Abstract
Collagenase injection is increasingly used as a nonsurgical treatment for patients with Dupuytren contracture (Atroshi et al. 2014). In the clinical trial by Hurst et al. (2009) collagenase was injected into the cords without prior local anesthesia to avoid a potential confounding factor. In our clinical practice, we observed, however, that many patients seemed to experience substantial pain during the collagenase injection. The hypothesis of our study was that injecting a local anesthetic before collagenase injection can reduce the patients’ overall pain experience during treatment.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Hypothesis
Collagenase injection is increasingly used as a nonsurgical treatment for patients with Dupuytren contracture (Atroshi et al. 2014). In the clinical trial by Hurst et al. (2009) collagenase was injected into the cords without prior local anesthesia to avoid a potential confounding factor. In our clinical practice, we observed, however, that many patients seemed to experience substantial pain during the collagenase injection. The hypothesis of our study was that injecting a local anesthetic before collagenase injection can reduce the patients’ overall pain experience during treatment.
2 Methods
Consecutive patients with Dupuytren contracture scheduled for collagenase injection were assigned to one of two groups (by alternating scheduled clinics): one received local anesthesia, as a nerve block in the proximal palm, approximately 20 min before collagenase injection (LA group), and the other received the collagenase injection without anesthesia (no-LA group). The eligibility criteria for treatment were a total extension deficit of >20° in the metacarpophalangeal joint and/or proximal interphalangeal joint in at least one finger and the presence of a palpable cord. An off-label modification of the standard collagenase injection technique was used (Atroshi et al. 2015). After reconstituting CCH with 0.39 ml of diluent, all content that could be withdrawn into the syringe (approximately 0.80 mg) was injected into multiple spots in the cord. The anesthetic used was 10 mg/ml mepivacaine, buffered by diluting each 20 ml with 5 ml 50 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate, in accordance with the guidelines established by the Department of Anesthesia, Skåne University Hospital (the amount of added bicarbonate is higher than that commonly advocated in the literature). Immediately after receiving local anesthesia and/or collagenase injection, the patients were asked by the nurse, independently of the treating surgeon, to rate the severity of the pain they experienced during the injection on a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). When the patients returned to the outpatient clinic for finger extension 1 or 2 days after the collagenase injection, the nurse asked them to rate, on the same VAS scale, the severity of pain they had experienced during the time since they received the injection. Previous studies assessing acute pain with the VAS scale have concluded that a difference of 1.3 is clinically significant (Gallagher et al. 2001). To be able to show a difference of this magnitude, we calculated a sample size of at least 50 patients per group (90 % power, 5 % significance, SD 2.0).
3 Results
The LA group included 83 patients (65 men), mean age 69 (SD 9) years, and the no-LA group included 78 patients (65 men), mean age 70 (SD 8) years. The mean score for pain experienced during the first injection (buffered mepivacaine in the LA group and collagenase in the no-LA group) was 2.3 (SD 1.7) for the LA group and 4.3 (SD 2.5) for the no-LA group (Fig. 15.1); the age and sex-adjusted mean difference in pain score was −2.1 (95 % confidence interval −2.7 to −1.5, p < 0.001). In the LA group, the mean score for pain experienced during collagenase injection was 0.9 (SD 1.0). The mean score for pain experienced during the 1 or 2 days interval between injection and finger extension was similar in the two groups; 2.9 (SD 2.3) for the LA group and 2.9 (SD 1.9) for the no-LA group (p = 0.9). No adverse events related to the local anesthesia occurred.
4 Summary
In patients with Dupuytren contracture treated with collagenase injection, administering local anesthesia before the collagenase injection significantly reduces the patients’ pain experience at the time of injection. It does not however reduce the pain experienced during the time interval up to the finger extension procedure because the effect of mepivacaine has a relatively short duration that is not prolonged by the sodium bicarbonate.
References
Atroshi I, Strandberg E, Lauritzson A, Ahlgren E, Walden M (2014) Costs for collagenase injections compared with fasciectomy in the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 4(1):e004166
Atroshi I, Nordenskjold J, Lauritzson A, Ahlgren E, Waldau J, Walden M (2015) Collagenase treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture using a modified injection method: a prospective cohort study of skin tears in 164 hands, including short-term outcome. Acta Orthop 86(3):310–315
Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE (2001) Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 38(6):633–638
Hurst LC, Badalamente MA, Hentz VR, Hotchkiss RN, Kaplan FT, Meals RA et al (2009) Injectable collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren’s contracture. N Engl J Med 361(10):968–979
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nordenskjöld, J., Ahlgren, E., Waldau, J., Waldén, M., Atroshi, I. (2017). Efficacy of Using Local Anesthesia Before Collagenase Injection in Reducing Overall Pain Experience in Patients Treated for Dupuytren Contracture: A Quasi-Randomized Study. In: Werker, P., Dias, J., Eaton, C., Reichert, B., Wach, W. (eds) Dupuytren Disease and Related Diseases - The Cutting Edge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32199-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32199-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32197-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32199-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)