Abstract
Bacteria in the genus Brucella are important human and veterinary pathogens, and they require a variety of metals to support their physiology and metabolism. Mammals employ both metal limitation and metal intoxication as defenses against invading pathogens, and correspondingly the metal acquisition and detoxification systems of Brucella strains play essential roles in their virulence.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1.1 Brucella
The genus Brucella currently consists of 11 recognized species of Gram-negative bacteria. Five of these—B. melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis, B. canis and B. ovis—are important veterinary and human pathogens. Molecular studies have shown that all Brucella strains are closely related at the genetic level. The separate ‘species’ designations have been retained, however, because these bacteria can be subdivided into distinct phenotypic groups (e.g., species and biovars within these species) that display different host specificities and virulence properties. These distinctions are important for understanding the epidemiology and pathogenesis of Brucella infections (reviewed in Whatmore 2009).
1.1.1 B. melitensis, B. abortus and B. suis
Brucella melitensis, B. abortus and B. suis cause abortion and infertility in goats and sheep, cattle, and swine, respectively (Atluri et al. 2011). These bacteria are highly infectious in their natural hosts where they can produce chronic, often life-long infections. Agricultural communities worldwide devote tremendous resources annually to prevent and control food animal brucellosis (Godfroid et al. 2014). B. melitensis, B. abortus and B. suis can also be readily transmitted to humans via the consumption of unpasteurized dairy products or direct contact with infected animals, where they produce a serious, chronic debilitating febrile disease (Fig. 1.1). Human brucellosis represents a major public health problem in areas of the world where the disease is not effectively controlled in food animals, and in fact, this disease is considered to be one of the world’s leading zoonotic infections (Pappas et al. 2006).
B. melitensis, B. suis and B. abortus strains also have characteristics that make them attractive as agents of biowarfare or bioterrorism (Valderas and Roop 2006). Specifically, they have low infectious doses via the aerosol route, the disease they produce in humans is difficult to treat with antibiotics, and there is no vaccine that can be safely and effectively used to prevent human brucellosis. Historically, B. melitensis and B. suis strains were included in the bioweapons arsenals of several countries before the global movement to ban the use of these weapons in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Today, many countries still tightly regulate the possession of B. melitensis, B. suis and B. abortus strains due to their potential use in bioterrorism.
1.1.2 B. canis and B. ovis
B. canis causes abortion and infertility in dogs, and canine brucellosis is a serious concern in kennels (Wanke 2004). This bacterium can also be transmitted from dogs to humans as a zoonotic agent (Fig. 1.1). Although the reported incidence of human disease caused by B. canis is low compared to that caused by B. melitensis, B. abortus and B. suis, it has been proposed that many human B. canis infections likely go unrecognized (Krueger et al. 2014). B. ovis causes epididymitis is sheep and is an important cause of infertility in rams worldwide (Gouletsou and Fthenakis 2015), but these strains are not known to cause human disease.
1.1.3 Other Brucella Species
Limited information is available regarding the importance of the remaining Brucella species as pathogens. B. microti, for instance, produces severe and sometimes fatal disease in both wild rodents (Hubálek et al. 2007) and experimentally infected mice (Jiménez de Bagüés et al. 2010), and was recently isolated from a wild boar (Rónai et al. 2015). But it is unclear how common and widespread B. microti infections are in wild rodents (Hammerl et al. 2015) or other wildlife, and disease in humans or domestic animals associated with this strain has not been reported. Similarly, although B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis strains are routinely isolated from marine mammals (Foster et al. 2007), overt clinical signs appear to be uncommon in the animals from which these strains are isolated (Nymo et al. 2011; Guzmán-Verri et al. 2012). B. ceti strains, have however, been isolated from a limited number of human infections (reviewed in Whatmore et al. 2008), suggesting that these strains have the potential to be zoonotic pathogens. Information regarding the prevalence, natural host range, pathogenicity and zoonotic potential of B. neotomae (Stoenner and Lackman 1957), B. inopinata (Scholz et al. 2010), B. papionis (Whatmore et al. 2014) and B. vulpis (Scholz et al. 2016) is even more limited, since only a few isolates of these strains have been characterized.
1.2 Biological Functions of Metals and the Importance of Metal Homeostasis in Living Cells
Copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), magnesium (Mg), nickel (Ni) and cobalt (Co) serve as important micronutrients for living cells. It has been estimated that approximately 50% of all enzymes, and 1/4–1/3 of proteins in general, require metal co-factors for their activity (Waldron et al. 2009). Metals can play either catalytic or structural roles in protein function. Zn in the active site of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase, for instance, directly participates in the interconversion of CO2 and HCO3 −, a reaction that maintains cytoplasmic pH balance in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (Supuran and Scozzafava 2007). The interaction of specific amino acid residues with Zn also coordinates the proper folding of the large family of eukaryotic proteins known as ‘Zn finger’ proteins (Klug 2010) which perform a variety of different biological functions. The redox activities of Fe and Cu make proteins containing these metals essential components of electron transport chains (Liu et al. 2014), and the Fe incorporated in heme plays a critical role in O2 transport in mammals (Fujiwara and Harigae 2015).
Despite the fact that they are essential micronutrients, metals can also be toxic when their levels exceed those required to meet the physiologic needs of the cell (Summers 2009). To prevent metal toxicity, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms have evolved finely-tuned homeostasis systems that tightly control the intracellular levels of metals (Waldron and Robinson 2009; Foster et al. 2014). These systems are typically comprised of metal importers and exporters, metal chaperones, and metal storage and detoxification proteins, and the expression of the genes that encode these proteins is tightly regulated in response to cellular metal levels. Metal toxicity occurs primarily for two reasons. First, the affinity of metals for proteins follows a scale known as the Irving-Williams series, with Cu and Zn having the highest affinity and Mg having the lowest (Waldron and Robinson 2009), and the intracellular levels of the high affinity metals must be maintained at lower levels that those of the lower affinity metals to avoid the higher affinity metals displacing the lower affinity metals in proteins or enzymes where the latter are essential for protein function, or dedicated metallochaperones must be in place to ensure that proteins acquire the proper metal. As shown in Fig. 1.2, these metal homeostasis systems ‘buffer’ the intracellular levels of the individual metals to ensure that their concentrations are inversely proportionate to their potential toxicity (Foster et al. 2014). The second reason for metal toxicity is that Fe reacts with reactive oxygen species such as the superoxide ion (O2 −) to form highly reactive hydroxyl radicals which can damage proteins, nucleic acids and lipids (Imlay 2013). Consequently, Fe homeostasis systems also play important roles in oxidative defense, and the genes that encode the components of these homeostasis systems are often responsive to oxidative stress in addition to their regulation in response to cellular levels of the corresponding metal (Faulkner and Helmann 2011).
1.3 Metal Homeostasis in Brucella Strains
Early studies of the nutritional requirements of Brucella strains during in vitro cultivation determined that Fe and Mg were essential micronutrients (Gerhardt 1958). Because it is very difficult to remove contaminating metals from media components and culture vessels, however, these earlier studies underestimated the importance of other metals in the physiology of these bacteria. More recent studies employing genetically defined mutants and genome analysis have not only confirmed the importance of Fe and Mg as micronutrients for Brucella strains, but have also shown that Mn, Zn, Cu, Ni and Co play critical roles in their basic physiology (Roop et al. 2012).
Brucella strains live in close association with their mammalian hosts (Roop et al. 2009), where they reside predominantly as intracellular pathogens. Their capacity to survive and replicate in host macrophages underlies their ability to cause chronic infections, and their extensive intracellular replication in placental trophoblasts plays an important role in their capacity to induce abortion in their natural hosts. Mammals not only tightly control the levels of metals in their tissues to avoid toxicity, but they also employ Fe, Mn and Zn deprivation and Cu intoxication as mechanisms to limit the replication of microbial pathogens (Hood and Skaar 2012) (Fig. 1.3). It is also notable in this regard that one of the important roles that placental trophoblasts play during pregnancy is to provide Fe from the maternal circulation to the developing fetus (Carter 2012; de Oliveira et al. 2012). Thus, it is not surprising that metal homeostasis systems have been shown to play critical roles in the virulence of Brucella strains in both experimental and natural hosts (Roop 2012). The following chapters will review the information that is currently available regarding the role that metal homeostasis plays in the biology and virulence of Brucella strains.
References
Atluri VL, Xavier MN, de Jong MF, den Hartigh AB, Tsolis RM (2011) Interactions of the human pathogenic Brucella species with their hosts. Ann Rev Microbiol 65:523–541
Carter AM (2012) Evolution of placental function in mammals: the molecular basis of gas and nutrient transfer, hormone secretion, and immune responses. Physiol Rev 92:1543–1576
De BK, Stauffer L, Koylass MS, Sharp SE, Gee JE, Helsel LO, Steigerwalt AG, Vega R, Clark TA, Daneshvar MI, Wilkins PP, Whatmore AM (2008) Novel Brucella strain (B01) associated with a prosthetic breast implant infection. J Clin Microbiol 46:43–49
de Oliveira CM, Rodrigues MN, Miglino MA (2012) Iron transportation across the placenta. An Acad Bras Cienc 84:1115–1120
Faulkner MJ, Helmann JD (2011) Peroxide stress elicits adaptive changes in bacterial metal ion homeostasis. Antioxid Redox Signal 15:175–189
Foster G, Osterman BS, Godfroid J, Jacques I, Cloeckaert A (2007) Brucella ceti sp nov. and Brucella pinnipedialis sp. nov. for Brucella strains with cetaceans and seals as their preferred hosts. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2688–2693
Foster AW, Osman D, Robinson NJ (2014) Metal preferences and metallation. J Biol Chem Chem 289:28095–28103
Fujiwara T, Harigae H (2015) Biology of heme in mammalian erythroid cells and related disorders. BioMed Res Int 2015:e278536
Gerhardt P (1958) The nutrition of brucellae. Microbiol Rev 22:81–98
Godfroid J, De Bolle X, Roop RM II, O’Callaghan D, Tsolis RM, Baldwin C, Santos RL, McGiven J, Olsen S, Nymo IH, Larsen A, Al Dahouk S, Letesson JJ (2014) The quest for a true One Health perspective of brucellosis. Rev Sci Tech 33:521–538
Gouletsou PG, Fthenakis GC (2015) Microbial diseases of the genital tract of rams or bucks. Vet Microbiol 181:130–135
Guzmán-Verri C, González-Barrientos R, Hernández-Mora G, Morales JA, Barquero-Calvo E, Chavez-Olarte E, Moreno E (2012) Brucella ceti and brucellosis in cetaceans. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:e3
Hammerl JA, Ulrich RG, Imholt C, Scholz HC, Jacob J, Kratzmann N, Nöckler K, Al Dahouk S (2015) Molecular survey on brucellosis in rodents and shrews—natural reservoirs of novel Brucella species in Germany? Transbound Emerg Dis. doi:10.1111/tbed.12425
Hood MI, Skaar EP (2012) Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nature Rev Microbiol 10:525–537
Hubálek Z, Scholz HC, Sedláček I, Meltzer F, Sanogo YO, Nesvadbová J (2007) Brucellosis of the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Vector-Borne Zoonot Dis 7:679–687
Imlay JA (2013) The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: lessons from a model bacterium. Nature Rev Microbiol 11:443–454
Irving H, Williams RJ (1948) Order of stability of metal complexes. Nature 162:746–747
Jiménez de Bagüés MP, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Quintana JF, Mitjana O, Hanna N, Bessoles S, Sanchez F, Scholz HC, Lafont V, Köhler S, Occhialini A (2010) The new species Brucella microti replicates in macrophages and causes death in murine models of infection. J Infect Dis 202:3–10
Klug A (2010) The discovery of zinc fingers and their applications in gene regulation and genome manipulation. Annu Rev Biochem 79:213–231
Krueger WS, Lucero NE, Brower A, Heil GL, Gray GC (2014) Evidence for unapparent Brucella canis infections among adults with occupational exposure to dogs. Zoonoses Publ Health 61:509–518
Liu JS, Chakraborty S, Hosseinzadeh P, Yu Y, Tian S, Petrik I, Bhagi A, Lu Y (2014) Metalloproteins containing cytochrome, iron-sulfur, or copper redox centers. Chem Rev 114:4366–4469
Nymo IH, Tryland M, Godfroid J (2011) A review of Brucella infection in marine mammals, with special emphasis on Brucella pinnipedialis in the hooded seal (Cystophora cristata). Vet Res 42:e93
Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV (2006) The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis 6:91–99
Rónai Z, Kreizinger Z, Dán A, Drees K, Foster JT, Bányai K, Marton S, Szeredi L, Jánosi A, Gyuranecz M (2015) First isolation and characterization of Brucella microti from wild boar. BMC Vet Res 11:e47
Roop RM II (2012) Metal acquisition and virulence in Brucella. Anim Health Res Rev 13:10–20
Roop RM II, Gaines JM, Anderson ES, Caswell CC, Martin DW (2009) Survival of the fittest: how Brucella strains adapt to their intracellular niche in the host. Med Microbiol Immunol 198:221–238
Roop RM II, Anderson E, Ojeda J, Martinson D, Menscher E, Martin DW (2012) Metal acquisition by Brucella strains. In: López-Goñi I, O’Callaghan D (eds) Brucella—molecular microbiology and genomics. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, pp 179–199
Schlabritz-Loutsevitch NE, Whatmore AM, Quance CR, Koylass MS, Cummins LB, Dick EJ Jr, Snider CL, Cappelli D, Ebersole JL, Nathanielsz PW, Hubbard GB (2009) A novel Brucella isolate in association with two cases of stillbirth in non-human primates—first report. J Med Primatol 38:70–73
Scholz HC, Nöckler K, Göllner C, Bahn P, Vergnaud G, Tomaso H, Al Dahouk S, Kämpfer P, Cloeckaert A, Maquart M, Zygmunt MS, Whatmore AM, Pfeffer M, Huber B, Busse HJ, De BK (2010) Brucella inopinata sp. nov., isolated from a breast plant infection. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:801–808
Scholz HC, Revilla-Fernández S, Al Dahouk S, Hammerl JA, Zygmunt MS, Cloeckaert A, Koylass M, Whatmore AM, Blom J, Vergnaud G, Witte A, Aistleitner K, Hofer E (2016) Brucella vulpis sp. nov., isolated from mandibular lymph nodes of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:2090–2098
Stoenner HG, Lackman DB (1957) A new species of Brucella isolated from the desert wood rat, Neotoma lepida Thomas. Am J Vet Res 18:947–951
Summers AO (2009) Damage control: regulating defenses against toxic metals and metalloids. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:138–144
Supuran CT, Scozzafava A (2007) Carbonic anhydrases as targets for medicinal chemistry. Biorg Med Chem 15:4336–4350
Valderas MW, Roop RM II (2006) Brucella and bioterrorism. In: Anderson B, Friedman H, Bendinelli M (eds) Microorganisms and bioterrorism. Springer, New York, NY, pp 139–153
Waldron KJ, Robinson NJ (2009) How do bacterial cells ensure that metalloproteins get the correct metal? Nature Rev Microbiol 6:25–35
Waldron KJ, Rutherford JC, Ford D, Robinson NJ (2009) Metalloproteins and metal sensing. Nature 460:823–830
Wanke MM (2004) Canine brucellosis. Anim Reprod Sci 82–83:195–207
Whatmore AM (2009) Current understanding of the genetic diversity of Brucella, an expanding genus of zoonotic pathogens. Infect Genet Evol 9:1168–1184
Whatmore AM, Dawson CE, Groussaud P, Koylass MS, King AC, Shankster SJ, Sohn AH, Probert WS, McDonald WL (2008) Marine mammal Brucella genotype associated with zoonotic infection. Emerg Infect Dis 14:517–518
Whatmore AM, Davison N, Cloeckaert A, Al Dahouk S, Zygmunt MS, Brew SD, Perrett LL, Koylass MS, Vergnaud G, Quance C, Scholz HC, Dick EJ Jr, Hubbard G, Schlabritz-Loutsevitch NE (2014) Brucella papionis sp. nov., isolated from baboons (Papio spp.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:4120–4128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roop II, R.M., Caswell, C.C. (2017). Introduction and Overview. In: Roop II, R., Caswell, C. (eds) Metals and the Biology and Virulence of Brucella. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53622-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53622-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53621-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53622-4
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)