Abstract
Biliary duct injuries and hemorrhages are still the most common complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Despite the advances in surgical technique, the incidence rate of these complications is slightly higher compared with open cholecystectomy. Understanding the mechanisms of injury and a greater attention in the prevention of these damages are recommended. We performed a systematic review of the literature with the aim to bring up to date the previous EAES guidelines, paying special attention to biliary duct and vascular injuries prevention and management, but not forgetting abscesses (due to bile leaks and/or gallstone spillage) and bowel injuries. The level of evidence of each article was graded following the “Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 Levels of Evidence.”
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
7.1 Bile Duct Injuries
7.1.1 Introduction
A quarter of century from the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and more about 20 years after it was established the gold standard for gallbladder removal, a rate of biliary duct injuries (BDI) is still reported with a range from 0.25 to 0.74 % for major BDI and from 0.28 to 1.7 % for minor BDI [1, 2] (survey) [3–10] (LoE4) [11–14] (LoE3). The accepted incidence for total BDI is nowadays attested in about 0.4 % [1] (survey) [12, 15] (LoE3) and seems to remain constant despite advances in this surgical field.
Nowadays only knowledge of risk factors and efforts to understand causes may help the surgeon to decrease BDI incidence. Patient features, as age or sex, and local factors, as acute or chronic inflammation, anatomic variations, previous abdominal surgery and hemorrhage, are associated in literature with BDI, but because of a small number of cases it is not always possible to provide data for the relevance of these factors.
7.1.2 Identification of Calot’s Triangle Structures
Misidentification of structures within the Calot’s triangle is the most frequent cause of BDI [16] (LoE4) so that a correct and conclusive identification of cystic and common bile duct (CBD) may help to prevent injuries. With this goal, routine use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) is often advocated, although the efficacy and cost-effectiveness are nowadays discussed. In our systematic review CBD injury risk during LC was similar with or without routine IOC, even if IOC was reported helpful in perioperative CBD stone detection [17] (LoE1). No routine IOC was associated with shorter operative time and fewer perioperative complications. The IOC may be adopted for patients undergoing LC when clinical, biochemical, or radiological features are suggestive of CBD stones [17] (LoE1). In a recent population-based cohort study, early detection of BDI using IOC led up to an improved survival [14] (LoE3). The EAES guideline that routine IOC cannot be recommended even if it allows early identification of BDI, as long as it is correctly interpreted, is still valid. To visualize the junction of cystic duct and CBD with the aim to decrease the incidence of BDI, routine use of intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound (IOUS) was also proposed. Hashimoto M. et al. referred 94 % of intraoperative valid identifications of biliary structures in 200 enrolled patients during LC before IOC [18] (LoE3). Machi J. et al. reported 96 % of successful IOUS in 200 patients during LC, whereas, in selected cases (3.5 %), IOC was needed with no false-positive detection of the identified 20 bile duct stones [19] (LoE3). Even if this technique may be useful to select patients needing IOC and to detect stones, the effectiveness of routine IOUS as an alternative to usual methods for identification of anatomic structures of Calot is nowadays unclear and not strongly recommended.
7.1.3 Critical View of Safety (CVS)
The effort to standardize an approach to the cystic artery and duct brought Strasberg et al. [20] (LoE2) to outline the “critical view of safety” (Figs. 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4). Although there is only limited evidence from clinical studies to back this technique, the EAES guidelines recommended to perform this strategy [21]. A more detailed description of the evidence available on CVS is in Chap. 2.
7.1.4 About Conversion
Despite the advances in training and increased clinical experience, conversion rates reaching 10 % are still reported [22] (LoE4). Needful prompt conversions are mandatory to avoid complications, but few studies have investigated the causes of conversion. Lengyel et al. recently claimed that conversion, in many circumstances, is performed “electively” due to an “anticipated” difficulty, with a longer hospital stay and higher costs [23] (LoE4) [24] (LoE3). Furthermore, to identify the timing and the main reasons for conversion, they concluded that the conversion was elective in 91 % of the examined cases. In about half of these cases, conversions were performed without a genuine attempt at laparoscopic dissection and the inserted trocars were fewer than four [22] (LoE4). Despite, several limitations of the study (small sample size, degree of laparoscopic training, experience of the surgeons), the authors believe that all laparoscopic cases should be genuinely attempted, the correct number of ports placed, and some effort made at dissection. With decreasing experience in open cholecystectomy, this procedure does not always seem to be a “safe” alternative.
7.1.5 Partial Cholecystectomy
In the case of a difficult LC (e.g., in acute cholecystitis wherein dissection of Calot’s triangle is challenging due to severe adhesions or inflammation), a change in surgical strategy such as anterograde or partial cholecystectomy or even drainage may be more practical than conversion. Since surgical skill and experience play an important role, a different surgical strategy may be especially valuable for less experienced surgical teams. An alternative approach to conversion aimed at preventing BDI is laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (Fig. 7.5). The safety and efficacy of this procedure are unclear. Literature concerning LPC is poor. Henneman et al. [25] (LoE3), in 625 patients suffering from acute cholecystitis who received partial (subtotal or incomplete) cholecystectomy, reported a median hospital stay of 4.5 days and one case of BDI. Without firm conclusions, closure of the remnant gallbladder pouch, cystic duct, or both seems favorable, minimizing the need for ERCP, reducing the amount of leaks and the associated hospital stay, and lowering the rate for recurrent symptoms of gallstone disease and for the risk of BDI. Also Davis et al. in a recent retrospective case-control study evaluated this technique in a series of patients with acute cholecystitis. They reported a half postoperative complication with no BDI after this strategy, suggesting partial cholecystectomy as an alternative approach to conversion. Furthermore, this technique with removing necrotic portions of the gallbladder may prevent empyema formation [26] (LoE4).
7.1.6 Intraoperative Management
A single-institution retrospective analysis of a large series of patients with diagnosis of BDI sustained during LC was recently published where 88 % of the patients receiving on-table repair during surgery had a favorable evolution. The authors concluded that the intraoperative diagnosis of BDI is a very important topic with lower morbidity and mortality rates [27] (LoE4). Even though only case series and expert opinions in management were published in the medical literature, there is a growing body of literature supporting the importance of early referral to a tertiary care hospital to treat BDI with a multidisciplinary approach [28–31] (LoE4) [32] (LoE3) [33] (LoE2). And so the EAES guidelines [21] recommend that “nevertheless no high-quality evidence dealing with this question was identified from clinical studies, the management of BDI should be performed by surgeons who are experienced in this field.”
7.2 Abscesses
The incidence of abscesses in LC is very low. In a large national survey of 77604 LCs [34], the reported abscess incidence was 1/13,000 complications. Bile leakage and gallstone spillage remain the most frequent causes of abscesses after surgery [35–45] (LoE4) [46] (LoE3). Untill now only case reports or case series are published in examined literature, and therefore it was not possible to perform a systematic review according to the criteria of the best evidence-based literature.
7.2.1 Incidence
The incidence rate of unretrieved gallstones in the peritoneal cavity is high (2.4–50 %) [43, 47] (LoE4) [48] (LoE3); nevertheless severe complications are rarely described. The incidence of infection-related complications was reported in 0.1–0.3 %. Abscesses were generally located in the abdominal wall or in the subhepatic space, but less frequently anywhere in the abdomen and more likely in the setting of acute cholecystitis [49] (LoE3).
7.2.2 Management
In a retrospective analysis on 10,174 LCs, only 0.08 % required reoperation for abdominal abscess with no mortality. Since gallbladder perforation and stone spillage occur during the dissection (75 %) or the removal (25 %) of the gallbladder, caution in removing from the hepatic fossa is suggested, avoiding hurried traction to Hartmann’s pouch [46] (LoE3). Less frequent causes include gallstone spillage during gallbladder retrieval across the umbilical port, especially if it is not recovered in an endobag, and so the use of this device is recommended [46] (LoE3). The number and the size of lost stone seem to be a risk factor for abscess growth. More than 15 stones or stones larger than 1.5 cm were found in more than 40 % of these patients [46] (LoE3). The kind of the stones seems to be an important factor: in the pigmented-type stones (black, brown, mixed), bacterial contamination was present in 83 % compared to 33 % in cholesterol calculi [46] (LoE3). It is suggested to send a sample of bile and/or a retrieved stone for microbiological analysis, because pathogens are usually the same as those that cause subsequent infections [46] (LoE3). Extensive peritoneal lavage is widely recommended, but care must be taken to not spread gallstones into more inaccessible sites, making retrieval even more difficult. Placing the irrigating instrument beyond the stones so that they are flushed into view can be helpful [48] (LoE3). Authors emphasize the need for removal of as many calculi as possible during laparoscopy [50] (LoE3). However, they advised conversion to an open procedure only in patients with too many gallstones left in the peritoneal cavity, especially when bacteriobilia is suspected or confirmed by Gram stain of the bile. They also noted that percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses in most of the patients was ineffective if the inciting gallstones were not removed [50] (LoE3). There is no indication for converting the laparoscopic procedure to a laparotomy purely on the basis of spilled stones, but documenting spilled stones in the operation note and informing the patient about stones’ spillage and its unlikely consequences should be useful. The surgeon should be alert to the possibility of abscess formation and other complications because early recognition of intraperitoneal gallstones is essential in the diagnosis and further treatment of symptomatic patients [45] (LoE4).
7.2.3 Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Therapy
In a recent Cochrane Systematic Review [51] (LoE1), Sanabria et al. concluded that there is no sufficient evidence to support or refuse the use of antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce surgical infections in low-risk patients undergoing elective LC.
In a recent randomized trial of 166 patients who suffered from accidental perforation of the gallbladder during elective LC, there was no significant association between antibiotic treatment and surgical wound infection [52] (LoE2). No patients developed residual abscess. In a multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus, age over 60, operation time lasting more than 70 min, and ASA 3 were identified as independent factors significantly associated with the onset of surgical wound infection (p < 0.001) [52] (LoE2). The authors concluded that routine administration of an antibiotic to patients experiencing accidental perforation of the gallbladder during LC is not necessary. They recommend antibiotic prophylaxis, immediately before surgery, for patients with associated risk factors [52] (LoE2).
7.3 Hemorrhages
Vascular injuries during LC may more often occur during dissection of the Calot’s triangle structures [53] (LoE4) [54] (LoE3). Unfortunately the clinical relevance and impact of vascular injuries may be dramatic for the surgeon and above all for the patient. The knowledge of the mechanism by which hemorrhages occur represents a fundamental way to diminish the risk of incontrollable bleeding during LC.
Recent literature still reports incidence data derived from systematic studies of the 1990s: the small number of cases and the wide extent of the confidence interval do not permit to obtain reliable updated incidence rate of bleeding in LC; furthermore, there is no uniform classification about major or minor bleeding. Maybe the real incidence of relevant hemorrhages during LCs is underestimated [54, 55] (LoE3).
Copious bleeding from the liver bed accounts for about 88 % of hemorrhages during LC [54] (LoE3) [56] (LoE4), while the right hepatic artery (RHA) injuries represent less than 12 % of cases [57, 58] (LoE3), with an overall rate of uncontrollable hemorrhages requiring open conversion ranging from 0.1 to 8 % [56, 59] (LoE4) [54, 60] (LoE3) (Fig. 7.6). Coagulation defects may be responsible for uncontrollable hemorrhage, and preoperative blood assessment must be carefully evaluated, and caution must be posed about the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs because of enhanced bleeding diathesis from poor platelet adhesiveness [61] (LoE4). Higher bleeding rate is reported in cirrhotic patients (26 vs 3.1 % in not cirrhotic patients) because of damaged liver function [62] (LoE3).
The common hemorrhage of the liver bed is often a borderline condition depending on the different caliber of the involved vessels. It frequently comes from small vascular branches so that direct pressure to the gallbladder bed via a laparoscopic instrument may arrest the hemorrhage [63] (LoE4), but surgeons have to keep in mind that a middle hepatic vein or an aberrant cystic artery (CA) may be also involved [63–65] (LoE4). The portal vein injury, often associated with hepatic artery injury (HAI), is the third highest ranking injury, although it is considerably less common (4 %) [66] (LoE4) [67] (LoE3).
CA bleeding may become a serious complication during LC, with an increasing risk of overlap vascular or biliary structures injuries, that may impose conversion to open surgery. The CA has many possible position, number, and origin with the RHA being the most common, and the knowledge of anatomical variations of the CA may help the surgeon to avoid hemorrhage [68] (LoE4).
The RHA, which is located in 82 % of the cases in the Calot’s triangle ([69] Atlas), is the most common major vascular structure damaged during dissection of this anatomic space (90 %) [58] (LoE3). Stewart et al. [66] (LoE4) described how the RHA may be misidentified as the CA. The source of the error depends upon the common bile duct incorrectly identified as the cystic duct: in this case the transection of the common bile duct exposes the RHA, which is often clipped, based on the wrong assumption that it is a posterior CA. These mistakes emphasize the importance of identifying the CA and dividing it close to the gallbladder. The “fundus-first” technique, suggested for acute cholecystitis [70] (LoE4), may lead to a possible injury to the RHA, which might be retracted downwards, along with the gallbladder [71] (LoE4). For incontrollable hemorrhage, even if only few data are available on the real incidence of bleeding complications, the rate of conversion to open surgery was reported in about 8 % of the cases (meta-analysis from 39 studies for a total of 15,596 patients) [60] (LoE3).
Among patients with bile duct injury (BDI) during LC, the incidence of RHA injury was reported from 12 to 25 % [34] (survey) [71] (LoE4). Higher incidence was reported in the review by Pulitanò and colleagues [58] (LoE3) where 38 % of cases were combined with HAI. In cases of BDI and concomitant HAI, the arterial supply to the bile duct is often completely interrupted, further increasing the risk for potential ischemic stricture of the remaining right biliary tree as well as a high risk for hepatic necrosis. The sensitivity of the bile duct to ischemic injury is well described and might contribute to the increased morbidity after biliary reconstruction [58] (LoE3).
7.3.1 Hemostatic Agents
Many adjunctive local hemostatic agents are frequently proposed to favor bleeding control in liver surgery, but no strong evidence exists about their real efficacy during LC. Because their actual effectiveness is not yet extensively studied in large randomized, controlled prospective studies, the current indications for usage, both in hemorrhage and bile leakage, are not clear and mostly based on the individual surgeon’s preference. Routine use of local hemostatic agents is not recommended.
7.4 Bowel Injuries
The incidence of all bowel injuries (BI) during LC is very low, and it was reported in literature from 0.07 to 0.5 % [54, 72, 73] (LoE3), but excluding lesions for trocar insertion or Veress needle, the specific LC-related causes are seldom referred and ascribe mainly to dissection, adhesiolysis [54] (LoE3), electrocautery burns, and tearing during retraction [74] (LoE4). BI comprise a severe complication when they do occur and may remain undetected during the operation [54] (LoE3). The injuries most frequently involve the small intestine, followed by the colon, duodenum, and stomach [75] (Chapter of book). Careful patient selection, control of the integrity of the isolation of the instruments, and no out-of-sight activities can diminish overall complication rates. Limited injuries to serosa may not require any treatment [76] (LoE4), while full-thickness lesions need immediate repair either laparoscopically [73] (LoE3) or with conversion to laparotomy. Since bowel injuries may remain undetected during the operation, any patient with signs of peritonitis, sepsis, or increased abdominal pain after laparoscopic surgery must promptly be investigated [72] (LoE3).
References
Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I et al (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140:986–992
Gigot J, Etienne J, Aerts R et al (1997) The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 11:1171–1178
Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanoski MP et al (1996) An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 224:145–154
Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM (1996) Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg 83:1356–1360
MacFadyen BV, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315–321
Z’graggen K, Wehrli H, Metzger A, Buehler M, Frei E, Klaiber C (1998) Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland: a prospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Surg Endosc 12:1303–1310
Adamsen S, Hart Hansen O, Funch-Jensen P et al (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184:571–578
Karvonen J, Gullichsen R, Laine S et al (2007) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution. Surg Endosc 21:1069–1073
Söderlund C, Frozanpor F, Linder S (2005) Bile duct injuries at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution prospective study. Acute cholecystitis indicates an increased risk. World J Surg 29:987–993
Chuang KI, Corley D, Postlethwaite DA, Merchant M, Harris HW (2012) Does increased experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries? Am J Surg 203:480–487
Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS et al (1996) Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993: a statewide experience. Arch Surg 131:382–388
Flum DR, Koepsell T, Heagerty P, Sinanan M, Dellinger EP (2001) Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error? Arch Surg 136:1287–1289
Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish inpatient registry. Arch Surg 141:1207–1213
Törnqvist B, Strömberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M (2012) Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.e6457
Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290(16):2168–2173
Way LW, Stewart LM, Gantert WM et al (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237(4):460–469 [article]
Sajid MS, Leaver C, Haider Z, Worthington T, Karanjia N, Singh KK (2012) Routine on-table cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(6):375–380
Hashimoto M, Matsuda M, Watanabe G (2010) Intraoperative ultrasonography for reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 57(101):706–709
Machi J, Oishi AJ, Tajiri T, Murayama KM, Furumoto NL, Oishi RH (2007) Routine laparoscopic ultrasound can significantly reduce the need for selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 21(2):270–274
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125
Eikermann M, Siegel R, Broeders I, Dziri C, Fingerhut A, Gutt C, Jaschinski T, Nassar A, Paganini AM, Pieper D, Targarona E, Schrewe M, Shamiyeh A, Strik M, Neugebauer EA (2012) Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 26(11):3003–3039
Lengyel BI, Azagury D, Varban O, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Brooks DC, Ashley SW, Tavakkolizadeh A (2012) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert? Surg Endosc 26(2):508–513
Lengyel B, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Ashley SW, Tavakkoli A (2012) A laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the price of conversion? Surgery 152(2):173–178
Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211
Henneman D, da Costa DW, Vrouenraets BC, van Wagensveld BA, Lagarde SM (2013) Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:351–358
Davis B, Castaneda G, Lopez J (2012) Subtotal cholecystectomy versus total cholecystectomy in complicated cholecystitis. Am Surg 78(7):814–817
Pekolj J, Alvarez FA, Palavecino M, Sánchez Clariá R, Mazza O, de Santibañes E (2013) Intraoperative management and repair of bile duct injuries sustained during 10,123 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a high-volume referral center. J Am Coll Surg 216(5):894–901
Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD et al (2005) Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg 241:786–792
Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Wei AC (2010) Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Timing of repair and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg 145(8):757–763
Barauskas G, Paškauskas S, Dambrauskas Z, Gulbinas A, Pundzius J (2012) Referral pattern, management, and long-term results of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: a case series of 44 patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 48(3):138–144
Fiocca F, Salvatori FM, Fanelli F, Bruni A, Ceci V, Corona M, Donatelli G (2011) Complete transection of the main bile duct: minimally invasive treatment with an endoscopic-radiologic rendezvous. Gastrointest Endosc 74(6):1393–1398
de Reuver PR, Rauws EA, Bruno MJ et al (2007) Survival in bile duct injury patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidisciplinary approach of gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons. Surgery 142:1–9
Thompson CM, Saad NE, Quazi RR, Darcy MD, Picus DD, Menias CO (2013) Management of iatrogenic bile duct injuries: role of the interventional radiologist. Radiographics 33(1):117–134
Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,704 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14
Khalid M, Rashid M (2009) Gallstone abscess: a delayed complication of spilled gallstone after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Emerg Radiol 16(3):127–129
Zamir G, Lyass S, Pertsemlidis D, Katz B (1999) The fate of the dropped gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13:68–70
Viera FT, Armellini E, Rosa L, Ravetta V, Alessiani M, Dionigi P, Rossi S (2006) Abdominal spilled stones: ultrasound findings. Abdom Imaging 31(5):564–567
Bhati CS, Tamijmarane A, Bramhall SR (2006) Tale of three spilled gall stones: one liver mass and two abscesses. Dig Surg 23:198–200
Iannitti DA, Varker KA, Zaydfudim V, McKee J (2006) Subphrenic and pleural abscess due to spilled gallstones. JSLS 10(1):101–104
Roberts DJ, Chun HM (2005) Dropped gallstone as a nidus of intra-abdominal abscess complicated by empyema. Clin Infect Dis 41(6):e64–e66
Hussain MI, Al-Akeely MH, Alam MK, Al-Abood FM (2010) Abdominal wall abscess following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an unusual late complication of lost gallstones. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 20(11):763–765
Kochar K, Vallance K, Mathew G, Jadhav V (2008) Intrahepatic perforation of the gallbladder presenting as liver abscess: case report, review of literature and Niemeier’s classification. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20(3):240–244
Schäfer M, Suter C, Klaiber C, Wehrli H, Frei E, Krähenbühl L (1998) Spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A relevant problem? A retrospective analysis of 10174 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 12(4):305–309
Memon MA, Deeik RK, Maffi TR, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1999) The outcome of unretrieved gallstones in the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13(9):848–857
Tumer AR, Yüksek YN, Yasti AC, Gözalan U, Kama NA (2005) Dropped gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the consequences. World J Surg 29(4):437–440
Brockmann JG, Kocher T, Senninger NJ, Schurmann GM (2002) Complications due to gallstones lost during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of incidence, clinical course, and management. Surg Endosc 16:1226–1232
Singh K, Wang ML, Ofori E, Widmann W, Alemi A, Nakaska M (2012) Gallstone abscess as a result of dropped gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg Case Rep 3(12):611–613
Woodfield JC, Rodgers M, Windsor JA (2004) Peritoneal gallstones following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18(8):1200–1207
Zehetner J, Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2007) Lost gallstones in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: all possible complications. Am J Surg 193:73–78
Rice DC, Memon MA, Jamison RL, Agnessi T, Ilstrup D, Bannon MB, Farnell MB, Grant CS, Sarr MG, Thompson GB, van Heerden JA, Zietlow SP, Donohue JH (1997) Long-term consequences of intraoperative spillage of bile and gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 1(1):85–91
Sanabria A, Dominguez LC, Valdivieso E, Gomez G (2010) Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):CD005265
Guzmán-Valdivia G (2008) Routine administration of antibiotics to patients suffering accidental gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not necessary. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(6):547–550
Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbuhl L (2000) A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg 180:73–77
Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:164–171
Tzovaras G, Dervenis C (2006) Vascular injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an underestimated problem. Dig Surg 23:370–374
Ball CG, MacLean AR, Kirkpatrick AW, Bathe OF, Sutherland F, Debru E, Dixon E (2006) Hepatic vein injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the unappreciated proximity of the middle hepatic vein to the gallbladder bed. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1151–1155
Strasberg SM, Helton WS (2011) An analytical review of vasculobiliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 13:1–14
Pulitanò C, Parks RW, Ireland H, Wigmore SJ, Garden OJ (2011) Impact of concomitant arterial injury on the outcome of laparoscopic bile duct injury. Am J Surg 201(2):238–244
Berti S, Bianco A, D’Ambra L, Bianchi C, Bonfante P, Falco E (2008) An easy way to control liver bed hemorrhages during laparoscopic cholecystectomies. J Am Coll Surg 206(3):1225–1226
Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV (1996) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224:609–620
Shibuya K, Midorikawa Y, Mushiake H, Watanabe M, Yamakawa T, Sugiyama Y (2010) Ruptured hepatic subcapsular hematoma following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of a case. Biosci Trends 4(6):355–358
Puggioni A, Wong LL (2003) A meta-analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. J Am Coll Surg 197:921–926
Misawa T, Koike M, Suzuki K, Unemura Y, Murai R, Yoshida K, Kobayashi S, Yamazaki Y (1999) Ultrasonographic assessment of the risk of injury to branches of the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 178:418–421
Shen BY, Li HW, Chen M, Zheng MH, Zang L, Jiang SM, Li JW, Jiang Y (2003) Color doppler ultrasonographic of the risk of injury to major branch of the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2:126–130
Bergamaschi R, Ignjatovic D (1999) Anatomic rationale for arterial bleeding from the liver bed during and/or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a postmortem study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:267–270
Stewart L, Robinson TN, Lee CM et al (2004) Right hepatic injury associated with laparoscopic bile duct injury: incidence, mechanism and consequences. J Gastrointest Surg 8:523–531
Alves A, Farges O, Nicolet J et al (2003) Incidence and consequence of an hepatic artery injury in patients with postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures. Ann Surg 238:93–96
Chen TH, Shyu JF, Chen CH, Ma KH, Wu CW, Lui WY, Liu JC (2000) Variations of the cystic artery in Chinese adults. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:154–157
Gray S, Skandalakis J (1985) Atlas of surgical anatomy for general surgeons. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Rosemberg J, Leinskold T (2004) Dome down laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Scand J Surg 93:48–51
Strasberg SM (2008) Error traps and vasculo-biliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:284–292
Binenbaum SJ, Goldfarb MA (2006) Inadvertent enterotomy in minimally invasive abdominal surgery. JSLS 10(3):336–340
Azevedo JLMC, Azevedo OC, Miyahira SA, Miguel GPS, Becker OM Jr, Hypolito OHM, Machado ACCG, Cardia W, Yamaguchi GA, Godinho L, Freire D, Almeida CES, Moreira CH, Freire DF (2009) Injuries caused by Veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 23:1428–1432
Taylor AM, Li MKW (1994) Laparoscopic management of complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 64:827–829
Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Bailey RW (1994) Complications. In: Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF, Modlin IM (eds) Laparoscopic surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 77–94, chapter 8
Triantafyllidis I, Nikoloudis N, Sapidis N, Chrissidou M, Kalaitsidou I, Chrissidis T (2009) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience in a district general hospital. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(6):449–458
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Narilli, P., Di Filippo, A., Campli, M., Motter, M., Carrara, A. (2014). Complications: How to Prevent and Manage Them. In: Agresta, F., Campanile, F., Vettoretto, N. (eds) Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05407-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05407-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05406-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05407-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)