Abstract
Phytoremediation of radioactive waste is a process that uses plants to remove, transfer, or immobilize radionuclides from the contaminated soil, sediment, sludge, or water, and it is a useful method for treating large-scale low-level radionuclide contamination. However, there have not been established criteria which can be utilized to screen out suitable plant species that are capable of remediating the radioactive waste. In this chapter, important factors influencing the selection of natural plant to remediate radioactive waste, including the characteristics of radioactive waste, the vegetation plant species and vegetation community composition in the radioactive waste deposited area, the concentration of a target radionuclide in the plant, the biomass of the plant, and the concentration of a target radionuclide in the radioactive, are analyzed, and the criteria based on the phytoremediation factor (PF) have been proposed for the selection of natural plant to remediate radioactive waste.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In the present chapter, radioactive waste mainly refers to radionuclide-contaminated soil, sediment, sludge, and water. The mechanisms of phytoremediation applicable to radioactive waste include enhanced rhizosphere biodegradation, phytoextraction, phytodegradation, and phytostabilization. Because radionuclides cannot be biodegraded, the mechanisms applicable to remediation of radionuclides are phytoextraction and phytostabilization. Phytoextraction is a process that includes the uptake of radionuclides by plant roots from the contaminated soil and the translocation/accumulation of radionuclides into plant shoots and leaves. The plants are subsequently harvested from the growing area, dried, and disposed of. Phytostabilization involves the production of chemical compounds by plants and their immobilization of radionuclides on the interface between roots and radioactive waste. Radionuclides transport in soil, sediments, or sludges can be reduced through absorption and accumulation by the plant roots; adsorption onto roots; precipitation, complexation, or metal valence reduction in soil within the root zone; or binding to humic (organic) matter through the process of humification. Before phytoremediation can be applied for remediating radioactive waste, the appropriate natural plant species should be selected. The procedures for screening the suitable plant species for phytoremediation of radioactive waste are as follow: First of all, the characteristics of radioactive waste to be remediated should be analyzed; secondly, the vegetation plant species and vegetation community composition in the radioactive waste deposited area should be surveyed; thirdly, the concentration of a target radionuclide in the plant should be determined; fourthly, the biomass of the plant should be calculated; and finally, the concentration of a target radionuclide in the remediated radioactive waste should be measured.
In this chapter, based on the previous work on screening of plant species for phytoremediation of U, Th and 226Ra-contaminated soils from uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China, important factors influencing the selection of natural plant for the remediation of radioactive waste were analyzed, and the criteria based on the phytoremediation factor (PF) were proposed for the selection of natural plant to remediate radioactive waste.
2 Characteristics of Radioactive Waste
The characteristics of radioactive waste are important factors to be considered in selecting the natural plant species for phytoremediation, since they will impact the growth of the candidate for phytoremediation of the radioactive waste. Based on the characteristics of radioactive waste, preliminary treatments, such as adjusting pH value for plant growth, supplying fertilizer to improve the physicochemical properties of radionuclides, and adding the chelating agent to increase the bioavailability of radionuclides in the radioactive waste, could be conducted.
In this chapter, the candidates for phytoremediation of radioactive waste were selected from the natural plants growing in a uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China. The impoundment has a subtropical continental climate with an annual average temperature of 17.9 °C, an annual average rainfall of 1452.0 mm, and an annual average evaporation capacity of 1324.5 mm, and its altitude is from 210.5 to 307.0 m above sea level. It covers an area of approximately 1.70 km2 and contains approximately 1.88 × 108 t of uranium mill tailings produced by a nearby uranium mill where the uranium ore was processed by acid leaching from 1963 to 1994. The tailings were sandy and without any nutrients and organic matter when they were deposited initially. But at present, on the top of the uranium tailings, many scattered regolith layers in thickness of 1–2 cm with high nutrient content or organic material from the rotten plants have been formed, and many plant species have colonized in the regolith layers.
The characteristics of the uranium mill tailings in the impoundment are presented in Table 1. The particle sizes of the tailings collected from the uranium mill tailings impoundment ranged between 0.040 and 0.074 mm. The pH value of the tailings ranged from 4.42 to 6.10. The reason for this was that the uranium ore was processed by acid leaching in the former uranium ore reprocessing factory and that the uranium mill tailings impoundment was in an acid rain zone (Fan et al. 2010). In this acidic environment, the mobility of the hazardous materials including radionuclides and heavy metals will increase. It was obvious that there was a great difference between the minimum and maximum values of the concentrations of the determined elements in the tailings. Three explanations for this may be given. First, the tailings had the acidic nature, this resulted in the dissolution of the elements from the tailings, and they could flow with the rainfall from one site to another. Second, the tailings had been deposited at the impoundment during different periods from 1963 to 1994, and this resulted in the different releasing order of the elements. Third, different plant species had different uptake activities for the elements from the tailings. The uranium mill tailings also contained considerable nutrients and trace elements needed for growth of plants.
Phytoremediation is limited to shallow soils and sediments. Because the growth of plants used in phytoremediation can be affected by climatic or seasonal conditions (FRTR 2002), this technology may not be applicable in areas with cold climates and short growing seasons.
3 Vegetation Plant Species and Vegetation Community Composition in the Radioactive Waste Deposited Area
The vegetation plant species and vegetation community composition in the radioactive waste deposited area are important for selecting the natural plant species for phytoremediation of radioactive waste. The selected plant species should be the dominant species, since they will cause the minimal impact on the ecological interaction between the local plants and keep the stability of the vegetation community.
An extensive survey was conducted in autumn 2011. To survey the vegetation composition of the flora in the mill tailings impoundment, 9 sampling sites were selected systematically in the uranium mill tailings impoundment (S1–S9, Fig. 1). Six sampling sites were in the dump 1, and the other three sampling sites were in dump 2.
In total, 80 species were recorded in the sampling sites. They belonged to 67 genera in 32 families (Table 2). Most of the species recorded were perennial forbs and grasses. The Poaceae and Asteraceae were the dominant families colonizing the impoundment and had 16 and 13 species, respectively, the Rosaceae and Cyperaceae had 5 species each, and the rest had less than 3 species. There were also some trees, including Broussonetia papyrifera, Paulownia fortunei, Cinnamomum camphora, Salix matsudana, Rhus chinensis, and Melia azedarach. Based on the life-form, most of the species were shallow-rooted, drought-tolerant plants and belonged to common native plants. In terms of the composition of vegetation community and the life-form, most of the species recorded were 1-year or 2-year perennial herbs, with a small number of trees and shrubs. The trees grew in the impoundment mainly belonged to typical positive pioneer plants.
In the investigation, only 7 species (Kyllinga brevifolia, Phragmites australis, Imperata cylindrica, Setaria viridis, Pteris multifida, Pteris cretica L. var. nervosa, and Pteridium aquilinum) occurred in all the sampling sites. Furthermore, 12 species, including Oxalis corymbosa, Avena fatua, Paspalum scrobiculatum, Eleusine indica, Miscanthus floxidulus, Polypogon fugax, Erigeron annuus, Erigeron canadensis, Solanum nigrum, Trema dielsian, R. chinensis, and Dryopteris scottii, occurred in 8 sampling sites. However, there were 13 species including Persicaria hydropiper, P. fortunei, C. camphora, Cyperus difformis, Rubus alceaefolius, Digitaria sanguinalis, Herba taraxaci, S. matsudana, Amaranthus spinosus, Plantago asiatica, Plantago major, Boehmeria nivea, and Medicago sativa occurring only in sampling sites.
The vegetation composition was influenced by grazing pressure, age of enclosures, and seasonality (Fernandes et al. 2006; Angassa and Oba 2010). Three types of vegetation community were formed by the activities of radionuclides in and pH value of the uranium tailings. The plant species in the locations of S4, S8, and S9 formed a relatively stable vegetation community (C. camphora and B. papyrifera + Loropetalum chinense and Vitex negundo + Macleaya cordata and Phytolacca acinosa). The plant species in the locations of S3, S5, and S6 formed the transitional vegetation community (B. papyrifera + Mallotus apelta and Ilex cornuta + M. floxidulus and P. aquilinum). The plant species in the locations of S1, S2, and S7 formed a simple unstable vegetation community (P. australis + I. cylindrica) and a vegetation community (M. apelta + R. chinensis + S. viridis + I. cylindrica + P. scrobiculatum) that was similar to that on the unused grassland.
4 Concentration of a Target Radionuclide in the Plant
The most important step to success in phytoremediation is to identify hyperaccumulators which can accumulate a target radionuclide to a certain concentration in their shoots in terms of dry weight. Baker and Brooks (1989) have proposed that the accumulators should have accumulation capabilities of more than 1,000 mg kg−1 for As, Pb, Cu, Ni, and Co, 10,000 mg kg−1 for Mn and Zn, and 100 mg kg−1 for Cd in their shoots. For an accumulator, the metal concentration in its shoot should be much higher than that in its root, and it should have a special capability of absorbing, transferring, and accumulating the metal in its aboveground part (Baker and Brooks 1989). More than 45 families have been identified to contain some metal-accumulating species, and more than 400 plant species of metal hyperaccumulators have been reported (Salt et al. 1998; Reeves and Baker 2000; Hu et al. 2013). But, the hyperaccumulators for radionuclides have not been defined so far. In recent years, phytoremediation studies concerning the treatment of radionuclide-contaminated soils have been carried out using different plant species under various conditions, and the improvement of the uptake by adding fertilizers, organic acids, or chelating agents (Khatir Sam 1995; Papastefanou 1996; Huang et al. 1998; Carini 1999; Madruga et al. 2001; Blanco Rodríguez et al. 2002; Shahandeh and Hossner 2002; Dushenkov 2003; Karunakara et al. 2003; Shinonaga et al. 2005; Soudek et al. 2007a, b, 2010, 2011; Pulhani et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2005; AbdEl-Sabour 2007; Thiry and Van 2008; Vera et al. 2008, 2009; Cukrov et al. 2009; Blanco Rodríguez et al. 2010; Dragović et al. 2010; Srivastava et al. 2010; Černe et al. 2011; Li et al. 2011; Hu et al. 2014). Also, sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) were proposed as potential uranium accumulators for uranium phytoextraction in one uranium mill tailings soil and nine acid and calcareous soils contaminated with different rates of uranyl nitrate. However, various factors, such as the physical and chemical properties of the soil, water, and sediment, climatic and seasonal conditions, plant and microbial exudates, bioavailability of metals, and the capability of plants to uptake, accumulate, translocate, sequester and detoxify metals, have influence on phytoremediation efficiency (Pedron et al. 2009). As a result, sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) have not been widely utilized for phytoremediation in practice so far (Fellet et al. 2007). Consequently, it is important to develop phytoremediation technology based on the native plant species that are suitable for the phytoremediation of the sites contaminated by particular radionuclides.
In July 2009, 15 dominant plant species belonging to 9 families were collected from the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China (Li et al. 2011). The concentrations of uranium and thorium in the samples of plant species and tailings were determined. The results are presented in Table 3. Among the plant samples collected, Cyperus iria accumulated the highest concentration of U in its shoot which reached 36.4 μg g−1 (Air dried or oven dried weight basis of samples (DW)). Juncellus serotinus accumulated the highest concentration of Th in its root which reached 3.66 μg g−1 (DW).
In September 2009, a wide survey was conducted in the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China (Ding et al. 2010). Thirty-five plant species were collected, and the concentrations of uranium in the samples were determined. The results are presented in Table 4. J. serotinus accumulated the highest concentration of U in its stem which reached 1.52 mg g−1 (Ash weight basis of samples (AW)). Furthermore, K. brevifolia, C. difformis, M. cordata, Geranium carolinianum, E. annuus, P. nervosa, C. iria, and A. fatua accumulated relatively high concentrations of U in their aerial parts.
In September 2011, an extensive survey was conducted in the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China (Hu et al. 2014). Thirty-three dominant plant species belonging to 16 families were collected, and the activities of 226Ra in the samples were determined. The results are presented in Table 5. There was great variation in the activities of 226Ra in the tissues of different plant species. The average activities of 226Ra in terms of AW for seeds, leaves, stalks, and roots were 30.99, 13.34, 5.772, and 4.515 Bq g−1, respectively. The high activities of 226Ra were found in the leaves of P. multifida (150.6 Bq g−1 of AW), in the leaves of P. aquilinum (122.2 Bq g−1 of AW), in the leaves of D. scottii (105.7 Bq g−1 of AW), and in the seed of P. fugax (105.5 Bq g−1 of AW). In contrast, the activity of 226Ra was found below the detection limit in the stalk and root of Ixeris chinensis and in the stalk of S. nigrum.
Although the hyperaccumulators for U, Th, and 226Ra have not been defined so far, Baker and Brooks (1989) have proposed a two criteria approach for defining the metal hyperaccumulator. First, the concentration of an element accumulated in an organism can be higher than that in the soil. Second, the amount of an element accumulated in an organism can be 10 times greater than that in other organisms investigated. Based on this approach, C. iria and J. serotinus satisfied the criteria for a hyperaccumulator for U. P. multifida, P. aquilinum, and D. scottii satisfied the criteria for a hyperaccumulator for 226Ra. Although the high concentration of a target radionuclide in the plant species has been found in our investigation, all the experiments were carried out on contaminated areas with different histories, different contents of nutrients and organic matter; the areas were situated in different vegetation climates; and the plant species growing naturally on these areas were also quite different. In the further study, the laboratory tests will be conducted to confirm the results.
5 Biomass of the Plant
The potential of a plant to be used in phytoremediation does not merely depend on the concentration of a target element in the plant (Verma et al. 2007). It has been proposed that a plant with low dry biomass would share a low resultant capability of accumulation for an element and would not be suitable for phytoremediation though the concentration of the target element would be very high in this plant (Robinson et al. 1997). The dry biomass of the plant is considered as an important factor. The removal capability of a plant for a target element in the plant samples collected was assessed by multiplying the concentration of the target element with the dry biomass of the plant. The average biomass (g) and the removal capability for U and Th (μg plant−1) of the plants collected from the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China are shown in Table 6. P. australis had the greatest removal capabilities for U and Th, which could remove 820 μg U and 103 μg Th per plant, respectively.
6 Concentration of a Target Radionuclide in the Radioactive Waste
The concentration of a target element in the tailings is another important factor that determines the duration it takes to complete the phytoremediation. Phytoremediation might be best suited for sites with the levels of radionuclide contamination which are only slightly higher than the cleanup target levels because the resulting amount of time for cleanup becomes reasonable (less than 10 years) and because possible plant toxicity effects are avoided (Schnoor 2002).
The concentrations of U, Th, and 226Ra in the tailings samples collected from the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China are presented in Table 1. The concentrations of U ranged from 6.03 to 46.5 μg g−1, Th ranged from 4.75 to 19.8 μg g−1, and 226Ra ranged from 7.32 to 29.52 Bq g−1 of DW in the uranium mill tailings. The concentrations of U, Th, and 226Ra in the tailings varied greatly with the sampling sites. This was probably caused by the pH value of the tailings in the sampling sites, microbial community composition and its metabolism, and the plant species growing on them (Li et al. 2011; Hu et al. 2014). The minimum and maximum concentrations of U in the tailings exceeded the background concentrations of U in the soil in the impoundment located in Hunan Province by 1.46 and 17.6 times, respectively. When compared to the background concentrations of U in the soil around the world, the minimum and maximum concentrations of U exceeded by 3.01 and 22.80 times, respectively (Nie et al. 2010). The maximum concentrations of Th in the tailings exceeded the background concentrations of Th in the soil in China by 1.55 times. When compared to the background concentrations of U in the soil around the world, the maximum concentrations of Th exceeded by 2.20 times (Nie et al. 2010). The minimum and maximum activities of 226Ra in the tailings exceeded the background activity of 226Ra in the soil in the impoundment located in Hunan Province by 6,150 and 1,525 times, respectively (Pan and Yang 1988; Li and Zheng 1989). When compared to the background activity of 226Ra in the soil around the world, the minimum and maximum activities of 226Ra exceeded by 9,973 and 2,473 times, respectively (Bowen 1979). The high concentrations of U, Th, and 226Ra in the tailings made the impoundment a potentially hazardous radioactive source to the plants and animals in and around it. It needs to be remediated urgently.
7 Transfer Factor
Baker and Brooks (1989) proposed that the metal hyperaccumulator should satisfy a criterion that the concentration of an element accumulated in an organism can be higher than that in the soil. Based on their definition, the transfer factor (TF) can be defined as the ratio of target element concentration in the plant to that in the tailings, and it can be used as an index for the accumulation of a target element in the plant and its transfer from the tailings to the plant. If TF for a plant is larger than 1 and the amount of the target element accumulated in the plant is relatively small, the removal capability of the plant for the target element can be further improved using various breeding techniques, and it can be used for phytoremediation (Whicker et al. 1999).
The TFs for U and Th of the plants collected from the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China are presented in Table 7. C. iria had a higher TF for U (5.48), compared with the collected plant species and the reported accumulation plants for U (Shahandeh and Hossner 2002; Chen et al. 2005). But the relatively small amount of biomass in C. iria may be a limiting factor for phytoremediation in this study (Table 6). TFs for U and Th of the other plant species were lower than one. TF for 226Ra of the plants collected from the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China is presented in Table 5. The TF for different tissues of the plant species ranged from 0.000 (leaf of R. hanceanus and M. floxidulus; stalk of J. serotinus, C. iria, P. scrobiculatum, I. cylindrica, I. chinensis, and S. nigrum; root of I. chinensis) to 9.131 (leaf of P. multifida). Different TF values for the plants tissues may be resulted in part from metabolic rate differences between plant species and cultivations (Chen et al. 2005). The factors such as the concentration of a radionuclide, speciation, pH of the tailings, the plant age, and ecotype may modify the uptake and ratio of the content of the element in the plant shoot to that in the plant root (Florijn et al. 1993; Jiang and Singh 1994; Tu et al. 2002). About 91 tissues of plant species had the TF values of less than 1, only 9 tissues of plant species had the TF values of more than 1. Overall, it was found that most of the plant species investigated had low capabilities of transferring U, Th, and 226Ra from the tailings to the plant tissues. The results were agreeable with the previous research results (Pulhani et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2005; Baeza and Guillén 2006; Soudek et al. 2007a, b, 2010, 2011; Lauria et al. 2009; Vera et al. 2009).
8 Phytoremediation Factor
In sum, phytoremediation of target radionuclides from the tailings mainly depends on three parameters including the target radionuclide concentration in the plant, the plant biomass, and the target radionuclide concentration in the tailings. In order to assess the potential of a plant for phytoremediation more comprehensively, a novel coefficient was proposed and termed as PF (Li et al. 2011). This factor is the ratio of the total amount of a target radionuclide accumulated in the plant shoot to the concentration in the tailings at the site where the plant grows. The calculation formula for PF is defined as follows:
In this formula, the shoot refers to the tissue above ground of the plant including the seed, leaf, and stalk. The PF can be used as an index for the capability of a plant to remove the target element from the tailings.
The PFs for U and Th of the plants collected from the uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China are calculated and presented in Table 7. As shown in the Table 7, P. australis had the highest PF for U (16.6) and Th (8.68), and it also had the greatest removal capabilities for U (820 μg plant−1) and Th (103 μg plant−1) (see Table 6), compared with other plants collected. The results indicated that PF was agreeable with the plant removal capability. PF extends the conventional definition of hyperaccumulator, and it can easily be obtained. Although the concentration of a target radionuclide in a plant does not satisfy the criteria for a hyperaccumulator, the plant may also be considered as the candidate for phytoremediation if it has relatively high biomass. Based on the PF, P. australis and M. cordata were selected as the candidates for phytoremediation of uranium-contaminated soils (Li et al. 2011; Ding et al. 2011). Azolla imbircata was selected as the candidate for phytoremediation of uranium-contaminated water (Ding et al. 2012a; Hu et al. 2012). P. australis was selected as the candidate for phytoremediation of thorium-contaminated soils (Li et al. 2011). P. multifida was selected as the candidate for phytoremediation of 226Ra-contaminated soils (Ding et al. 2012b; Hu et al. 2014). Although PF provides a novel reference for identification of a plant capable of remediating the tailings and soils contaminated by the radioactive nuclides and heavy metals on a large scale, the plant biomass at a unit area of land is not considered in this factor. It is necessary that further studies should be performed to improve this factor.
9 Conclusion
To screen the suitable plant species for phytoremediation of radioactive waste, the factors, including the characteristics of radioactive waste, the vegetation plant species and vegetation community composition in the radioactive waste deposited area, the concentration of a target radionuclide in the plant, the biomass of the plant, and the concentration of a target radionuclide in the radioactive waste, were analyzed systematically. The PF, which takes into consideration the concentration of a target element in a plant, the plant shoot biomass, and the concentration of the target element in the tailings or soil surrounding the root of the plant, was proposed for the first time to indicate the removal capability of the plant for the target element from the radioactive waste. Using the PF as the criteria, P. australis, M. cordata, and Azolla imbircata were selected as the candidates for phytoremediation of uranium-contaminated soil, P. australis was selected as the candidate for phytoremediation of thorium-contaminated soil, and P. multifida was selected as the candidate for phytoremediation of 226Ra-contaminated soil.
References
AbdEl-Sabour MF (2007) Remediation and bioremediation of uranium contaminated soils. Electron J Environ Agric Food Chem 6:2009–2023
Angassa A, Oba G (2010) Effects of grazing pressure, age of enclosures and seasonality on bush cover dynamics and vegetation composition in southern Ethiopia. J Arid Environ 74:111–120
Baeza A, Guillén J (2006) Influence of the soil bioavailability of radio nuclides on the transfer of uranium and thorium to mushrooms. Appl Radiat Isot 64:1020–1026
Baker AJM, Brooks RR (1989) Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic-a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126
Blanco Rodríguez P, Vera Tomé F, Lozano JC, Pérez Fernández MA (2010) Transfer of 238U, 230Th, 226Ra, and 210Pb from soils to tree and shrub species in a Mediterranean area. Appl Radiat Isot 68:1154–1159
Bowen HJM (1979) Environmental chemistry of elements. Academic Press, New York
Carini F (1999) Radionuclides in plants bearing fruit: an overview. J Environ Radioact 46:77–97
Černe M, Smodiš B, Štrok M (2011) Uptake of radionuclides by a common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) grown in the vicinity of the former uranium mine at Žirovski vrh. Nucl Eng Des 241:1282–1286
Chen SB, Zhu YG, Hu QH (2005) Soil to plant transfer of 238U, 226Ra and 232Th on a uranium mining-impacted soil from southeastern China. J Environ Radioact 82:223–236
Cukrov N, Mlakar M, Cuculić V, Barišić D (2009) Origin and transport of 238U and 226Ra in riverine, estuarine and marine sediments of the Krka River, Croatia. J Environ Radioact 100:497–504
Ding DX, Li GY, Hu N, Liu YL, Wang YD, Liu Y, Ma SW, Chen X (2010) Study on phyto-mining of uranium from uranium mill sand. Min Metall Eng 30:58–60 (In Chinese)
Ding DX, Li GY, Hu N, Liu YL, Wu YQ, Wang YD, Xie HY, Yin J, Hu JS, Liu, Y, Ma SW (2011) A phytoremediation method of using plant to remediate uranium mill tailing. Patent China ZL 2009 1 0044229.4 (In Chinese)
Ding DX, Li GY, Hu N, Liu YL, Wu YQ, Wang YD, Xie HY, Hu JS, Liu Y, Ma SW (2012a) A phytoremediation method of using floating plant to remediate uranium contaminated water. Patent China ZL200910044181.7 (In Chinese)
Ding DX, Li GY, Hu N, Wang YD, Li HT, Yin J, Ma SW (2012b) A phytoremediation method of using plant to remove 226Ra from the uranium mill tailing and contaminated soil. Patent China ZL 200910044181.7 (In Chinese)
Dragović S, Mihailović N, Gajić B (2010) Quantification of transfer of 238U, 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in mosses of a semi-natural ecosystem. J Environ Radioact 101:159–164
Dushenkov S (2003) Trends in phytoremediation of radionuclides. Plant Soil 249:167–175
Fan Q, Luo XY, Fan SJ, Yi JP, Ding ZM, Zhong LJ, Wang AY, Feng RQ (2010) Numerical simulation research on the meteorological fields in a spring acid rain event over Hengshan region. Chin Environ Sci 30:879–887 (In Chinese)
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (2002) Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 4.0: Phytoremediation. http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4-3.html
Fellet G, Marchiol L, Perosa D, Zerbi G (2007) The application of phytoremediation technology in a soil contaminated by pyrite cinders. Ecol Eng 31:207–214
Fernandes HM, Simoes Filho FFL, Perez V, Franklin MR, Gomiero LA (2006) Radioecological characterization of a uranium mining site located in a semi-arid region in Brazil. J Environ Radioact 88:140–157
Florijn PJ, DE Knecht JA, Van Beusichem ML (1993) Phytochelatin concentrations and binding state of Cd in roots of maize genotypes in shoot/root Cd partitioning. J Plant Physiol 142: 537–542
Hu N, Ding DX, Li GY, Wang YD, Li L, Zheng JF (2012) Uranium removal from water by five aquatic plants. Acta Sci Circumst 32:1637–1645 (In Chinese)
Hu N, Zheng JF, Ding DX, Li GY, Chen X, Yu J, Yin J (2013) Screening of native hyperaccumulators at the Huayuan River contaminated by heavy metals. Bioremed J 17:21–29
Hu N, Ding DX, Li GY, Zheng JF, Li L, Zhao WC, Wang YD (2014) Vegetation composition and 226Ra uptake by native plant species at a uranium mill tailings impoundment in South China. J Environ Radioact 129:100–106
Huang JW, Blaylock MJ, Kapulnik Y, Ensley BD (1998) Phytoremediation of uranium-contaminated soils: role of organic acids in triggering uranium hyperaccumulation in plants. Environ Sci Technol 32:2004–2008
Jiang QQ, Singh BR (1994) Effect of different forms and sources of arsenic on crop yield and arsenic concentration. Water Air Soil Pollut 74:321–343
Karunakara N, Somashekarappa HM, Narayana Y, Avadhani DN, Mahesh HM, Siddappa K (2003) 226Ra, 40K and 7Be activity concentrations in plants in the environment of Kaiga, India. J Environ Radioact 65:255–266
Khatir Sam A (1995) Radium-226 uptake by vegetation grown in Western Sudan. J Environ Radioact 29:27–38
Lauria DC, Ribeiro FCA, Conti CC, Loureiro FA (2009) Radium and uranium levels in vegetables grown using different farming management systems. J Environ Radioact 100:176–183
Li J, Zheng CJ (1989) The Handbook of the environmental background value. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)
Li GY, Hu N, Ding DX, Zheng JF, Liu YL, Wang YD, Nie XQ (2011) Screening of plant species for phytoremediation of uranium, thorium, barium, nickel, strontium and lead contaminated soils from a uranium mill tailings repository in South China. Bull Environ Cont Toxicol 86:646–652
Madruga MJ, Brogueira A, Alberto G, Cardoso F (2001) 226Ra bioavailability to plants at the Urgeirica uranium mill tailings site. J Environ Radioact 54:75–188
Nie XQ, Ding DX, Li GY, Gao B, Wu YQ, Hu N, Liu YL (2010) Soil radionuclide contamination and radionuclide accumulation characteristics of competitive plants in a uranium tailings repository in South China. Res Environ Sci 23:719–725 (In Chinese)
Pan YM, Yang GZ (1988) The soil background value and research methods of Hunan Province. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)
Papastefanou C (1996) Radiological impact from atmospheric releases of 226Ra from coal-fired power plants. J Environ Radioact 32:105–114
Pedron F, Petruzzelli G, Barbafieri M, Tassi E (2009) Strategies to use phytoextraction in very acidic soil contaminated by heavy metals. Chemosphere 75:808–814
Pulhani VA, Dafauti S, Hegde AG, Sharma RM, Mishra UC (2005) Uptake and distribution of natural radioactivity in wheat plants from soil. J Environ Radioact 79:331–346
Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2000) Metal-accumulating plants. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley, New York
Robinson BH, Brooks RR, Howes AW, Kirkman JH, Gregg PEH (1997) The potential of the high-biomass nickel hyperaccumulator Berkheya coddii for phytoremediation and phytomining. J Geochem Exp 60:115–126
Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I (1998) Phytoremediation. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:643–648
Schnoor J (2002) Phytoremediation of soil and groundwater. Prepared for the ground-water remediation technologies analysis center. Technology evaluation report TE-02-01. U.S. Department of Energy. “Phytoremediation: natural attenuation that really works.” TIE Quarterly. Volume 6(1), Spring 1997
Shahandeh H, Hossner LR (2002) Role of soil properties in phytoaccumulation of uranium. Water Air Soil Pollut 141:165–180
Shinonaga T, Schimmack W, Gerzabek MH (2005) Vertical migration of 60Co, 137Cs and 226Ra in agricultural soils as observed in lysimeters under crop rotation. J Environ Radioact 79:93–106
Soudek P, Petřík P, Vágner M, Tykva R, Plojhar V, Petrová Š, Vaněk T (2007a) Botanical survey and screening of plant species which accumulate 226Ra from contaminated soil of uranium waste depot. Europ J Soil Biol 43:251–261
Soudek P, Petrová Š, Benešová D, Tykva R, Vaňková R, Vaněk T (2007b) Comparison of 226Ra nuclide from soil by three woody species Betula pendula, Sambucus nigra and Alnus glutinosa during the vegetation period. J Environ Radioact 97:76–82
Soudek P, Petrová Š, Benešová D, Kotyza J, Vágner M, Vaňková R, Vaněk T (2010) Study of soil–plant transfer of 226Ra under greenhouse conditions. J Environ Radioact 101:446–450
Soudek P, Petrová Š, Benešová D, Dvořáková M, Vaněk T (2011) Uranium uptake by hydroponically cultivated crop plants. J Environ Radioact 102:598–604
Srivastava S, Bhainsa KC, D’Souza SF (2010) Investigation of uranium accumulation potential and biochemical responses of an aquatic weed Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle. Bioresour Technol 101:2573–2579
Thiry Y, Van Hees M (2008) Evolution of pH, organic matter and 226radium/calcium partitioning in U-mining debris following revegetation with pine trees. Sci Total Environ 393:111–117
Tu C, Ma LQ, Bondada B (2002) Arsenic accumulation in the hyperaccumulator Chinese brake and its utilization potential for phytoremediation. J Environ Qual 31:1671–1675
Vera Tomé F, Blanco Rodríguez P, Lozano JC (2008) Elimination of natural uranium and 226Ra from contaminated waters by rhizofiltration using Helianthus annuus L. Sci Total Environ 393:351–357
Vera Tomé F, Blanco Rodríguez P, Lozano JC (2009) The ability of Helianthus annuus L. and Brassica juncea to uptake and translocate natural uranium and 226Ra under different milieu conditions. Chemosphere 74:293–300
Verma VK, Singh YP, Rai JPN (2007) Biogas production from plant biomass used for phytoremediation of industrial wastes. Bioresour Technol 98:1664–1669
Whicker FW, Hinton TG, Orlandini KA, Clark SB (1999) Uptake of natural and anthropogenic actinides in vegetable crops grown on a contaminated lake bed. J Environ Radioact 45:1–12
Acknowledgment
The presented work was supported by Defense Industrial Technology Development Program (B3720132001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51274124), the Program of Science and Technology Department of Hunan Province (No. 2010GK2025), and the Program of Scientific Research Foundation of Education Department of Hunan Province (No. 10A103, 10C1134).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hu, N., Ding, D., Li, G. (2014). Natural Plant Selection for Radioactive Waste Remediation. In: Gupta, D., Walther, C. (eds) Radionuclide Contamination and Remediation Through Plants. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07665-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07665-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07664-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07665-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)