Abstract
Indications for open radical nephrectomy include locally advanced kidney tumors with invasion of the perirenal fat and adrenal gland (T3a), tumors with invasion of the renal vein or vena cava (T3b and c), tumors that extend to adjacent organs (T4), and tumors that will likely undergo a wide lymph node dissection. This chapter explores surgical technique and different approaches in open radical nephrectomy.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keyword
Open radical nephrectomy (ORN), first described by Frederic Foley in 1952 [1], includes the early ligation of the renal artery and vein, removal of the ipsilateral adrenal gland and the Gerota’s fascia surrounding the kidney, and removal of the paraaortic/paracaval lymph nodes extending from the diaphragm crus to the inferior mesenteric artery [2]. Adrenalectomy is recommended in patients with large tumors and adrenal involvement on preoperative imaging [3]. Although initially identified as a component of RN, the routine application of ipsilateral adrenalectomy in local or locally advanced disease is not recommended [4]. This is because patients who undergo ipsilateral adrenalectomy have lower adrenal involvement rates [5] and do not have a survival benefit compared with those who do not [6,7,8]. Regional lymphadenectomy is not necessary in every radical nephrectomy case, considering the overall incidence of lymph node disease is about 5% [9, 10]. Guidelines continue to recommend lymph node dissection for patients with visible lymphadenopathy on preoperative imaging, although there is no evidence of benefit [11].
Indications for ORN include locally advanced kidney tumors with invasion of the perirenal fat and adrenal gland (T3a), tumors with invasion of the renal vein or vena cava (T3b and c), tumors that extend to adjacent organs (T4), and tumors that will likely undergo a wide lymph node dissection [12, 13].
18.1 Surgical Technique
The surgical site can be reached retroperitoneally by flank incision and transperitoneally by midline or subcostal incision (Fig. 18.1). The thoracoabdominal approach may be preferred for large upper-pole tumors. Briefly, the kidney is released from the surrounding organs and tissues along with its fascia, then the artery and vein are cut after the ligation. The lengths of the renal vein on the right (shorter) and left (longer) sides should be considered. The gonadal, adrenal, and lumbar veins should also be ligated and the ureter should be ligated and cut distally to the extent possible and removed along with the Gerota’s fascia of the kidney. Performing RN involving perirenal tissues as described [2] is important in preventing local recurrence because perinephric fat invasion is observed in about 25% of RN specimens [14].
18.2 Flank Approach
This approach provides easy access to the kidney and renal hilum prevents peritoneal cavity involvement, and reduces the risk of bowel injury, especially in patients with a previous history of abdominal surgery. Nevertheless, approaching the renal artery and vein is more difficult. The retroperitoneal flank approach may not provide sufficient surgical space in large tumors, upper-pole tumors, or in patients with thrombus in the inferior vena cava (IVC). It may also not be appropriate in cases where lymphadenectomy is planned. With this approach, although subcostal access may be sufficient in most cases, the subsequent division and removal of the 11th and 12th ribs may be required in tumors located in the upper pole and when the adrenal glands need to be evaluated. In this case, the rib to be removed is selected, the incision is started over that rib, and if necessary, the incision can be extended to end at the lateral edge of the rectus abdominis.
18.3 Anterior Subcostal Approach
The anterior subcostal approach provides good exposure to the renal hilum. The incision is started in front of the 12th rib and, at approximately 2 cm below the costal arch, is extended in the cranial direction along the costal arch and terminated at the level of the xiphoid bone. In tumors that are medially located and require meticulous pedicle dissection or aorta and IVC dissection, the incision can be passed to the opposite side in a “Chevron” fashion without ending at the xiphoid level. When necessary, lymphadenectomy can be performed easily, and even the opposite side can be evaluated and improved if needed by entering the retroperitoneum. In the modified approach we implement at our clinic, we perform the incision in the 45-degree lateral decubitus position, a little more forward than the classical flank approach, starting from the front of the 12th rib and extending slightly longer medially. This way, not only can we continue operating retroperitoneally but also reduce the likelihood of incisional hernia by preventing subcostal nerve injury in most patients.
18.4 Thoracoabdominal Approach
The thoracoabdominal approach reveals the upper abdomen, retroperitoneal structures, and thoracic cavity. It is used in large kidney tumors or when a mass or metastasis in the ipsilateral lung needs to be removed. The patient is placed in a semi-oblique position, and an incision is made between the 8th and 10th ribs. The incision can be made between the ribs or over the ribs, allowing them to be removed. The incision starts from the posterior axillary line, continues from the costal cartilage edge, and is advanced from the midline to the umbilicus. Performing intercostal nerve blockage while closing the surgical incision may reduce postoperative pain.
References
Foley FB, Mulvaney WP, Richardson EJ, et al. Radical nephrectomy for neoplasms. J Urol. 1952 Jul;68(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17):68168–0
Robson CJ. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1963 Jan;89:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)64494-x
Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100. Epub 2017 May 4
Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Bedke J, et al. European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Version 2021. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/renal-cell-carcinoma/.
Kletscher BA, Qian J, Bostwick DG, et al. Prospective analysis of the incidence of ipsilateral adrenal metastasis in localized renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):1844–6
Siemer S, Lehmann J, Kamradt J, et al. Adrenal metastases in 1635 patients with renal cell carcinoma: outcome and indication for adrenalectomy. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2155–9; discussion 2159. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000125340.84492.a7
Leibovitch I, Raviv G, Mor Y, et al. Reconsidering the necessity of ipsilateral adrenalectomy during radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 1995 Sep;46(3):316–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80213-1
Kozak W, Höltl W, Pummer K, et al. Adrenalectomy--still a must in radical renal surgery? Br J Urol. 1996 Jan;77(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.08105.x
Olumi AF, Preston MA, Blute ML. Chapter 60: Open surgery of the kidney, In: Alan J. Wein, Louis R. Kavoussi, Alan W. Partin editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 2020;12th
Freedland SJ, Dekernion JB. Role of lymphadenectomy for patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Rev Urol. 2003 Summer;5(3):191–5
Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011
Gregg JR, Scarpato KR. Chapter 8: surgical approaches for open renal surgery, including open radical nephrectomy. In: Smith JA, Howards SS, Preminger GM, et al. editors. Hinman’s Atlas of Urologic Surgery. 2019;4th.
Van Poppel H, Becker F, Cadeddu JA, et al. Treatment of localised renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):662–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.040. Epub 2011 Jun 29
Shah PH, Lyon TD, Lohse CM, et al. Prognostic evaluation of perinephric fat, renal sinus fat, and renal vein invasion for patients with pathological stage T3a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):270–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14523
Petros FG, Angell JE, Abaza R. Outcomes of robotic nephrectomy including highest-complexity cases: largest series to date and literature review. Urology. 2015;85(6):1352–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.063.
Crocerossa F, Carbonara U, Cantiello F, et al. Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2020; S0302–2838(20)30854-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.034.
Abaza R, Gerhard RS, Martinez O. Robotic radical nephrectomy for massive renal tumors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(2):196–200. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0630.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campi, R. et al. (2022). Open Radical Nephrectomy. In: Goonewardene, S.S., Persad, R., Albala, D. (eds) Robotic Surgery for Renal Cancer. Management of Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11000-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11000-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10999-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11000-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)