Abstract
In this paper we introduce the Comprehension SEEDING system and describe the system components designed to enhance classroom discussion by providing real-time formative feedback to teachers. Using SEEDING, teachers ask free-response questions. As students are constructing their responses using digital devices, SEEDING allows teachers to assess a student’s understanding. Once SEEDING collects student responses, the system automatically groups them based on semantic similarity. Teachers can use this information to address student misconceptions and engage the classroom from a more informed perspective. This paper describes the SEEDING system and how it can be used to aid teachers and improve classroom discussion.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Beck, I., Margaret, M.: Inviting students into the pursuit of meaning. Educational Psychology Review 13(3), 225–241 (2001)
Bunce, D.M., VandenPlas, J.R., Havanki, K.: Comparing the effectiveness of student achievement of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes. Journal of Chemisty Education 83(3), 488–493 (2006)
Carnaghan, C., Webb, A.: Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning, and Engagement in Accounting Education. Issues in Accounting Education 22(3), 391–409 (2007)
Chi, M.T.H.: Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(1), 73–105 (2009)
Duggan, P.M., Palmer, E., Devitt, P.: Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: A randomised trial. BMC Medical Education 7(25) (2007)
Duncan, D.: Clickers: A New Teaching Aid with Exceptional Promise. Astronomy Education Review 5(1), 70 (2006)
Fies, C., Marshall, J.: Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15(1), 101–109 (2006)
Herreid, C.F.: Clicker Cases: Introducing Case Study Teaching Into Large Classrooms (2006)
Keller, C., Finkelstein, N., Perkins, K., Pollock, S., Turpen, C., Dubson, M., Hsu, L., et al.: Research-based Practices For Effective Clicker Use. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 128–131 (2007)
Larson, B.: Classroom discussion: A method of instruction and a curriculum outcome. Teaching and Teacher Education 16(5-6), 661–677 (2000)
Nielsen, R.D., Ward, W., Martin, J.H.: Automatic Generation of Fine-Grained Representations of Learner Response Semantics. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 173–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Penuel, W.R., Boscardin, C.K., Masyn, K., Crawford, V.M.: Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology Research and Development 55(4), 315–346 (2006)
Siau, K., Nah, F.F., Siau, K., Sheng, H., Nah, F.F.: Use of a Classroom Response System to Enhance Classroom Interactivity (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Paiva, F. et al. (2014). Comprehension SEEDING: Comprehension through Self Explanation, Enhanced Discussion, and INquiry Generation. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)