Abstract
All epidemiologic studies are (or should be) based on a particular source population followed over a particular risk period. The goal is usually to estimate the effect of one or more exposures on one or more health outcomes. When we are estimating the effect of a specific exposure on a specific health outcome, confounding can be thought of as a mixing of the effects of the exposure being studied with the effect(s) of other factor(s) on the risk of the health outcome of interest. Interaction can be thought of as a modification, by other factors, of the effects of the exposure being studied on the health outcome of interest, and can be subclassified into two major concepts: biological dependence of effects, also known as synergism; and effect-measure modification, also known as heterogeneity of a measure. Both confounding and interaction can be assessed by stratification on these other factors (i.e. the potential confounders or effect modifiers). The present chapter covers the basic concepts of confounding and interaction and provides a brief overview of analytic approaches to these phenomena. Because these concepts and methods involve far more topics than we can cover in detail, we provide many references to further discussion beyond that in the present handbook, especially to relevant chapters in Modern Epidemiology by Rothman and Greenland (1998).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Armstrong B, White E, Saracci R (1992) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York
Armstrong BG (1998) Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 55:651–656
Axelson O (1978) Aspects on confounding in occupational health epidemiology. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 4:85–89
Axelson O (1989) Confounding from smoking in occupational epidemiology. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 46:505–507
Axelson O, Steenland K (1988) Indirect methods of assessing the effects of tobacco use in occupational studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 13:105–118
Axelson O, Flodin U, Hardell L (1982) A comment on the reference series with regard to multiple exposure evaluations in a case-referent study. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 8(suppl 1):15–19
Bross IDJ (1967) Pertinency of an extraneous variable. Journal of Chronic Diseases 20:487–495
Checkoway H, Waldman GT (1985) Assessing the possible extent of confounding in occupational case-referent studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 11:131–133
Checkoway H, Pearce N, Kriebel D (2004) Research methods in occupational epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York
Cole SR, Hernan MA (2002) Fallibility in estimating direct effects. International Journal of Epidemiology 31:163–165
Copeland KT, Checkoway H, McMichael AJ, Holbrook RH (1977) Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. American Journal of Epidemiology 105:488–495
Cornfield J, Haenszel W, Hammond EC, Lilienfeld AM, Shimkin MB, Wynder EL (1959) Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22:173–203
Doll R, Peto R (1978) Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 32:303–313
Efron B, Morris C (1977) Stein’s paradox in statistics. Scientific American 236:119–127
Espeland M, Hui SL (1987) A general approach to analyzing epidemiologic data that contain misclassification errors. Biometrics 43:1001–1012
Fingerhut MA, Halperin WE, Marlow DA, Piacitelli LA, Honchar PA, Sweeney MH, Greife AL, Dill PA, Steenland K, Suruda AJ (1991) Cancer mortality in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. New England Journal of Medicine 324:212–218
Flanders WD, Khoury MJ (1990) Indirect assessment of confounding: graphic description and limits on effect for adjusting for covariates. Epidemiology 1:239–246
Greenland S (1980) The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates. American Journal of Epidemiology 112:564–569
Greenland S (1988) Variance estimation for epidemiologic effect estimates under misclassification. Statistics in Medicine 7:745–757
Greenland S (1993a) Additive-risk versus additive relative-risk models. Epidemiology 4:32–36
Greenland S (1993b) Basic problems in interaction assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 101(suppl 4):59–66
Greenland S (1993c) Methods for epidemiologic analyses of multiple exposures: Areview and a comparative study of maximum-likelihood, preliminary testing, and empirical-Bayes regression. Statistics in Medicine 12:717–736
Greenland S (1996) Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference. Epidemiology 7:498–501
Greenland S (2000a) An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology 29:722–729
Greenland S (2000b) Principles of multilevel modelling. International Journal of Epidemiology 29:158–167
Greenland S (2000c) When should epidemiologic regressions use random coefficients? Biometrics 56:915–921
Greenland S (2001a) Ecologic versus individual-level sources of confounding in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. International Journal of Epidemiology 30:1343–1350
Greenland S (2001b) Putting background information about relative risks into conjugate prior distributions. Biometrics 57:663–670
Greenland S (2003) The impact of prior distributions for uncontrolled confounding and response bias: Acase study of the relation of wire codes and magnetic fields to childhood leukemia. Journal of the American Statistical Association 98: 47–54
Greenland S (2004a) Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals. International Journal of Epidemiology (in press)
Greenland S (2004b) Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology (in press)
Greenland S (2005) Multiple-bias modeling for observational studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (in press)
Greenland S, Kleinbaum D (1983) Correcting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies. International Journal of Epidemiology 12:93–97
Greenland S, Maldonado G (1994) The interpretation of multiplicative model parameters as standardised parameters. Statistics in Medicine 13:989–999
Greenland S, Neutra RR (1980) Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. International Journal of Epidemiology 9:361–367
Greenland S, Poole C (1988) Invariants and noninvariants in the concept of interdependent effects. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 14:125–129
Greenland S, Robins JM (1985) Confounding and misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology 122:495–506
Greenland S, Robins JM (1986) Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. International Journal of Epidemiology 15:413–419
Greenland S, Robins JM (1991) Empirical-Bayes adjustments for multiple comparisons are sometimes useful. Epidemiology 2:244–251
Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM (1999a) Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10:37–48
Greenland S, Robins JM, Pearl J (1999b) Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Statistical Science 14:29–46
Greenland S, Schwartzbaum JA, Finkle WD (2000) Problems due to small samples and sparse data in conditional logistic regression analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 151:531–539
Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Mitchell AA (2002) Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation. American Journal of Epidemiology 155:176–184
Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM (2004) A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 15:615–625
Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic research. Principles and quantitative methods. Lifetime Learning Publication, Belmont, CA
Kogevinas M, Pearce N, Susser M, Boffetta P (1997) Social inequalities and cancer. IARC Scientific Publications No. 138, Lyon
Koopman JS (1977) Causal models and sources of interaction. American Journal of Epidemiology 106:439–444
Kriebel D, Zeka A, Eisen EA, Wegman DH (2004) Quantitative evaluation of the effects of uncontrolled confounding by alcohol and tobacco in occupational cancer studies. International Journal of Epidemiology 33:1–6
Kupper LL, Hogan MD (1978) Interaction in epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 108:447–453
Lash TL, Fink AK (2003) Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational epidemiologic data. Epidemiology 14:451–458
Maldonado G, Greenland S (1993) A simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. American Journal of Epidemiology 138:923–936
Marshall JR, Hastrup JL (1996) Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: uncorrelated errors. American Journal of Epidemiology 143:1069–1078
Marshall JR, Hastrup JL (1999) Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: correlated errors. American Journal of Epidemiology 150:88–96
Miettinen OS (1974) Confounding and effect-modification. American Journal of Epidemiology 100:350–353
Miettinen OS (1982) Causal and preventive interdependence. Elementary principles. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 8:159–168
Miettinen OS (1985) The “case-control” study: valid selection of subjects. Journal of Chronic Diseases 38:543–548
Miettinen OS, Cook EF (1981) Confounding: essence and detection. American Journal of Epidemiology 114:593–603
Moolgavkar SH, Venzon DJ (1987) General relative risk regression models for epidemiologic studies. [comment]. American Journal of Epidemiology 126:949–961
Pearce N (1988) Multistage modelling of lung cancer mortality in asbestos textile workers. International Journal of Epidemiology 17:747–752
Pearce N (1989) Analytical implications of epidemiological concepts of interaction. International Journal of Epidemiology 18:976–980
Pearce N, Checkoway H (1988) Case-control studiesusing other diseases as controls: problems of excluding exposure-related diseases. [comment]. American Journal of Epidemiology 127:851–856
Pearl J (2000) Causality: models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Phillips CV (2003) Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors. Epidemiology 14:459–466
Robins JM (1989) The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Statistics in Medicine 8:679–701
Robins JM (2001) Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference. Epidemiology 12:550–560
Robins JM, Greenland S (1992) Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 3:143–155
Robins JM, Greenland S (1994) Adjusting for differential rates of prophylaxis therapy for PCP in high-dose versus low-dose AZT treatment arms in an AIDS randomized trial. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89:737–749
Robins JM, Morgenstern H (1987) The foundations of confounding in epidemiology. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 14:869–916
Robins JM, Blevins D, Ritter G, Wulfsohn M (1992) G-estimation of the effect of prophylaxis therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia on the survival of AIDS patients. Epidemiology 3:319–336
Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560
Rothman KJ (1976) Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology 104:587–592
Rothman KJ (1978) Occam’s razor pares the choice among statistical models. American Journal of Epidemiology 108:347–349
Rothman KJ (1990) No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1:43–46
Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Walker AM (1980) Concepts of interaction. American Journal of Epidemiology 112:467–470
Saracci R (1987) The interactions of tobacco smoking and other agents in cancer etiology. Epidemiologic Reviews 9:175–193
Savitz DA, Baron EA (1989) Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology 129:1062–1071
Schlesselman JJ (1978) Assessing effects of confounding variables. American Journal of Epidemiology 99:3–8
Schlesselman JJ (1982) Case-control studies: design, conduct, analysis. Oxford University Press, New York
Selikoff IJ, Seidman H, Hammond EC (1980) Mortality effects of cigarette smoking among amosite asbestos factory workers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 65:507–513
Siemiatycki J, Thomas DC (1981) Biological models and statistical interactions: an example from multistage carcinogenesis. International Journal of Epidemiology 10:383–387
Siemiatycki J, Wacholder S, Dewar R, Wald L, Begin D, Richardson L, Rosenman K, Gerin M (1988) Smoking and degree of occupational exposure: are internal analyses in cohort studies likely to be confounded by smoking status? American Journal of Industrial Medicine 13:59–69
Sommer A, Zeger SL (1991) On estimating efficacy from clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 10:45–52
Steenland K, Thun M (1986) Interaction between tobacco smoking and occupational exposures in the causation of lung cancer. Journal of Occupational Medicine 28:110–118
Steenland K, Beaumont J, Halperin W (1984) Methods of control for smoking in occupational cohort mortality studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 10:143–149
Steenland K, Bray I, Greenland S, Boffetta P (2000) Empirical Bayes adjustments for multiple results in hypothesis-generating or surveillance studies. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 9:895–903
Thomas DC, Greenland S (1983) The relative efficiencies of matched and independent sample designs for case-control studies. Journal of Chronic Diseases 36:685–697
Thomas DC, Stram D, Dwyer J (1993) Exposure-measurement error: influence on exposure-disease relationships and methods of correction. Annual Review of Public Health 14:69–93
Walter SD, Holford TR (1978) Additive, multiplicative, and othermodels for disease risks. American Journal of Epidemiology 108:341–346
Weinberg CR (1993) Toward a clearer definition of confounding. American Journal of Epidemiology 137:1–8
Witte JS, Greenland S, Kim L-L, Arab L (2000) Multilevel modeling in epidemiology with GLIMMIX. Epidemiology 11:684–688
Yanagawa T (1984) Case-control studies: assessing the effects of a confounding factor. Biometrika 71:191–194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pearce, N., Greenland, S. (2005). Confounding and Interaction. In: Ahrens, W., Pigeot, I. (eds) Handbook of Epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-26577-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-26577-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00566-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26577-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)