Abstract
We give the first single-pass (“on the fly”) tableau decision procedure for computational tree logic (CTL). Our method extends Schwendimann’s single-pass decision procedure for propositional linear temporal logic (PLTL) but the extension is non-trivial because of the interactions between the branching inherent in CTL-models, which is missing in PLTL-models, and the “or” branching inherent in tableau search. Our method extends to many other fix-point logics like propositional dynamic logic (PDL) and the logic of common knowledge (LCK).
The decision problem for CTL is known to be EXPTIME-complete, but our procedure requires 2EXPTIME in the worst case. A similar phenomenon occurs in extremely efficient practical single-pass tableau algorithms for very expressive description logics with EXPTIME-complete decision problems because the 2EXPTIME worst-case behaviour rarely arises. Our method is amenable to the numerous optimisation methods invented for these description logics and has been implemented in the Tableau Work Bench ( twb.rsise.anu.edu.au ) without these extensive optimisations. Its one-pass nature also makes it amenable to parallel proof-search on multiple processors.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Computation Tree Logic
- Automate Theorem Prover
- Transition Frame
- Propositional Dynamic Logic
- Computation Tree Logic
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Abate, P.: The Tableau Workbench: a framework for building automated tableau-based theorem provers. PhD thesis, The Australian National University (2006)
Baader, F., Tobies, S.: The inverse method implements the automata approach for modal satisfiability. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2083, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Baader, F.: Augmenting concept languages by transitive closure of roles: an alternative to terminological cycles. Technical Report, DFKI (1990)
Basukoski, A., Bolotov, A.: A clausal resolution method for branching time logic ECTL+. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 46(3), 235–263 (2006)
Ben-Ari, M., Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of branching time. In: Proceedings of Principles of Programming Languages (1981)
Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: Decision procedures and expressiveness in the temporal logic of branching time. J. of Computer and System Sci. 30, 1–24 (1985)
Fisher, M., Dixon, C., Peim, M.: Clausal temporal resolution. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (2001)
Gaintzarain, J., Hermo, M., Lucio, P., Navarro, M., Orejas, F.: A Cut-Free and Invariant-Free Sequent Calculus for PLTL. In: 6th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science and Logic (to appear, 2007)
Gough, G.: Decision procedures for temporal logics. Master’s thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Manchester, England (1984)
Grumberg, O., Clarke, E.M., Peled, D.A.: Model checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Optimising description logic subsumption. Journal of Logic and Computation 9(3), 267–293 (1999)
Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: A tableaux decision procedure for SHOIQ. In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 448–453 (2005)
Hustadt, U., Konev, B.: TRP++: A temporal resolution prover. In: Collegium Logicum, Kurt Gödel Society, pp. 65–79 (2004)
Jäger, G., Alberucci, L.: About cut elimination for logics of common knowledge. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 133(1-3), 73–99 (2005)
Jäger, G., Kretz, M., Studer, T.: Cut-free common knowledge. Journal of Applied Logic (to appear)
Janssen, G.: Logics for Digital Circuit Verification: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands (1999)
Kesten, Y., Manna, Z., McGuire, H., Pnueli, A.: A decision algorithm for full propositional temporal logic. In: Courcoubetis, C. (ed.) CAV 1993. LNCS, vol. 697, pp. 97–109. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Reynolds, M.: Towards a CTL* tableau. In: Ramanujam, R., Sen, S. (eds.) FSTTCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3821, pp. 384–395. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Schwendimann, S.: A new one-pass tableau calculus for PLTL. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) TABLEAUX 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1397, pp. 277–291. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Vardi, M.Y., Pan, G., Sattler, U.: BDD-based decision procedures for K. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 16(1-2), 169–208 (2006)
Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. Journal of Computer Systems and Science (1986)
Voronkov, A.: How to optimize proof-search in modal logics: new methods of proving redundancy criteria for sequent calculi. ACM Trans. on Comp. Logic 2(2) (2001)
Wolper, P.: Temporal logic can be more expressive. Inf. and Cont. 56, 72–99 (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abate, P., Goré, R., Widmann, F. (2007). One-Pass Tableaux for Computation Tree Logic. In: Dershowitz, N., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4790. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75560-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75560-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75558-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75560-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)