Abstract
An ageing population, pressure on health, social care capacity and changing social roles and expectations are driving demand for innovative solutions to support independence at home for people living with long term conditions and disabilities. Digital health-technologies have been posited as one potential solution to alleviate pressures placed on existing care services, reducing overall costs and carer burden (Petersson et al. 2011). As a consequence, significant investment into telehealth and telecare has been made. However whilst advances in these technologies are moving apace, a growing body of research has suggested that significant questions still remain regarding the acceptance and ultimately adoption of these devices by end users (May et al. 2011, Greenhalgh et al. 2013).
This paper shares the findings of the initial phase of a two-year qualitative research study identifying end-users attitudes to technology in everyday life and exploring how technology might be most appropriately designed to support personal health care. Utilising a critical artefact methodology the study has focused particularly on exploring the needs of groups of individuals who are currently under-represented in this research arena including individuals from diverse ethnic communities and communities classed as being of high socio-economic need. The research has identified a number of barriers to inclusion and the need for designers to understand the broader physical and cultural contexts where health technologies are used. The paper concludes with a broader discussion of the role design in eliciting understanding and developing responses to the complex challenges facing current healthcare services.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bentley CL, Powell LA, Orell A, Mountain GA (2014) Addressing design and suitability barriers to Telecare use: Has anything changed? Technology and Disability 26: 221-235
Chamberlain P, Craig C (2013) Engagingdesign - Methods for collective creativity. In: Kurosu M (Ed.) Human-computer interaction, part I, HCII 2013, LNCS 8004. Springer
Chamberlain P, Roddis J (2003) Making sense. The Design Journal (6)1: 40-51
Chamberlain P, Yoxall Y (2012) Of mice and men. The role of interactive exhibitions as research tools for inclusive design. The Design Journal 15(1): 57-78
Dixon J (2012) Does telehealth reduce hospital costs? Six points to ponder. British Politics and Policy at LSE (09 Jul 2012), blog entry. Available at: eprints.lse.ac.uk/48410/ (Accessed in November 2015)
Foster A, Horspool KA, Edwards L, Thomas CL, Salisbury C, Montgomery AA et al. (2015) Who does not participate in telehealth trials and why? A cross sectional survey. Trials 16: 258
Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter RN, Stones R (2013) What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Social Science and Medicine 93: 86-94
Hanson V, Gibson L, Coleman G, Bobrowicz A, McKay A (2010) A engaging the disengaged: How do we design technology for digitally excluded older adults? In: Proceedings of DIS 2010, Aarhus, Denmark
Huang J-C (2013) Innovative health care delivery systems: A questionnaire survey to evaluate the influence of behavioural factors on individuals’ acceptance of telecare. Computers in Biology and Medicine 43(4): 281-6
Lorig KR, Holman H (2004) Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioural Medicine 26:1-7
May CR, Finch TL, Cornford J, Exley C, Gately C, Kirk S et al. (2011) Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: what needs to be done? BMC Health Service Research 11:131
Morris J (2012) Integrated care for frail older people 2012: A clinical overview. Journal of Integrated Care 20(4): 257-264
Petersson I, Lilja M, Borrell L (2011) To feel safe in everyday life at home - A study of older adults after home modifications. Ageing and Society 2(5): 791-811
Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R (Eds.) Analysing qualitative data, pp. 173–194. Routledge, London, UK
Salisbury C, Thomas C, O’Cathain A, Pope C, Yardley L, Hollinghurst S et al. (2015) TElehealth in CHronic disease: Mixed methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation. BMJ Open (5)2
Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M et al. (2012) Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the whole system demonstrator trial: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 12: 220
Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S et al. (2012) Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: Findings from the whole system demonstrator cluster randomized trial. British Medical Journal 2012; 344: e3874
WHO (2015) World report on ageing and health. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: www.who.int/ageing/publications/world-report-2015/en/ (Accessed in November 2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chamberlain, P.M., Craig, C.L., Dexter, M. (2016). InTacT: Insights into Telehealth and Care Technologies. In: Langdon, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A., Dong, H. (eds) Designing Around People. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29498-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29498-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29496-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29498-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)