Abstract
Mobile cloud computing (MCC) has emerged as a significant area of interest due to its ability of facilitating high computing power and massive storage capacity to the mobile users based on the cost-effective scheme of “pay-as-you-go”. Usually, the mobile devices have limited resources such as limited storage, limited computing power, limited battery life, etc. However, MCC provides the facility of using the cloud servers for storing data and executing exhaustive computation to deal with this problem. Internet of Things (IoT) is another promising paradigm of recent time that enables the integration of several technologies and supports networked interconnection of everyday objects equipped with ubiquitous intelligence. A huge amount of sensory data is generated from the large scale IoT networks which need to be stored and processed. In that case cloud computing has come up with the solution that can provide processing and storage on demand. The integration of IoT with MCC gives birth to a new dimension in wireless communication to support a variety of smart applications. This chapter presents an overview of IoT-MCC along with an illustration of the architecture and applications. The power-efficiency i.e. green aspect for IoT-MCC is also highlighted in this chapter. Finally, we highlight the future research directions of IoT- MCC in this chapter.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In the last few decades, the number of mobile users has increased drastically and the mobile devices have become popular medium for accessing Internet services. Various mobile applications have been introduced for learning purpose, video conferencing, chatting, health monitoring, playing games, listening music, editing photos and videos, accessing social networking sites and professional sites, etc. However, the handheld mobile devices suffer from various drawbacks such as limited storage capacity, limited processing capability, limited battery life, etc. Due to these constraints the execution of exhaustive applications and storage of high-volume data inside the mobile devices may not be possible. In such a scenario, MCC has come that permits to store data and execute applications outside the mobile device and into the cloud [1,2,3]. Nowadays, the use of edge/fog computing can provide the facility to perform processing in the intermediate device and can bring the resources at the network edge [4,5,6]. With the rapid advancement in different technological aspects, people are seeking smart solutions for their daily lives such as smart home, smart transportation, smart education, smart banking, smart retail, smart healthcare, smart agriculture, etc. To provide smart solutions IoT comes into the picture, where the uniquely identified embedded devices are connected within an Internet infrastructure to build a computing environment [6–7]. In IoT, the sensors and actuators are used, and the objects’ status information collected by the sensors are transmitted to the servers for storage and processing. The use of cloud computing in IoT provides the facility of processing and storing huge volume of sensory information inside the cloud. The integration of IoT with MCC can be referred as Internet of Things using M obile C loud C omputing (IoT-MCC). In IoT-MCC, the sensory information collected by the sensor nodes are transmitted to the cloud through the mobile device. The mobile device is connected to the network either through a cellular base station or through a Wi-Fi access point. In both the cases, the data processing and storage happen inside the cloud. After the introduction of fog computing the intermediate devices such as switch, router, gateway, etc. also participate in data processing [5–6]. The edge computing has brought the resources at the edge of the network [4–5]. In edge computing, the edge server is attached with the base station in case of the cellular network [4–5]. In case of Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN)/Wireless Metropolitan Area Network (WMAN), the cloudlet is used in case of edge computing [4–5]. The edge server/cloudlet is used for providing the facilities to offload data and computation inside the edge server/cloudlet. In case of edge-fog-cloud-based IoT framework, the intermediate fog devices or the edge server or cloudlet can participate in the processing and storage of the sensory information. An overview of the IoT-MCC architecture is presented in Fig. 1.
The mobile device can be used for data collection and accumulation purposes before forwarding to the next hop. Nowadays, various sensors are attached with mobile devices. Various mobile applications (apps) are also available to collect the number of footsteps went, acceleration, temperature, humidity, etc. Camera and GPS are also available inside the smartphones. The preliminary processing on the collected sensor data can be performed inside the mobile device itself. This in turn can reduce the unnecessary data transmission over the network. The use of edge/fog devices for data processing also reduces the amount of data transmission to the cloud. In [8–9], the edge/fog devices have been used for preliminary data processing in IoT-based healthcare. In [8–9], only if abnormal health condition has been predicted, the data transmission takes place to the cloud. This in turn provides faster health care service and reduces unnecessary data transmission over the network [8–9].
Mobile devices especially smartphones have become an important part of our life. The use of smartphones in IoT has brought several advantages to the users also, for example, using body area network and smartphone, the health parameter values, location, and movement information are collected and processed inside the smartphone/edge device/fog device/cloud to predict the current health condition of individual [8–9]. In case of abnormal health conditions, health care advice is provided to the user through the mobile phone. In the case of smart home, smart retailing, the smartphone acts as a medium of interaction. Augmented Reality (AR) provides a virtual environment to the users through which the users see the real world with virtual objects composited with the real world [10]. In IoT-MCC-based AR, a virtual reality can be provided to the user even at home to view the virtual objects superimposed with the real world. The IoT is largely used in smart agriculture. Various mobile apps related to agriculture are nowadays available.
In this chapter, we discuss on the architecture, applications, and research scopes of IoT-MCC. The rest of the chapter is organized as: Sect. 2 discusses the architecture of IoT-MCC. Section 3 illustrates the delay and power consumption in IoT-MCC, Sect. 4 briefly describes the IoT-MCC Convergence, and Sect. 5 describes various applications of IoT-MCC. Section 6 briefly illustrates enabling technologies for Green IoT-MCC, Sect. 7 summarizes different energy harvesting techniques for Green IoT, Sect. 8 investigates various research challenges of Green IoT-MCC, and finally, Sect. 9 concludes the chapter.
2 Architecture of MCC
Nowadays, due to the massive use of IoT devices in variety of application an enormous volume of data is generated. These large scales of data demand new architectures and technologies for data management both for capturing and processing. The IoT-MCC architecture serves the purpose. The IoT-MCC architecture consists of four layers as presented in Fig. 2. The principle components of IoT-MCC are:
-
Sensors and actuators
-
Mobile devices
-
Edge/fog devices
Cloud servers.
The working model of IoT-MCC is described as follows.
-
The layer 1 consists of sensor nodes and actuators. The sensor nodes are attached with the objects to collect their status. The collected sensor data is transmitted to the mobile device at layer 2.
-
The mobile devices such as smartphone, tablet, laptop, etc. are present at layer 2. The mobile device receives sensor information from the sensor nodes. The mobile device performs preliminary processing on the data and then sends it to the connecting edge/fog device at layer 3. However, the mobile device can send the raw data also to the connecting edge/fog device at layer 3.
-
At layer 3 the devices which connect the mobile device with the network are present. In case of cellular network, the base station, and in case of WLAN/WMAN, the Wi-Fi access point connects the mobile device with the network [4–5]. The access point is connected with the network through switch, router, etc. In cellular network, small cells exist [11–12]. In case of fog computing, the intermediate devices such as switches, routers and small cells participate in data processing before forwarding to the cloud. In case of edge computing, the edge server attached with the base station or the cloudlet participates in data processing. The data storage can happen inside the edge/fog devices after processing, or the data can be transmitted to the cloud at layer 4 according to the requirement.
-
The cloud servers are present at layer 4. Usually, the data storage happens inside the cloud. The cloud can process the data, usually, for exhaustive computation cloud is used. If required the cloud can send the processed data or result after processing to the connected edge/fog device from which the user can receive the data or access the data using his/her mobile device.
3 Delay and Power Consumption of IoT-MCC Based Network
To calculate the delay, we have considered the data collection, transmission, and processing delays. The power consumption by the devices of IoT-MCC during these periods is calculated [5, 8–9] (Table 1).
The time period in data transmission from layer 1 to layer 2 is given as,
The time period in data processing at layer 2 is given as,
The time period in data transmission from layer 2 to layer 3 is given as,
The time period in data processing at layer 3 is given as,
The time period in data transmission from layer 3 to layer 4 is given as,
The time period in data processing at layer 4 is given as,
Therefore, the total delay in data collection, processing, and transmission in the IoT-MCC framework is given as,
The power consumption of the sensor nodes at layer 1 for data collection and transmission is given as,
The power consumption of the mobile device at layer 2 for data reception, processing, and transmission is given as,
The power consumption of the edge/fog device at layer 3 for data reception, processing, and transmission is given as,
The power consumption of the cloud at layer 4 for data reception and processing is given as,
Therefore, the total power consumption of the devices of the IoT-MCC framework is given as,
In the IoT-MCC framework, the intermediate mobile device and edge/fog device participate in data processing, therefore, the amount of data transmission from the end node to the cloud is reduced, which reduces the amount of data traffic, delay, and consequently, power consumption of the entire framework. In Table 2 and Fig. 4, we have presented the total delay and power consumption of the IoT-MCC framework for data collection, processing, and transmission.
We observe that the use of mobile device and edge/fog device in data processing reduces the delay and power consumption than transmission and processing of the entire collected sensor data inside the cloud. Table 2 shows that the use of edge/fog device in IoT-MCC reduces the delay ~23% than the cloud-only IoT framework. We observe from Fig. 3 that using the edge/fog device in the IoT-MCC framework the power consumption is reduced ~62% than the cloud-only IoT framework.
4 Contribution of IoT- MCC Convergence
The fruitfulness of IoT mainly depends on high performance, reliability, pervasiveness, and scalability. In recent days, it becomes possible through the integration of IoT with MCC which enables “everything as a service” model [13,14,15]. The integration of IoT with MCC provides several advantages mentioned as follows:
-
Flexible and efficient architecture: Integration of IoT and MCC provides a flexible and efficient architecture.
-
Unlimited data storage capacity: Convergence of IoT and MCC provides a solution towards the storage limitation of mobile device. It provides unlimited data storage capacity on cloud.
-
Extending battery lifetime: One of the major limitations of the mobile device is its limited battery lifetime. IoT-MCC integration provides the facility of offloading. In order to reduce power consumption of mobile devices, large computation can be offloaded to the powerful cloud server.
-
On-demand service: IoT-MCC integration extends various services of cloud computing to the edge of the network. Through MCC it is possible to distribute data in such a way that it will be easily accessible to the end users. Every IoT device is uniquely identifiable. Through IoT-MCC integration the request of users along with the ID and location are transmitted to the central processors of the cloud. After processing requested services are provided to the mobile users.
5 Applications of IoT- MCC
Integration of IoT and MCC technologies creates exciting opportunities in variety of real world applications [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] in which energy management [6, 16], environment monitoring, agriculture[17,18,19], healthcare [9, 12, 20,21,22,23,24], smart city [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], and Industrial automation [33–34] are worth mentioning. Table 3 presents recent IoT-MCC-based publications in various application domains. Here, we have considered the applications of sensor-mobile-cloud also.
6 Enabling Technologies for Green IoT-MCC
Green IoT means it should be environment-friendly and energy-efficient. Initially IoT devices remained switched on even when not required. In recent days, the main focus is on smart operation of devices to achieve green IoT [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. It is achievable by enforcing that the devices will be only on when it is required otherwise it will remain idle or off. Green IoT-MCC is achievable through the collaboration of several enabling technologies [35] as shown in Fig. 4.
Green tags are one of the important enabling technologies which include RFID (Radio Frequency Identification). It is a promising wireless system to enable green IoT. Near Field Communications (NFC) is one of the most recent short-range wireless system which is similar to RFID and more customer-oriented [35].Due to the tiny size, low cost, and reduced energy consumption these green tags are nowadays integrated in every device. In addition, several clustering algorithms including bio-inspired algorithms are playing important role for making green sensor network which is the main component of green IoT [39,40,41,42]. Energy-efficient cloud computing, data management, machine-to-machine communication, and green cellular network are also vital for Green IoT-MCC.
7 Energy Harvesting Techniques for Green IoT
Energy harvesting also plays a significant role in successful implementation of green IoT. Energy harvesting receives considerable research attention both from Industry and Academia [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. In addition, the role of other energy-efficient techniques is also important [57,58,59,60]. Table 4 summarizes various energy efficient solutions and their contribution towards green IoT [60].
8 Future Research Directions of IoT-MCC
Although IoT-MCC integration can overcome several limitations of IoT and provide several advantages, still there are a lot of research challenges need to be addressed, which we mention as follows:
-
Security and privacy: Most of the real world IoT-MCC application requires communication between huge numbers of heterogeneous IoT devices which challenges the data security and privacy of individual users [36,37,38].
-
Energy harvesting: The functioning of IoT devices mainly depends on the continuous power supply which becomes difficult in remote deployment. In this respect energy harvesting using ambient energy source can play an important role [52,53,54,55,56]. However, usefulness of this type of ambient energy mainly depends on the location of the devices and compromises the mobility of the device [60]. In addition, minimizing energy consumption of IoT devices, energy-efficient data aggregation and transmission from sensor nodes plays important role in implementing green IoT-MCC [57,58,59,60,61,62,63].
-
Reusability: Due to the vast use of IoT devices, percentage of carbon foot print is also increasing rapidly. Therefore, reusability of IoT devices is becoming necessary for successful implementation of sustainable green IoT-MCC [64].
-
Heterogeneity: The services offered by the IoT-MCC require communication between heterogeneous devices. Most of the IoT data which are coming from dispersed sources are either unstructured or semi structured. Hence, the real time data processing and service provisioning are becoming major challenges [65–66].
-
Interoperability: Interoperability among various heterogeneous IoT devices as well as between IoT/Cloud infrastructures is one of the main challenges of green IoT-MCC [67,68,69,70].
-
Scalability: Scalability of the IoT device is one of the crucial design challenges which need to be addressed for fruitful implementation of green IoT-MCC [71–72].
9 Conclusion
IoT and MCC are two emerging areas of smart computing. In this chapter, we have illustrated the integration of IoT and MCC, and discussed the architecture and applications of IoT-MCC. We have mathematically formulated the delay and power consumption model for the IoT-MCC framework. We have discussed on the enabling technologies and applications of IoT-MCC. Green i.e. power-efficiency is a major concern for an eco-friendly system. The aspect of power-efficiency we have also highlighted in this chapter. Accordingly, the use of energy-harvesting in IoT has been also discussed. Finally, this chapter covers the future research directions of IoT-MCC.
References
De, D.: Mobile Cloud Computing: Architectures, Algorithms and Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2019)
Fernando, N., Loke, S.W., Rahayu, W.: Mobile cloud computing: a survey. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(1), 84–106 (2013)
Dinh, H.T., Lee, C., Niyato, D., Wang, P.: A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 13(18), 1587–1611 (2013)
Peng, K., Leung, V., Xu, X., Zheng, L., Wang, J., Huang, Q.: A survey on mobile edge computing: focusing on service adoption and provision. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018 (2018)
Mukherjee, A., De, D., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R.: Mobile Edge Computing. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69893-5. eBook ISBN: 978-3-030-69893-5. Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-030-69892-8
Mukherjee, A., Deb, P., De, D., Buyya, R.: IoT-F2N: an energy-efficient architectural model for IoT using Femtolet-based fog network. J. Supercomput. 75(11), 7125–7146 (2019)
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)
Ghosh, S., Mukherjee, A., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R.: Mobi-IoST: mobility-aware cloud-fog-edge-IOT collaborative framework for time-critical applications. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. (2019)
Mukherjee, A., Ghosh, S., Behere, A., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R.: Internet of health things (IoHT) for personalized health care using integrated edge-fog-cloud network. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 1–17 (2020)
Van Krevelen, D.W.F., Poelman, R.: A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. Int. J. Virtual Real. 9(2), 1–20 (2010)
Deb, P., Mukherjee, A., De, D.: A study of densification management using energy efficient femto-cloud based 5g mobile network. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 101(4), 2173–2191 (2018)
De, D., Mukherjee, A.: Femto-cloud based secure and economic distributed diagnosis and home health care system. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. 5(3), 435–447 (2015)
Psannis, K.E., Xinogalos, S., Sifaleras, A.: Convergence of internet of things and mobile cloud computing. Syst. Sci. Cont. Eng. An Open Access J. 2(1), 476–483 (2014)
Biswas, A.R., Giaffreda, R.: IoT and cloud convergence: opportunities and challenges. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 375–376. IEEE (2014, March)
Botta, A., De Donato, W., Persico, V., Pescapé, A.: Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: a survey. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 56, 684–700 (2016)
Hashmi, S.A., Ali, C.F., Zafar, S.: Internet of things and cloud computing-based energy management system for demand side management in smart grid. Int. J. Energy Res. 45(1), 1007–1022 (2021)
Ruan, J., et al.: Agriculture IoT: emerging trends, cooperation networks, and outlook. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 26(6), 56–63 (December 2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.001.1900096
Ferrag, M.A., Shu, L., Yang, X., Derhab, A., Maglaras, L.: Security and privacy for green IoT-based agriculture: review, blockchain solutions, and challenges. IEEE Access. 8, 32031–32053 (2020)
Kiran, S., Kanumalli, S.S., Krishna, K.V.S.S.R., Chandra, N.: Internet of things integrated smart agriculture for weather predictions and preventive mechanism. Mater. Today Proc. (2021)
Suciu, G., Suciu, V., Martian, A., Craciunescu, R., Vulpe, A., Marcu, I., Halunga, S., Fratu, O.: Big data, internet of things and cloud convergence–an architecture for secure e-health applications. J. Med. Syst. 39(11), 1–8 (2015)
Nandyala, C.S., Kim, H.K.: Green IoT agriculture and healthcare application (GAHA). Int. J. Smart Home. 10(4), 289–300 (2016)
Islam, M.M., Razzaque, M.A., Hassan, M.M., Ismail, W.N., Song, B.: Mobile cloud-based big healthcare data processing in smart cities. IEEE Access. 5, 11887–11899 (2017)
Oueida, S., Kotb, Y., Aloqaily, M., Jararweh, Y., Baker, T.: An edge computing based smart healthcare framework for resource management. Sensors. 18(12), 4307 (2018)
Ijaz, M., Li, G., Lin, L., Cheikhrouhou, O., Hamam, H., Noor, A.: Integration and applications of fog computing and cloud computing based on the internet of things for provision of healthcare services at home. Electronics. 10(9), 1077 (2021)
Jiang, D.: The construction of smart city information system based on the Internet of Things and cloud computing. Comput. Commun. 150, 158–166 (2020)
Kumar, M., Raju, K.S., Kumar, D., Goyal, N., Verma, S., Singh, A.: An efficient framework using visual recognition for IoT based smart city surveillance. Multimed. Tools Appl., 1–19 (2021)
Chen, N., Qiu, T., Zhao, L., Zhou, X., Ning, H.: Edge intelligent networking optimization for internet of things in smart city. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 28(2), 26–31 (2021)
Haseeb, K., Din, I.U., Almogren, A., Ahmed, I., Guizani, M.: Intelligent and secure edge-enabled computing model for sustainable cities using green internet of things. Sustain. Cities Soc. 68, 102779 (2021)
Kumar, K.S., Kumar, T.A., Sundaresan, S., Kumar, V.K.: Green IoT for 9 Sustainable Growth and Energy Management in Smart Cities, p. 155. Handbook of green engineering technologies for sustainable smart cities (2021)
Sarkar, N.I., Gul, S.: Green computing and internet of things for smart cities: technologies, challenges, and implementation. In: Green Computing in Smart Cities: Simulation and Techniques, pp. 35–50. Cham, Springer (2021)
Jokanović, V.: Smart healthcare in smart cities. In: Towards Smart World, pp. 45–72. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2020)
Rajab, H., Cinkelr, T.: IoT based smart cities. In: 2018 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2018, June)
Sundari, V.K., Nithyashri, J., Kuzhaloli, S., Subburaj, J., Vijayakumar, P., Jose, P.S.H.: Comparison analysis of IoT based industrial automation and improvement of different processes–review. Mater. Today Proc. 45, 2595–2598 (2021)
Xenakis, A., Karageorgos, A., Lallas, E., Chis, A.E., González-Vélez, H.: Towards distributed IoT/cloud based fault detection and maintenance in industrial automation. Proc. Comput. Sci. 151, 683–690 (2019)
Shaikh, F.K., Zeadally, S., Exposito, E.: Enabling technologies for green internet of things. IEEE Syst. J. 11(2), 983–994 (2015)
Choudhury, T., Gupta, A., Pradhan, S., Kumar, P., Rathore, Y.S.: Privacy and security of cloud-based internet of things (IoT). In: 2017 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE), pp. 40–45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CINE.2017.28
Sahmim, S., Gharsellaoui, H.: Privacy and security in internet-based computing: cloud computing, internet of things, cloud of things: a review. Proc. Comput. Sci. 112, 1516–1522 (2017)
Najafizadeh, A., Salajegheh, A., Rahmani, A.M., Sahafi, A.: Privacy-preserving for the internet of things in multi-objective task scheduling in cloud-fog computing using goal programming approach. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., 1–26 (2021)
Ray, A., De, D.: An energy efficient sensor movement approach using multi-parameter reverse glowworm swarm optimization algorithm in mobile wireless sensor network. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory. 62, 117–136 (2016)
Ray, A., De, D.: Energy efficient clustering protocol based on K-means (EECPK-means)-midpoint algorithm for enhanced network lifetime in wireless sensor network. IET Wirel. Sens. Syst. 6(6), 181–191 (2016)
Ray, A., De, D.: Energy efficient clustering algorithm for multi-hop green wireless sensor network using gateway node. Adv. Sci. Eng. Med. 5(11), 1199–1204 (2013)
Raychaudhuri, A., De, D.: Bio-inspired algorithm for multi-objective optimization in wireless sensor network. In: Nature Inspired Computing for Wireless Sensor Networks, pp. 279–301. Singapore, Springer (2020)
Kaur, G., Tomar, P., Singh, P.: Design of cloud-based green IoT architecture for smart cities. In: Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics Toward Next-Generation Intelligence, pp. 315–333. Cham, Springer (2018)
Liu, X., Ansari, N.: Toward green IoT: energy solutions and key challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 57(3), 104–110 (2019)
Eteläperä, M., Vecchio, M., Giaffreda, R.: Improving energy efficiency in IoT with re-configurable virtual objects. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 520–525. IEEE (2014, March)
Chen, J.I.Z., Lai, K.L.: Machine learning based energy management at Internet of Things network nodes. J. Trends Comput. Sci. Smart Technol. September. 2020(3), 127–133 (2020)
Oma, R., Nakamura, S., Duolikun, D., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M.: An energy-efficient model for fog computing in the internet of things (IoT). Internet of Things. 1, 14–26 (2018)
Azar, J., Makhoul, A., Barhamgi, M., Couturier, R.: An energy efficient IoT data compression approach for edge machine learning. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 96, 168–175 (2019)
Tcarenko, I., Huan, Y., Juhasz, D., Rahmani, A.M., Zou, Z., Westerlund, T., Liljeberg, P., Zheng, L., Tenhunen, H.: Smart energy efficient gateway for internet of mobile things. In: 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 1016–1017. IEEE (2017, January)
Albreem, M.A., El-Saleh, A.A., Isa, M., Salah, W., Jusoh, M., Azizan, M.M., Ali, A.: Green internet of things (IoT): an overview. In: 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Application (ICSIMA), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017, November)
Pan, J., Jain, R., Paul, S., Vu, T., Saifullah, A., Sha, M.: An internet of things framework for smart energy in buildings: designs, prototype, and experiments. IEEE Internet Things J. 2(6), 527–537 (2015)
Sangoleye, F., Irtija, N., Tsiropoulou, E.E.: Smart energy harvesting for internet of things networks. Sensors. 21(8), 2755 (2021)
Hans, M.R., Tamhane, M.A.: IoT based hybrid green energy driven street lighting system. In: 2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC), pp. 35–41. IEEE (2020)
Said, O., Al-Makhadmeh, Z., Tolba, A.M.R.: EMS: an energy management scheme for green IoT environments. IEEE Access. 8, 44983–44998 (2020)
Yau, C.W., Kwok, T.T.O., Lei, C.U., Kwok, Y.K.: Energy harvesting in internet of things. Internet of Everything, 35–79 (2018)
Sanislav, T., Mois, G.D., Zeadally, S., Folea, S.C.: Energy harvesting techniques for internet of things (IoT). IEEE Access. 9, 39530–39549 (2021)
Tahiliani, V., Dizalwar, M.: Green iot systems: an energy efficient perspective. In: 2018 Eleventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018, August)
Solanki, A., Nayyar, A.: Green internet of things (G-IoT): ICT technologies, principles, applications, projects, and challenges. In: Handbook of Research on Big Data and the IoT, pp. 379–405. IGI Global (2019)
De, D., Mukherjee, A., Ray, A., Roy, D.G., Mukherjee, S.: Architecture of green sensor mobile cloud computing. IET Wirel. Sens. Syst. 6(4), 109–120 (2016)
Sarkar, S., Debnath, A.: Green IoT: design goals, challenges and energy solutions. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), pp. 637–642. IEEE (2021, July)
Arshad, R., Zahoor, S., Shah, M.A., Wahid, A., Yu, H.: Green IoT: an investigation on energy saving practices for 2020 and beyond. IEEE Access. 5, 15667–15681 (2017)
Poongodi, T., Ramya, S.R., Suresh, P., Balusamy, B.: Application of IoT in green computing. In: Advances in Greener Energy Technologies, pp. 295–323. Singapore, Springer (2020)
Ray, A., De, D.: Performance evaluation of tree based data aggregation for real time indoor environment monitoring using wireless sensor network. Microsyst. Technol. 23(9), 4307–4318 (2017)
Sharma, N., Panwar, D.: Green IoT: advancements and sustainability with environment by 2050. In: 2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), pp. 1127–1132. IEEE (2020)
Medhi, K., Mondal, M.A., Hussain, M.I.: An approach to handle heterogeneous healthcare IoT data using deep convolutional neural network. In: Emerging Technologies for Smart Cities, pp. 25–31. Singapore, Springer (2021)
Booij, T.M., Chiscop, I., Meeuwissen, E., Moustafa, N., den Hartog, F.T.: ToN_IoT: The Role of Heterogeneity and the Need for Standardization of Features and Attack Types in IoT Network Intrusion Datasets. IEEE Internet of Things J (2021)
Noura, M., Atiquzzaman, M., Gaedke, M.: Interoperability in internet of things: taxonomies and open challenges. Mob. Netw. Appl. 24(3), 796–809 (2019)
Abbasi, M.A., Memon, Z.A., Durrani, N.M., Haider, W., Laeeq, K., Mallah, G.A.: A multi-layer trust-based middleware framework for handling interoperability issues in heterogeneous IoTs. Clust. Comput., 1–28 (2021)
Ahmad, R., Asim, M.A., Khan, S.Z., Singh, B.: Green IOT—issues and challenges. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Software Engineering (ICACSE) (2019)
Raychaudhuri, A., Mukherjee, A., De, D.: SMEC: sensor mobile edge computing. In: Mobile Edge Computing, pp. 89–110. Springer, Cham (2021)
Tuysuz, M.F., Trestian, R.: From serendipity to sustainable green IoT: technical, industrial and political perspective. Comput. Netw. 182, 107469 (2020)
Abdul-Qawy, A.S.H., Srinivasulu, T.: SEES: a scalable and energy-efficient scheme for green IoT-based heterogeneous wireless nodes. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 10(4), 1571–1596 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raychaudhuri, A., Mukherjee, A., De, D., Gill, S.S. (2022). Green Internet of Things Using Mobile Cloud Computing: Architecture, Applications, and Future Directions. In: De, D., Mukherjee, A., Buyya, R. (eds) Green Mobile Cloud Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08038-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08038-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08037-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08038-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)