Skip to main content

Guilty Without Crime: The Policing of Solidarity with Refugees and Other Migrants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democratic Protests and New Forms of Collective Action

Abstract

We argue that ‘civic disobedience’ by civil society actors starts only after governments begin to disobey international human rights and humanitarian law. In the name of migration management, governments at the EU (European Union) external borders started to conduct illegal pushbacks and pay third countries to conduct pullbacks to prevent the spontaneous arrivals of refugees and other migrants.

The ‘social disobedience’ theory proposes that when acting in resistance to such laws, civil society actors are attempting to construct an ‘alternative reality’. We argue that such emphasis is misplaced. In fact, it is not they but governments who are constructing an alternative hierarchy of norms in the international legal order.

We conclude that while the ‘social disobedience’ concept gives some legitimacy to those who help migrants, it implies that they are ‘guilty without a crime’. Thus, we propose instead to speak about ‘state disobedience’ to international human rights and humanitarian law and other customary law principles, which should have guided lawmakers in the first place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aliverti, A. (2021). Manufacturing obedience: Coercion and Authority in border controls. Punishment & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Jazeera. (2020). Greek Police Accuse aid workers of supporting migrant smugglers, 28 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allsopp, J., Vosyliūtė, L., & Brenda Smialowski, S. (2020). Picking “Low-Hanging Fruit” while the Orchard burns: The Costs of policing humanitarian actors in Italy and Greece as a Strategy to prevent migrant smuggling. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 27, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. (2020). Punishing compassion - Solidarity on trial in fortress Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bárd, P., Bayer, J., Chun Luk, N., & Vosyliūtė, L. (2020). SLAPP in the EU context’, ad-hoc study requested by DG JUSTICE within the frame of EU-CITZEN project, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S., Mitsilegas, V., Allsopp, J., & Vosyliūtė, L. (2019). Policing humanitarianism: EU policies against human smuggling and their impact on civil society. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S., Vosyliūtė, L., Brenda Smialowski, S., Allsopp, J., & Sanchez, G. (2018a, December 21). Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalization of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants: 2018 Update. CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S., Allsopp, J., & Vosyliūtė, L. (2018b). Policing the mobility society: The effects of EU anti-migrant smuggling policies on humanitarianism. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 4(3), 236–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S., Den Hertog, L., Núñez Ferrer, J., Musmeci, R., Vosyliūtė, L., & Pilati, M. (2018c). Oversight and management of the EU Trust funds: Democratic accountability challenges and promising practices. European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPS. (2021). Webinar ‘Human rights violations at the Polish and Lithuanian EU External Borders with Belarus: What should the EU do to uphold the rights of refugees and migrants?’

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, D. (2021). Croatia, Greece, Romania Illegally pushing refugees back, report, 7 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, E. (2017). Straightjacketing migrant rescuers? The code of conduct on maritime NGOs’ Straightjacketing migrant rescuers? The code of conduct on maritime NGOs’. Mediterranean Politics, 24(1), 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, E., & Villa, M. (2020). From “Angels” to “Vice Smugglers”: The criminalization of Sea Rescue NGOs in Italy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 27, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuttitta, P. (2018). Repoliticization through search and rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and migration management in the Central Mediterranean. Geopolitics, 23(3), 632–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the EU, Parliament and Commission. (2007). Joint Statement. The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid: The humanitarian challenge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELFI. (2021). Iš esmės. Pokalbis su penkis afganistaniečius priglaudusia moterimi ir jų advokate, 21 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutche Welle. (2021). Poland: Thousands protest against migrant pushbacks at Belarus Border. DW, 17 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECRE. (2021). Extraordinary responses: Legislative changes In Lithuania. ECRE Legal Note No.11, September 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2018). Progress report on the European Agenda on Migration. COM (2018) 250 final, 14 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020a). Commission Guidance on the implementation of EU rules on definition and prevention of the facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence, 2020/C 323/01, 23 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020b). Recommendation on cooperation among Member States concerning operations carried out by vessels owned or operated by private entities for the purpose of search and rescue, C/2020/6468, 23 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2018). Motion for Resolution on Guidelines for Member States to prevent humanitarian assistance from being criminalized, 2018/2769 (RSP).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Fundamental Rights Agency. (2014). Criminalization of Migrants in an Irregular Situation and of Persons engaging with them, Vienna, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRA. (2020). December 2020 update – NGO ships involved in search and rescue in the Mediterranean and legal proceedings against them, 18 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., & Vedsted-Hansen, J. (Eds.). (2016). Human rights and the dark side of globalisation: Transnational law enforcement and migration control. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, E., Carrera, S., Vosyliūtė, L., Groenendijk, K., Brouwer, E., Bigo, D., Jeandesboz, J., & Martin-Mazé, M. (2016). An analysis of the Schengen area in the wake of recent developments. European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, Y. (2021). Sitting of 05-10-2021 at the European Parliament Plenary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juncker, J. C. (2015). President of the European Commission ‘State of the Union 2015: Time for Honesty, Unity and Solidarity’, Strasbourg, 9 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koji, T. (2001). Emerging hierarchy in international human rights and beyond: From the perspective of non-derogable rights. European Journal of International Law, 12(5), 917–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagerwall, A. (2015). Jus Cogens. Oxford Bibliographies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luyten, K., & Brenda Smialowski, S. (2021, January). Understanding EU action against migrant smuggling. Briefing EPRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochenov, D., & Bard, P. (2018). Rule of law crisis in the new member states of the EU: The pitfalls of overemphasising enforcement. RECONNECT Working Paper No. 1 – July 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioural study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Lax, V. (2018). The EU humanitarian border and the securitization of human rights: The ‘rescue-through-interdiction/rescue-without-protection’. paradigm JCMS, 56(1), 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Lax, V. (2021). A new common European approach to search and rescue? Entrenching proactive containment, 3 February, Blog EU immigration and asylum law and policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • PICUM. (2021). The New EU plan against migrant smuggling is failing migrants, 7 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Red Cross. (2021). Position Paper - Protecting the humanitarian space to access and support migrants, 3 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salcedo, J. A. C. (1997). Reflections on the existence of a hierarchy of norms in international law. European Journal of International Law, 8, 583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatz, O., Branco, J. et al. (2019). Communication to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Pursuant to the Article 15 of the Rome Statute on EU Migration Policies in the Central Mediterranean and Libya (2014-2019), Statewatch, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, D. (2002). Hierarchy of norms and human rights: Of trumps and winners. Sask. L. Rev., 65, 301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommier, I., Hayes, G., & Ollitrault, S. (2019). Breaking laws - Violence and civil disobedience in protest. Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Szuleka, M. (2018). First Victims or Last Guardians? The Consequences of Rule of Law Backsliding for NGOs: Case Studies of Hungary and Poland. CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe No. 2018-06, CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tondo, L. (2021, September 30). Pro-refugee Italian mayor sentenced to 13 years for abetting illegal migration. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2017). The concept of “financial or other material benefit” in the smuggling of migrants protocol. UNODC Issue Paper. UN Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosyliūtė, L., & Conte, C. (2019). Crackdown on NGOs and volunteers helping refugees and other migrants – Final Synthetic Report. ReSOMA, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosyliūtė, L. (2018). Is saving lives still a priority for the EU?. Reconnecting Europe Blog, 19 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosyliūtė, L. (2019). How could strategic litigation prevent policing of humanitarianism? ReSOMA, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosyliūtė, L. (2020). Contribution to Discussion: Guidelines on criminalization and humanitarian assistance. MigrationHUB by IMISCOE, 28 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosyliūtė, L., & Chun Luk, N. (2020). Protecting Civil Society Space: Strengthening freedom of association, NGOs and human rights defenders in Europe. European Parliament, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, P. (2020, September 27). “Catastrophe for Human Rights” as Greece Steps up Refugee ‘pushbacks’. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Sanchez, G., & Achilli, L. (2018). Crimes of solidarity in mobility: Alternative views on migrant smuggling. The Annals, 676(1), 6–15. (Article first published online: 21 February).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Vosyliūtė .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vosyliūtė, L., Brenda Smialowski, S. (2023). Guilty Without Crime: The Policing of Solidarity with Refugees and Other Migrants. In: Daher, L.M. (eds) Democratic Protests and New Forms of Collective Action. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44049-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics