Skip to main content

The Promise and Pitfalls of Human Rights in Immigration Detention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Research Agenda for a Human Rights Centred Criminology

Abstract

This chapter explores the promise and pitfalls of human rights-based challenges to conditions in immigration detention in Greece. Drawing on over five years of research with a variety of organisations in Greece, from the National Preventive Mechanism to independent activist organisations, like the Border Violence Monitoring Network, we critically assess their limited impact on border control policies and set out a series of factors that undermine their efforts. Notwithstanding widespread international condemnation of the treatment of migrants and refugees in Greece, successive governments have managed to deflect criticism and remained indifferent to demands for change. What, under these conditions, can human rights achieve and how might further research into this field bring gross human rights violations to light and lead to more accountability?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amnesty International. 2010. Greece: Irregular Migrants and Asylum-Seekers Routinely Detained in Substandard Conditions. London: Amnesty International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. 2012. Greece: The End of the Road for Refugees, Asylum-Seekers and Migrants. London: Amnesty International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostou, D. 2014. Law and Rights’ Claiming on Behalf of Minorities in the Multi-level European System. In Rights and Courts in Pursuit of Social Change: Legal Mobilisation in the Multi-level European System, ed. D. Anagnostou. London: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamiatzis, S. 2013. Δένδιας: Η Αμυγδαλέζα Είναι από τα Πιο Σύγχρονα Στρατόπεδα στην Ευρώπη [Dendias: Amygadleza Is One of the Most Modern Camps in Europe]. News247, 11 July. https://www.news247.gr/politiki/dendias-i-amygdaleza-einai-apo-ta-pio-sygchrona-stratopeda-stin-eyropi.6217730.html. Accessed 11 September 2018.

  • Bhui, H.S., and M. Bosworth. 2020. Human rights protections and monitoring immigration detention at Europe’s Borders. European Human Rights Law Review 6 : 640–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhui, H.S., and M. Bosworth. 2022. Human Rights Protections and Monitoring Immigration Detention at Europe’s Borders. European Human Rights Law Review 6: 640–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhui, H.S., A. Fili, and M. Bosworth. 2018. Monitoring Immigration Detention at the Borders of Europe: Report on a Pilot Project in Greece, Hungary, Turkey and Italy, 2016–2017. Oxford: Centre for Criminology. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/project_report_final_1.pdf.

  • Bhui, H.S., A. Fili, and M. Bosworth. 2019. Monitoring Immigration Detention at the Borders of Europe: Report on Immigration Detention Monitoring in Turkey and Greece. Oxford: Border Criminologies. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/monitoring_immigration_detention_at_the_borders_of_europe_compressed.pdf.

  • Birk, M., G. Moritz, D. Long, R. Murray, and W. Suntinger. 2015. Enhancing Impact of National Preventive Mechanisms. Strengthening the Follow-Up on NPM Recommendations in the EU: Strategic Development, Current Practices and the Way Forward. Vienna: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights. https://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/law/hric/2015-documents/NPM%20Study_final.pdf. Accessed 11 September 2018.

  • Border Violence Monitoring Network. 2023. Dark Rooms, Degrading Treatment and Denial: The Use of Violence in Greece’s Pre-removal Detention Centres. https://borderviolence.eu/reports/detention-violence-greece/.

  • Bosworth, M. 2016. The Impact of Immigration Detention on Mental Health: Literature Review. In Review into the Welfare in Detention of Vulnerable Persons: A Report to the Home Office by Stephen Shaw. London: HMSO, CM 9186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., and M. Vannier. 2016. Comparing Immigration Detention in Britain and France: A Matter of Time? European Journal of Migration & Law 18 (2): 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., A. Fili, and S. Pickering. 2018. Women and Border Policing at the Edges of Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (13): 2182–2196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., F. Esposito, and A. Fli. 2021. Accessing Justice from Immigration Detention in Greece and Italy. In Rule of Law: Strategies, Experiences, and Interpretations, ed. B. Faedda, 177–186. Vicenza: Ronzani Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.K. 1964. Honour, Family and Patronage: A Study of Institutions and Moral Values in a Greek Mountain Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R., and L. Handley. 2016. Does Torture Prevention Work? Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. 2001. States of Denial. Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelisse, G. 2010. Immigration Detention and Human Rights: Rethinking Territorial Sovereignty. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, C. 2012. Human Rights and the Elusive Universal Subject: Immigration Detention Under International Human Rights and EU Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 19 (1): 257–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembour, M.-B., and T. Kelly, eds. 2011. Are Human Rights for Migrants? Critical Reflections on the Status of Irregular Migrants in Europe and the United States. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fili, A. 2013. The Maze of Immigration Detention Greece: A Case Study of the Athens Airport Detention Facility. Prison Service Journal 205: 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fili, A. 2023, forthcoming. Mapping Resistance in Immigration Detention. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M. 2012. On the Unintended Consequences of Human Rights Promotion on Immigration Detention. Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjIs7v9tPXsAhXfQEEAHRHOBTsQFjABegQIBBAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.globaldetentionproject.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F06%2FFlynn_Discussion_Paper_v4.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3vX1uMea2lQtx9_NK4QU05. Accessed 5 July 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franko, K. 2020. The Crimmigrant Other: Migration and Penal Power. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, L., and S. Caruana. 2022. Are We OPCAT Ready? So Far, Bare Bones. Alternative Law Journal 47 (1): 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyollai, D., and A. Amatrudo. 2019. Controlling Irregular Migration: International Human Rights Standards and the Hungarian Legal Framework. European Journal of Criminology 16 (4): 432–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2008. Stuck in a Revolving Door: Iraqis and Other Asylum Seekers and Migrants at the Greece/Turkey Entrance to the European Union. New York: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T. 2009. The UN Committee Against Torture: Human Rights Monitoring and the Legal Recognition of Cruelty. Human Rights Quarterly 31 (3): 777–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majcher, I., M. Flynn, and M. Grange. 2020. Immigration Detention in the European Union. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, L., and A. Spena. 2016. Introduction: The Criminalization of Migration and European (Dis)Integration. European Journal of Migration and Law 18 (2): 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medécins Sans Frontières. 2010. Migrants in Detention: Lives on Hold. Athens: MSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medécins Sans Frontières. 2014. Invisible Suffering: Prolonged and Systematic Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers in Substandard Conditions in Greece. Athens: MSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobile Info Team. 2023. “PRISON FOR PAPERS”: Last Resort Measures Used as Standard Procedure. Researching Pre-removal Detention Centres on Mainland Greece. https://www.mobileinfoteam.org/detention.

  • Morris, J. 2016. In the market of morality: International human rights standards and the immigration detention ‘improvement’ complex. In Conlon, C. and Hiemstra, N. (eds.) Intimate Economies of Immigration Detention: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papapantoleon, C. 2014. The Judiciary. In Mapping Ultra-Right Extremism, Xenophobia and Racism Within the Greek State Apparatus, ed. D. Christopoulos. Brussels: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pro Asyl. 2007. The Truth May Be Bitter but It Must Be Told: The Situation of Refugees in the Aegean and the Practices of the Greek Coast Guard. Frankfurt/Main: Pro Asyl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pro Asyl. 2012. Walls of Shame: Accounts from the Inside: The Detention Centres of Evros. Frankfurt/Main: Pro Asyl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M. 2013. Humanitarian Problems Relating to Migration in the Turkish-Greek Border Region: The Crucial Role of Civil Society Organisations. Research Resources Paper for COMPAS, University of Oxford. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/2013/humanitarian-problems-relating-to-migration-in-the-turkish-greek-border-region-the-crucial-role-of-civil-society-organisations/.

  • Snacken, S., and D. van Zyl Smit. 2009. Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, A. 2022. The Treatment of Immigrants in the European Court of Human Rights: Moving Beyond Criminalisation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Greek Ombudsman. 2018a. OPCAT—National Preventive Mechanisms Against Torture and Ill-Treatment: Annual Special Report 2016. https://www.synigoros.gr/resources/docs/opcat_2016_en.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018.

  • The Greek Ombudsman. 2018b. OPCAT—National Preventive Mechanisms Against Torture and Ill-Treatment: Annual Special Report 2017. https://www.synigoros.gr/resources/opcat_2017_en.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018.

  • Xenakis, S., and L. Cheliotis. 2018. Carceral Moderation and the Janus Face of International Pressure: A Long View of Greece’s Engagement with the European Convention of Human Rights. Crime, Law and Social Change 70 (2): 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andriani Fili .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fili, A., Bosworth, M. (2024). The Promise and Pitfalls of Human Rights in Immigration Detention. In: Weber, L., Marmo, M. (eds) A Research Agenda for a Human Rights Centred Criminology. Palgrave Critical Studies in Human Rights and Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46289-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46289-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46288-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46289-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics