Abstract
This paper is reviewing objective assessments of Parkinson’s disease (PD) motor symptoms, cardinal, and dyskinesia, using sensor systems. It surveys the manifestation of PD symptoms, sensors that were used for their detection, types of signals (measures) as well as their signal processing (data analysis) methods. A summary of this review’s finding is represented in a table including devices (sensors), measures and methods that were used in each reviewed motor symptom assessment study. In the gathered studies among sensors, accelerometers and touch screen devices are the most widely used to detect PD symptoms and among symptoms, bradykinesia and tremor were found to be mostly evaluated. In general, machine learning methods are potentially promising for this. PD is a complex disease that requires continuous monitoring and multidimensional symptom analysis. Combining existing technologies to develop new sensor platforms may assist in assessing the overall symptom profile more accurately to develop useful tools towards supporting better treatment process.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Parkinson’s Disease
- Sensors
- Objective assessment
- Motor symptoms
- Machine learning
- Dyskinesia
- Bradykinesia
- Rigidity
- Tremor
1 Introduction
The number of studies using electronic healthcare technologies and sensor systems assessing the Parkinson’s disease (PD) motor symptoms objectively are increasing. PD is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by a large number of motor symptoms that can impact on the function to a variable degree. The four cardinal motor symptoms of PD comprise of tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and postural instability. The primary goal of therapy is to maintain good motor function. Therefore therapeutic decision making requires accurate, comprehensive and accessible quantification of symptoms. Electronic sensor-based systems can facilitate remote, long-term and repeated symptom assessments. They are able to capture the symptom fluctuations more accurately and also they are effective with patient’s hospitalization costs. This paper reviews methods and sensor systems to detect, assess and quantify the four cardinal and dyskinetic motor symptoms. The method for identifying and accessing resources involved the online databases, Google Scholar, IEEE computer society, Springer link (Springer Netherlands) and PubMed central. The evaluation of resources was based on their relevance to the topic and the year of publication (not older than 2005). Selection of articles is done to have one reference per instrument that was used to detect all our addressed symptoms. The structure of this article is formed into sections of PD symptoms, followed by corresponding sensors and instruments, and computer and statistical methods that were employed for assessments.
2 Parkinson’s Disease Cardinal and Dyskinetic Symptoms
Parkinson’s tremor consists of oscillating movements and appears when a person’s muscles are relaxed and disappears when the person starts an action. It’s the most apparent well-known symptom. Rigidity symptoms cause stiffness of the limbs, neck or trunk and result in inflexibility. Bradykinesia (slow movement) describes the general reduction of spontaneous movement (abnormal stillness and a decrease in facial expressivity) and causes difficulties with repetitive movements. It can cause walking with short and shuffling steps and can also affect the speech. Postural instability symptom is a trend to be unstable when standing upright, rising from a chair or turning. And dyskinesia is a difficulty in performing voluntary movements, which often occurs as a side effect of long-term therapy with levodopa. Dyskinetic movements look like smooth tics (uncoordinated periodic moves).
3 Sensors, Signals and Measures
Among the developed electronic techniques to measure and analyze the PD’s symptoms the common sensors and devices for evaluation are accelerometer, electromyograph (EMG), magnetic tracker system, gyroscope, digitizing tablet, video recording, motion detector, and depth sensor. In accelerometry, an electromechanical sensor device is used to measure acceleration forces and capture the movements by converting it into electrical signals that are proportional to the muscular force producing motion. Gyroscope is a sensor device used to measure angular velocity (angular rate) which senses rotational motion and changes in orientation [1]. Accelerometer and gyroscope are joint in many motion sensing instruments. Electromyography (EMG) is a technique for evaluating and recording the electrical activity produced by neurologically activated muscles using Electromyograph that records how fast nerves can send electrical signals. Digitizing tablet in PD symptom detection is a computer input device used to digitize patient’s drawing when he/she traces a pre-drawn shape [2,3,] or freely writes or draws a shape. The position of the tip of the pen (x, y) and the time (milliseconds) are collected for analysis [3]. Electromagnetic tracker system captures the object’s movement displacement (x, y, and z) and orientation (pitch, roll, and yaw). Active optical marker systems are used to capture and record object’s motion. Wired position markers can be placed on different locations of patient’s body to obtain object’s posture and movements.
4 Signal Processing and Analysis
Wavelet transform as a multi-resolution transformation method uses a variable window size at each level to obtain more information about the sensor signal in the time-frequency (time-scale) domain. Principal component analysis (PCA) is theoretically the best linear dimension reduction technique that uses rectangular transformation to convert the set of observations of possibly correlated variables into a set of values of linearly uncorrelated variables [3]. It’s the direction to where the most variance exists. Wavelet transform is usually used with PCA to reduce the number of features to most important and related ones [3]. Discrete Fourier Transform converts samples of a function (a signal that varies over time) into the list of coefficients of a finite combination of complex sinusoids (ordered frequency that has sample value). Fast Fourier transform converts time (signal) to frequency by decomposing an N point time domain signal into N signals [4] and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis is a method to determine self-affection of a signal [5]. Often Spectral Analysis (SA) is used in signal processing for PD’s motor symptom assessment. The magnitude of an input signal versus a certain frequency within the full range of the frequency is measured using a spectrum analyzer. Artificial Intelligence (Visual perception, decision making, image processing, and classification techniques) enables the development of computer systems to perform tasks that usually require human intelligence. For image processing, computer vision is a method to acquire, process and analyze a patient body’s images (like face and body posture). Machine learning in PD symptom assessment [6] often includes techniques to assess the magnitude of addressed symptom. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classification method is used to optimally separate populations and reduce the dimensionality [7,8,]. Non-parametric, generalized and multilayer perceptron analysis are different alternatives of LDA.
5 Discussion and Conclusion
Table 1 summarizes the research studies that have evaluated the four cardinal PD motor symptoms. From left to right, it lists the evaluated symptoms, type of the instruments, calculated measures and employed analytical assessment methods.
According to Table 1, rigidity and postural instability are mostly evaluated as single symptoms. However, among articles which research on combined symptoms assessments, bradykinesia (with tremor, dyskinesia, rigidity, and dyskinesia together) is mostly studied. Tremor is assessed in some studies as a single symptom, and also together with each of bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and postural instability symptoms.
A common sensor for symptom detection was the accelerometer that was mostly used for detecting the tremor, dyskinesia, and postural instability. Digitizing tablet is used almost for all types of symptoms. Smartphone [5] and Microsoft Kinect (motion detector, and depth sensor) [15] are the latest devices in the market used for this. Smartphones (new generation of sensing devices) could expand rapidly with PD motor symptom assessments. Angular sensor detectors are used to detect rigidity and postural instability as single symptoms, and they are also used to detect bradykinesia and dyskinesia together with tremor. Video recording is often required for clinicians’ observational analysis. Wearable sensors (small, available, accurate, including high time resolution, and flexible with body locations) are preferred for PD since it’s a progressive chronic disease and symptoms need to be assessed continuously throughout the day. For this, the mobile applications and wrist watches are more preferred as they are currently part of almost everyone’s daily accessories. However, their analysis methods and their validations are important and a question is whether the devices or clinical ratings will become the gold standard. Machine learning techniques are potentially good solutions in the development of assessment systems to determine the effectiveness of drug dosing. Tools that can effectively characterize the severity of symptoms and can discriminate between bradykinesia and dyskinesia are needed. Some successful products are Parkinson’s Kinetigraph [18], Kinesia devices [20], and Rempark [6].
References
Salarian, A., et al.: Quantification of tremor and bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease using a novel ambulatory monitoring system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54(2), 313–322 (2007)
Liu, X., et al.: Quantifying drug-induced dyskinesias in the arms using digitised spiral-drawing tasks. J. Neurosci. Meth. 144(1), 47–52 (2005)
Westin, J., et al.: A new computer method for assessing drawing impairment in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Meth. 190(1), 143–148 (2010)
Westin, J., et al.: A home environment test battery for status assessment in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. 98(1), 27–35 (2010)
Arora, S., et al.: Detecting and monitoring the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease using smartphones: a pilot study. Parkinsonism Relat. Dis. 21(6), 650–653 (2015)
Sama, A., et al.: Dyskinesia and motor state detection in Parkinson’s disease patients with a single movement sensor. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2012, 1194–1197 (2012)
Lopane, G., et al.: Dyskinesia detection and monitoring by a single sensor in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 30, 1267 (2015)
Adkin, A.L., Bloem, B.R., Allum, J.H.J.: Trunk sway measurements during stance and gait tasks in Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture 22(3), 240–249 (2005)
Scanlon, B.K., et al.: An accelerometry-based study of lower and upper limb tremor in Parkinson’s disease. J. Clin. Neurosci. 20(6), 827–830 (2013)
Bachlin, M., et al.: A wearable system to assist walking of Parkinson s disease patients. Meth. Inf. Med. 49(1), 88–95 (2010)
Moreau, C., et al.: Gait disorders in Parkinson’s disease: and pathophysiological approaches. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 166(2), 158–167 (2010)
Moore, S.T., MacDougall, H.G., Ondo, W.G.: Ambulatory monitoring of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Meth. 167(2), 340–348 (2008)
Cano-de-la-Cuerda, R., et al.: Isokinetic dynamometry as a technologic assessment tool for trunk rigidity in Parkinson’s disease patients. NeuroRehabilitation 35(3), 493–501 (2014)
Mancini, M., et al.: Trunk accelerometry reveals postural instability in untreated Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 17(7), 557–562 (2011)
Yeung, L.F., et al.: Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway. Gait Posture 40(4), 532–538 (2014)
Ahlrichs, C., et al.: Detecting freezing of gait with a tri-axial accelerometer in Parkinson’s disease patients. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 54(1), 223–233 (2016)
Mellone, S., et al.: Hilbert-Huang-based tremor removal to assess postural properties from accelerometers. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58(6), 1752–1761 (2011)
Dunnewold, R.J., et al.: Ambulatory quantitative assessment of body position, bradykinesia, and hypokinesia in Parkinson’s disease. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15(3), 235–242 (1998)
Griffiths, R.I., et al.: Automated assessment of bradykinesia and dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Disord. 2(1), 47–55 (2012)
Mera, T.O., et al.: Feasibility of home-based automated Parkinson’s disease motor assessment. J. Neurosci. Meth. 203(1), 152–156 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aghanavesi, S., Westin, J. (2016). A Review of Parkinson’s Disease Cardinal and Dyskinetic Motor Symptoms Assessment Methods Using Sensor Systems. In: Ahmed, M., Begum, S., Raad, W. (eds) Internet of Things Technologies for HealthCare. HealthyIoT 2016. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51234-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51234-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51233-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51234-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)