Abstract
Given the focus on incremental change in existing empirical aerodynamic design methods, radical, unintuitive, new optimal solutions in previously unexplored regions of design space are very unlikely to be found using them. We present a framework based on an implicit shape representation and a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm that aims to produce a variety of optimal flow topologies for a given requirement, providing designers with insights into possibly radical solutions. A revolutionary integrated flow simulation system developed specifically for design work is used to evaluate candidate designs.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Giles, M.B.: Aerospace Design: a Complex Task. Technical Report 97/07, Oxford University Computing Laboratory (1997)
Fluent Inc.: First Viscous Analysis of Grid Fins Gives Better Prediction of Missile Trajectory. JA136 Journal Articles by Fluent Software Users, Fluent Inc. (2001)
Scott, J.: Missile Grid Fin (2006) (Last checked on September 15th, 2007), http://www.aerospaceweb.org
Deb, K.: Unveiling Innovative Design Principles by Means of Multiple Conflicting Objectives. Engineering Optimization 35(5), 445–470 (2003)
Sasaki, D., Obayashi, S., Nakahashi, K.: Navier-Stokes Optimization of Supersonic Wings with Four Objectives Using Evolutionary Algorithm. Journal of Aircraft 39 (2002)
Hutabarat, W., Parks, G.T., Jarrett, J.P., Clarkson, P.J.: A New Approach to Aerodynamic Topology Optimization. In: Parmee, I. (ed.) Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture, vol. 2006 (2006)
Cambridge Flow Solutions: BoXeR (2007) (Last checked on September 15th, 2007), http://www.cambridgeflowsolutions.com
Mohammadi, B., Pironneau, O.: Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Jameson, A., Vassberg, J.C.: Computational Fluid Dynamics for Aerodynamic Design: Its Current and Future Impact. In: 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA (2001)
Borrvall, T., Petersson, J.: Topology Optimization of Fluids in Stokes Flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 41, 77–107 (2003)
Bendsoe, M., Kikuchi, N.: Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 71(2), 197–224 (1988)
Gersborg-Hansen, A.: Topology Optimization of Flow Problems. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2007)
Häussler, P., Nitsopoulos, I., Sauter, J., Stephan, M.: Topology and Shape Optimization Methods for CFD Problems. In: 24th CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2006, International Congress on FEM Technology (2006)
Xie, Y., Steven, G.: Evolutionary Structural Optimization. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Kane, C., Schoenauer, M.: Topological Optimum Design Using Genetic Algorithms. Control and Cybernetics 25(5), 1059–1088 (1996)
Kita, E., Tamaki, T., Tanie, H.: Topology and Shape Optimization of Continuum Structures by Genetic Algorithm and BEM. Computer Assisted Mechanics and Engineering Sciences 11, 63–75 (2004)
Allaire, G., Gournay, F.D., Jouve, F., Toader, A.M.: Structural Optimization Using Topological and Shape Sensitivity Via a Level Set Method. Technical report, Ecole Polytechnique (2004)
Wang, S., Wang, M.: Radial Basis Functions and Level Set Method for Structural Topology Optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 65(12), 2060–2090 (2005)
Carr, J., Beatson, R., Cherrie, J., Mitchell, T., Fright, W., McCallum, B., Evans, T.: Reconstruction and Representation of 3D Objects with Radial Basis Functions. In: Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 67–76 (2001)
Dawes, W.N.: Building Blocks Towards VR-Based Flow Sculpting. In: 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, AIAA (January 2005)
Turk, G., O’Brien, J.: Modelling with Implicit Surfaces that Interpolate. ACM Transations on Graphics 21, 855–873 (2002)
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)
Hirschen, K., Schäfer, M.: A Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization for Flow Geometry Design. Computational Mechanics 37(2), 131–141 (2006)
Ballester, P.J., Carter, J.N.: An Effective Real-Parameter Genetic Algorithm with Parent Centric Normal Crossover for Multimodal Optimisation. In: Deb, K., et al. (eds.) GECCO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3102, pp. 901–913. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Fogel, D.B.: Mutation Operators. In: Evolutionary Computation I: Basic Algorithms and Operators, pp. 237–255. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK (2000)
Kellar, W.P.: Geometry Modeling in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Design Optimisation. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (January 2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hutabarat, W., Parks, G.T., Jarrett, J.P., Dawes, W.N., Clarkson, P.J. (2008). Aerodynamic Topology Optimisation Using an Implicit Representation and a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm. In: Monmarché, N., Talbi, EG., Collet, P., Schoenauer, M., Lutton, E. (eds) Artificial Evolution. EA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79305-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79305-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79304-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79305-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)