Skip to main content

Participatory Communication for Sustainable Development: A Study of the Access Project in Ghana

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Communication Management for Development and Social Change

Abstract

Participatory communication has become a buzzword in the field of communication and development for decades. It focuses on the involvement of communities at various stages of project development. The local government statutes in Ghana require the active participation of community members in any project, especially projects that affect their well-being. The present study explores the extent to which participatory communication occurs in relation to the Access Project, a project funded by the US government under the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) and implemented by the Millennium Development Authority (MiDA). The study uses qualitative methods of interviews and focus group discussions. The result shows beneficiaries of the project actively participated at all stages of the project. Participants were fully empowered in the decision-making process as communication occurred through a bottom-up approach. The study suggests the need for a wider exploration of the extent of community participation in various projects funded by international bodies/governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adusei-Asante, K. (2012). The state of Ghana’s local government system: The case of assembly members. Inkanyiso, Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 4(2), 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahenkan, A., Bawole, J. N., & Domfeh, K. A. (2013). Improving citizens participation in local government planning and financial management in Ghana: A stakeholder analysis of the Sefwi Wiaso Municipal Assembly. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 3(2), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajayi, T. F. (2018). Ghana End-of-term report 2016–2017. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Ghana_End-of-Term_Report_2015-2017.pdf

  • Amoyan, C. J., & Custodio, P. A. (2019). Development communication and the dialogic space: Finding the voices under the mines. In M. J. Dutta & D. B. Zapata (Eds.), Communicating for social change: Meaning, power and resistance (pp. 63–86). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anaeto, S., & Anaeto, M. (2010). Development communication principles. Stirling-Horden Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, V. (2015). Engaging citizens and civil society to promote good governance and development effectiveness. The Governance Brief, 23, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botchie, G. (2000). Rural District planning in Ghana: A case study. Environmental Planning Issues. No. 21. International Institute for Environmental and Development, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2019). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadiz, M. C. H. (2005). Communication for empowerment: The practice of participatory communication in development. In O. Hemer & T. Tufte (Eds.), Media and global? Change: Rethinking communication for development (pp. 145–158). CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahyono, E. D. (2019). Participatory communication/ extension for social change. In M. J. Dutta & D. B. Zapata (Eds.), Communicating for social change: Meaning, power and resistance (pp. 213–236). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, M. J., & Zapata, D. B. (Eds.). (2019). Communicating for social change: Meaning, power, and resistance. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO Expert Consultation on Communication for Rural Development. (2011). Communication for development: Meeting today’s agriculture and rural development challenges. FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitryarini, I. (2018). Participatory communication and sustainability development: Case study of coal mining environment in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1983). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M.B. Ramos, Trans.) (30th Anniversary ed.). Continuum. (Original work Published 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2008). Reflections on the theory and practice of development communication: Development communication sourcebook. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, H., Mcloughlin, C., & Scott, Z. (2011). Topic Guide on Communication and Governance. GSDRC/CommGAP. University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwell, M. R. (2011). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry. In C. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry (2nd ed.). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jooste, J. (2014). The nature of participatory communication between stakeholders of the b’hive university incubator. (master’s thesis), North-West University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. L. (2018). Dialogue. In R. L. Heath & W. Johansen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of strategic communication. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119010722.iesc0061

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Local Government Service. (2017). Local Government Act of 2016, Act 936. https://lgs.gov.gh/local-governanceact-of-2016-act-936/

  • Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (global ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maina, B. M., Biwott, C., & Ombaka, B. (2020). Participatory communication strategies used in the implementation of public water projects in Murang’a County: Case study of Northern Collector Tunnel, Kenya. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 9(5), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, T. L. (Ed.). (2009). Development communication: Reframing the role of the media. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mefalopulos, P. (2005). Communication for sustainable development: Applications and challenges. In O. Hemer & T. Tufte (Eds.), Media and global change: Rethinking communication for development (pp. 145–158). CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mefalopulos, P. (2008). Development communication sourcebook: Broadening the boundaries of communication. The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melkote, S. R. (1991). Communication for development in the third world: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melkote, S. R. (2018). Communication for development and social change: An introduction. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 13(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2018.1491585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2015). Communication for development: Theory and practice for empowerment and social Justice. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molale, T. B. (2019). Participatory communication in South African municipality government: Matlosana local municipality’s integrated development plan processes. Communicare, 38(1), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musakophas, R., & Polnigongit, W. (2017). Current and future studies on participatory communication in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. (Ed.). (2005). Measuring empowerment. Cross-disciplinary perspectives. The World Bank & Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2017). An introduction to qualitative research: Learning in the field (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2008). Communication for development and social change. Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J. (2015). The international Encyclopedia of communication participatory communication. [online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407. Accessed 24 July 2022.

  • Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of communication for development and social change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2005). Participatory communication: The new paradigm. In O. Hemer & T. Tufte (Eds.), Media and global? Change. Rethinking communication for development (pp. 91–103). NORDICOM/CLASCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2007). Communication and sustainable development. In FAO, Communication and sustainable development. Selected papers from the 9th UN roundtable on communication for development (pp. 1–22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2020). Communication for development and social change: Three development paradigms, two communication models, and many applications and approaches. In J. Servaes (Ed.), Handbook of communication for development and social change (pp. 63–92). Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, L., & Servaes, J. (2021). “Participatory communication for social change”. In S. R. Melkote & A. Singhal (Eds.), Handbook of communication and development, (pp. 120–141). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J., Jacobson, T. L., & White, S. A. (1996). Participatory communication for social change. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siwalette, J. D., Hidayat, K., Cahyono, E. D., & Purnomo, M. (2018). Transformation of production organization of dusung based nutmeg plantation: Case study of industrial and farmers’ partnership in Hila Village, Moluccas Province. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.53.4248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonderling, S. (1997). Development support communication (DSC): A change-agent in support of popular participation or a double-agent of deception. Communicatio, 23(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500169708537834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Communication initiative, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), & The World Bank. (2007). World congress on communication for development: Lessons, challenges, and the way forward. The International Bank for reconstruction and development? The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, T. (2017). Communication and social change: A citizen’s perspective. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, T., & Mefalopulos, P. (2009). Participatory communication: practical guide. World Bank working paper NO. 170. Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization (UNESCO). (2007). Toward a common system approach: Achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Report of the 10th UN Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Fliert, E. (2010). Participatory communication in rural development: What does it take for the established order. Extension Farming Systems Journal, 6(1), 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Fliert, E. (2014). Communication, development, and the natural environment. In K. G. Wilkins, T. Tufte, & R. Obregon (Eds.), The handbook of development communication and social change (pp. 125–127). Wiley Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, K. G., & Mody, B. (2001). Reshaping development communication: Development communication and communicating development. Communication Theory, 11(4), 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, K. G., Tufte, T., & Obregon, R. (2014). The handbook of development communication and social change. Wiley Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Anani-Bossman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anani-Bossman, A., Blankson, I.A. (2024). Participatory Communication for Sustainable Development: A Study of the Access Project in Ghana. In: Mmutle, T., Molale, T.B., Akinola, O.O., Selebi, O. (eds) Strategic Communication Management for Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41401-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics