Abstract
This chapter concludes the book by summarizing the main findings and themes of the study. As an independent measure of implicit learning, the results of the three groups of Anglophone learners suggested differential levels of sensitivity to the idiomatic preferences of Spanish for comprehending and speaking about motion. Crucial indicators were the comparison of trends in the receptive task, the composition of the vocabulary of motion verb types, and the proportions of highest path token frequencies of learners in their fifth and sixth semesters compared to those of the control group. The evidence showed that when mastery of Spanish and accumulated exposure to the language was still limited, learners tended to rely more on first-language knowledge to comprehend and produce motion expressions. Prolonged formal instruction combined with immersion in a Hispanic community appeared as reasonably safe predictors that the advanced learners would in time entrench the path conflation across usage events. For a conceptual category like motion, about which Anglophone learners of Spanish hear, and read about, listen to, and even enact within and outside of an instructional context, the lexico-semantic tendencies established by the first-language seem less firmly and definitively shaped. Learners, then, may be able to incorporate into their interlanguage systems, those of an additional language. The chapter ends by proposing further research to address limitations of the study and corroborate the interesting results obtained.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68(4), 706–755.
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (2001). Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 337–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, J., & Thompson, S. (1997). Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23, 378–388.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 564–570. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002.
Corder, P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 147–159.
Daller, M., Treffers-Daller, J., & Furman, R. (2011). Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 95–119.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 1545–7249.
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Cornwall, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Ellis, N. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
Ellis, N. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 297–339.
Ellis, N. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). New York and London: Routledge.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2002). Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249–260.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York: Routledge.
Gregersen, T., Olivares-Cuhat, G., & Storm, J. (2009). An examination of L1 and L2 gesture use: What role does proficiency play? The Modern Language Journal, 93, 195–208.
Han, Z. (2004). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish-English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(3), 249–261.
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kellerman, E., & Van Hoof, A. (2003). Manual accents. IRAL, 41, 251–269.
Kolers, P. A. (1973). Three stages of reading. In F. Smith (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading (pp. 28–49). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Lightbown, P. (1985). Great expectations: Second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6, 173–189.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2015). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.
Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. D. Lambert & E. Shohany (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honour of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179–192). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Magiste, E. (1979). The competing linguistic systems of the multilingual: A developmental study of decoding and encoding processes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 79–89.
Magiste, E. (1986). Selected issues in second and third language learning. In J. Vaid (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 97–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Magiste, E. (1992). Second language learning in elementary and high school students. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 355–365.
Marcus, G. F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46(1), 55–85.
McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128.
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109–135.
Navarro, S. (2012). Conversing in Spanish at a seniors’ center: A brief experience of community-based and foreign language learning. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(10), 1590–1600.
Navarro, S. (2013). Teletandem Canada-Chile: Enhancing communication in Spanish and English beyond the classroom. In Proceedings of the 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 2256–2262). Valencia, Spain, IATED.
Navarro, S. (2014, November). Learner autonomy and authentic Spanish use during unsupervised language activities. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Guelph, ON.
Navarro, S. (2015). Thinking outside the classroom for practicing Spanish. In E. Guntly, Z. Lam, A. Anghelescu, & N. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of 1st Okanagan Workshop on Innovation in Language Teaching (OWILT) (pp. 21–34). University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 41.
Navarro, S. (2017). Empowering learners with linguistic autonomy for successful communication beyond the classroom. Manuscript in preparation.
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J., Jordan, S., & Gelabert, J. (2004). The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 113–147.
Norrik, N. (2000). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8(1), 38–55.
Pavlenko, A. (2000). L2 influence on L1 in late bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11, 175–205.
Pelletieri, J. (2011). Measuring language-related outcomes of community-based learning in intermediate Spanish courses. Hispania, 94(2), 285–302. doi:10.1353/hpn.2011.0041.
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.
Sherman, J., & Nicoladis, E. (2004). Gestures by advanced Spanish-English second-language learners. Gesture, 4(2), 43–56.
Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 381–398.
Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26.
Stam, G. (2006). Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. IRAL, 44, 145–171. doi:10.1515/IRAL.2006.006.
Stam, G. (2010). Can an L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity (pp. 59–83). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Swain, M. (1991). French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition: Research and the classroom (pp. 91–103). Lexington, MA: Heath.
Talmy, L. (1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2006). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 439–458). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 435–450.
VanPatten, B., Williams, J., & Rott, S. (2004). Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 1–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x.
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 416–432. doi:10.1093/applin/12.4.416.
Williams, J. N. (2004). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ortega, S.A.N. (2017). Conclusion. In: Comprehending and Speaking about Motion in L2 Spanish. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49307-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49307-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49306-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49307-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)