Abstract
This chapter reviews the concept of motion in language as a recurrent topic in human communication. Some theoretical positions from cognitive semantics postulate that, across languages, speakers lexicalize motion using lexico-syntactic constructions that emphasize different aspects of the event. In this sense, motion events are a fertile area in which to explore how learners acquire and produce form-meaning mappings to describe motion in a second language. Drawing on Talmy’s (Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring, 2000) classification, English and Spanish have been the source of numerous studies as they are said to represent different language typologies. Findings in oral production indicate that, although the two languages overlap in some lexicalization patterns, their main trends differ. English speakers tend to lexicalize the manner (e.g., run) in the main verb (i.e., to focus on the internal mechanism of motion), whereas Spanish speakers tend to lexicalize the path (e.g., entrar ‘enter’), and focus on the trajectory of an entity in motion. Anglophones need to learn the central tendency of Spanish in order to package motion events in a way that is idiomatically correct. Talmy’s proposal also guides my analysis of the motion-event descriptions collected from the receptive and production tasks participants completed in the study reported in this book. The chapter concludes with a discussion of three stages of acquisition that Anglophones need to master in order to talk about motion idiomatically in line with Spanish.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14.
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bowerman, M. (1989). Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? In M. L. Rice & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), The teachability of language (pp. 133–169). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. (2001). Learning to talk about motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: Is there a language-specific bias for verb learning? In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 512–543).
Brown, P. (2004). Position and motion in Tzeltal frog stories. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 37–57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cadierno, T. (2004). Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 239–275). New York and London: Routledge.
Cadierno, T., & Lund, K. (2004). Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in typological framework. In B. Van Patten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 139–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 183–216.
Cerda Masso, R., Muñoz Olivares, M. C., López de Ayala, J. L., & Lloret Cantero, J. (1986). Diccionario de lingüística. Madrid: ANAYA.
de León, L. (2001). Finding the richest path: Language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil (Mayan). In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 544–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Cornwall, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers, corpus linguistics and TESOL: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 375–396.
Forsberg, F. (2010). Using conventional sequences in L2 French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 25–51.
Foster, P., Bolibaugh, C., & Kotula, A. (2014). Knowledge of nativelike selections in a L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 101–132.
Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York: Routledge.
Gopnik, A., & Choi, S. (1995). Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: Nouns are not always learned before verbs. In M. Tomasello & W. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 63–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gopnik, A., Choi, S., & Baumberger, T. (1996). Crosslinguistic differences in early semantic and cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 11, 197–227.
Gullberg, M. (2008). Gestures and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 276–305). New York/London: Routledge.
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish-English bilingual adults. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 9(3), 249–261.
Hohenstein, J., Naigles, L., & Einsenberg, A. (2004). Keeping verb acquisition in motion: A comparison of English and Spanish. In G. Hall & S. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 569–602). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kellerman, E., & Van Hoof, A. (2003). Manual accents. IRAL, 41, 251–269.
Kita, S. (1999). Japanese enter/exit verbs without motion semantics. Studies in Language, 23(2), 307–330.
Lado, R. (1964). Language teaching: A scientific approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. (1990). Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2015). How languages are learned. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here? Language Teaching, 47, 349–362. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000134.
Loucks, J., & Pederson, E. (2011). Linguistic and non-linguistic categorization of complex motion events. In J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 108–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. (2000). Growth points in thinking for speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Verbs of motion. In Language and perception. Cambridge, MA, England: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Naigles, L. R., Eisenberg, A. R., Kako, E. T., Highter, M., & McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521–549.
Naigles, L. R., & Terrazas, P. (1998). Motion verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9, 363–369.
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J., Jordan, S., & Gelabert, J. (2004). The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 113–147.
Özçalişkan, S., & Slobin, D. I. (1999). Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston University conference on language development (Vol. 2, pp. 541–552). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Pavlenko, A., & Volynsky, M. (2015). Motion encoding in Russian and English: Moving beyond Talmy’s Typology. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 32–48. doi:10.1111/modl.12177.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). London: Longman.
Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, USA (pp. 435–445).
Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Slobin, D. I. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic Typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Slobin, D. I. (2005). Linguistic representations of motion events: What is signifier and what is signified? In C. Maeder, O. Fischer, & W. Herlofsky (Eds.), Outside-in-outside-out: Iconicity in language and literature 4 (pp. 307–322). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I., & Bocaz, A. (1988). Learning to talk about movement through time and space: The development of narrative abilities in Spanish and English. Lenguas Modernas, 15, 5–24.
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed language: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–505.
Stam, G. (2010). Can an L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity (pp. 59–83). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Swan, M. (1997). The influence of the mother tongue on second language vocabulary and use. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 156–180). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shoepen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
VanPatten, B., Williams, J., & Rott, S. (2004). Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 1–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. (2004). A third way to travel. The place of Thai in motion typology. In S. Strömquist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative (pp. 159–190). Mahwak, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ortega, S.A.N. (2017). The Linguistic Expression of Motion in Language. In: Comprehending and Speaking about Motion in L2 Spanish. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49307-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49307-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49306-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49307-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)