Abstract
Pharmaceuticals (VPs) are used in large amounts to protect human health and reduce diseases and promote growth for livestock and poultry in farms. Due to their use pattern, they possess a potential for reaching the soil environment where they develop resistance and can impact the soil ecosystem services. The environmental pollution and health risks caused by the antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) have become urgent issues all over the world. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the occurence of antibiotics and ARGs in soil. The fate of antibiotics such as photodegradation, bioremediation, chemical treatments, etc., was discussed in detail. ARGs’ occurrence and their mechanism (horizontal and vertical) of transfer into soil ecosystem were reviewed. We review the impact that pollution by antibiotics or by antibiotic resistance genes may have for both human health and the evolution of environmental microbial populations. The chapter could be helpful to university teachers, students, and management authorities for the management and to develop the policy for the new emerging environmental contaminates.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Antibiotic Resistance Gene
- Public Health Effect
- Soil Solid Phase
- Natural Microbial Community
- Manure Amendment
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
4.1 Introduction
The era of anthropogenic antibiotics began after the discovery of penicillin in 1928 by Alexander Fleming (Diggins 1999). Natural soil is the reservoir of autochthonous soil microorganisms which biosynthesize antimicrobial secondary metabolites (Martinez-Fleites et al. 2006; Raaijmakers et al. 1997). Nevertheless, since the first introduction of antibiotics, new chemical entities of antimicrobials have been discovered and were synthesized on an industrial scale (Kumar and Gayen 2011). Antibiosis is a natural chemical regulation mechanism among organisms, especially microorganisms. Hence, antibiotics also biosynthesize in soils (Gottlieb 1976). Today, to treat and control many bacterial infections, synthetic and naturally antibiotics have been widely used in veterinary and human medicines, but misuse or overuse of antibiotics contributes to the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the environmental compartments (Tang et al. 2015). Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are emerging environmental contaminants and may pose a threat to public health (Chen and Zhang 2013). There are some typical pathways of antibiotics by which they are introduced into the environment: (1) inadvertent release during production and use, (2) their application against plant diseases, (3) sewage sludge with antibiotic residues of human medicine, and (4) medicated animals’ manure which received therapeutic feed/water additives, injection solutions, or ergotropics (see below; Fig. 4.1; adapted from Du and Liu 2012). As a result, antibiotics have been detected in different environmental compartments such as groundwater of farms and in aquatic and soil environments (Martinez 2009). Forty different tetracycline-resistance (tet) genes with three specific mechanisms (i.e., target modification with ribosomal protection protein, antibiotic efflux pumps, and antibiotic inactivation) have been characterized to date (Roberts 2005). Four sulfonamide-resistance (sul) gene types, including sul1, sul2, sul3, and sulA, have also been studied (Pei et al. 2006). In both animals and humans, a significant amount of antibiotics (up to 75 %) can be excreted in an unaltered state (Elmund et al. 1971) which could pose threat to soil environment in general and particularly to humans. So this chapter covers the antibiotics and ARGs’ general information, their fate in soil environment, pollution caused by the ARGs, and their impact on human health.
4.2 Physical Properties of Antibiotics
The compounds which are synthesized through secondary metabolism of living organisms are known as antibiotics, with exceptions for semi- or completely synthetic substances. Antibiotics are heterogeneous compounds with different fields of usage such as antiinfectives , antimycotics , and anthelmintics , have different structural classes (tetracyclines, nucleosides), and reveal different molecular structures and diverse physical and chemical properties (Garrod and O’Grady 1968). Depending on the pH of the medium, most antibiotics tend to ionize; pka values are related with the diverse functional groups of the compounds. Some important antibiotic compounds ’ physicochemical properties ranges are listed in Table 4.1. However, a brief description of physicochemical properties of selected antibiotics is given below:
4.2.1 Tetracyclines
Tetracyclines (TCs) are polyketides, and structure is like that of a naphthacene ring (Fig. 4.2). The TCs have three pka values and are amphoteric. They exhibit stability in acids, but not in bases, and form salts in both media (Podojil et al. 1984). Most TCs are sparingly soluble in water, while the solubility of the corresponding hydrochlorides is much higher. The TCs strongly absorb light and, thus, are susceptible to photodegradation (Chen et al. 2008).
4.2.2 Sulfonamides
Sulfonamides (SAs) are relatively insoluble in water and characterized by two pka values (Fig. 4.3). SAs indicate protonation of the amino group at a pH of 2–3 and deprotonation of the R1SO2 NHR2 moiety at a pH of 5–11 (Ingerslev and Halling-Sørensen 2000). In general, the atmospheric SAs behave as weak acids and form salts in strongly acidic or basic solutions.
4.2.3 Aminoglycosides
Aminoglycosides like antibiotics are basic and strongly polar cationic compounds (Fig. 4.4). Their molecular structure is comprised of two or more amino sugars that are glycosidically bound to aminocyclitol. They are susceptible to photodegradation, mostly hydrophilic, and water soluble .
4.2.4 Fluoroquinolones
Fluoroquinolones (FQs) showed large chemical stability and are known as quinolones (Fig. 4.5). They are degraded by UV light, insensitive to hydrolysis and increased temperature. Their antibiotic potency depends mostly on the aromatic fluorine substituent at the C-6 position (Sukul and Spiteller 2007).
4.3 Natural Antibiotics Occurrence in Soil
New pharmaceuticals were discovered due to secondary metabolites of natural resources and often served as blueprints for the development of synthetic antibiotics (Sarmah et al. 2006). Soil microbial communities and plant roots serve as the reservoir of natural antimicrobial production (Gottlieb 1976; Mavrodi et al. 2012; Raaijmakers and Mazzola 2012), often comprising fungal, pseudomonad, and actinomycete species (Butler and Buss 2006; Raaijmakers et al. 2002). It has been reported that the production of antibiotic in natural microbial communities is suggested to promote microbial fitness, defense, signaling, gene regulation, and competiveness (Mavrodi et al. 2012). Hence, antibiotics are considered as a part of the disease regulation in soil. The detection and quantification of natural antimicrobials, in nutrient-poor soil, are often prohibited by fast degradation, strong sorption to the soil matrix, and concentrations near the detection limit (Mavrodi et al. 2012; Thomashow et al. 1997). However, the natural broad-spectrum antibiotic phenazine-1-carboxylic acid was successfully quantified at concentrations up to 1.6 μg/g−1 root fresh weight in nutrient-rich rhizosphere soil of wheat plants (Mavrodi et al. 2012). Rhizosphere samples of plants exhibited natural antibiotic concentrations in the range 0.02–5.0 μg/g−1 (Mavrodi et al. 2012; Thiele-Bruhn 2003). The antibiotic resistance evolution in natural microbial communities is thought due to the exposure to autochthonous antimicrobial compounds. Such exposure might also alter the response to synthetic antibiotics from anthropogenic sources (Aminov and Mackie 2007). Soil microbial communities are probably composed of more and less antibiotic-susceptible strains, suggesting also coadaptations to some synthetic antimicrobials .
4.4 Anthropogenic Antibiotics Occurrence in Soil
Anthropogenic synthesized antibiotics contamination of terrestrial soil and aquatic environments is a widespread problem, which begins through hospital waste and with the excretion by the animals (Boxall et al. 2004; Kümmerer 2008a). Most of antibiotics have been designed to be readily excreted after medication with rather short half-lives, for example, 0.1–26 h for SA antibiotics and 1.5–16 h for FQ antibiotics (Picó and Andreu 2007). Of the applied drug, 44 % SDZ (SA) was excreted unchanged as parent compound, with acetyl conjugates (26 %) and hydroxylated compounds (19 %) as major metabolites (Lamshöft et al. 2010). Of the applied DIF (FQ), approximately 96 % were excreted as parent compound, with sarafloxacin as the major metabolite (Lamshöft et al. 2010). The concentrations of SA in contaminated manure typically ranged from 1 to 10 mg kg−1, occasionally up to 235 mg kg−1 fresh weight (Hamscher and Mohring 2012; Kumar et al. 2005). Monitoring of manure samples from Austria exhibited SAs, tetracyclines, and FQ concentrations up to 91 mg kg−1, 46 mg kg−1, and 8 mg kg−1, respectively (Martínez-Carballo et al. 2007). Feedlot pig manure from China contained tetracycline and FQ concentrations up to 60 mg kg−1 and 47 mg kg−1, respectively (Zhao et al. 2010). Consequently, agriculture soils are enriched with large quantities of antibiotic compounds with contaminated animal manure. Under long-term conventional farming practice, a tetracycline concentration of 200 μg kg−1 was extractable from soil (Hamscher et al. 2003). Farmland soils of southern China had FQ and SA concentrations of even 1537 μg kg−1 and 321 μg kg−1, respectively (Li and Zhang 2011). SDZ concentrations up to 90 μg kg−1 were reported in the soil of wheat-planted and manure-fertilized agricultural landscapes (Grote et al. 2007). Antibiotic concentration in field soil increased due to mixtures of different antibiotics such as SAs, FQs, and tetracyclines, as indicated in the northern Marmara region of Turkey (Karcı and Balcıoğlu 2009). However, due to low extraction efficiencies of many compounds, antibiotic concentrations in soil are probably underestimated .
4.5 Antibiotics Fate in the Soil Environment
When the antibiotics are added to the soil solid phase, they are liable to microbial transformation. Since the 1940s, there are some compounds like sulfonamides which have been extensively used in the animal husbandry and pig production (Kümmerer 2008b; Zhou et al. 2012). The changes occur because of the abovementioned biotransformation results in the retransformation of metabolites into the parent compound similarly as in fertilizers (Giang et al. 2015; Jechalke et al. 2014). For many antibiotics, mineralization accounts for less than 2 % of the added compounds (Forster et al. 2009; Junge et al. 2012). Because of poor light penetration, the photodegenration in the soils as an alternative pathway of pharmaceutical degradation is limited (Ozaki et al. 2011). Final pathways to be considered are potential transfers of the antibiotics from soil into the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere (Fig. 4.6). Low vapor pressure is responsible for the fate of the pharmaceuticals in soil and here volatilization is not relevant. All antibiotics may disperse because of the surface runoff and particle-facilitated transport in the environment (Burch et al. 2014; Joy et al. 2013, 2014). The vertical percolation or leaching that occurs in the groundwater is restricted to a few antibiotics such as sulfanomides , which mainly occurs in preferential flow path. So that is the reason that the largest fraction of most antibiotics applied to soils with manure is usually returned in the surface soil (Ostermann et al. 2013; Srinivasan and Sarmah 2014). For the removal of antibiotics from the soil, the plant uptake by several pharmaceuticals is done (Felizeter et al. 2012; Sabourin et al. 2012), but there concentrations are commonly so small in the plant tissues that there plant uptake might not represent a major pathway (Engelhardt et al. 2015; Fang et al. 2014; Rosendahl et al. 2012). Sorption and desorption reactions are responsible for the interaction of the veterinary antibiotics with the soil solid phase. Biotransformation , biological effects, their mobility, and uptake by plants are controlled by the sorption and desorption processes. Sorption is not only a function of polarity and water solubility for most antibiotics, and its effect on the chemical specifications and charge of the compounds is particularly controlled by the pH value (e.g., Schaffer et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2012). The history of fertilization and other solutes can also affect sorption. Sorption of a Sulfonamide antibiotic (sulfamethoxazole) was reduced in soils fertilized and irrigated with untreated wastewater for 14–100 years, most likely as a result of a saturation of high-affinity sorption sites, sorption competition with other solutes, and changes of soil organic matter properties, whereas sorption of ciprofloxacin was not affected (Dalkmann et al. 2014).
Resulting in hysteresis and a subsequent kinetic sorption and desorption with slow release rates, the primary sorption reaction of antibiotics is often governed by the reversible equilibrium process (Doretto and Rath 2013; Kasteel et al. 2010). Only fractions of the non-extractible antibiotic residues are formed in parallel to the reversible processes of equilibrium sorption and sequestration. Rigid moieties in soil organic matter (SOM) (Pignatello and Xing 1995), nomopores within oxides, and clay interlayers (Nowara et al. 1997) are stopped to be released into the soil due to the formation of the voids due to the physical diffusion and also from enzymatically catalyzed formation of covalent bonds due to this formation of non-extractible residues , e.g., Bialk et al. (2007) and Gulkowska et al. (2013).
4.6 Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in the Soil Environment
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria enrichment in soil environment is considered as one of the most serious threats to public health in the twenty-first century. Resistance genes enter the food system via amendment of soils with manure from antibiotic-treated animals, which are considered a reservoir of such genes (Gillings 2013). Application of pig manure is the cause of sulfonamide-resistance genes dispersal to soil bacteria. Further, it has been found that dairy cow manure amendment enhanced the proliferation of genes encoding β-lactamases and resident antibiotic-resistant bacteria in soil even though the cows from which the manure was derived had not been treated with antibiotics.
Manure amendment and resistance exhibit a correlation which has been proved by a number of studies in previous few decades. For example, the prevalence of sulfonamide-resistant isolates was increased in a field soil after 2 years of slurry application of antibiotic-containing manure, compared to preapplication soil (Byrne-Bailey et al. 2009). In further microcosm experiments , the accumulation of resistance genes by the agricultural practice of repeated manure amendment was shown (Heuer et al. 2011). Sulfonamide concentrations as low as 0.1 mg kg−1 of soil could have a selective effect on resistant populations in soil (Heuer et al. 2008).
However, there are fewer reports available on the long-term effects of antibiotics pollution with antibiotics and resistant bacteria. A recent study by Tang et al. (2015) revealed the accumulation of antibiotic resistance genes in paddy soils from four field experiments in south of China over decades of increasing use of antibiotics.
4.7 Environmental and Public Health Effects of Antibiotic Resistance Genes Pollution
Antibiotic resistance genes’ pollution could increase the human pathogens by obtaining resistance. When the human microbia containing the residues is released in the environment in which the bacteria-enriched resistance elements are present, then the determinants by human-linked bacteria increase the possibility of acquiring novel resistance. So that is why it is stressed that residuals from hospitals in which human commensal and infective bacteria and also antibiotics are released should be minimized at all costs to avoid interchange of genetic material (Sirés and Brillas 2012). As stated by Baquero et al., the possibility of the variation of genetics and the novel mechanisms resistance’s possible emergence that are reintroduced in the human environment is because of the other types of microbiota in different ecosystems (from soil sediments of groundwater to animal microbiota) coming in contact with the human microbiota (Baquero et al. 2008). The physiology of natural microbial populations and their dynamics is challenged by the spread of resistance genes that currently exist in the human- or animal-associated microbial which are found without the antibiotic pollution in different environments, as indicated by several reports. Bacteria that is found in humans and animals has the genes on several occasions. The above fact has not been focused or studied in detail, but it is said that the environmental populations are responsible for the spread of those genes. Now the question arises here that in the recipient organisms these antibiotic resistance genes may produce relevant changes or not. The case has been proven by some studies. For instance, resistance to either glycopeptides or beta-lactam antibiotics strongly modifies the structure of the peptidoglycan in Gram-positive bacteria (Mainardi et al. 2008; Martinez et al. 2009), and it has been described that antibiotic resistance of small colony variants of S. aureus is associated with the rewiring of bacterial metabolism (Heinemann et al. 2005). For the bacterial metabolism, there is an indication that acquisition could have incalculable consequences. This could also lead to the evolution of the environmental biosphere. Up till now, the studies that have been made so far in which the antibiotic resistance has an effect of antibiotic pollution are different regarding the antibiotic genes that come with pollution. Firstly, this results in the outburst of the resistant bacteria that exist in the humans or animals. When the antibiotic exposure is ceased, the microbial community outcome is largely settled. If a gene transfer unit that already contains antibiotic resistance genes in the environment also exists as contaminants, then their diffusion will be favored by the occurrence of the antibiotics, and when the discharge of the antibiotics is reduced or ceased, then the modification of the antibiotic resistance will be lower .
4.8 Conclusion
This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of antibiotics and ARGs in soil, potentially providing knowledge for managing antibiotic resistance emanating from agricultural activities. Although there are numerous recent studies on antibiotics and antibioticresistance genes, many questions still need to be addressed more systematically. Information on the effects of reductions in antibiotic use on the overall level of resistance is needed in order to evaluate management options. Along the article, we review the impact that pollution by antibiotics or by antibiotic resistance genes may have for both human health and the evolution of environmental microbial populations.
References
Aminov RI, Mackie RI (2007) Evolution and ecology of antibiotic resistance genes. FEMS Micro Lett 271:147–161
Baquero F, Negri M, Morosini M, Blazquez J (2008) The antibiotic selective process: concentration-specific amplification of low-level resistant populations. Antibiotic resistance: origins, evolution, selection and spread. Ciba Found Symp 787:93
Bialk HM, Hedman C, Castillo A, Pedersen JA (2007) Laccase-mediated Michael addition of 15N-sulfapyridine to a model humic constituent. Environ Sci Tech 41:3593–3600
Boxall A, Fogg L, Blackwell P, Blackwell P, Kay P, Pemberton E, Croxford A (2004) Veterinary medicines in the environment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 180:1–91
Burch TR, Sadowsky MJ, LaPara TM (2014) Fate of antibiotic resistance genes and class 1 integrons in soil microcosms following the application of treated residual municipal wastewater solids. Environ Sci Tech 48:5620–5627
Butler MS, Buss AD (2006) Natural products—the future scaffolds for novel antibiotics? Biochem Pharm 71:919–929
Byrne-Bailey K, Gaze WH, Kay P, Boxall A, Hawkey PM, Wellington EM (2009) Prevalence of sulfonamide resistance genes in bacterial isolates from manured agricultural soils and pig slurry in the United Kingdom. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:696–702
Chen H, Zhang M (2013) Occurrence and removal of antibiotic resistance genes in municipal wastewater and rural domestic sewage treatment systems in eastern China. Environ Intern 55:9–14
Chen Y, Hu C, Qu J, Yang M (2008) Photodegradation of tetracycline and formation of reactive oxygen species in aqueous tetracycline solution under simulated sunlight irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 197:81–87
Dalkmann P, Willaschek E, Schiedung H, Bornemann L, Siebe C, Siemens J (2014) Long-term wastewater irrigation reduces sulfamethoxazole sorption, but not ciprofloxacin binding, in Mexican soils. J Environ Qual 43:964–970
Diggins FW (1999) The true history of the discovery of penicillin, with refutation of the misinformation in the literature. Br J Biomed Sci 56:83
Doretto KM, Rath S (2013) Sorption of sulfadiazine on Brazilian soils. Chemosphere 90:2027–2034
Du L, Liu W (2012) Occurrence, fate, and ecotoxicity of antibiotics in agro-ecosystems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:309–327
Elmund GK, Morrison S, Grant D, Nevins M (1971) Role of excreted chlortetracycline in modifying the decomposition process in feedlot waste. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 6:129–132
Engelhardt I, Sittig S, Šimůnek J, Groeneweg J, Pütz T, Vereecken H (2015) Fate of the antibiotic sulfadiazine in natural soils: experimental and numerical investigations. J Contam Hydrol 177:30–42
Fang H, Han Y, Yin Y, Pan X, Yu Y (2014) Variations in dissipation rate, microbial function and antibiotic resistance due to repeated introductions of manure containing sulfadiazine and chlortetracycline to soil. Chemosphere 96:51–56
Felizeter S, McLachlan MS, de Voogt P (2012) Uptake of perfluorinated alkyl acids by hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Environ Sci Tech 46:11735–11743
Forster M, Laabs V, Lamshöft M, Groeneweg J, Zühlke S, Spiteller M, Krauss M, Kaupenjohann M, Amelung M (2009) Sequestration of manure-applied sulfadiazine residues in soils. Environ Sci Tech 43:1824–1830
Garrod LP, O’grady F (1968) Antibiotics & chemotherapy. Edinburgh University Press, Livingstone
Giang CND, Sebesvari Z, Renaud F, Rosendahl I, Minh QH, Amelung W (2015) Occurrence and dissipation of the antibiotics sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, trimethoprim, and enrofloxacin in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. PLoS One 10:e0131855
Gillings MR (2013) Evolutionary consequences of antibiotic use for the resistome, mobilome and microbial pangenome. Front Microbiol 4
Gottlieb D (1976) The production and role of antibiotics in soil. J Antibio 29:987–1000
Grote M, Schwake-Anduschus C, Michel R, Stevens H, Heyser W, Lan G, Betsche T, Freitag M (2007) Incorporation of veterinary antibiotics into crops from manured soil. Landbauforschung Volkenrode 57:25–32
Gulkowska A, Sander M, Hollender J, Krauss M (2013) Covalent binding of sulfamethazine to natural and synthetic humic acids: assessing laccase catalysis and covalent bond stability. Environ Sci Technol 47:6916–6924
Hamscher G, Mohring SA (2012) Veterinary drugs in soil and in the aquatic environment. Chem Ing Tech 84:1052–1061
Hamscher G, Pawelzick HT, Sczesny S, Nau H, Hartung J (2003) Antibiotics in dust originating from a pig-fattening farm: a new source of health hazard for farmers? Environ Health Perspect 111:1590
Heinemann M, Kümmel A, Ruinatscha R, Panke S (2005) In silico genome-scale reconstruction and validation of the Staphylococcus aureus metabolic network. Biotechnol Bioeng 92:850–864
Heuer H, Focks A, Lamshöft M, Smalla K, Matthies M, Spiteller M (2008) Fate of sulfadiazine administered to pigs and its quantitative effect on the dynamics of bacterial resistance genes in manure and manured soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1892–1900
Heuer H, Solehati Q, Zimmerling U, Kleineidam K, Schloter M, Müller T, Focks A, Thiele-Bruhn S, Smalla K (2011) Accumulation of sulfonamide resistance genes in arable soils due to repeated application of manure containing sulfadiazine. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2527–2530
Ingerslev F, Halling-Sørensen B (2000) Biodegradability properties of sulfonamides in activated sludge. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2467–2473
Jechalke S, Heuer H, Siemens J, Amelung W, Smalla K (2014) Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil. Trends Microbiol 22:536–545
Joy SR, Bartelt-Hunt SL, Snow DD, Gilley JE, Woodbury BL, Parker DB, Marx DB, Li X (2013) Fate and transport of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance genes in soil and runoff following land application of swine manure slurry. Environ Sci Technol 47:12081–12088
Joy SR, Li X, Snow DD, Gilley JE, Woodbury B, Bartelt-Hunt SL (2014) Fate of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance genes in simulated swine manure storage. Sci Total Environ 481:69–74
Junge T, Claßen N, Schäffer A, Schmidt B (2012) Fate of the veterinary antibiotic 14C-difloxacin in soil including simultaneous amendment of pig manure with the focus on non-extractable residues. J Environ Sci Health Part B 47:858–868
Karcı A, Balcıoğlu IA (2009) Investigation of the tetracycline, sulfonamide, and fluoroquinolone antimicrobial compounds in animal manure and agricultural soils in Turkey. Sci Total Environ 407:4652–4664
Kasteel R, Mboh CM, Unold M, Groeneweg J, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2010) Transformation and sorption of the veterinary antibiotic sulfadiazine in two soils: a short-term batch study. Environ Sci Technol 44:4651–4657
Kumar M, Gayen K (2011) Developments in biobutanol production: new insights. Appl Energy 88:1999–2012
Kumar K, Gupta SC, Chander Y, Singh AK (2005) Antibiotic use in agriculture and its impact on the terrestrial environment. Adv Agron 87:1–54
Kümmerer K (2008a) Antibiotics in the environment. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the environment. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 75–93
Kümmerer K (2008b) Pharmaceuticals in the environment – a brief summary. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the environment. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–21
Lamshöft M, Sukul P, Zühlke S, Spiteller M (2010) Behaviour of 14 C-sulfadiazine and 14 C-difloxacin during manure storage. Sci Total Environ 408:1563–1568
Li B, Zhang T (2011) Mass flows and removal of antibiotics in two municipal wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 83:1284–1289
Mainardi J-L, Villet R, Bugg TD, Mayer C, Arthur M (2008) Evolution of peptidoglycan biosynthesis under the selective pressure of antibiotics in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:386–408
Martinez JL (2009) Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. Environ Pollut 157:2893–2902
Martinez JL, Fajardo A, Garmendia L, Hernandez A, Linares JF, Martínez-Solano L, Sánchez MB (2009) A global view of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:44–65
Martínez-Carballo E, González-Barreiro C, Scharf S, Gans O (2007) Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ Pollut 148:570–579
Martinez-Fleites C, Proctor M, Roberts S, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ (2006) Insights into the synthesis of lipopolysaccharide and antibiotics through the structures of two retaining glycosyltransferases from family GT4. Chem Biol 13:1143–1152
Mavrodi OV, Mavrodi DV, Parejko JA, Thomashow LS, Weller DM (2012) Irrigation differentially impacts populations of indigenous antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in the rhizosphere of wheat. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3214–3220
Nowara A, Burhenne J, Spiteller M (1997) Binding of fluoroquinolone carboxylic acid derivatives to clay minerals. J Agric Food Chem 45:1459–1463
Osol A, Remington JP (1980) Remington’s pharmaceutical sciences. Mack, Easton
Ostermann A, Siemens J, Welp G, Xue Q, Lin X, Liu X, Amelung W (2013) Leaching of veterinary antibiotics in calcareous Chinese croplands. Chemosphere 91:928–934
Ozaki N, Bester K, Moldrup P, Henriksen K, Komatsu T (2011) Photodegradation of the synthetic fragrance OTNE and the bactericide triclosan adsorbed on dried loamy sand – results from models and experiments. Chemosphere 83:1475–1479
Pei R, Kim S-C, Carlson KH, Pruden A (2006) Effect of river landscape on the sediment concentrations of antibiotics and corresponding antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). Water Res 40:2427–2435
Picó Y, Andreu V (2007) Fluoroquinolones in soil—risks and challenges. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1287–1299
Pignatello JJ, Xing B (1995) Mechanisms of slow sorption of organic chemicals to natural particles. Environ Sci Technol 30:1–11
Podojil M, Blumauerova M, Vanek Z, Culik K (1984) The tetracyclines: properties, biosynthesis, and fermentation. In: Vandamme EJ (ed) Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences. Marcel Dekker, New York
Raaijmakers JM, Mazzola M (2012) Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by beneficial and plant pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:403–424
Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1997) Frequency of antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:881–887
Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, De Souza JT (2002) Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81:537–547
Roberts MC (2005) Update on acquired tetracycline resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 245:195–203
Rosendahl I, Siemens J, Kindler R, Groeneweg J, Zimmermann J, Czerwinski S, Lamshöft M, Laabs V, Wilke BM, Vereecken H, Amelung W (2012) Persistence of the fluoroquinolone antibiotic difloxacin in soil and lacking effects on nitrogen turnover. J Environ Qual 41:1275–1283
Sabourin L, Duenk P, Bonte-Gelok S, Payne M, Lapen DR, Topp E (2012) Uptake of pharmaceuticals, hormones and parabens into vegetables grown in soil fertilized with municipal biosolids. Sci Total Environ 431:233–236
Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall AB (2006) A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere 65:725–759
Schaffer M, Boxberger N, Börnick H, Licha T, Worch E (2012) Sorption influenced transport of ionizable pharmaceuticals onto a natural sandy aquifer sediment at different pH. Chemosphere 87:513–520
Sirés I, Brillas E (2012) Remediation of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical residues based on electrochemical separation and degradation technologies: a review. Environ Int 40:212–229
Srinivasan P, Sarmah AK (2014) Assessing the sorption and leaching behaviour of three sulfonamides in pasture soils through batch and column studies. Sci Total Environ 493:535–543
Sukul P, Spiteller M (2007) Fluoroquinolone antibiotics in the environment. In: Sukul P (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, Berlin, pp 131–162
Tang X, Lou C, Wang S, Lu Y, Liu M, Hashmi MZ, Liang X, Li Z, Liao Y, Qin W, Fan F, Xu J, Brookes PC (2015) Effects of long-term manure applications on the occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in paddy soils: evidence from four field experiments in south of China. Soil Biol Biochem 90:179–187
Thiele-Bruhn S (2003) Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils – a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166:145–167
Thomashow LS, Bonsall RF, Weller DM (1997) Antibiotic production by soil and rhizosphere microbes in situ manual of environmental microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp. 493–499
Yang W, Lu Y, Zheng F, Xue X, Li N, Liu D (2012) Adsorption behavior and mechanisms of norfloxacin onto porous resins and carbon nanotube. Chem Eng J 179:112–118
Zhao L, Dong YH, Wang H (2010) Residues of veterinary antibiotics in manures from feedlot livestock in eight provinces of China. Sci Total Environ 408:1069–1075
Zhou LJ, Ying GG, Liu S, Zhao JL, Chen F, Zhang RQ, Peng FQ, Zhang QQ (2012) Simultaneous determination of human and veterinary antibiotics in various environmental matrices by rapid resolution liquid chromatography – electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chroma A 1244:123–138
Acknowledgement
The Research was funded by TWAS-COMSTECH Research award_15-384 RG/ENG/AS_C and HEC Start Up Research Grant 21-700/SRGP/R&D/HEC/2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hashmi, M.Z., Mahmood, A., Kattel, D.B., Khan, S., Hasnain, A., Ahmed, Z. (2017). Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in Soil: Occurrence, Fate, and Effects. In: Hashmi, M., Kumar, V., Varma, A. (eds) Xenobiotics in the Soil Environment. Soil Biology, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47744-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47744-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47743-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47744-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)