Abstract
Similar to single user decisions, group decisions can be affected by decision biases. In this paper we analyze anchoring effects as a specific type of decision bias in the context of group decision scenarios. On the basis of the results of a user study in the domain of software requirements prioritization we discuss results regarding the optimal time when preference information of other users should be disclosed to the current user. Furthermore, we show that explanations can increase the satisfaction of group members with various aspects of a group decision process (e.g., satisfaction with the decision and decision support quality).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Curley, S., Zhang, J.: Recommender systems, consumer preferences, and anchoring effects. In: Decisions@RecSys 2011, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 35–42 (2011)
Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Curley, S., Zhang, J.: De-biasing user preference ratings in recommender systems. In: RecSys 2014 Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems (IntRS 2014), Foster City, CA, USA, pp. 2–9 (2014)
Dyer, J.: MAUT - multi attribute utility theory. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys of Intl. Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 78, pp. 265–292. Springer, New York (2005)
Felfernig, A.: Biases in decision making. In: Intl. Worksh. on Decision Making and Recommender Systems, vol. 1278, pp. 32–37. CEUR Proceedings (2014)
Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Gula, B., Hitz, M., Kruggel, T., Leitner, G., Melcher, R., Riepan, D., Strauss, S., Teppan, E., Vitouch, O.: Persuasive recommendation: serial position effects in knowledge-based recommender systems. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 283–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Felfernig, A., Gula, B., Teppan, E.: Knowledge-based Recommender Technologies for Marketing and Sales. Intl. Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (IJPRAI) 21(2), 1–22 (2006)
Felfernig, A., Zehentner, C., Ninaus, G., Grabner, H., Maalej, W., Pagano, D., Weninger, L., Reinfrank, F.: Group decision support for requirements negotiation. In: Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T. (eds.) UMAP Workshops 2011. LNCS, vol. 7138, pp. 105–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Gkika, S., Lekakos, G.: The persuasive role of explanations in recommender systems. In: 2nd Intl. Workshop on Behavior Change Support Systems (BCSS 2014), vol. 1153, pp. 59–68. CEUR Proceedings, Padua (2014)
Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S.: Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 84(2), 332–339 (2003)
Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: CSCW 2000, pp. 241–250. ACM, Philadelphia (2000)
Jacowitz, K., Kahneman, D.: Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(1), 1161–1166 (1995)
Masthoff, J.: Group recommender systems: combining individual models. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 677–702 (2011)
Masthoff, J., Gatt, A.: In Pursuit of Satisfaction and the Prevention of Embarrassment: Affective State in Group Recommender Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16(3–4), 281–319 (2006)
Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S.: Knowing other’s preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. Jrnl. of Personality & Social Psy. 98(5), 794–808 (2010)
Murphy, J., Hofacker, C., Mizerski, R.: Primacy and Recency Effects on Clicking Behavior. Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 522–535 (2012)
Pu, P., Chen, L.: Trust-inspiring Explanation Interfaces for Recommender Systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 542–556 (2007)
Rodriguez, M., Steinbock, D., Watkins, J., Gershenson, C., Bollen, J., Grey, V., deGraf B.: Smartocracy: social networks for collective cecision making. In: HICSS 2007, pp. 90. IEEE, Big Island (2007)
Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Leitner, G., Reiterer, S., Jeran, M.: Counteracting serial position effects in the CHOICLA group decision support environment. In: 20th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI2015), pp. 148–157. ACM, Atlanta (2015)
Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Ninaus, G., Jeran, M., Reiterer, S., Leitner, G.: Configuring decision tasks. In: Configuration Workshop, Novi Sad, pp. 17–21 (2014)
Teppan, E., Felfernig, A.: Minimization of Decoy Effects in Recommender Result Sets. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 10(4), 385–395 (2012)
Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Explanations of recommendations. In: ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems 2007, pp. 203–206. ACM, Minneapolis (2007)
Tversky, A., Simonson, I.: Context-dependent Preferences. Management Science 39(10), 1179–1189 (1993)
Yardi, S., Hill, B., Chan, S.: VERN: facilitating democratic group decision making online. In: Intl. ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2005), pp. 116–119. ACM, Sanibel (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Leitner, G., Reiterer, S. (2015). Counteracting Anchoring Effects in Group Decision Making. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. UMAP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20266-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20267-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)