Abstract
Hydrogenation reactions have a variety of applications in the chemical industry which is shown by the corresponding products, such as ammonia, methanol, and polyamides. In petrochemistry, the addition of hydrogen is used to adjust properties of product mixtures, e.g. in the hydrocracking or hydrotreating. For renewables, the same is already feasible or first proofs of concept were already shown. Therefore, hydrogenations indicate ways to increase the availability and enhance handling of products from natural resources. Heterogeneously catalysed hydrogenations with renewables are realised already in big scale, e.g. in the production of margarine or sorbitol.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
2.1 Introduction
Hydrogenation reactions have a variety of applications in the chemical industry which is shown by the corresponding products, such as ammonia, methanol, and polyamides. In petrochemistry, the addition of hydrogen is used to adjust properties of product mixtures, e.g. in the hydrocracking or hydrotreating. For renewables the same is already feasible or first proofs of concept were already shown. Therefore, hydrogenations indicate ways to increase the availability and enhance handling of products from natural resources. Heterogeneously catalysed hydrogenations with renewables are realised already in big scale, e.g. in the production of margarine or sorbitol.
In general, hydrogenation is the addition of hydrogen to C–C-, C–O-, C–N-, or N–O-multiple bonds. If the bond is broken, the reaction is referred to as hydrogenolysis [1]. Hydrogenation reactions are usually exothermic; therefore, low temperatures favour the reaction over its corresponding back reaction, which is dehydrogenation (Fig. 2.1).
Hydrogenations on industrial scale are mostly heterogeneously catalysed but lack of reactivity at mild reaction conditions or selectivity. Therefore, homogeneous catalysed hydrogenations are needed for more specialised reactions, which are required for the valorisation of renewables.
Common catalyst metals for homogeneous hydrogenations are platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, and ruthenium. But also non-precious metal systems as nickel, copper and other transition metals, such as molybdenum and cobalt have found applications in industrial processes. Frequently used homogeneous catalyst complexes in hydrogenation are as follows:
-
Wilkinson-type catalysts like RhCl(PPh3)3 and the corresponding ruthenium or iridium species
-
Hydride species like Rh(CO)2(PPh3)H
-
Chelate complexes with chiral ligands like the Binaphos (see Fig. 2.4)
-
Ru-Carbene complexes
-
Special pincer ligands have high activity in the hydrogenation of, for example, CO2.
The present chapter is structured by the substrates of hydrogenation. In the first part, CO2 as an inactive resource with carbon in a high oxidative state and with a low energy content as substrate is described. In this respect, homogeneous catalysts are able to gain valuable chemicals from this side product of burning or fermentation processes, e.g. methanol or formic acid.
The second part describes processing renewables, such as fatty acids and lignin via hydrogenation. These highly complex mixtures that contain various molecules and are oxygen rich compared to petrochemicals are defunctionalised or depolymerised via hydrogenation in order to gain more uniform blends.
2.2 Hydrogenations of Carbon Dioxide
Back in the 1980s, there were just a few research groups who dealt with the conversion of the “inactive” CO2 [2,3,4,5,6,7]. The flashlight on carbon dioxide utilisation was set during the climate discussion and the impact of carbon dioxide to the greenhouse effect. Numerous efforts were put in the development of catalysts to process CO2 as a chemical feedstock [8,9,10,11]. Beside this development, also photochemical and electrochemical reactions are in the statu nascendi with various materials from metal complexes, organic compounds, and transition metal electrodes [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The homogenously catalysed reduction of carbon dioxide focuses on formic acid and methanol as products. These C1- molecules can act as hydrogen storage, as these molecules are liquid at ambient conditions. While formic acid contains 4.4 wt% of hydrogen, methanol contains 12.6 wt%. The stored hydrogen preferably originates from the electrolysis of water using solar energy from where a lot of effort is invested lately [27, 30,31,32,33,34,35]. The synthesis of formic acid [36] formate salts [37, 38] or methanol [39, 40] is entropically disfavoured, wherefore different bases are applied in the formation of formic acid (Fig. 2.2). If water is used as solvent, the carbonate/bicarbonate equilibrium also plays a role in the hydrogenations. Calculations showed that hydrogenation of the bicarbonate to formates is exergonic [41].
The formation of formic acid (FA) and formate amine salts was numerously studied in the last years. Also systems of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation with one catalyst system were developed. The following Table 2.1 gives an overview on several catalyst systems.
First attempts to hydrogenate CO2 were already made by Inoue in 1976 by applying triphenylphosphine with Ru-, Ir-, and Rh-complexes in benzene. The solvents applied in this hydrogenation of CO2 play a crucial role for stabilising intermediate catalytic species. The Wilkinson complex has higher reaction rates in more polar solvents like methanol [43]. Also supercritical CO2 itself as solvent in its state is possible, wherein also hydrogen is highly soluble [47]. The group of Jessop reported a TOF up to 95.000 h−1 with RuCl2(OAc)(PMe3)4 as catalyst precursor with different amines and alcohols [48]. The role of these additives is still object of investigation, but it is reported that the formate generation needs a Lewis base, while the alcohol additive is proton donor.
The role of water in the solvent mixtures was investigated since faster reactions were reported if water was present [56]. Reactions in water were first shown in the early 1990 by Leitner with rhodium and sulfonated phosphine ligands (see Fig. 2.4), [57], and this concept was transferred to other ligands and metals [45, 49, 58,59,60,61]. TOFs of up to 9.600 h−1 were found with [RuCl2TPPMS2]2. Besides, the sulfonated ligands also water-soluble amine-based ligands were used [62,63,64,65]. Beller and Laurenczy showed that if [RuCl2(C6H6)]2 is used also simple phosphine ligands such as TPP can form an active catalyst system in an aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The ligand diphenylphosphinomethane DPPM showed TOFs of up to 1.260 h−1 but is fast deactivated. However, also phosphite ligands are reported [66].
The combination of ionic liquids (IL) and sulfonated ruthenium phosphine complexes was used to form a continuous operated process to gain pure formic acid under supercritical conditions (Fig. 2.3).
The optimisation of the process parameters was performed in a batch mode, especially the identification of the suitable IL. The 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIMCI) was selected while the anion HCO2 − showed the highest activity under continuous conditions. The extraction of the formic acid was the limiting factor of this system [67].
The group of Hicks established another concept of catalyst recycle by the immobilisation of Ir-complexes on mesoporous silica tethered surfaces. These concepts give a TON of 2800 after 20 h [68]. Laurenczy proved with the [RuCl2(PTA)4] (see Fig. 2.4) the stability of the complex by producing FA without base under mild conditions. This system was recycled four times showing a constant activity [69].
Another step to a commercial hydrogenation of carbon dioxide is the use of non-precious metals as catalyst metal due to their lower cost. These opportunities were investigated by Beller with Co-precursors and PP3 (see Fig. 2.4) as ligand which yield a TON of over 3.500 [70]. If very strong bases like the Verkade base are applied with 2 MPa CO2/H2, a TOF of 74.000 h−1 was achieved [71]. Also Fe complexes show activity in the hydrogenation with TONs of up to 7.500 [72].
Pincer ligands (see Fig. 2.5) are another highly promising aspect of hydrogenation of CO2 since Nozaki reported on the trihydride iridium species with the PNP-pincer ligand (2,6-bis(diisopropylphosphinomethyl)pyridine) which showed the highest reported TOF (150.000 h−1) and TON (3.5 mio after 48 h) at a temperature of 200 °C and 8 MPa in THF/water [51, 52]. In the following, also, other air-stable pincer ligands with lower activities were reported [73] and pincer ligands which use Fe as a catalyst metal [74]. Pidko reported on a Ru-based pincer catalyst which increases the TOF to 1.100.000 h−1 in a DMF/DBU system [54].
Like in other filed of homogeneous catalysis, N-heterocyclic carbenes were applied also in this field. The electron-donating ligands [75] showed with iridium TONs of up to 190.000 at 200 °C and 6 MPa in 75 h [76, 77].
Only a few examples of N,N- or N,C-Ligands were reported so far [78,79,80]. These complexes are highly pH sensitive in respect of activity and solubility. The iridium-4DHBP catalyst complex [Cp*Ir-(4DHBP)Cl]Cl can be attributed to TOF of 42,000 h−1 and TON of 190,000 at 120 °C and 6 MPa. Noteworthy is activity of the catalyst at ambient temperature and pressure with the TOF of 7 h−1. The pH switch can also be used as a trigger to precipitate such catalyst complexes in order to recycle them [81, 82]. While [Cp*Ir(4DHBP)(OH2)]2+ is still soluble in the water phase (1 ppm) even at optimised pH conditions, [Cp*Ir(DHPT)(Cl)]+ has a very low solubility in the product mixture of acidic FA/formate solution in a pH range of 4–7 (lowest concentration at pH 5 with 100 ppb). The filtration of the catalyst had an efficiency of 91% after three runs, and the activity was retained over these recycling runs [55].
2.2.1 Interconversion of CO2/Formic Acid as Hydrogen Storage
In order to use the hydrogenation of CO2 as liquid hydrogen storage not only the reaction to formic acid (FA) is important, but also the dehydrogenation of FA plays an important role [83, 84]. The concept of interconversion with one catalyst system was first realised by Leitner who used a Rh/DPPB catalyst system in a FA/NEt3/acetone mixture in order to gain a hydrogenation TOF of 54 h−1 and a dehydrogenation TOF of 40 h−1 [85]. The very effective NPN Pincer iridium catalyst system for the hydrogenation is not active in the dehydrogenation [52]. If other additives like triethanolamine or NaOH are used, TOFs of up to 1.000 h−1 were observed for the dehydrogenation (Fig. 2.6).
The systems can be switched from hydrogenation to dehydrogenation by temperature and pressure [86, 87] or pH value [88]. Olah and co-workers presented a temperature controlled reversible hydrogen storage system in which a Ru pincer complex catalysed the hydrogenation of CO2 in a water/THF system at 70–85 °C and 4–8 MPa. The dehydrogenation is executed at 69 °C with the same catalyst complex. The recovery of the formed FA was completed after 4.5 h with 90% yield and could be repeated for six times with a total TON of 11.500.
The pH-controlled system is using the circumstance that at high pH values the hydrogenation is favoured while at low pH the dehydrogenation is faster (Fig. 2.7). This behaviour was shown with the [(Cp*IrCl)2(THBPM)]2+ complex which is active at ambient conditions with a TOF of 70 h−1 towards the FA and a TOF for the dehydrogenation of 228.000 h−1 at 90 °C and low pH value. This cycle was repeated twice by adding acid or base to the system, respectively.
2.2.2 Methanol
The hydrogenation of formic acid, urea, or CO2 can also be used to yield methanol in a more sustainable fashion in comparison with the route via syngas, which is gained from the partial oxidation of naphtha or steam reforming of methane. The examples to use homogeneous catalysis in this case are rare, but these examples are qualified by high efficiency.
For urea derivatives, organic carbonates, carbamates, and formates as products from carbon dioxide, Milstein showed that a PNN-Ru(II) pincer complexes [Ru(P7)(H)-(CO)] and [Ru(P11)(H)(CO)] produce methanol under mild conditions [89]. The high TON of 4.400 for the substrate dimethyl carbonate at 5 MPa, H2 at 110 °C, is a promising example on the indirect hydrogenation [89].
The use of the above-described FA route in combination with the followed disproportionation of FA yields methanol [90] (Fig. 2.8). After the first investigation with iridium catalysts [90], Cantat reported a significantly improved precursor [Ru(cod)(methylallyl)2], with triphos (CH3C(CH2PPh2)3) as ligand and MSA (methanesulfonic acid) as catalytic system [91].
The direct hydrogenation of CO2 without any intermediates is also part of the efforts of the academic community. At first, a tandem reaction was designed consisting of three steps: hydrogenation of CO2 to FA (a); esterification to the formate ester (b); hydrogenation of the formate ester to methanol (c) [92]. The total TON for the whole cascade reaction was 2.5 in respect of methanol in a one-pot reaction (Fig. 2.9).
The direct hydrogenation of CO2 was initially shown by the Leitner group while the hydrogenation to methanol is conducted within one catalytic cycle (Fig. 2.10).
The ligand triphos is the game-changer in this synthesis and in cooperation with the additives gives a TON for the ruthenium complex of 603. The activity of this catalyst system is comparable to the heterogeneous catalyst systems.
2.3 Lignin
As lignin is a complex three-dimensional amorphous polymer that consists of methoxylated phenylpropanoids (see Chap. 1.3.4), it is a hard task to generate valuable chemical products or products blends [93]. Since lignin is the only widespread renewable with aromatic moieties, several approaches were made to depolymerise lignin as alternative to the petrochemically produced aromatics [94, 95]. Hydrotreating is one possibility to produce chemicals with low molecular weight from lignin. These processes are also named hydrodeoxygenation, hydrogenation, and hydrogenolysis depending on the molecular structure to be cleaved. The monomers from lignin are usually linked by ether or by C–C bonds. The majority of almost two-thirds or more are ether bonds. The review of Zhang beautifully shows differences of the linkages (Fig. 2.11) [96].
The big challenge in the valorisation of lignin is the different linkages of the polymeric structure and the big variety of the compositions of lignin depending on plant type, part of the plant, etc. [97, 98].
The homogeneous-based systems for hydrogenation of lignin compounds are relatively rare in comparison with the heterogeneous catalyst systems [99]. Table 2.2 shows recent examples of homogeneous catalysts with model substrates. Only few catalyst systems are ready to work with processed lignin from, e.g., the Kraft process.
Hu hydrogenated lignin model compounds such as 4-propylphenol, eugenol, 1,2-dimethoxy-4-propylbenzene, and 2,6-dimethoxy-4-propylphenol at 298 K with a di-μ-chlorobis(η4-1,5-hexadiene)-dirhodium(I) complex. In a solvent system of hexane/water, mostly double bond and the aromatic rings were hydrogenated. This reactivity is not beneficial due to the point that no cleavage has occurred and hydrogen has been consumed. Further examples used other model substrates, such as phenol, anisole, and anthracene [102,103,104,105, 108, 109].
The group of Nagy used besides Raney Ni, Pt/C, and NaBH4/I2 also the homogeneous hydrogenation catalyst Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 in the hydrogenation of organosolv lignin in order to significantly reduce the molecular weight of the lignin. This catalyst was able to cleave 4-O-5- and aryl-O-aliphatic linkages to decrease oxygen content in the product mixture [106].
Nickel complexes with a N-heterocyclic carbene (SIPr·HCl) and NaOtBu as an additive are also active in the hydrogenolysis of diaryl ethers [107]. At 0.1 MPa, H2 yields of 54–99% for the corresponding phenols and arenes were reported by Hartwig. The cleavage activity for aromatic C–O bonds of this system is in the order of Ar–OAr ≫ Ar–OMe > ArCH2–OMe. Comparable heterogeneous Ni catalyst showed different selectivities to the diol instead of the phenol (Fig. 2.12) [110].
The group of Marks developed a nice way to process aliphatic ethers or furans with a tandem strategy of homogenous and heterogeneous catalysis. The homogeneous catalyst is a transition metal triflate that decyclises the C–O bond in the furan while the supported Pd nanoparticle catalyst hydrogenates the resulting double bond. This reaction is conducted in a stabilising IL and yields linear alcohols with no loss of any aromaticity (Fig. 2.13) [111, 112].
These reactivities are dedicated to cleave β-O-4 ethanol aryl ethers and do not affect the aromatic rings in the substrates [113, 114]. Popular catalyst systems are Ru(Cl)2(PPh3)3, RuH2(CO)(PPh3)3, and Ru-Xantphos, as shown in Fig. 2.14.
A new reactivity was lately shown by Leitner by addressing the C–C Bond in β-O-4-linked molecules. The Ru triphos complex showed again, as already shown in the CO2 hydrogenation, a unique reactivity (Fig. 2.15) [115].
Different substrates were applied with high selectivities for the cleavage of the C-C bonds. These developments show the possibility to address several linkages in lignin by homogeneous catalysis.
2.4 Sugars
The conversion of cellulose, starch, or the corresponding oligo- and mono-sugars by hydrogenation with homogeneous catalysts is rarely reported. Hydrogenation of carbohydrates can be divided into the conversion of polymers into degraded products or monomers and further processed derivatives like HMF. The depolymerisation of cellulose is acid catalysed hydrogenolysis to fermentable sugars [116]. For the conversion of mono-sugars such as glucose in big scale processes to yield, e.g. the sweetener sorbitol, heterogeneous catalyst are used.
An example using homogeneous catalysis for depolymerisation was shown by Jiang to yield alcohols by applying 80–120 bar hydrogen with nickel salts. The intermediates glucose and xylose were hydrogenated in one pot to sorbitol and xylitol in yields up to 87.9% [117] (Fig. 2.16).
Furthermore, homogeneous reactions with platform intermediates from sugar are reported, as like HMF [118] to caprolactam. Also fragrances and pharmaceuticals can be synthesised incorporating homogenous catalysis [119].
2.5 Fats
The hydrogenation of unsaturated fats and oils is a well-established process in oleo chemistry and is called “hardening”. This process is used in the nutrition industry for producing margarine. Liquid unsaturated oils are converted into their corresponding saturated fats. The common catalyst for this process is Raney nickel, while some processes also use palladium particles [1]. A more challenging transformation is the selective conversion of polyunsaturated fatty acids into mono-unsaturated compounds (Fig. 2.17).
These reactions are catalysed by palladium carbonyls, platinum-tin systems, iron, and cobalt or nickel salts, which are activated by triethylaluminium [120,121,122,123]. Good results are observed with precious metal phosphine catalyst, for example, Wilkinson’s catalyst [124]. High conversions of linoleic esters can be easily obtained with a palladium nanocatalyst. The catalytically active nanoparticles (diameter: 4 nm) are obtained by reducing palladium dichloride with hydrogen in DMF or propylene carbonate and an aqueous buffer. Sunflower oil with a linoleic acid content of 70% is converted into 92% oleic acid with no detectable content of linoleic acid. These palladium nanoparticles are also suitable for recycling using a liquid/liquid technique [125,126,127].
2.6 Conclusions
In conclusion, the hydrogenation of renewables with homogeneous catalyst addresses several points for future greener chemistry. The upgrade of raw renewable polymers such as lignin or sugars is of high importance to use more of these good available feedstocks. Furthermore also defined high value molecules can be yielded by hydrogenation of the renewables. Specially, the hydrogenation of CO2 will gain more importance in the future as possible energy storage or as starting point for C1-building blocks.
References
Sanfilippo D, Rylander PN (2000) Hydrogenation dehydrogenation. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag
Aresta M, Forti G (1987) Carbon dioxide as a source of carbon—biochemical and chemical uses. D. Reidel Publ, Dordrecht
Inoue S, Yamazaki Y (1982) Organic and bioorganic chemistry of carbon dioxide. Kodansha, Tokyo
Behr A (1987) Chem Eng Technol 10:16–27
Behr A (1988) Angew Chem 100:681–698
Behr A (1988) Carbon dioxide activation by metal complexes. VCH-Verlag, Weinheim, New York
Klankermayer J, Wesselbaum S, Beydoun K, Leitner W (2016) Angew Chem 55:7296–7343
Appel AM, Bercaw JE, Bocarsly AB, Dobbek H, DuBois DL, Dupuis M, Ferry JG, Fujita E, Hille R, Kenis PJA et al (2013) Chem Rev 113:6621–6658
Tsuji Y, Fujihara T (2012) Chem Commun 48:9956–9964
Behr A, Neuberg S (2009) Erdöl Erdgas Kohle 125:367–374
Aresta M (2010) Carbon dioxide as a chemical feedstock. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Benson EE, Kubiak CP, Sathrum AJ, Smieja JM (2009) Chem Soc Rev 38:89–99
Hori Y (2008) Mod Asp Electrochem 89–189
Morris AJ, Meyer GJ, Fujita E (2009) Acc Chem Res 42:1983–1994
Rakowski Dubois M, Dubois DL (2009) Acc Chem Res 42:1974–1982
Doherty MD, Grills DC, Muckerman JT, Polyansky DE, Fujita E (2010) Coord Chem Rev 254:2472–2482
Takeda H, Ishitani O (2010) Coord Chem Rev 254:346–354
Takeda H, Koike K, Morimoto T, Inumaru H, Ishitani O (2011) Inorg Photochem (eds.: van Eldik R, Stochel G), Academic Press, pp 137–186
Schneider J, Jia H, Muckerman JT, Fujita E (2012) Chem Soc Rev 41:2036
Tamaki Y, Morimoto T, Koike K, Ishitani O (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:15673–15678
Izumi Y (2013) Coord Chem Rev 257:171–186
Navalón S, Dhakshinamoorthy A, Álvaro M, Garcia H (2013) ChemSusChem 6:562–577
Costentin C, Robert M, Savéant J-M (2013) Chem Soc Rev 42:2423–2436
Clark ML, Grice KA, Moore CE, Rheingold AL, Kubiak CP (1894) Chem Sci 2014:5
Protti S, Albini A, Serpone N (2014) Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:19790–19827
Das S, Wan Daud WMA (2014) Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:765–805
Oh Y, Hu X (2013) Chem Soc Rev 42:2253–2261
Lu X, Leung DYC, Wang H, Leung MKH, Xuan J (2014) ChemElectroChem 1:836–849
Manbeck GF, Fujita EA (2015) J Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 19:45–64
Fujita E, Furenlid LR, Renner MW (1997) J Am Chem Soc 119:4549–4550
DiMeglio JL, Rosenthal J (2013) J Am Chem Soc 135:8798–8801
Costentin C, Passard G, Robert M, Savéant JM (2014) J Am Chem Soc 136:11821–11829
Rosen BA, Salehi-Khojin A, Thorson MR, Zhu W, Whipple DT, Kenis PJA, Masel RI (2011) Science 334:643–645
Grills DC, Matsubara Y, Kuwahara Y, Golisz SR, Kurtz DA, Mello BA (2014) J Phys Chem Lett 5:2033–2038
Costentin C, Drouet S, Robert M, Saveant JMA (2012) Science 338:90–94
Jessop PG, Iktariya T, Noyori R (1995) Chem Rev 95:259–272
Himeda Y (2007) Eur J Inorg Chem 3927–3941
Jessop PG, Joó F, Tai CC (2004) Coord Chem Rev 248:2425–2442
Li Y-N, Ma R, He L-N, Diao Z-F (2014) Catal Sci Technol 4:1498
Choudhury J (2012) ChemCatChem 4:609–611
Kovács G, Schubert G, Joó F, Pápai I (2006) Catal Today 115:53–60
Inoue Y, Izumida H, Sasaki Y, Hashimoto H (1976) Chem Lett 5:863–864
Ezhova NN, Kolesnichenko NV, Bulygin AV, Slivinskii EV, Han S (2002) Russ Chem Bull Int Ed 51:2165–2169
Graf E, Leitner W (1992) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 623–624
Leitner W, Dinjus E, Gassner F (1998) Aqueous-Phase Organomet Catal Concepts Appl Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 486–498
Jessop PG (2007) Handbook homogeneous hydrogenation (De Vries JG, Elsevier CJ, eds). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 489–511
Jessop PG, Ikariya T, Noyori R (1994) Nature 368:231–233
Munshi P, Main AD, Linehan JC, Tai CC, Jessop PG (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:7963–7971
Elek JJ, Nádasdi L, Papp G, Laurenczy G, Joó F (2003) Appl Catal A 255:59–67
Federsel C, Boddien A, Jackstell R, Jennerjahn R, Dyson PJ, Scopelliti R, Laurenczy G, Beller M (2010) Angew Chem Int Ed 49:9777–9780
Tanaka R, Yamashita M, Nozaki K (2009) J Am Chem Soc 131:14168–14169
Tanaka R, Yamashita M, Chung LW, Morokuma K, Nozaki K (2011) Organometallics 30:6742–6750
Filonenko GA, Hensen EJM, Pidko EA (2014) Catal Sci Technol 4:3474–3485
Filonenko GA, van Putten R, Schulpen EN, Hensen EJ, Pidko EAM (2014) ChemCatChem 6:1526–1530
Himeda Y, Onozawa-Komatsuzaki N, Sugihara H, Kasuga K (2007) Organometallics 26:702–712
Tsai JC, Nicholas KM (1992) J Am Chem Soc 114:5117–5124
Gassner F, Leitner W (1993) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1465–1466
Jószai I, Joó F (2004) J Mol Catal A Chem 224:87–91
Kathó Á, Opre Z, Laurenczy G, Joó F (2003) J Mol Catal A Chem 204–205:143–148
Joó F, Laurenczy G, Karády P, Elek J, Nádasdi L, Roulet R (2000) Appl Organomet Chem 14:857–859
Joó F, Laurenczy G, Nadasdi L, Elek J (1999) Chem Commun 971–972
Laurenczy G, Joo F, Nadasdi L (2000) Inorg Chem 39:5083–5088
Horváth H, Laurenczy G, Kathó Á (2004) J Organomet Chem 689:1036–1045
Erlandsson M, Landaeta VR, Gonsalvi L, Peruzzini M, Phillips AD, Dyson PJ, Laurenczy G (2008) Eur J Inorg Chem 2008:620–627
Laurenczy G, Jedner S, Alessio E, Dyson PJ (2007) Inorg Chem Commun 10:558–562
Muller K, Sun Y, Thiel WR (2013) ChemCatChem 5:1340–1343
Wesselbaum S, Hintermair U, Leitner W (2012) Angew Chem Int Ed 51:8585–8588
Xu Z, McNamara ND, Neumann GT, Schneider WF, Hicks JC (2013) ChemCatChem 5:1769–1771
Moret S, Dyson PJ, Laurénczy G (2014) Nat Commun 5:4017
Federsel C, Ziebart C, Jackstell R, Baumann W, Beller M (2012) Chem A Eur J 18:72–75
Kisanga PB, Verkade JG, Schwesinger R (2000) J Org Chem 65:5431–5432
Ziebart C, Federsel C, Anbarasan P, Jackstell R, Baumann W, Spannenberg A, Beller M (2012) J Am Chem Soc 134:20701–20704
Schmeier TJ, Dobereiner GE, Crabtree RH, Hazari N (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:9274–9277
Langer R, Diskin-Posner Y, Leitus G, Shimon LJW, Ben-David Y, Milstein D (2011) Angew Chem Int Ed 50:9948–9952
Sanz S, Azua A, Peris E (2010) Dalton Trans 39:6339–6343
Azua A, Sanz S, Peris E (2011) Chem A Eur J 17:3963–3967
Sanz S, Benítez M, Peris E (2010) Organometallics 29:275–277
Bolinger CM, Sullivan BP, Conrad D, Gilbert JA, Story N, Meyer TJ (1985) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 796–797
Hayashi H, Ogo S, Abura T, Fukuzumi S (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:14266–14267
Wang WH, Ertem MZ, Xu S, Onishi N, Manaka Y, Suna Y, Kambayashi H, Muckerman JT, Fujita E, Himeda Y (2015) ACS Catal 5:5496–5504
Zuwei X, Ning Z, Yu S, Kunlan L (2001) Science 292:1139–1141
Wang W, Zhang G, Lang R, Xia C, Li F (2013) Green Chem 15:635
Williams R, Crandall RS, Bloom A (1978) Appl Phys Lett 33:381–383
Bi QY, Lin JD, Liu YM, Du XL, Wang JQ, He HY, Cao Y (2014) Angew Chem Int Ed 53:13583–13587
Leitner W, Dinjus E, Gassner F (1994) J Organomet Chem 475:257–266
Hsu SF, Rommel S, Eversfield P, Muller K, Klemm E, Thiel WR, Plietker B (2014) Angew Chem Int Ed 53:7074–7078
Enthaler S, Brück A, Kammer A, Junge H, Irran E, Gülak S (2015) ChemCatChem 7:65–69
Maenaka Y, Suenobu T, Fukuzumi S (2012) Energy Environ Sci 5:7360
Balaraman E, Gunanathan C, Zhang J, Shimon LJW, Milstein D (2011) Nat Chem 3:609–614
Miller AJM, Heinekey DM, Mayer JM, Goldberg KI (2013) Angew Chem Int Ed 52:3981–3984
Savourey S, Lefèvre G, Berthet JC, Thuéry P, Genre C, Cantat T (2014) Angew Chem Int Ed 53:10466–10470
Huff CA, Sanford MS (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:18122–18125
Achyuthan KE, Achyuthan AM, Adams PD, Dirk SM, Harper JC, Simmons BA, Singh AK (2010) Molecules 15:8641–8688
Holladay JE, White JF, Bozell JJ, Johnson D (2007) Top value-added chemicals from biomass—volume II results of screening for potential candidates from biorefinery lignin, Richland, WA
Gasser CA, Hommes G, Schäffer A, Corvini PFX (2012) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:1115–1134
Li C, Zhao X, Wang A, Huber GW, Zhang T (2015) Chem Rev 115:11559–11624
Stewart D (2008) Ind Crops Prod 27:202–207
Calvo-Flores FG, Dobado JA (2010) ChemSusChem 3:1227–1235
Zakzeski J, Bruijnincx PCA, Jongerius AL, Weckhuysen BM (2010) Chem Rev 110:3552–3599
Januszkiewicz KR, Alper H (1983) Organometallics 2:1055–1057
Nasar K, Fache F, Lemaire M, Béziat J-C, Besson M, Gallezot P (1994) J Mol Catal 87:107–115
Hu TQ, James BR, Rettig SJ, Lee C-L (1997) Can J Chem 75:1234–1239
Lamping AE, Guo X, Rempel GL (1994) J Mol Catal 87:75–93
Plasseraud L, Süss-Fink G (1997) J Organomet Chem 539:163–170
Zhao C, Wang HZ, Yan N, Xiao CX, Mu XD, Dyson PJ, Kou Y (2007) J Catal 250:33–40
Nagy M, David K, Britovsek GJP, Ragauskas AJ (2009) Holzforschung 63:513–520
Sergeev AG, Hartwig JF (2011) Science 332:439–443
Schulz J, Roucoux A, Patin H (2000) Chemistry 6:618–624
Suárez T, Guzmán A, Fontal B, Reyes M, Bellandi F, Contreras RR, Cancines P, León G, Rojas L (2006) Transit Met Chem 31:176–180
Sergeev AG, Webb JD, Hartwig JF (2012) J Am Chem Soc 134:20226–20229
Atesin AC, Ray NA, Stair PC, Marks TJ (2012) J Am Chem Soc 134:14682–14685
Li Z, Assary RS, Atesin AC, Curtiss LA, Marks TJ (2014) J Am Chem Soc 136:104–107
Nichols JM, Bishop LM, Bergman RG, Ellman JA (2010) J Am Chem Soc 132:12554–12555
Wu A, Patrick BO, Chung E, James BR (2012) Dalton Trans 41:11093
vom Stein T, den Hartog T, Buendia J, Stoychev S, Mottweiler J, Bolm C, Klankermayer J, Leitner W (2015) Angew Chem Int Ed 54:5859–5863
Huang Y-B, Fu Y (1095) Green Chem 2013:15
Jiang C (2014) Cellul Chem Technol 48:75–78
van Putten RJ, van der Waal JC, De Jong E, Rasrendra CB, Heeres HJ, De Vries JG (2013) Chem Rev 113:1499–1597
Shao X, Li Z, Qian X, Xu X (2009) J Agric Food Chem 57:951–957
Ahmad MM, Priestley TM, Winterbottom JM (1979) J Am Oil Chem Soc 56:571–577
Fedeli E, Jacini G (1976) Fette, Seifen, Anstrichm 78:30–34
Koritala S (1985) J Am Oil Chem Soc 62:517–520
Filip V, Zajic J (1987) Fat Sci Technol 89:220–224
Bland WJ, Dine TC, Jobanputra RN, Shone GG (1984) J Am Oil Chem Soc 61:924–928
Behr A, Döring N, Kozik C, Schmidtke H, Durowicz S (1991) Preparation of unsaturated fatty acids or derivatives by catalytic hydrogenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids or derivatives, DE4012873A1
Behr A, Lux A (2014) Chem Ing Tech 86:1933–1940
Behr A, Döring N, Durowicz-Heil S, Ellenberg B, Kozik C, Lohr C, Schmidke H (1993) Fat Sci Technol 95:2–12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vorholt, A.J., Behr, A. (2017). Hydrogenation of Renewables. In: Homogeneous Catalysis with Renewables. Catalysis by Metal Complexes, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54161-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54161-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54159-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54161-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)