Abstract
Husserl argued that the crisis of modern sciences was caused by the fact that they had taken their idealizations and abstractions, their mathematical and geometrical formulae, for bare truth, and had forgotten that they originated in the lifeworld. Phenomenology therefore asks how phenomena in everyday life are experienced. How phenomena in the immediate environment such as things or human others are experienced has been well studied. But how are macro phenomena experienced? To explore this question, I choose the meso level of organizations. How are organizations experienced? First, Husserls eidetic analyses or ‘personalities of a higher order’ is considered. Second, Alfred Schutz’s alternative approach and the two poles of his lifeworld analysis are examined. On this basis, I ponder, third, the question of how a phenomenology of organizations can be developed: How is an organization experienced, and how is it interactionally constituted? Finally, I summarize and discuss my reflections and make some suggestions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspers, P. (2010). The second road to phenomenological sociology. Sociology, 47, 214–219.
Belvedere, C. (2020). Ethnomethodology as an experimentation with the natural attitude. George Psathas on phenomenological sociology. Human Studies, 43(3), 327–342.
Belvedere, C. (2022). A treatise in phenomenological sociology. Lexington.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor, Doubleday.
Bittner, E. (1965). The concept of organization. Social Research, 32(3), 239–255.
Button, G., Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2015). Deconstructing ethnography. Springer.
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Sage.
De Vecchi, F. (2016). A priori of the law and values in the social ontology of Wilhelm Schapp and Adolf Reinach. In A. Salice & H. B. Schmid (Eds.), The phenomenological approach to social reality (pp. 279–316). Springer.
Dilthey, W. (1927/2002). The formation of the historical world in the human sciences (R. Makkreel & F. Rodi, Eds.). Princeton University Press.
Dreher, J., & López, D. G. (2015). Subjectivity and power. Human Studies, 38, 197–222.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press.
Eberle, T. S. (2012). Phenomenological life-world analysis and ethnomethodology’s program. Human Studies: Special Issue in Memory of Harold Garfinkel, 35(2), 279–304.
Eberle, T. S. (2014). Phenomenology as a research method. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 184–202). Sage.
Eberle, T. S. (2021). A study in xenological phenomenology: Alfred Schutz’s Stranger Revisited. Schutzian Research, 13, 27–50.
Fineman, S. (2000). Emotion in Organizations. London: Sage.
Garfinkel, H. (2006). Seeing sociologically. The routine grounds of social action. Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, H. (1952). The perception of the other. A study in social order. Unpublished dissertation, Harvard University.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Gros, A. (2020). The reification of the other as a social pathology: Traces of a phenomenoloogical critical theory in Alfred Schutz. Schutzian Research, 12, 13–44.
Gros, A. (2022). A phenomenology of modernity? Alfred Schutz’s contributions to a theory of modern society. In M. Barber (Ed.), The anthem companion to Alfred Schutz (pp. 115–136). Anthem Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1944). Roads to serfdom. Routledge.
Heath, C. (2013). The dynamics of auction. Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). SCM Press.
Heidegger, M. (1949). Existence and being. Regnery Co.
Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–147). Routledge.
Holt, R., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Phenomenology and organization theory. In H. Tsoukas & R. Chia (Eds.), Philosophy and organization theory (Research in the sociology of organizations 32) (pp. 215–249). Emerald.
Husserl, E. (1928/2012). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Routledge.
Husserl, E. (1936/1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern.
Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 1921–1929 (I. Kern, Ed.). Husserliana 14. Martinus Nijhoff.
Knoblauch, H. (1995). Kommunikationskultur. Die kommunikative Konstruktion kultureller Kontexte. de Gruyter.
Knoblauch, H., Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology and social interaction: The emergence of ‘workplace studies’. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 299–320.
Knoblauch, H. (2020). The communicative construction of reality. Routledge.
Léon, F., & Zahavi, D. (2016). Phenomenology of experiential sharing: The contribution of Schutz and Walther. In A. Salice & H. B. Schmid (Eds.), The phenomenological approach to social reality (pp. 219–234). Springer.
Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to systems theory. Polity.
Maynard, D. W. (2006). Ethnography and conversation analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Emergent methods in social research (pp. 55–94). Sage.
Meyer, C., & Meier zu Verl, C. (2022). Ethnomethodologische Fundierungen. In A. Poferl & N. Schröer (Eds.), Handbuch Soziologische Ethnographie (pp. 85–99). Springer VS.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. R. (1977). Institutionalized organizations. Formal structure as myths and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Mises, L. (1949/1998). Human action. The Scholarly Edition. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Sage.
Psathas, G. (1989). Phenomenology and sociology. Theory and research. The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology, University Press of America.
Sacks, H. (1963). Sociological description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 8, 1–17.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversations (Vol. 1 & 2). Blackwell.
Salice, A., & Schmid, H. B. (Eds.). (2016a). The phenomenological approach to social reality. Springer.
Salice, A., & Schmid, H. B. (2016b). Social reality—The phenomenological approach. In A. Salice & B. Schmid (Eds.), The phenomenological approach to social reality (pp. 1–14). Springer.
Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmermann (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44–70). Polity.
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101–134). Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165–187.
Schmid, H. B. (2005). Wir-Intentionalität. Freiburg/München.
Schutz, A. (1932/1967). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Northwestern.
Schutz, A. (1936/2013). The problem of personality in the social world. In M. Barber (Ed.), Collected papers VI. Literary reality and relationships (pp. 199–308). Springer Science+Business.
Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers 1: The problem of social reality (M. Natanson, Ed.). Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers 2: Studies in social theories (A. Brodersen, Ed.). Nijhoff.
Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973/1989). The structures of the Life-World. Vol. I (1973). Trans. R. Zaner & T. Engelhardt. Vol. II (1989). Trans. R. Zaner & D. J. Parent. Northwestern University Press.
Silverman, D., & Jones, J. (1976). Organizational work. The language of grading / the grading of language. Collier-Macmillan.
Srubar, I. (1988). Kosmion. Die Genese der pragmatischen Lebenswelttheorie von Alfred Schütz und ihr anthropologischer Hintergrund. .
Srubar, I. (2005). The pragmatic theory of the lifeworld as a basis for intercultural comparison. In M. Endress et al. (Eds.), Explorations of the lifeworld (pp. 235–266). Springer.
Stein, E. (1925). Untersuchung über den Staat. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 7, 1–125.
Tönnies, F. (1887/2002). Community and society (C. P. Loomis, Trans. and Ed.). Dover.
vom Lehn, D. (2019). Phenomenology-based ethnography for management studies and organizational analysis. British Journal of Management, 30, 188–202.
vom Lehn, D., & Hitzler, R. (Eds.). (2015). Phenomenology-based ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44, 5.
Walther, G. (1923). Zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 6, 1–159.
Zahavi, D. (2016). The end of what? Phenomenology vs. speculative realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 24(3), 289–309.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eberle, T.S. (2023). Some Reflections on a Phenomenology of Organizations. In: Belvedere, C., Gros, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Macrophenomenology and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34712-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34712-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34711-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34712-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)