Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

1 Manifolds with Fibred Boundaries

Let X be a compact manifold with boundary ∂X endowed with a fibration

Let \(x \in {\mathcal{C}}^{\infty }(X)\) be a boundary defining function and let \({g}_{\Phi }\) be a complete Riemannian metric on X ∖ ∂X which in a collar neighborhood of ∂X is of the form

$${g}_{\Phi } = \frac{d{x}^{2}} {{x}^{4}} + \frac{{\Phi }^{{_\ast}}h} {{x}^{2}} + \kappa ,$$
(1)

where κ is a symmetric 2-tensor restricting to give a metric on each fibre of \(\Phi \) and h is a Riemannian metric on Y. To study geometric operators (Laplacian, Dirac operators) associated to such metrics, Mazzeo and Melrose introduced a calculus of pseudodifferential operators: the \(\Phi \)-calculus. The starting point is the Lie algebra of \(\Phi \)-vector fields:

$${\mathcal{V}}_{\Phi }(X) =\{ \xi \in \Gamma (TX)\;\vert \;\xi x \in {x}^{2}{\mathcal{C}}^{\infty }(X),\;{\Phi }_{ {_\ast}}({\left.\xi \right \vert }_{\partial X}) = 0\}.$$

In local coordinates, such a vector \(\xi \in {\mathcal{V}}_{\Phi }(X)\) takes the form:

$$\xi = a{x}^{2} \frac{\partial } {\partial x} +\sum\limits_{i}{b}^{i}x \frac{\partial } {\partial {y}^{i}} +\sum\limits_{j}{c}^{j} \frac{\partial } {\partial {z}^{j}},\quad a,{b}^{i},{c}^{j} \in {\mathcal{C}}^{\infty }(X).$$

Since it is a Lie algebra, we can consider its universal enveloping algebra to define \(\Phi \)-differential operators. Mazzeo and Melrose defined more generally \(\Phi \)-pseudodifferential operators. They are useful to study mapping properties, for instance to determine when a \(\Phi \)-differential operator is Fredholm.

2 Manifolds with Foliated Boundaries

Question 1.

What can we do when the fibration \(\Phi \) is replaced by a smooth foliation \(\mathcal{F}\) on ∂X?

The notion of \(\mathcal{F}\)-vector fields is easy to define:

$${\mathcal{V}}_{\mathcal{F}}(X) =\{ \xi \in \Gamma (TX)\;\vert \;\xi x \in {x}^{2}{\mathcal{C}}^{\infty }(X),\;{\left.\xi \right \vert }_{ \partial X} \in \Gamma (T\mathcal{F})\}.$$

This is still a Lie algebra, so we can define \(\mathcal{F}\)-differential operators. However, since pseudodifferential operators are not local, we expect global aspects of the foliation \(\mathcal{F}\) to come into play. One approach consists in using groupoid theory, namely, since \({\mathcal{V}}_{\mathcal{F}}(X)\) is in fact a Lie algebroid, we can integrate it to get a Lie groupoid \(\mathcal{G}\). We can then use the general approach of Nistor-Weinstein-Xu to construct a pseudodifferential calculus. We will instead proceed differently by assuming the foliation can be ‘resolved’ by a fibration. This restricts the class of foliations that can be considered, but will allow us to develop further the underlying analysis.

We will assume the foliation arises as follows:

  1. 1.

    \(\partial X = \partial \widetilde{X}/\Gamma \), where \(\Gamma \) is a discrete group acting freely and properly discontinuously on \(\partial \widetilde{X}\), a possibly non-compact manifold;

  2. 2.

    There is a fibration \(\Phi : \partial \widetilde{X} \rightarrow Y\) with \(Y\) a compact manifold;

  3. 3.

    The group \(\Gamma \) acts Y in a locally free manner (that is, if \(\gamma \in \Gamma \) and \(\mathcal{U}\subset Y\) an open set are such that y ⋅γ = y for all \(y \in \mathcal{U}\), then γ is the identity element) and so that \(\Phi (p \cdot \gamma ) = \Phi (p) \cdot \gamma \) for all \(p \in \partial \widetilde{X}\) and \(\gamma \in \Gamma \);

  4. 4.

    The images of the fibres of \(\Phi \) under the quotient map \(q : \partial \widetilde{X} \rightarrow \partial X\) give the leaves of the foliation \(\mathcal{F}\).

Example 1.

The Kronecker foliation on the 2-torus with lines of irrational slope θ arise in this way. One takes \(\partial \widetilde{X} = \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}\) with the fibration \(\Phi \) given by the projection on the right factor \(Y = \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}\), and the group \(\Gamma \) to be the integers with action given by

$$(x,[y]) \cdot k = (x + k,[y - k\theta ]),\;[y] \cdot k = [y - k\theta ],\;k \in \mathbb{Z}.$$

The identification with the standard definition of the Kronecker foliation is then given by the map

$$\begin{array}{lccc} \Psi :&(\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})/\mathbb{Z}& \rightarrow &{\mathbb{T}}^{2} = \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} \\ & [x,[y]] & \mapsto & ([x],[y + \theta x])\end{array}$$

Example 2.

Seifert fibrations (circle foliations on a compact 3-manifold) typically arise in this way, except when the space of leaves is a bad orbifold.

For such foliations, we can define \(\mathcal{F}\)-operators as follows. We let M = ∂X ×[0, ε) x  ⊂ X be a collar neighborhood of ∂X and consider \(\widetilde{M} = \partial \widetilde{X} \times [0,\epsilon {)}_{x}\) with \(\Gamma \) acting on \(\widetilde{M}\) in obvious way so that \(\widetilde{M}/\Gamma = M\). On \(\widetilde{M}\), we consider the space of \(\Gamma \)-invariant \(\Phi \)-operators \({\Psi }_{\Phi ,\Gamma }^{{_\ast}}(\widetilde{M})\) with support away from x = ε. Given \(\widetilde{P} \in {\Psi }_{\Phi ,\Gamma }^{k}(\widetilde{M})\), we can make it act on \(f \in {\mathcal{C}}^{\infty }(M)\) by requiring that \(\widetilde{P}({q}^{{_\ast}}f) = {q}^{{_\ast}}\widetilde{P}(f)\), where \(q :\widetilde{ M} \rightarrow M\) is the quotient map. This is meaningful because \(\widetilde{P}\) acts on \(\Gamma \) invariant functions to give again \(\Gamma \)-invariant functions. We denote by \({q}_{{_\ast}}\widetilde{P}\) the operator acting on \({\mathcal{C}}^{\infty }(M)\) obtained from \(\widetilde{P}\) in this way.

Definition 1.

An \(\mathcal{F}\)-pseudodifferential operator \(P \in {\Psi }_{\mathcal{F}}^{m}(X)\) is an operator of the form

$$P = {q}_{{_\ast}}{P}_{1} + {P}_{2},\quad {P}_{1} \in {\Psi }_{\Phi ,\Gamma }^{m}(\widetilde{M}),\;{P}_{ 2} \in \dot{ {\Psi }}^{m}(X).$$

From the \(\Phi \)-calculus, we deduce relatively easily that \(\mathcal{F}\)-operators are closed under composition, that they map smooth functions to smooth functions and that they are bounded when acting on appropriate Sobolev spaces. One can also introduce a notion of principal symbol σ m (P) as well as a notion of normal operator \({N}_{\mathcal{F}}(P)\) defined by ‘restricting’ the operator P to the boundary. This leads to a simple criterion to describe Fredholm operators. An operator \(P \in {\Psi }_{\mathcal{F}}^{m}(X)\) is Fredholm (when acting on suitable Sobolev spaces) if and only if its principal symbol σ m (P) and its normal operator \({N}_{\mathcal{F}}(P)\) are invertible.

3 An Index Theorem for Some Dirac-Type Operators

Assume now that the the foliation \(\mathcal{F}\) is also such that \(\partial \widetilde{X}\) is compact and the group \(\Gamma \) is finite. In particular, the leaves of \(\mathcal{F}\) must be compact. Let \({g}_{\mathcal{F}}\) be a metric such that \({q}^{{_\ast}}({\left.{g}_{\mathcal{F}}\right \vert }_{M})\) takes the form (1) near \(\partial \widetilde{X}\). Suppose X is even dimensional and that X, \(\widetilde{X}\) and Y are spin manifolds. Let \({D}_{\mathcal{F}}\) be the induced Dirac operator. Suppose its normal operator \({N}_{\mathcal{F}}({D}_{\mathcal{F}})\) is invertible, which is the case for instance when the induced metric on the leaves of the foliation \(\mathcal{F}\) has positive scalar curvature. Under the decomposition \(S = {S}^{+} \oplus {S}^{-}\) of the spinor bundle, the Dirac operator can be written as

$${D}_{\mathcal{F}} = \left (\begin{array}{cc} 0 &{D}_{\mathcal{F}}^{-} \\ {D}_{\mathcal{F}}^{+} & 0 \end{array} \right ).$$

Since \({N}_{\mathcal{F}}({D}_{\mathcal{F}})\) is invertible, the operator \({D}_{\mathcal{F}}^{+}\) is Fredholm.

Theorem 1.

The index of \({D}_{\mathcal{F}}^{+}\) is given by

$$\text{ ind}({D}_{\mathcal{F}}^{+}) =\int\limits_{X}\widehat{A}(X,{g}_{\mathcal{F}}) - \frac{1} {\vert \Gamma \vert }\int\limits_{Y }\widehat{A}(Y,h)\widehat{\eta }(\widetilde{{D}}_{0}) + \frac{\rho } {2},$$

where \(\widetilde{{D}}_{0}\) is a family of Dirac operators on the fibres of \(\Phi : \partial \widetilde{X} \rightarrow Y\) associated to \({q}^{{_\ast}}({\left.{D}_{\mathcal{F}}\right \vert }_{M})\) and \(\rho = \frac{\eta (\widetilde{{D}}_{\delta })} {\vert \Gamma \vert } - \eta ({D}_{\delta })\) is a difference of two eta invariants with \(\widetilde{{D}}_{\delta }\) the Dirac operator on \((\partial \widetilde{X}, \frac{{\Phi }^{{_\ast}}h} {{\delta }^{2}} + \kappa )\) and D δ the Dirac operator on \((\partial X,{q}_{{_\ast}}(\frac{{\Phi }^{{_\ast}}h} {{\delta }^{2}} + \kappa ))\) . Both \(\widetilde{{D}}_{\delta }\) and D δ are invertible for δ > 0 small enough and ρ does not depend on δ.

The strategy to prove this theorem is to take an adiabatic limit.