Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is a complex multifactorial disorder with autoimmune features occurring only in genetically predisposed individuals, carrying the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 and/or -DQ8 alleles, upon ingestion of gluten-containing dietary products. HLA predisposition explains only 35 % of the disease genetic susceptibility, while the remaining is due to numerous non-HLA genes that singularly contribute to a much lower extent to CD heritability. The prevalence of the disease is about 1 % of the general population; environmental factors in addition to gluten, such as dysbiosis, viral infection, and infancy feeding practices, may contribute to disease development. From a pathogenic standpoint, CD is characterized by a gluten-specific immune-mediated reaction arising in the small-intestinal mucosa that finally leads to tissue damage. The typical histological hallmarks of CD are an increased infiltration of intraepithelial lymphocytes, crypts hyperplasia, and villous atrophy. These microscopic features, together with the detection of CD-specific autoantibodies, allow the clinical diagnosis of CD. Its clinical presentation could widely vary from asymptomatic subjects to severe malabsorption leading to diarrhea and nutritional deficiencies. CD is often associated with other autoimmune condition (such as type-1 diabetes) and other congenital disorders (such as Down syndrome). The only currently available treatment is represented by a lifelong strict gluten-free diet, but many new potential therapies are under investigation and will be hopefully available in the nearest future.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Celiac disease
- Gluten-dependent enteropathy
- Gluten intolerance
- Malabsorption
- Non-celiac gluten sensitivity
- Intestinal biopsy
- Tissue transglutaminase
- Anti-endomysium antibodies
- Deamidated gliadin peptides
Definition
A permanent sensitivity to gluten resulting in a small-intestinal inflammatory disorder occurring in genetically predisposed individuals belonging to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class II specific haplotypes, celiac disease (CD) is characterized by a variable combination of elevated titers of celiac-specific autoantibodies, an inflammatory enteropathy with variable degrees of severity, and a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) and extraintestinal complaints [1, 2] .
Described in modern times by Samuel Gee in 1888 [3], it was only in the 1940s that Dicke identified the central role of gluten [4]. The subsequent availability, in the 1960s [5], of a capsule to obtain biopsies from the small intestine allowed the description of the typical changes caused by gluten in the duodenal mucosa of affected individuals. In the following decades, it became clear that CD reached far beyond the intestine as it was associated with many non-GI signs and symptoms, some HLA-associated, some not. Among the best described are: short stature [6, 7], osteoporosis [8, 9], iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) [10–12], arthritis [13–15], headaches [16–18], liver and biliary tract abnormalities [19, 20], myalgia [21, 22], adverse pregnancy outcomes [23–25], dental enamel defects [26, 27], dermatitis herpetiformis [28, 29], and others. In addition, a clear association with other autoimmune conditions such as type 1 diabetes has been well documented [30–32], and its link with some congenital disorders such as IgA deficiency and Down syndrome among others was discovered [33]. Although a genetic-based disease, CD can have its onset at any age, from infancy to old age, triggered by traumatic events, or in most cases without any obvious precipitating factor.
Epidemiology
The prevalence of CD is increasing at a remarkable pace during the past few decades [34–39]. Once thought to be a rare condition, affecting no more than 1/10,000 people, thanks to the availability and widespread use of specific and sensitive serological markers, CD is now recognized worldwide as a common disorder, with a prevalence varying between 3 and 13 per 1000 [40]. While an increased awareness, especially in North America, is responsible for increased diagnostic rates, reliable epidemiological data document worldwide a true increase in prevalence, of the order of doubling rates every 20 years or so. In Northern Sweden, an epidemiological investigation employing a combined serological/endoscopic approach in an unselected population of 1000 adults found a prevalence of almost 2 % [41]. It is assumed that a variety of environmental factors are responsible for such a rapid change [34–39]. Among them: modalities of delivery [42, 43], early-life infections [44], including RSV infections leading to hospitalization [45], exposure to antibiotics [46], infant feeding practices [47, 48], and even socioeconomic status [49, 50]. However, only a limited portion of the expected celiac patients is actually identified, with proportions varying between different countries: in the USA, even though CD overall prevalence should be around 1 %, only about 15 % of this population (including children and adults) has been diagnosed and can therefore be treated [51]. This phenomenon of underdiagnosis is likely due to a combination of inadequate awareness and a high prevalence of asymptomatic patients and appears to be quite widespread. Recent data suggest that unless a mass screening is implemented, it might be hard to improve substantially our current diagnosis rates, as even strategies based on large-scale case finding have failed to improve diagnostic rates [52] .
Of interest, CD seems to affect more females than males, with a ratio of about 2:1. However, since studies of prevalence based on screening do not show such clear-cut difference, it is currently thought that the female predominance, while in part due to a true higher prevalence in girls versus boys, could also in part be attributed to the fact that women appear to utilize health-care services more than men [53, 54]. Currently, in most populations, women constitute 60–70 % of individuals with diagnosed CD [55, 56] .
Etiopathogenesis
Like most multifactorial disorders, CD is the result of a complex interaction between genes, immune status of the host, and environmental triggers.
Genetic Factors
The weight of genetic predisposing factors in CD pathogenesis is relevant, as initially suggested by the observation of a strong familiar aggregation [57], with a prevalence of CD among first-degree relatives of around 10 %. The most important and best-characterized susceptibility gene is the HLA class II; in particular, the HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 alleles are required for CD development. The concordance rate is about 30 % among HLA-identical siblings, 80 % in monozygotic twins, and 10 % in dizygotic twins [58]. The HLA-DQ2 molecules are expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells; they contain positively charged pockets that preferentially bind negatively charged epitopes, such as deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) , and present them to cluster of differentiation-4 (CD4)+ T cells thereby activating them [59, 60].
The Central Role of HLA-DQ Haplotype
HLA genes are located on chromosome six and are divided into three classes (I–III). HLA-DQ (6p21.3) belongs to class II and is composed of a heterodimer located on antigen-presenting cells and encoded by HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1. Each of the copies of the HLA-DQ gene encodes for a heterodimer, resulting in four proteins (one couple per chromosome). HLA-DQ2 homozygotes (DQB1*02 on both chromosomes) subjects have the highest risk to develop CD, fivefold higher than heterozygotes [61, 62]. Even if more rare in the general population, DQ2 homozygosis is characteristic of 25 % of all CD patients and often relates to a more severe clinical outcome, as suggested by its association with earlier disease onset [63, 64] and its higher prevalence in refractory CD patients [65]. In fact, the immune response arising in homozygous individuals is stronger than the response from heterozygous individuals [57, 66]. The most common configuration (more than 50 % of CD patients) is represented by DQ2.5 (DQB1*02/DQA1*05) heterozygotes [62].
HLA-DQ8 is found in 5–10 % of CD patients [62, 67], with DQ8 homozygosis conferring increased risk compared to DQ8 heterozygosis [68]. It must be noted that about 5 % of CD patients carry only one of the HLA-DQ2 heterodimer alleles (HLA-DQA1*05 or HLA-DQB1*02), therefore encoding for the so-called “half heterodimer.” These patients constitute the overwhelming majority of CD subjects not carrying the full HLA-DQ2 and/or -DQ8 alleles [69]. The highest risk group includes individuals who inherit both DQ8 and DQ2.
Only less than 1 % of patients who fulfill clinical criteria for CD do not carry the DQ2 (including half heterodimer) nor the DQ8 alleles [69]. Thus, in the clinical practice CD can be virtually excluded in individuals lacking HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8.
Interestingly, 30 % of European descent individuals carry HLA-DQ2 susceptibility allele, however only about 4 % of these individuals will develop CD [61]. This suggests that even though those molecules are necessary, they are not sufficient to induce the disease, implying that other genetic and environmental factors must contribute to it.
Non-HLA Genetic Susceptibility Factors
HLA alleles explain only 35 % of the disease genetic susceptibility, while the remaining is due to numerous non-HLA genes that singularly contribute to a much lower extent to CD heritability. A recent dense genotyping study [70] identified 13 new CD risk loci reaching genome-wide significance, bringing the number of known CD-associated susceptibility loci (including the HLA locus) to 40. Notably, 64 % of the 39 non-HLA loci were shared with at least another autoimmune disease (e.g., type 1 diabetes), reinforcing the idea that autoimmune disorders may share common pathogenic pathways [71].
In those regions, more than 115 non-HLA genes have been associated to CD, individually contributing only modestly to the overall disease risk. Twenty-eight of them encode for molecules involved in the immune response, reinforcing the central role of immune dysregulation in CD pathogenesis. Post-genome-wide association studies (GWAS) will need to focus on elucidating the functional basis of these genetic variants, in particular, the role of regulatory variation. Furthermore, considering multiple gene variants may help refining risk prediction models and identifying high-risk individuals that could benefit of preventive strategies.
Environmental Factors
The high impact of genetic predisposing factors in CD does not exclude a key role of the environment in triggering disease development. In fact, the increased incidence of CD in the past decades cannot be explained by genetic drift and most likely results from faster changes in the environment. In an elegant review, Abadie et al. [72] show that CD prevalence does not perfectly correlate, as it would be predicted, with the levels of wheat consumption and frequencies of HLA-DQ predisposing alleles, thus emphasizing the role of environmental factors in CD pathogenesis.
Infant Feeding Practices and CD Development
Mode of delivery and breast-feeding contributes to shape the infant immune system, thus suggesting that both maternal microbial intestinal flora and early infant feeding practices may have a key role in determining future development of immune-mediated diseases.
As for modalities of delivery, elective cesarean section (C-section) has been associated with a modest increased risk of later CD, possibly related to the profound differences in the intestinal microbiota found between vaginally versus C-section delivered babies [43, 73].
The importance of early infant feeding and timing of first gluten introduction had been highlighted by the so-called “Swedish epidemic.” In the late 1980s in Sweden, a fourfold increase in CD incidence was recorded in children below the age of two that dropped to pre-1985 rates a decade later [74, 75]. This rapid rise in disease incidence correlated with several changes in infant dietary patterns including introduction of gluten after completing breast-feeding and increased amount of gluten in the infant diet. Of interest, such increased incidence declined to pre-epidemic levels only after these changes were reverted [76, 77]. Prolonged breast-feeding too had been thought to have a protective effect on later onset of the disease [78, 79]. On this basis, gradual introduction of small amounts of gluten during breast-feeding has been proposed as strategy to prevent early onset of CD, and breast-feeding is recommended, in infants born in families at risk for CD, for the whole first year of life, with gluten introduction advised between 4 and 6 months of life [80, 81]. While prior studies had suggested, as we have seen, that infant feeding practices and timing of initial gluten exposure are important, two recent multicenter randomized trials that tested strategies of early or delayed gluten introduction in infants, showed that neither strategy appeared to influence celiac disease risk. Additionally, breast-feeding was not show to protect against the development of CD [82, 83].
Viral Infections
Among environmental factors that contribute to trigger CD, infective agents have been proposed. Higher rates of summer births were described in children with CD, suggesting that exposure of 4–6-month-old infants to winter-linked viral infections such as rotavirus may play a role. The first correlation between viruses and CD dates back to the 1980s when a homology between alpha gliadin and a protein of the human adenovirus [84] had been described and related to increased frequency of adenovirus infection in CD patients [85] compared to controls. More recently, increased rate of rotavirus infections (as measured by anti-rotavirus antibody titers) has been associated with a moderate, but significantly increased risk of CD in HLA-susceptible children [86]. The mechanisms through which viral infections in early life can increase CD occurrence in later years have not been elucidated.
Microbiome
The composition of intestinal microbiota as well as bacterial metabolic products (and especially short-chain fatty acids) can affect intestinal epithelium function and mucosal immune homeostasis. Both quantitative and qualitative differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiome have been observed in patients with autoimmune disorders [87, 88], as well as CD [89–93] when compared to healthy individuals. In the context of CD, an expansion of some pathogenic bacterial populations ( Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus) [93, 94] and a reduction in butyrate-producing bacteria (Bifidobacterium) [95, 96] have been described. Currently, it is still unclear whether the observed changes in the microbial composition are the cause or the result of the intestinal inflammatory process. Indeed, epithelial alterations, such as those described in CD, could create a specific environment favoring the selective colonization of some microbial species, thus contributing to the creation of the microenvironmental milieu that favors the disease development. This is clearly a rapidly evolving field, likely to bring important new acquisitions in the near future.
Pathogenesis
CD is a chronic inflammatory disorder with autoimmune features, characterized by a T cell-mediated immune response arising in the small-intestinal mucosa upon gluten ingestion. In genetically susceptible individuals, gliadin peptides activate stress pathways and provide ligands for innate immune receptors, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory mediators that then sustain the T cell response both in the lamina propria and in the epithelium (Fig. 40.1). This inflammatory reaction typically involves both the innate and the adaptive arms of the immune response. In this model, two hits are required, each one being necessary but not sufficient for the development of CD: one is the activation of stress markers in intestinal epithelial cells and the second is the rise of a gluten-specific proinflammatory CD4 T cell response in the lamina propria [97, 215]. These two events lead to the full activation of mobilization of lymphocytes in the intestinal epithelium (intraepithelial lymphocytes—IELs), final responsible of tissue destruction [98].
The immunological reaction occurring in CD patients follows the ingestion of gluten-containing cereals: wheat, rye, and barley. Glutenins and gliadins, typical gluten components, are responsible for the viscosity and elasticity of the wheat dough [99, 100].Their high concentration of glutamine and proline residues (35 and 15 % of the total amino acid content) renders them highly resistant to GI enzymes [101]. Indeed, the lack of prolyl-endopeptidase activity in any of the human digestive enzymes prevents enzymatic attack of proline-rich domains in gluten proteins.Thus, at the end of a normal, full digestive process of gluten, many gliadin peptides remain undigested in the intestinal lumen. The mechanism through which such peptides reach the intestinal lamina propria is not entirely clear. Even though an increase in intestinal permeability has been shown in CD, a retro-transcytosis pathway has been described for secretory antibodies, potentially having a role also for gliadin transport [102].
Tissue-Tranglutaminase 2
In the subsequent steps in CD pathogenesis, the enzyme tissue transglutaminase 2 (tTG) has a pivotal role. tTG is a calcium-dependent transamidating enzyme that catalyzes covalent cross-linking of proteins. When located extracellularly in the presence of calcium, tTG is in an open and active form [103]; furthermore, an inflammatory environment leads to its constitutive activation [104]. tTG is the main autoantigen for CD: In addition, it has a crucial role in inducing posttranslational modification of gluten peptides. In fact, in the lamina propria, tTG mediates the conversion of glutamine into glutamic acid, introducing negatively charged residues into gliadin peptides that act as immunogenic epitopes binding to HLA-DQ molecules with relatively higher affinity, thus representing a prerequisite for a gluten-specific T cell response [105].
Autoantibodies
Genetic, mechanistic, and epidemiological data relate CD to other autoimmune disorders. One of the key diagnostic features of CD is the presence of serum anti-tTG IgA and IgG autoantibodies . The mechanisms leading to their production in CD are unclear. The upregulation and activation of tTG in inflamed tissues may generate additional antigenic epitopes by cross-linking or deamidating exogenous or endogenous proteins. However, the most accepted hypothesis for their formation, which explains also their dependence on dietary gluten, is that the enzyme cross-links itself to gluten during the substrate–enzyme interaction [106]. Once internalized, those complexes are processed and gluten epitopes bind HLA-DQ molecules of the B cell that may allow gluten-reactive CD4 T cells provide the required help to tTG-specific B cells in a hapten carrier-like manner and drive tTG-specific antibody production.
The Adaptive Immune Response in CD
CD originates as a result of both innate immunity and adaptive immunity activation. Adaptive response, characterized by the activation a gluten-specific CD4 T cell response in the intestinal lamina propria, is a key event in CD pathogenesis. Gluten contains a large number of peptides capable of stimulating T cells. Dendritic cells present negatively charged gliadin peptides through HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 molecules to naïve CD4 T cells, thus enhancing a T helper 1 inflammatory response, characterized by the production of high levels of interferon-γ (Fig. 40.1).
The gluten-specific CD4 T cell response is sustained by several cytokines, including IL-15 and IL-21. The expression of IL-21, enhanced by gluten, is very high in active CD patients, while it is downregulated in potential CD [107], supporting its role in the induction of tissue damage. It acts in synergy with IL-15 [108] promoting interferon-γ production and enhancing cytotoxic CD8 T cells proliferation and survival; however, the mechanism initiating its production in CD is unclear.
The Innate Immune Response
As mentioned, innate immune activation is also necessary for the development of CD. There is in fact evidence that in addition to the immunodominant epitopes, which as, discussed, are presented to CD4 naïve T cells, gliadin also contains fragments which are able to enhance epithelial stress and induce an innate immune effect [109–111]. The best-known fragment is the peptide 31–43 (P31–43) of α-gliadin, which is able to upregulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-related molecules (MICs) [112] to activate the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway and induce apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. P31–43 induces cell proliferation and actin cytoskeleton rearrangements in in vitro and ex vivo models [109–111, 113, 114]. The proliferative response elicited by P31–43 in CD mucosa involves epidermal growth factor (EGF)/IL15 cooperation. Of note, a constitutive activation of the EGF receptor (EGF-R)/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) pathway has been found in celiac patients [110] potentially representing a predisposing condition to the damaging effects of gliadin.
Of interest, P31–43 is able to impair actin cytoskeleton in healthy subjects, suggesting that it can act on similar pathways altered in CD cells. In addition, it enhances the expression of IL-15, a key innate cytokine involved in CD pathogenesis, as it contributes actively to enhance the expression of activating natural killer cells (NK) receptors (i.e., NKG2D) on IELs and impair the T regulatory cells function in celiac patients [115, 116].
IELs Activation and the Induction of Tissue Damage
The tissue damage typical of CD, characterized by villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, is due to a profound remodeling of the small intestinal architecture and is mainly mediated by cytotoxic IELs. IELs represent a heterogeneous population including TcRα/β CD8 cells NK-like cells, and TcRγ/δ cells.
As evident in potential CD patients, the gluten-specific T cell adaptive immune response alone can occur even in the absence of villous atrophy, suggesting that other signals are required to induce tissue damage [98]. Indeed, the full activation of IELs and acquisition of their cytotoxic killing phenotype requires also stimuli from the epithelial compartment. Increased expression of stress molecules, such as nonclassical MHC class I molecules (i.e., MIC and HLA-E), has been shown in intestinal epithelial cells of active CD patients, as part of the innate stress response induced by gluten or by other environmental triggers. MIC and HLA-E are ligands for NKG2D and CD94, activating NK receptors that are upregulated on IELs in CD patients and whose expression is enhanced by IL15. Activation of IELs, with increased Fas ligand expression, results in epithelial cell apoptosis and villous atrophy via interactions with Fas on intestinal epithelial cells.Altogether, the end result of these various events is to lead to IEL infiltration and the resulting tissue destruction, characterized by crypt hyperplasia and villous atrophy.
These changes occur in a continuum, going from normal to a complete flattening of the villi in a slow progression. Marsh [117] described in great detail such progression and his description is also utilized in the pathology reports from duodenal biopsies. Thus, the intestinal damage seen in CD is described as follows:
-
Type 0 or pre-infiltrative stage (normal);
-
Type 1 or infiltrative stage (increased IELs);
-
Type 2 or hyperplastic stage (type 1 + hyperplastic crypts);
-
Type 3 or destructive stage (type 2 + villous atrophy of progressively more severe degrees, denominated 3a—partial atrophy, 3b—subtotal atrophy, and 3c—total atrophy).
Clinical Presentations
The inflammatory changes described in the previous section, resulting in the most advanced cases in severe villous atrophy, lead to a wide variety of clinical presentations. While GI manifestations are understandably present and in many cases prominent, CD goes well beyond the GI tract, so that basically all systems and organs can be involved. GI signs and symptoms due to malabsorption , such as diarrhea and abdominal pain, are very common and easily lead to evaluation for CD, but they are by no means universally present. In fact, there is evidence [118–122] that CD presentation in children and teenagers has substantially changed over time, moving from a malabsorptive disorder causing GI symptoms and malnutrition to a more subtle condition causing a variety of extraintestinal manifestations (see Table 40.1). Thus, it is understandable that the term “typical,” reserved for the GI manifestations of CD, is quickly becoming obsolete, as the extraintestinal manifestations are now so prevalent they are no longer to be referred to as “atypical” [123]. It is indeed this variety of presentations, and the fact that CD may also be entirely asymptomatic, that is responsible for the dismal rate of diagnoses around the globe.
Table 40.1 reports the main clinical presentations of CD, with their prevalent age distribution. As it can be seen, the clinical manifestations can be protean, thus making the diagnosis not obvious in most cases. When CD has its onset in infancy and very early childhood, the GI manifestations prevail and can be quite aggressive, resulting in a clinical picture of malnutrition and failure to thrive, often associated with a protein-losing enteropathy. Subsequently, however, the onset may be more subtle, and more extraintestinal manifestations become common .
GI Manifestations
Abdominal pain and distention is probably the most common symptom of patients diagnosed with CD worldwide; in Canadian children, it has been reported in as many as 90 % [124]. Chronic or intermitted diarrhea, characterized by bulky, foul-smelling, greasy stool, is a very common symptom in children with CD. Its occurrence, however, is progressively becoming less frequent than in the past. Counterintuitively, long-standing and occasionally severe constipation can be the presenting manifestation in a significant amount of patients, children, as well as adults [125]. Constipation appears to be related to a well-documented delay in oro-cecal transit time [126, 127], possibly caused in part by disturbed upper GI motor function [128] . Other presenting symptoms related to the GI tract are vomiting (especially in infants and toddlers), weight loss, or failure to thrive leading—particularly in cases of delayed diagnosis—to severe malnutrition and cachexia. However, it should be noted that children with CD can also be overweight or obese , as well documented in the literature, (reviewed in [129]) so that the absence of malnutrition should by no means rule out the possibility of CD. More rarely, other disorders such as acute electrolyte disturbances, hypotension, and lethargy can accompany the clinical picture [130]. Recurrent intussusception, an uncommon but important GI sign, was first described in children in 1997 [131], and it is now well recognized as an event occurring more frequently in CD children before their diagnosis than in control populations [132].
Mild elevation of liver transaminases is well described in pediatric CD. A recent meta-analysis [133] revealed that this sign is presented by 36 % of children with CD, while 12 % of children with mild unexplained hypertransaminasemia have CD. Of note, a gluten-free diet (GFD) normalized transaminase levels in 77–100 % of patients with CD within 4–8 months .
Extraintestinal Manifestations
Anemia in celiac children can be the end result of several different, and sometimes combined, causes; however, the single most common type of anemia is due to iron deficiency.
IDA has in fact been reported in between 12 and 69 % of newly diagnosed celiac cases [10–12, 122, 134]. Even when asymptomatic, CD can lead to IDA; in a large series of patients with subclinical CD, IDA was indeed found in almost half of the patients, with adults having a higher incidence than children: 46 versus 35 % [10]. The pathogenesis of iron deficiency in celiac seems to be straightforward; in fact, iron is absorbed in the duodenum and proximal jejunum, areas that are typically most affected in florid CD. Thus, most cases result from an impaired absorption of iron. The higher prevalence of anemia in celiac patients with an atrophic mucosa (Marsh 3) compared to those with mild enteropathy (Marsh 1 or 2) recently found in a study conducted in Italy on a large number of patients [135] provides indirect support for this.
Dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) is considered the skin presentation of CD. Rare in children, DH affects mostly teenagers and adults who present symmetrical, pruritic blisters followed by erosions, excoriations, and hyperpigmentation. The most commonly involved sites are the elbows (90 %), knees (30 %), shoulders, buttocks, sacral region, and face. Itching of variable intensity, scratching, and burning sensation immediately preceding the development of lesions are common [136, 137]. The diagnosis rests on a combination of clinical, serological (same autoantibodies utilized for CD), and histological criteria showing the typical IgA deposits in skin biopsies [138, 139]. Its treatment is based on a strict GFD. Dapsone and/or other drugs should be used during the period until the GFD is effective [138].
Dental enamel hypoplasia is more common in patients with CD compared to the general population [26], and in CD it has been reported with a prevalence ranging from 10 to 97 %. It appears to be more prevalent in children, compared with adults with CD and is thought to be secondary to nutritional deficiencies and immune disturbances during the period of enamel formation in the first 7 years [27].
Aphthous ulcers too can be present in children and adults with CD and they often regress once the patients are on a GFD [28].
Low bone mineral density is found in the vast majority of newly diagnosed patients, and in some cases it is advanced to osteoporosis and can be associated with fractures. The etiology of such bone alterations in CD is multifactorial, thought to be mostly secondary to the combination of intestinal malabsorption and chronic inflammation. At diagnosis, approximately one-third of adult CD patients have osteoporosis, one-third have osteopenia, and one-third have normal bone mineral density [29]. While children with CD, once on a GFD, seem to be able to improve their bone mineral density more fastly, adult patients’ bone mineral density was found to be significantly lower than expected for the normal population, not just at diagnosis, but even after 1 or 2 years of GFD [140]. Thus, there is a risk for suboptimal peak bone mass acquisition and a retarded growth in CD children, as the bone density increases until the end of puberty , when it reaches its peak value: if normal peak bone mass is not achieved, the individual is at a higher risk for developing osteoporosis [141].
Joint involvement, though not too common, has been described in children and adults with CD and it is suggested that patients presenting with unexplained articular manifestations be tested for CD [142].
Children with CD have a slightly increased frequency of neurological symptoms compared to controls. These include headache [143], peripheral neuropathy [144], and seizures; ataxia is described only in adult cases [145]. The prevalence of epilepsy in CD children also appears to be slightly higher than expected, around 1 % [146]. Seizures are often generalized tonic–clonic, but partial and occasionally absence seizures are also reported [146, 147]. A recent epidemiologic study of nearly 29,000 subjects with CD and 143,000 controls found that CD increased the risk of epilepsy, including in children, by 1.4-fold [148]. In some patients with CD and epilepsy refractory to antiepileptic drugs, seizures have been controlled with a GFD [149, 150].
Relatively common in adolescents are also psychiatric issues: anxiety, often with recurrent panic attacks, hallucinations, depression, leading to a slightly higher prevalence of suicidal behavior in celiac patients [30]. Interestingly, there is some evidence that the GFD may help in alleviating depression in celiac adolescents [31].
Disease Associations
A series of recent large-scale epidemiological investigations, mostly, but not solely, conducted in Sweden, have also revealed a growing number of associated conditions that can occur with CD, although in most cases the reasons for such associations and the clinical relevance of them remain unclear. Among the conditions with increased prevalence in CD, in most cases related to adult patients, are: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [151], ischemic heart disease [152], urticaria [153], eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease [154], pancreatitis [155], hemochromatosis [156], cataracts and uveitis [157, 158], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [159], nephrolithiasis [160], end-stage renal disease [161], eating disorders [162], primary hyperparathyroidism [38] (a risk however subsiding on GFD), adrenal insufficiency [33], systemic lupus [163], cataract [40], and endometriosis [39].
In addition, the offspring of celiac mothers appear to also be at an increased risk for a number of adverse events, including congenital malformations [164].
On the other hand, a reduced risk for ovarian and breast cancer has been reported for celiac women [165].
IgA deficiency has also been associated with CD. In fact, about 8 % of IgA-deficient children are celiac [166] and about 2 % of CD children are IgA-deficient [167]. While clinically not relevant, this association is important in the strategy of screening for CD (see below).
Autoimmune Conditions
A strong association has also been shown between CD and autoimmune disorders, thought to be mostly due to a shared genetic component in the HLA region. The best described association is with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), where a prevalence of approximately 10 % of CD is found [32, 168]. About two-thirds of children diagnosed with CD after T1DM onset have elevated levels of celiac antibodies at the time of T1DM diagnosis or within the first 24 months; however, an additional 40 % of patients develop CD a few years after diabetes onset [169], and even adults with a long history of T1DM show a progressively higher prevalence of CD [170]. Thus, it is recommended that T1DM children be repeatedly tested for CD. Of note, it has been shown that the presence or absence of GI symptoms in children with T1DM has no predictable value for biopsy-confirmed CD or not [168]. Clearly, once diagnosed with CD, children with T1DM need to follow a GFD. Its effects on diabetic control are however unclear: In fact, glycemic control, both in children with or without malabsorption, has been found either improved or unaffected [171].
The issue of whether the onset of autoimmune disorders in CD patients is favored by the ingestion of gluten remains controversial. An increased prevalence of autoimmune disorders was found in parallel with the increasing age at diagnosis of CD [172], suggesting that prolonged exposure to gluten may favor the onset of autoimmune conditions; however, these results have not been reproduced by subsequent investigations [173, 174], leaving the question unresolved [175].
Chromosomal Disorders
Down syndrome [176], Turner syndrome [177], and Williams syndrome [178] are conditions where the prevalence of CD has been found to be higher than in the general population, and hence children with such syndromes need to be screened for CD.
Diagnosing CD
Given the many various manifestations of CD, in children as well as adults, clearly the first requisite for diagnosis is a high degree of suspicion. Table 40.2 lists the circumstances that demand testing for CD .
The availability of very sensitive and specific autoantibodies in the IgA subclass, generated in the small intestinal mucosa and detectable in the serum, such as the tTG-IgA or anti-endomysium IgA (EMA-IgA) [179] has given the physician a powerful screening tool. In addition, another class of antibodies has also been found valuable in screening (especially in very young children when tTG-IgA could be negative [180, 181]) and in following up patients with CD : the anti-DGP , both -IgA and -IgG antibodies produced against the gliadin peptides after they have been modified by the tTG [182]. Currently, it is universally recommended [33, 179, 183] that tTG-IgA and total serum IgA be the first line of screening, due to the very elevated sensitivity of this test. Total serum IgA needs to be added in order to ascertain that the individual is able to produce tTG-IgA: In fact, celiac patients who happen to be IgA-deficient may have a false-negative tTG-IgA. In these circumstances, both tTG-IgG [184–186] and DGP-IgG [187] can be usefully checked as markers of CD.
In 1990, the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published diagnostic criteria [188] that have been universally applied for over 20 years, both in pediatric age and in adults. While reducing the number of biopsy procedures needed for a firm diagnosis from three of the original guidelines (initial one showing typical changes, followed after a year on GFD by a second one documenting healing, and finally by a third one after gluten challenge to show relapse) to only one, they still called for the indispensable role of documenting the flattening of small-intestinal mucosal villi in patients with a consistent history and laboratory findings. In 2012, an ad hoc task force of the same society published revised criteria [1] and produced an evidence-based algorithm that allowed the physician to skip the duodenal biopsy under certain circumstances, namely, in children and teenagers showing a genetic asset and a history compatible with CD, a very elevated titer (more than ten times the upper limit of normal) of tTG-IgA, along with a positive EMA titer. While this simplified approach appears certainly valid, as it possesses a positive predictive value close to 100 %, one needs to apply it with great care. In fact, children with GI complaints diagnosed without the endoscopy may have additional disorders that would go undiagnosed by skipping this procedure.
Figure 40.2 is an algorithm (based in part on the ESPGHAN guidelines [1]) that summarizes the diagnostic steps for a child or teenager suspected of CD. Again, Table 40.2 lists the presentations that require screening. The subject with normal serum IgA and normal tTG-IgA do not need to be considered celiac, given the high sensitivity of the test; however, since it would appear that in the infant and toddler tTG-IgA may not be as sensitive as in later ages, DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG can be measured additionally. Furthermore, in the presence of a strong clinical suspicion in the very young child, it would be appropriate to still proceed with an esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy even if celiac serology is negative.
If the subject has positive tTG-IgA, then the titer becomes important. In fact, as mentioned, with titers that are more than ten times the upper limit of normal range, the EMA titer must be checked and if it too is clearly positive, then the diagnosis of CD can be considered definitive. On the contrary, the EGD would be necessary if the EMA prove negative, or in all cases where the tTG-IgA increase does not reach the threshold of > 10× normal. It is important to notice that it is recommended [1, 183, 189] that at least four biopsies be taken from the distal duodenum, and also one or two from the bulb, otherwise the diagnostic yield may be jeopardized by the occasional patchy duodenal lesions.
The interpretation of the pathology of the duodenal biopsies guides the final diagnosis: while pathology changes showing lesions of Marsh type 2–3, in the presence of positive serology, confirm the diagnosis, caution must be exerted for findings of Marsh type 1, especially when not supported by positive serology. In fact, such increased presence of IELs (“lymphocytic duodenosis”) has been found to be due to celiac in no more than 16–39 % of cases [190, 191]. Thus, additional conditions (see Table 40.3) must be carefully looked at before concluding for its association with CD.
As for those with a Marsh type 0, the call is even more delicate. In fact, the patient can be defined as “potential” if tTG-IgA are elevated > 10× and/or EMA titer is positive; but with tTG-IgA increased less than ten times and a negative EMA, then the possibility of a false-positive tTG-IgA must be considered. This occurrence is especially common, for unclear reasons, in children with T1DM, where tTG-IgA have also been found to spontaneously normalize [192]. Such patients should therefore remain on a gluten-containing diet and be carefully monitored.
More complex is the decision about the need for a GFD for true “potential” celiac children and adolescents who are asymptomatic. The literature shows in fact variable percentages (between 30 and 60 %) of evolution into full-blown CD when they are left on gluten [193–195], including the possibility of some eventually becoming serologically negative. It seems in fact that potential CD patients show a low grade of inflammation that likely could be due to active regulatory mechanisms preventing the progression toward a mucosal damage [196]. In essence, while research will eventually allow us to predict which patients would develop full-blown CD if left on gluten, currently we do not have this capacity, so that the decision on whether or not to put potential celiac patients on a GFD must be taken with great care, on an individual basis, and be properly agreed upon by the family.
Complications
Refractory CD
Better known by the older terminology as “refractory sprue,” refractory CD is a very severe form of CD that does not respond to a GFD, in spite of normalization of celiac serology [197]. Refractory CD almost exclusively occurs in adults or elderly patients who have been suffering from malabsorptive symptoms for a long time prior to being diagnosed. This condition is further classified into type I and type II on the basis of gamma chain T cell clonal rearrangement and aberrant T cell phenotypes. Type II refractory CD is the most aggressive form, leading to the most feared complication of CD: the enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma (EATL). As a consequence, refractory CD results in an increased mortality rate, with a 5-year survival rate of 80–96 % for patients with type I refractory CD and 44–58 % for type II cases [197]. When examining the survival rate of those patients with type II refractory CD who developed EATL, the survival rate at 5 years was a dismal 8 % [198]. New treatment modalities, including autologous stem cell transplant, are becoming available for this aggressive condition [199, 200].
Increased Mortality Rate
Aside from the risks related to refractory CD, evidence is mounting that unrecognized, and hence untreated, CD may carry a risk for increased mortality rate [201]. There appears to be a positive correlation between diagnostic delay and/or insufficient compliance with the diet and decreased life expectancy, which has been documented in a large retrospective study in Italy [202]. More recently, increased mortality has also been reported in undiagnosed patients (based on elevated serum tTG-IgA) in the USA [203] and in Europe [204–206].
All of the evidence therefore strongly emphasizes the importance of an aggressive strategy for early detection and treatment of patients with CD.
Treatment
CD is a lifelong condition and a strict GFD is currently the only available treatment. While the exact amount of gluten that can be tolerated daily by CD patients is unknown and is likely to be subject to a wide interindividual variability, there is evidence that no patient would react to a daily dose of up to 10 mg, while the majority would at 100 mg or above [207]. In practice, many patients, and especially older children and adults, do not present any symptom after inadvertent gluten ingestion or sporadic intentional consumption of gluten-containing products. In addition, dietary compliance assessment is not always an easy task, since serology often fails to reveal slight transgressions. Therefore, a periodical follow-up is needed and the importance of a lifelong diet should be constantly reinforced, especially to asymptomatic patients. The dietary restriction must include wheat, rye, barley, and their derivatives such as triticale, spelt, and kamut. Other cereals such as rice, corn, maize, and buckwheat are perfectly safe for CD patients and can be used as wheat substitutes. Oats were included in the first group of toxic cereals, but later evidence has conclusively shown that they are tolerated by the vast majority of patients, provided the oats-based products are manufactured in plants that can guarantee absence of any possible cross-contamination with flours based on wheat, rye, or barley. In any case, introducing them with prudence is recommended in order to recognize any adverse effect.
Gluten withdrawal is necessary to shut down the inflammatory response arising in the gut. However, whether a GFD could prevent the development of associated autoimmune conditions or complications, such as malignancies, is still debated [175]. As discussed previously, since the benefits of GFD in terms of prevention of complications and comorbidities in patients with potential CD are still unclear, it remains controversial whether such dietary regimen should be proposed to all of them, particularly those who are asymptomatic.
Future Potential Therapeutic Strategies
Following a lifelong strict dietary regimen is not an easy task for many patients, especially teenagers and young adults who may not easily accept limitations to their social life. On the other hand, there is a subgroup of CD patients (i.e., refractory CD) who fail to respond even to a strict GFD, thus reinforcing the concept that GFD could not be considered a cure for all CD patients. Importantly, a variety of commercial food products and some safe cereals can be cross-contaminated with unsafe cereals as the result of mixing during transportation and processing. Hence, there is a requirement for alternative approaches to treat CD.
A first approach may consist in creating new varieties of wheat that are safe for CD patients. The identification of the full sequences of immune-stimulating peptides may lead to the production of wheat varieties lacking biologically active peptide sequences through breeding programs and/or transgenic technology. Large-scale cultivars where these cereals could replace the current toxic varieties could reduce the risk of possible cross-contamination. However, it is evident that this process will take a long time to be developed and would still require for the patients the need to carefully select such products.
Recent progresses in understanding the cellular and molecular basis of CD have helped in identifying several possible therapeutical targets, from already available molecules that can find a new application in this disease to new drugs that may be developed. Strategies vary from gliadin-degrading enzymes that would allow the occasional consumption of gluten-containing products to the more ambitious attempt to reestablish immunological tolerance toward gluten using a peptide-based “vaccine.”
Given the high content in proline residues, gliadin peptides are highly resistant to proteolysis, thus favoring the accumulation of long fragments within the intestinal lumen. Exogenous proline and/or glutamine-specific proteases-based drugs and/or dietary supplements (i.e., ALV003 (glutenase Alvine 003) and AN-PEP (alanyl (membrane) aminopeptidase)) facilitate gluten digestion and T cell epitopes destruction [208], thus representing a useful “adjunctive” tool for CD under a GFD, in particular situations where there is a risk of cross-contamination. Another possible gluten detoxifying strategy is represented by gluten-sequestering polymers (i.e., hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-styrene sulfonate; HEMA-co-SS) that bind gluten fragments, reducing their effects on the intestinal mucosa [209].
A pharmacological reduction of intestinal permeability may contribute to reduce the load of gliadin peptides reaching the intestinal lamina propria. In this perspective, larazotide (AT-1001), a zonulin antagonist, is undergoing clinical trials in CD patients. Furthermore, inhibition of Rho kinase (RhoA or ROCK), two molecules regulating cytoskeleton and tight junction structure, has been proposed as future potential target [210].
Furthermore, the identification of specific epitopes may also provide the basis for immunomodulation by antigenic peptides. In this regard, the most ambitious and promising therapeutic intervention for CD patients is represented by a vaccine based on a set of gliadin immunodominant peptides recognized selectively by HLA-DQ2 and that should promote the induction of tolerance to gluten through a peptide-based desensitization [211] .
Other promising approaches include preventing gliadin presentation to T cells by blocking HLA-binding sites [212] or use of tTG inhibitors [213], thus impairing the adaptive immune response activated by gliadin peptides. Any immunomodulatory approach will be required to have a high safety profile to be a valuable substitute to the GFD.
Anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibodies, already tested in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, have been proposed for refractory CD, where the expansion of IELs is dependent on this cytokine. Blocking NKG2D to prevent full activation of IELs has also been proposed as a further potential therapeutic target in CD patients [214]. Again, security profile, side effects, and compliance will need to be taken into account before any of those treatments could replace GFD.
References
Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabo IR, Mearin ML, Phillips A, Shamir R, et al. European society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(1):136–60.
Ludvigsson JF, Leffler DA, Bai JC, Biagi F, Fasano A, Green PH, et al. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut. 2013;62(1):43–52.
Gee SJ. On the celiac affection. St Barth Hosp Rep. 1888;24:17–20.
van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Mulder CJ. Pioneer in the gluten free diet: Willem-Karel Dicke 1905–1962, over 50 years of gluten free diet. Gut. 1993;34(11):1473–5.
Shiner M. Coeliac disease: histopathological findings in the small intestinal mucosa studies by a peroral biopsy technique. Gut. 1960;1:48–54.
Groll A, Candy DC, Preece MA, Tanner JM, Harries JT. Short stature as the primary manifestation of coeliac disease. Lancet. 1980;2(8204):1097–9.
Cacciari E, Salardi S, Lazzari R, Cicognani A, Collina A, Pirazzoli P, et al. Short stature and celiac disease: a relationship to consider even in patients with no gastrointestinal tract symptoms. J Pediatr. 1983;103(5):708–11.
Jerosch J, Jantea C, Geske B. Osteomalacia and fatigue fractures in celiac disease. Z Rheumatol. 1990;49(2):100–2.
McFarlane XA, Bhalla AK, Reeves DE, Morgan LM, Robertson DA. Osteoporosis in treated adult coeliac disease. Gut. 1995;36(5):710–4.
Bottaro G, Cataldo F, Rotolo N, Spina M, Corazza GR. The clinical pattern of subclinical/silent celiac disease: an analysis on 1026 consecutive cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(3):691–6.
Harper JW, Holleran SF, Ramakrishnan R, Bhagat G, Green PH. Anemia in celiac disease is multifactorial in etiology. Am J Hematol. 2007;82(11):996–1000.
Hin H, Bird G, Fisher P, Mahy N, Jewell D. Coeliac disease in primary care: case finding study. BMJ. 1999;318(7177):164–7.
Bourne JT, Kumar P, Huskisson EC, Mageed R, Unsworth DJ, Wojtulewski JA. Arthritis and coeliac disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1985;44(9):592–8.
Maki M, Hallstrom O, Verronen P, Reunala T, Lahdeaho ML, Holm K, et al. Reticulin antibody, arthritis, and coeliac disease in children. Lancet. 1988;1(8583):479–80.
Pinals RS. Arthritis associated with gluten-sensitive enteropathy. J Rheumatol. 1986;13(1):201–4.
Gabrielli M, Cremonini F, Fiore G, Addolorato G, Padalino C, Candelli M, et al. Association between migraine and Celiac disease: results from a preliminary case-control and therapeutic study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(3):625–9.
Lahat E, Broide E, Leshem M, Evans S, Scapa E. Prevalence of celiac antibodies in children with neurologic disorders. Pediatr Neurol. 2000;22(5):393–6.
Serratrice J, Disdier P, de Roux C, Christides C, Weiller PJ. Migraine and coeliac disease. Headache. 1998;38(8):627–8.
Altuntas B, Kansu A, Girgin N. Hepatic damage in gluten sensitive enteropathy. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1998;40(6):597–9.
Vajro P, Fontanella A, Mayer M, De Vincenzo A, Terracciano LM, D’Armiento M, et al. Elevated serum aminotransferase activity as an early manifestation of gluten-sensitive enteropathy. J Pediatr. 1993;122(3):416–9.
Bagnato GF, Quattrocchi E, Gulli S, Giacobbe O, Chirico G, Romano C, et al. Unusual polyarthritis as a unique clinical manifestation of coeliac disease. Rheumatol Int. 2000;20(1):29–30.
King TS, Anderson JR, Wraight EP, Hunter JO, Cox TM. Skeletal muscle weakness and dysphagia caused by acid maltase deficiency: nutritional consequences of coincident celiac sprue. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21(1):46–9.
Freeman HJ. Reproductive changes associated with celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(46):5810–4.
Tata LJ, Card TR, Logan RF, Hubbard RB, Smith CJ, West J. Fertility and pregnancy-related events in women with celiac disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4):849–55.
Choi JM, Lebwohl B, Wang J, Lee SK, Murray JA, Sauer MV, et al. Increased prevalence of celiac disease in patients with unexplained infertility in the United States. J Reprod Med. 2011;56(5–6):199–203.
Aine L, Maki M, Collin P, Keyrilainen O. Dental enamel defects in celiac disease. J Oral Pathol Med. 1990;19(6):241–5.
Rasmussen P, Espelid I. Coeliac disease and dental malformation. ASDC J Dent Child. 1980;47(3):190–2.
Shuster S, Watson AJ, Marks J. Coeliac syndrome in dermatitis herpetiformis. Lancet. 1968;1(7552):1101–6.
Walker-Smith JA, Talley NA. Coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis. Med J Aust. 1973;1(1):10–2.
Hooft C, Roels H, Devos E. Diabetes and coeliac disease. Lancet. 1969;2(7631):1192.
Maki M, Hallstrom O, Huupponen T, Vesikari T, Visakorpi JK. Increased prevalence of coeliac disease in diabetes. Arch Dis Child. 1984;59(8):739–42.
Thain ME, Hamilton JR, Ehrlich RM. Coexistence of diabetes mellitus and celiac disease. J Pediatr. 1974;85(4):527–9.
Hill ID, Dirks MH, Liptak GS, Colletti RB, Fasano A, Guandalini S, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: recommendations of the north american society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40(1):1–19.
Dydensborg S, Toftedal P, Biaggi M, Lillevang ST, Hansen DG, Husby S. Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease in Denmark: a linkage study combining national registries. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(2):179–84.
Vilppula A, Kaukinen K, Luostarinen L, Krekela I, Patrikainen H, Valve R, et al. Increasing prevalence and high incidence of celiac disease in elderly people: a population-based study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:49.
Lohi S, Mustalahti K, Kaukinen K, Laurila K, Collin P, Rissanen H, et al. Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(9):1217–25.
Mustalahti K, Catassi C, Reunanen A, Fabiani E, Heier M, McMillan S, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Ann Med. 2010;42(8):587–95.
Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, Sturgeon C, Helzlsouer K, Clipp SL, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med. 2010;42(7):530–8.
Ludvigsson JF, Rubio-Tapia A, van Dyke CT, Melton LJ 3rd, Zinsmeister AR, Lahr BD, et al. Increasing incidence of celiac disease in a North American population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(5):818–24.
Lionetti E, Castellaneta S, Pulvirenti A, Tonutti E, Francavilla R, Fasano A, et al. Prevalence and natural history of potential celiac disease in at-family-risk infants prospectively investigated from birth. J Pediatr. 2012;161(5):908–14.
Walker MM, Murray JA, Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T, D’Amato M, et al. Detection of celiac disease and lymphocytic enteropathy by parallel serology and histopathology in a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(1):112–9.
Decker E, Hornef M, Stockinger S. Cesarean delivery is associated with celiac disease but not inflammatory bowel disease in children. Gut Microbes. 2011;2(2):91–8.
Marild K, Stephansson O, Montgomery S, Murray JA, Ludvigsson JF. Pregnancy outcome and risk of celiac disease in offspring: a nationwide case-control study. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(1):39–45, e3.
Myleus A, Hernell O, Gothefors L, Hammarstrom ML, Persson LA, Stenlund H, et al. Early infections are associated with increased risk for celiac disease: an incident case-referent study. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:194.
Tjernberg AR, Ludvigsson JF. Children with celiac disease are more likely to have attended hospital for prior respiratory syncytial virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(7):1502–8.
Marild K, Ye W, Lebwohl B, Green PH, Blaser MJ, Card T, et al. Antibiotic exposure and the development of coeliac disease: a nationwide case-control study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:109.
Ivarsson A, Myleus A, Norstrom F, van der Pals M, Rosen A, Hogberg L, et al. Prevalence of childhood celiac disease and changes in infant feeding. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):e687–94.
Myleus A, Ivarsson A, Webb C, Danielsson L, Hernell O, Hogberg L, et al. Celiac disease revealed in 3 % of Swedish 12-year-olds born during an epidemic. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(2):170–6.
Whyte L, Kotecha S, Watkins W, Jenkins H. Coeliac disease is more common in children with high socio-economic status. Acta Paediatr. 2013;103(3):289–94
Kondrashova A, Mustalahti K, Kaukinen K, Viskari H, Volodicheva V, Haapala AM, et al. Lower economic status and inferior hygienic environment may protect against celiac disease. Ann Med. 2008;40(3):223–31.
Rubio-Tapia A, Ludvigsson JF, Brantner TL, Murray JA, Everhart JE. The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1538–44, quiz 7, 45.
Rosen A, Sandstrom O, Carlsson A, Hogberg L, Olen O, Stenlund H, et al. Usefulness of symptoms to screen for celiac disease. Pediatrics. 2014;133(2):211–8
Dixit R, Lebwohl B, Ludvigsson JF, Lewis SK, Rizkalla-Reilly N, Green PH. Celiac disease is diagnosed less frequently in young adult males. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(7):1509–12.
Pinkhasov RM, Wong J, Kashanian J, Lee M, Samadi DB, Pinkhasov MM, et al. Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on health care utilization and health risk behavior in men and women in the United States. Intl J Clin Pract. 2010;64(4):475–87.
Green PHR, Stavropoulos SN, Panagi SG, Goldstein SL, McMahon DJ, Absan H, et al. Characteristics of adult celiac disease in the USA: results of a national survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(1):126–31.
Megiorni F, Mora B, Bonamico M, Barbato M, Montuori M, Viola F, et al. HLA-DQ and susceptibility to celiac disease: evidence for gender differences and parent-of-origin effects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(4):997–1003.
Ploski R, Ek J, Thorsby E, Sollid LM. On the HLA-DQ (alpha 1*0501, beta 1*0201)-associated susceptibility in celiac disease: a possible gene dosage effect of DQB1*0201. Tissue Antigens. 1993;41(4):173–7.
van Belzen MJ, Koeleman BP, Crusius JB, Meijer JW, Bardoel AF, Pearson PL, et al. Defining the contribution of the HLA region to cis DQ2-positive coeliac disease patients. Genes Immun. 2004;5(3):215–20.
Molberg O, Kett K, Scott H, Thorsby E, Sollid LM, Lundin KE. Gliadin specific, HLA DQ2-restricted T cells are commonly found in small intestinal biopsies from coeliac disease patients, but not from controls. Scand J Immunol. 1997;46(3):103–9.
Molberg O, McAdam SN, Korner R, Quarsten H, Kristiansen C, Madsen L, et al. Tissue transglutaminase selectively modifies gliadin peptides that are recognized by gut-derived T cells in celiac disease. Nat Med. 1998;4(6):713–7.
Mearin ML, Biemond I, Pena AS, Polanco I, Vazquez C, Schreuder GT, et al. HLA-DR phenotypes in Spanish coeliac children: their contribution to the understanding of the genetics of the disease. Gut. 1983;24(6):532–7.
Megiorni F, Mora B, Bonamico M, Barbato M, Nenna R, Maiella G, et al. HLA-DQ and risk gradient for celiac disease. Hum Immunol. 2009;70(1):55–9.
Zubillaga P, Vidales MC, Zubillaga I, Ormaechea V, Garcia-Urkia N, Vitoria JC. HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 genetic markers and clinical presentation in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34(5):548–54.
Congia M, Cucca F, Frau F, Lampis R, Melis L, Clemente MG, et al. A gene dosage effect of the DQA1*0501/DQB1*0201 allelic combination influences the clinical heterogeneity of celiac disease. Hum Immunol. 1994;40(2):138–42.
Al-Toma A, Goerres MS, Meijer JW, Pena AS, Crusius JB, Mulder CJ. Human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 homozygosity and the development of refractory celiac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(3):315–9.
Vader W, Stepniak D, Kooy Y, Mearin L, Thompson A, van Rood JJ, et al. The HLA-DQ2 gene dose effect in celiac disease is directly related to the magnitude and breadth of gluten-specific T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(21):12390–5.
Louka AS, Moodie SJ, Karell K, Bolognesi E, Ascher H, Greco L, et al. A collaborative European search for non-DQA1*05-DQB1*02 celiac disease loci on HLA-DR3 haplotypes: analysis of transmission from homozygous parents. Hum Immunol. 2003;64(3):350–8.
Pietzak MM, Schofield TC, McGinniss MJ, Nakamura RM. Stratifying risk for celiac disease in a large at-risk United States population by using HLA alleles. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(9):966–71.
Karell K, Louka AS, Moodie SJ, Ascher H, Clot F, Greco L, et al. HLA types in celiac disease patients not carrying the DQA1*05-DQB1*02 (DQ2) heterodimer: results from the European Genetics Cluster on Celiac Disease. Hum Immunol. 2003;64(4):469–77.
Trynka G, Hunt KA, Bockett NA, Romanos J, Mistry V, Szperl A, et al. Dense genotyping identifies and localizes multiple common and rare variant association signals in celiac disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43(12):1193–201.
Zhernakova A, Withoff S, Wijmenga C. Clinical implications of shared genetics and pathogenesis in autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9(11):646–59.
Abadie V, Sollid LM, Barreiro LB, Jabri B. Integration of genetic and immunological insights into a model of celiac disease pathogenesis. Ann Rev Immunol. 2011;29:493–525.
Decker E, Engelmann G, Findeisen A, Gerner P, Laass M, Ney D, et al. Cesarean delivery is associated with celiac disease but not inflammatory bowel disease in children. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):e1433–40.
Ivarsson A. The Swedish epidemic of coeliac disease explored using an epidemiological approach—some lessons to be learnt. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19(3):425–40.
Ivarsson A, Persson LA, Nystrom L, Hernell O. The Swedish coeliac disease epidemic with a prevailing twofold higher risk in girls compared to boys may reflect gender specific risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(7):677–84.
Ivarsson A, Persson LA, Nystrom L, Ascher H, Cavell B, Danielsson L, et al. Epidemic of coeliac disease in Swedish children. Acta Paediatrica. 2000;89(2):165–71.
Ivarsson A, Hernell O, Stenlund H, Persson LA. Breast-feeding protects against celiac disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(5):914–21.
Akobeng AK, Ramanan AV, Buchan I, Heller RF. Effect of breast feeding on risk of coeliac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(1):39–43.
Akobeng AK, Heller RF. Assessing the population impact of low rates of breast feeding on asthma, coeliac disease and obesity: the use of a new statistical method. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(6):483–5.
Guandalini S. The influence of gluten: weaning recommendations for healthy children and children at risk for celiac disease. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Paediatr Programme. 2007;60:139–51, discussion 51–5.
Szajewska H, Chmielewska A, Piescik-Lech M, Ivarsson A, Kolacek S, Koletzko S, et al. Systematic review: early infant feeding and the prevention of coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36(7):607–18.
Lionetti E, Castellaneta S, Francavilla R, Pulvirenti A, Tonutti E, Amarri S, Barbato M, Barbera C, Barera G, Bellantoni A, Castellano E, Guariso G, Limongelli MG, Pellegrino S, Polloni C, Ughi C, Zuin G, Fasano A, Catassi C. Introduction of gluten, HLA status, and the risk of celiac disease in children. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1295–303.
Vriezinga SL, Auricchio R, Bravi E, Castillejo G, Chmielewska A, Crespo Escobar P, Kolaček S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabo IR, Mummert E, Polanco I, Putter H, Ribes-Koninckx C, Shamir R, Szajewska H, Werkstetter K, Greco L, Gyimesi J, Hartman C, Hogen Esch C, Hopman E, Ivarsson A, Koltai T, Koning F, Martinez-Ojinaga E, te Marvelde C, Pavic A, Romanos J, Stoopman E, Villanacci V, Wijmenga C, Troncone R, Mearin ML. Randomized feeding intervention in infants at high risk for celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1304–15.
Kagnoff MF, Austin RK, Hubert JJ, Bernardin JE, Kasarda DD. Possible role for a human adenovirus in the pathogenesis of celiac disease. J Exp Med. 1984;160(5):1544–57.
Kagnoff MF, Paterson YJ, Kumar PJ, Kasarda DD, Carbone FR, Unsworth DJ, et al. Evidence for the role of a human intestinal adenovirus in the pathogenesis of coeliac disease. Gut. 1987;28(8):995–1001.
Stene LC, Honeyman MC, Hoffenberg EJ, Haas JE, Sokol RJ, Emery L, et al. Rotavirus infection frequency and risk of celiac disease autoimmunity in early childhood: a longitudinal study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(10):2333–40.
Atkinson MA, Chervonsky A. Does the gut microbiota have a role in type 1 diabetes? Early evidence from humans and animal models of the disease. Diabetologia. 2012;55(11):2868–77.
Mathis D, Benoist C. Microbiota and autoimmune disease: the hosted self. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10(4):297–301.
Forsberg G, Fahlgren A, Horstedt P, Hammarstrom S, Hernell O, Hammarstrom ML. Presence of bacteria and innate immunity of intestinal epithelium in childhood celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(5):894–904.
Sanz Y, Sanchez E, Marzotto M, Calabuig M, Torriani S, Dellaglio F. Differences in faecal bacterial communities in coeliac and healthy children as detected by PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;51(3):562–8.
Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, De Pasquale I, Ndagijimana M, Vernocchi P, Ricciuti P, et al. Duodenal and faecal microbiota of celiac children: molecular, phenotype and metabolome characterization. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:219.
Nistal E, Caminero A, Herran AR, Arias L, Vivas S, de Morales JM, et al. Differences of small intestinal bacteria populations in adults and children with/without celiac disease: effect of age, gluten diet, and disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(4):649–56.
Nadal I, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y. Imbalance in the composition of the duodenal microbiota of children with coeliac disease. J Medical Microbiol. 2007;56(Pt 12):1669–74.
Sanchez E, Nadal I, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y. Reduced diversity and increased virulence-gene carriage in intestinal enterobacteria of coeliac children. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008;8:50.
De Palma G, Nadal I, Medina M, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis and reduced immunoglobulin-coated bacteria associated with coeliac disease in children. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:63.
Collado MC, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y. Specific duodenal and faecal bacterial groups associated with paediatric coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62(3):264–9.
Jabri B, Sollid LM. Tissue-mediated control of immunopathology in coeliac disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(12):858–70.
Abadie V, Discepolo V, Jabri B. Intraepithelial lymphocytes in celiac disease immunopathology. Seminars Immunopathol. 2012;34(4):551–66.
Shewry PR, Halford NG. Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. J Exp Bot. 2002;53(370):947–58.
Shewry PR, Tatham AS. The prolamin storage proteins of cereal seeds: structure and evolution. Biochem J. 1990;267(1):1–12.
Shan L, Molberg O, Parrot I, Hausch F, Filiz F, Gray GM, et al. Structural basis for gluten intolerance in celiac sprue. Science. 2002;297(5590):2275–9.
Matysiak-Budnik T, Moura IC, Arcos-Fajardo M, Lebreton C, Menard S, Candalh C, et al. Secretory IgA mediates retrotranscytosis of intact gliadin peptides via the transferrin receptor in celiac disease. J Exp Med. 2008;205(1):143–54.
Pinkas DM, Strop P, Brunger AT, Khosla C. Transglutaminase 2 undergoes a large conformational change upon activation. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(12):e327.
Sollid LM, Jabri B. Celiac disease and transglutaminase 2: a model for posttranslational modification of antigens and HLA association in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23(6):732–8.
Kim CY, Quarsten H, Bergseng E, Khosla C, Sollid LM. Structural basis for HLA-DQ2-mediated presentation of gluten epitopes in celiac disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(12):4175–9.
Sollid LM, Molberg O, McAdam S, Lundin KE. Autoantibodies in coeliac disease: tissue transglutaminase–guilt by association? Gut. 1997;41(6):851–2.
Sperandeo MP, Tosco A, Izzo V, Tucci F, Troncone R, Auricchio R, et al. Potential celiac patients: a model of celiac disease pathogenesis. PloS One. 2011;6(7):e21281.
Zeng R, Spolski R, Finkelstein SE, Oh S, Kovanen PE, Hinrichs CS, et al. Synergy of IL-21 and IL-15 in regulating CD8 + T cell expansion and function. J Exp Med. 2005;201(1):139–48.
Maiuri L, Ciacci C, Ricciardelli I, Vacca L, Raia V, Auricchio S, et al. Association between innate response to gliadin and activation of pathogenic T cells in coeliac disease. Lancet. 2003;362(9377):30–7.
Barone MV, Gimigliano A, Castoria G, Paolella G, Maurano F, Paparo F, et al. Growth factor-like activity of gliadin, an alimentary protein: implications for coeliac disease. Gut. 2007;56(4):480–8.
Nanayakkara M, Kosova R, Lania G, Sarno M, Gaito A, Galatola M, et al. A celiac cellular phenotype, with altered LPP sub-cellular distribution, is inducible in controls by the toxic gliadin peptide P31–43. PloS One. 2013;8(11):e79763.
Hue S, Mention JJ, Monteiro RC, Zhang S, Cellier C, Schmitz J, et al. A direct role for NKG2D/MICA interaction in villous atrophy during celiac disease. Immunity. 2004;21(3):367–77.
Nanayakkara M, Lania G, Maglio M, Discepolo V, Sarno M, Gaito A, et al. An undigested gliadin peptide activates innate immunity and proliferative signaling in enterocytes: the role in celiac disease. AmJ Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1123–35.
Nanayakkara M, Lania G, Maglio M, Kosova R, Sarno M, Gaito A, et al. Enterocyte proliferation and signaling are constitutively altered in celiac disease. PloS One. 2013;8(10):e76006.
Ben Ahmed M, Belhadj Hmida N, Moes N, Buyse S, Abdeladhim M, Louzir H, et al. IL-15 renders conventional lymphocytes resistant to suppressive functions of regulatory T cells through activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. J Immunol. 2009;182(11):6763–70.
Zanzi D, Stefanile R, Santagata S, Iaffaldano L, Iaquinto G, Giardullo N, et al. IL-15 interferes with suppressive activity of intestinal regulatory T cells expanded in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(7):1308–17.
Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology. 1992;102(1):330–54.
Garampazzi A, Rapa A, Mura S, Capelli A, Valori A, Boldorini R, et al. Clinical pattern of celiac disease is still changing. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;45(5):611–4.
Lebenthal E, Shteyer E, Branski D. The changing clinical presentation of celiac disease. In: Fasano A, Troncone R, Branski D, editors. Frontiers in celiac disease. Basel: Karger; 2008. p. 18–22.
Maki M, Kallonen K, Lahdeaho ML, Visakorpi JK. Changing pattern of childhood coeliac disease in Finland. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988;77(3):408–12.
Roma E, Panayiotou J, Karantana H, Constantinidou C, Siakavellas SI, Krini M, et al. Changing pattern in the clinical presentation of pediatric celiac disease: a 30-year study. Digestion. 2009;80(3):185–91.
Lo W, Sano K, Lebwohl B, Diamond B, Green PH. Changing presentation of adult celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(2):395–8.
Rostami Nejad M, Rostami K, Pourhoseingholi MA, Nazemalhosseini Mojarad E, Habibi M, Dabiri H, et al. Atypical presentation is dominant and typical for coeliac disease. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009;18(3):285–91.
Rashid M, Cranney A, Zarkadas M, Graham ID, Switzer C, Case S, et al. Celiac disease: evaluation of the diagnosis and dietary compliance in Canadian children. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):e754–9.
Ehsani-Ardakani MJ, Rostami Nejad M, Villanacci V, Volta U, Manenti S, Caio G, et al. Gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal presentation in patients with celiac disease. Arch Iran Med. 2013;16(2):78–82.
Bai JC, Maurino E, Martinez C, Vazquez H, Niveloni S, Soifer G, et al. Abnormal colonic transit time in untreated celiac sprue. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 1995;25(5):277–84.
Sadik R, Abrahamsson H, Kilander A, Stotzer PO. Gut transit in celiac disease: delay of small bowel transit and acceleration after dietary treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(12):2429–36.
Cucchiara S, Bassotti G, Castellucci G, Minella R, Betti C, Fusaro C, et al. Upper gastrointestinal motor abnormalities in children with active celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995;21(4):435–42.
Diamanti A, Capriati T, Basso MS, Panetta F, Di Ciommo Laurora VM, Bellucci F, et al. Celiac disease and overweight in children: an update. Nutrients. 2014;6(1):207–20.
Aad G, Abajyan T, Abbott B, Abdallah J, Abdel Khalek S, Abdelalim AA, et al. Search for magnetic monopoles in sqrt[s]=7 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109(26):261803.
Germann R, Kuch M, Prinz K, Ebbing A, Schindera F. Celiac disease: an uncommon cause of recurrent intussusception. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;25(4):415–6.
Reilly NR, Aguilar KM, Green PH. Should intussusception in children prompt screening for celiac disease? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56(1):56–9.
Vajro P, Paolella G, Maggiore G, Giordano G. Meta-analysis: pediatric celiac disease, cryptogenic hypertransaminasemia, and autoimmune hepatitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013; 56(6):663–70.
Kolho KL, Farkkila MA, Savilahti E. Undiagnosed coeliac disease is common in Finnish adults. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(12):1280–3.
Zanini B, Caselani F, Magni A, Turini D, Ferraresi A, Lanzarotto F, et al. Celiac disease with mild enteropathy is not mild disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(3):253–8.
Bolotin D, Petronic-Rosic V. Dermatitis herpetiformis. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical presentation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(6):1017–24, quiz 25–6.
Nicolas ME, Krause PK, Gibson LE, Murray JA. Dermatitis herpetiformis. Intl J Dermatol. 2003;42(8):588–600.
Bolotin D, Petronic-Rosic V. Dermatitis herpetiformis. Part II. Diagnosis, management, and prognosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(6):1027–33, quiz 33–4.
Caproni M, Antiga E, Melani L, Fabbri P, Italian Group for Cutaneous I. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(6):633–8.
Margoni D, Chouliaras G, Duscas G, Voskaki I, Voutsas N, Papadopoulou A, et al. Bone health in children with celiac disease assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry: effect of gluten-free diet and predictive value of serum biochemical indices. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(5):680–4.
Krupa-Kozak U. Pathologic bone alterations in celiac disease: etiology, epidemiology, and treatment. Nutrition. 2014;30(1):16–24.
Ghozzi M, Sakly W, Mankai A, Bouajina E, Bahri F, Nouira R, et al. Screening for celiac disease, by endomysial antibodies, in patients with unexplained articular manifestations. Rheumatol Int. 2013; 34(5):637–42.
Dimitrova AK, Ungaro RC, Lebwohl B, Lewis SK, Tennyson CA, Green MW, et al. Prevalence of migraine in patients with celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Headache. 2013;53(2):344–55.
Chin RL, Sander HW, Brannagan TH, Green PH, Hays AP, Alaedini A, et al. Celiac neuropathy. Neurology. 2003;60(10):1581–5.
Ruggieri M, Incorpora G, Polizzi A, Parano E, Spina M, Pavone P. Low prevalence of neurologic and psychiatric manifestations in children with gluten sensitivity. J Pediatr. 2008;152(2):244–9.
Pengiran Tengah DS, Holmes GK, Wills AJ. The prevalence of epilepsy in patients with celiac disease. Epilepsia. 2004;45(10):1291–3.
Fois A, Vascotto M, Di Bartolo RM, Di Marco V. Celiac disease and epilepsy in pediatric patients. Child’s Nerv Sys. 1994;10(7):450–4.
Ludvigsson JF, Zingone F, Tomson T, Ekbom A, Ciacci C. Increased risk of epilepsy in biopsy-verified celiac disease: a population-based cohort study. Neurology. 2012;78(18):1401–7.
Canales P, Mery VP, Larrondo FJ, Bravo FL, Godoy J. Epilepsy and celiac disease: favorable outcome with a gluten-free diet in a patient refractory to antiepileptic drugs. Neurologist. 2006;12(6):318–21.
Pascotto A, Coppola G, Ecuba P, Liguori G, Guandalini S. Epilepsy and occipital calcifications with or without celiac disease: report of four cases. J Epilepsy. 1994;7:130–6.
Ludvigsson JF, Inghammar M, Ekberg M, Egesten A. A nationwide cohort study of the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in coeliac disease. J Intern Med. 2012;271(5):481–9.
Emilsson L, Carlsson R, Holmqvist M, James S, Ludvigsson JF. The characterisation and risk factors of ischaemic heart disease in patients with coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(9):905–14.
Ludvigsson JF, Lindelof B, Rashtak S, Rubio-Tapia A, Murray JA. Does urticaria risk increase in patients with celiac disease? A large population-based cohort study. Eur J Dermatol. 2013;23(5):681–7.
Ludvigsson JF, Aro P, Walker MM, Vieth M, Agreus L, Talley NJ, et al. Celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease, an adult population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(7):808–14.
Sadr-Azodi O, Sanders DS, Murray JA, Ludvigsson JF. Patients with celiac disease have an increased risk for pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(10):1136–42, e3.
Ludvigsson JF, Murray JA, Adams PC, Elmberg M. Does hemochromatosis predispose to celiac disease? A study of 29,096 celiac disease patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(2):176–82.
Mollazadegan K, Kugelberg M, Lindblad BE, Ludvigsson JF. Increased risk of cataract among 28,000 patients with celiac disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(2):195–202.
Mollazadegan K, Kugelberg M, Tallstedt L, Ludvigsson JF. Increased risk of uveitis in coeliac disease: a nationwide cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(6):857–61.
Emilsson L, Andersson B, Elfstrom P, Green PH, Ludvigsson JF. Risk of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in 29,000 patients with celiac disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1(3):e001594.
Ludvigsson JF, Zingone F, Fored M, Ciacci C, Cirillo M. Moderately increased risk of urinary stone disease in patients with biopsy-verified coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(4):477–84.
Welander A, Prutz KG, Fored M, Ludvigsson JF. Increased risk of end-stage renal disease in individuals with coeliac disease. Gut. 2012;61(1):64–8.
Passananti V, Siniscalchi M, Zingone F, Bucci C, Tortora R, Iovino P, et al. Prevalence of eating disorders in adults with celiac disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:491657.
Ludvigsson JF, Rubio-Tapia A, Chowdhary V, Murray JA, Simard JF. Increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in 29,000 patients with biopsy-verified celiac disease. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(10):1964–70.
Zugna D, Richiardi L, Stephansson O, Pasternak B, Ekbom A, Cnattingius S, et al. Risk of congenital malformations among offspring of mothers and fathers with celiac disease: a nationwide cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;12(7):1108–1116.e6.
Ludvigsson JF, West J, Ekbom A, Stephansson O. Reduced risk of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer in women with celiac disease. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(3):E244–50.
Meini A, Pillan NM, Villanacci V, Monafo V, Ugazio AG, Plebani A. Prevalence and diagnosis of celiac disease in IgA-deficient children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996;77(4):333–6.
Cataldo F, Marino V, Bottaro G, Greco P, Ventura A. Celiac disease and selective immunoglobulin A deficiency. J Pediatr. 1997;131(2):306–8.
Bybrant MC, Ortqvist E, Lantz S, Grahnquist L. High prevalence of celiac disease in Swedish children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and the relation to the Swedish epidemic of celiac disease: a cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(1):52–8.
Barera G, Bonfanti R, Viscardi M, Bazzigaluppi E, Calori G, Meschi F, et al. Occurrence of celiac disease after onset of type 1 diabetes: a 6-year prospective longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 2002;109(5):833–8.
Tiberti C, Panimolle F, Bonamico M, Filardi T, Pallotta L, Nenna R, et al. Long-standing type 1 diabetes: patients with adult-onset develop celiac-specific immunoreactivity more frequently than patients with childhood-onset diabetes, in a disease duration-dependent manner. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51(4):675–8.
Scaramuzza AE, Mantegazza C, Bosetti A, Zuccotti GV. Type 1 diabetes and celiac disease: the effects of gluten free diet on metabolic control. World J Diab. 2013;4(4):130–4.
Ventura A, Magazzu G, Greco L. Duration of exposure to gluten and risk for autoimmune disorders in patients with celiac disease. SIGEP study group for autoimmune disorders in celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 1999;117(2):297–303.
Elli L, Bonura A, Garavaglia D, Rulli E, Floriani I, Tagliabue G, et al. Immunological comorbity in coeliac disease: associations, risk factors and clinical implications. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(5):984–90.
Metso S, Hyytia-Ilmonen H, Kaukinen K, Huhtala H, Jaatinen P, Salmi J, et al. Gluten-free diet and autoimmune thyroiditis in patients with celiac disease. A prospective controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(1):43–8.
Elli L, Discepolo V, Bardella MT, Guandalini S. Does gluten intake influence the development of celiac disease-associated complications? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(1):13–20.
Marild K, Stephansson O, Grahnquist L, Cnattingius S, Soderman G, Ludvigsson JF. Down syndrome is associated with elevated risk of celiac disease: a nationwide case-control study. J Pediatr. 2013;163(1):237–42.
Bonamico M, Bottaro G, Pasquino AM, Caruso-Nicoletti M, Mariani P, Gemme G, et al. Celiac disease and turner syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;26(5):496–9.
Santer R, Pankau R, Schaub J, Burgin-Wolff A. Williams–Beuren syndrome and celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;23(3):339–40.
Giersiepen K, Lelgemann M, Stuhldreher N, Ronfani L, Husby S, Koletzko S, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(2):229–41.
Amarri S, Alvisi P, De Giorgio R, Gelli MC, Cicola R, Tovoli F, et al. Antibodies to Deamidated gliadin peptides: an accurate predictor of coeliac disease in infancy. J Clin Immunol. 2013; 33(5):1027–30.
Barbato M, Maiella G, Di Camillo C, Guida S, Valitutti F, Lastrucci G, et al. The anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies unmask celiac disease in small children with chronic diarrhoea. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43(6):465–9.
Aleanzi M, Demonte AM, Esper C, Garcilazo S, Waggener M. Celiac disease: antibody recognition against native and selectively deamidated gliadin peptides. Clin Chem. 2001;47(11):2023–8.
Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(5):656–76.
Dahlbom I, Olsson M, Forooz NK, Sjoholm AG, Truedsson L, Hansson T. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies used as markers for IgA-deficient celiac disease patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12(2):254–8.
Korponay-Szabo IR, Dahlbom I, Laurila K, Koskinen S, Woolley N, Partanen J, et al. Elevation of IgG antibodies against tissue transglutaminase as a diagnostic tool for coeliac disease in selective IgA deficiency. Gut. 2003;52(11):1567–71.
Villalta D, Alessio MG, Tampoia M, Tonutti E, Brusca I, Bagnasco M, et al. Testing for IgG class antibodies in celiac disease patients with selective IgA deficiency. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 9 IgG anti-tissue transglutaminase, 1 IgG anti-gliadin and 1 IgG anti-deaminated gliadin peptide antibody assays. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;382(1–2):95–9.
Villalta D, Tonutti E, Prause C, Koletzko S, Uhlig HH, Vermeersch P, et al. IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides for diagnosis of celiac disease in patients with IgA deficiency. Clin Chem. 2010;56(3):464–8.
Walker-Smith JA, Guandalini S, Schmitz J, Shmerling DH, Visakorpi JK. Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease. Report of a Working Group of ESPGAN. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65:909–11.
Bai JC, Fried M, Corazza GR, Schuppan D, Farthing M, Catassi C, et al. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines on celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(2):121–6.
Aziz I, Evans KE, Hopper AD, Smillie DM, Sanders DS. A prospective study into the aetiology of lymphocytic duodenosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(11–12):1392–7.
Santolaria S, Dominguez M, Alcedo J, Abascal M, Garcia-Prats MD, Marigil M, et al. Lymphocytic duodenosis: etiological study and clinical presentations. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;36(9):565–73.
Waisbourd-Zinman O, Hojsak I, Rosenbach Y, Mozer-Glassberg Y, Shalitin S, Phillip M, et al. Spontaneous normalization of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody levels is common in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(5):1314–20.
Biagi F, Trotta L, Alfano C, Balduzzi D, Staffieri V, Bianchi PI, et al. Prevalence and natural history of potential celiac disease in adult patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(5):537–42.
Kurppa K, Ashorn M, Iltanen S, Koskinen LL, Saavalainen P, Koskinen O, et al. Celiac disease without villous atrophy in children: a prospective study. J Pediatr. 2010;157(3):373–80, 80 e1.
Tosco A, Salvati VM, Auricchio R, Maglio M, Borrelli M, Coruzzo A, et al. Natural history of potential celiac disease in children. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(4):320–5, quiz e36.
Borrelli M, Salvati VM, Maglio M, Zanzi D, Ferrara K, Santagata S, et al. Immunoregulatory pathways are active in the small intestinal mucosa of patients with potential celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(11):1775–84.
Biagi F, Corazza GR. Defining gluten refractory enteropathy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13(5):561–5.
Al-Toma A, Verbeek WH, Hadithi M, von Blomberg BM, Mulder CJ. Survival in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: retrospective evaluation of single-centre experience. Gut. 2007;56(10):1373–8.
Malamut G, Cellier C. Refractory celiac disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;8(3):323–8.
Nijeboer P, van Wanrooij RL, Tack GJ, Mulder CJ, Bouma G. Update on the diagnosis and management of refractory coeliac disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:518483.
Biagi F, Corazza GR. Mortality in celiac disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7(3):158–62.
Corrao G, Corazza GR, Bagnardi V, Brusco G, Ciacci C, Cottone M, et al. Mortality in patients with coeliac disease and their relatives: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9279):356–61.
Rubio-Tapia A, Kyle RA, Kaplan EL, Johnson DR, Page W, Erdtmann F, et al. Increased prevalence and mortality in undiagnosed celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(1):88–93.
Lohi S, Maki M, Rissanen H, Knekt P, Reunanen A, Kaukinen K. Prognosis of unrecognized coeliac disease as regards mortality: a population-based cohort study. Ann Med. 2009;41(7):508–15.
Metzger MH, Heier M, Maki M, Bravi E, Schneider A, Lowel H, et al. Mortality excess in individuals with elevated IgA anti-transglutaminase antibodies: the KORA/MONICA Augsburg cohort study 1989–1998. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(5):359–65.
Solaymani-Dodaran M, West J, Logan RF. Long-term mortality in people with celiac disease diagnosed in childhood compared with adulthood: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(4):864–70.
Hischenhuber C, Crevel R, Jarry B, Maki M, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Romano A, et al. Review article: safe amounts of gluten for patients with wheat allergy or coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23(5):559–75.
Siegel M, Garber ME, Spencer AG, Botwick W, Kumar P, Williams RN, et al. Safety, tolerability, and activity of ALV003: results from two phase 1 single, escalating-dose clinical trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(2):440–50.
Pinier M, Verdu EF, Nasser-Eddine M, David CS, Vezina A, Rivard N, et al. Polymeric binders suppress gliadin-induced toxicity in the intestinal epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(1):288–98.
Sollid LM, Khosla C. Novel therapies for coeliac disease. J Intern Med. 2011;269(6):604–13.
Anderson RP, Jabri B. Vaccine against autoimmune disease: antigen-specific immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(3):410–7.
Xia J, Bergseng E, Fleckenstein B, Siegel M, Kim CY, Khosla C, et al. Cyclic and dimeric gluten peptide analogues inhibiting DQ2-mediated antigen presentation in celiac disease. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15(20):6565–73.
Rauhavirta T, Oittinen M, Kivisto R, Mannisto PT, Garcia-Horsman JA, Wang Z, et al. Are transglutaminase 2 inhibitors able to reduce gliadin-induced toxicity related to celiac disease? A proof-of-concept study. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(1):134–42.
Pinier M, Fuhrmann G, Verdu EF, Leroux JC. Prevention measures and exploratory pharmacological treatments of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(12):2551–61, quiz 62.
Setty M, Discepolo V, Abadie V, Kamhawi S, Mayassi T, Kent A, Ciszewski C, Maglio M, Kistner E, Bhagat G, Semrad C, Kupfer SS, Green PH, Guandalini S, Troncone R, Murray JA, Turner JR, Jabri B. Distinct and Synergistic Contributions of Epithelial Stress and Adaptive Immunity to Functions of Intraepithelial Killer Cells and Active Celiac Disease. Gastroenterol. 2015. pii: S0016–5085(15)00685-X. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guandalini, S., Discepolo, V. (2016). Celiac Disease. In: Guandalini, S., Dhawan, A., Branski, D. (eds) Textbook of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17169-2_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17169-2_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17168-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17169-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)