context of individual choice and in multi-agent decision problems. A fundamental coherence requirement imposed on a relation is the well-known transitivity axiom. If a relation is interpreted as a goodness relation, transitivity postulates that whenever one alternative is at least as good as a second and the second alternative is, in turn, at least as good as a third, then the first alternative is at least as good as the third. However, from an empirical as well as a conceptual perspective, transitivity is frequently considered too demanding and weaker notions of coherence have been proposed in the literature. Two alternatives that have received a considerable amount of attention are quasi-transitivity and acyclicity. Quasi-transitivity demands that the asymmetric factor of a relation (the betterness relation) is transitive, whereas acyclicity rules out the presence of betterness cycles. Quasi-transitivity is implied by transitivity and implies acyclicity. The reverse implications are not valid.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Arrhenius, G. (2000). An impossibility theorem for welfarist axiologies. Economics and Philosophy, 16, 247–266
Arrow, K. (1951, 2nd ed. 1963). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley
Blackorby, C., Bossert, W., & Donaldson, D. (2005). Population issues in social choice theory, welfare economics, and ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Blackorby, C., Bossert, W., & Donaldson, D. (2006). Population ethics and the value of life. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Inequality, poverty and well-being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Blackorby, C., Bossert, W., Donaldson, D., & Fleurbaey, M. (1998). Critical levels and the (reverse) repugnant conclusion. Journal of Economics, 67, 1–15
Blackorby, C., & Donaldson, D. (1991). Normative population theory: A comment. Social Choice and Welfare, 8, 261–267
Blackorby, C., Donaldson, D., & Weymark, J. (1984). Social choice with interpersonal utility comparisons: A diagrammatic introduction. International Economic Review, 25, 327–356
Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y., & Suzumura, K. (2005a). Consistent rationalizability. Economica, 72, 185–200
Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y., & Suzumura, K. (2005b). Maximal-element rationalizability. Theory and Decision, 58, 325–350
Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y., & Suzumura, K. (2006). Rationalizability of choice functions on general domains without full transitivity. Social Choice and Welfare, 27, 435–458
Bossert, W., & Suzumura, K. (2008). Utility in social choice. In K. Basu, & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Welfare, development, philosophy and social science: Essays for Amartya Sen’s 75th birthday, vol. i, welfare economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bossert, W., & Weymark, J. (2004). Utility in social choice. In S. Barbera, P. Hammond, & C. Seidl (Eds.), Handbook of utility theory, vol. 2: Extensions. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Broome, J. (2004). Weighing lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Carlson, E. (1998). Mere addition and the two trilemmas of population ethics. Economics and Philosophy, 14, 283–306
Dalton, H. (1920). The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Economic Journal, 30, 348–361
d’Aspremont, C., & Gevers, L. (1977). Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. Review of Economic Studies, 44, 199–209
Hammond, P. (1979). Equity in two person situations: Some consequences. Econometrica, 47, 1127–1135
Hansson, B. (1968). Choice structures and preference relations. Synthese, 18, 443–458
Marshall, A., & Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of majorization and its applications. New York: Academic Press
McMahan, J. (1981). Problems of population theory. Ethics, 92, 96–127
Parfit, D. (1976). On doing the best for our children. In M. Bayles (Ed.), Ethics and population. Cambridge: Schenkman
Parfit, D. (1982). Future generations, further problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11, 113–172
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Pigou, A. (1912). Wealth and welfare. London: Macmillan
Richter, M. (1966). Revealed preference theory. Econometrica, 41, 1075–1091
Richter, M. (1971). Rational choice. In J. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. Richter, & H. Sonnenschein (Eds.), Preferences, utility, and demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Shinotsuka, T. (2008). Remarks on population ethics. In P. Pattanaik, K. Tadenuma, Y. Xu, & N. Yoshihara (Eds.), Rational choice and social welfare. New York: Springer
Sikora, R. (1978). Is it wrong to prevent the existence of future generations? In R. Sikora, & B. Barry (Eds.), Obligations to future generations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
Suzumura, K. (1976a). Rational choice and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies, 43, 149–158
Suzumura, K. (1976b). Remarks on the theory of collective choice. Economica, 43, 381–390
Suzumura, K. (1977). Houthakker’s axiom in the theory of rational choice. Journal of Economic Theory, 14, 284–290
Suzumura, K. (1983). Rational choice, collective decisions and social welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press
Szpilrajn, E. (1930). Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 16, 386–389
Thomson, W. (1990). The consistency principle. In T. Ichiishi, A. Neyman, & Y. Tauman (Eds.), Game theory and applications. New York: Academic Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bossert, W. (2008). Suzumura Consistency. In: Pattanaik, P.K., Tadenuma, K., Xu, Y., Yoshihara, N. (eds) Rational Choice and Social Welfare. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79831-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79832-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)