Skip to main content

A 3D Biomechanical Model of Human-Seat Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 2022 USCToMM Symposium on Mechanical Systems and Robotics (USCToMM MSR 2022)

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 118))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Limited studies present the comprehensive biomechanical analysis of sitting consisting of the external load and muscle force evaluation. This study uses a 3D multibody model representing the upper body to simulate the sitting postures and backrest support through the Newton-Euler equations. Then, the back-backrest contact pressure distribution is simulated using the contact mechanics method. Additionally, the forces of neck muscles are calculated based on inverse dynamic and static optimization. The muscle force result is compared to the simulation by OpenSim 4.2. A case study is presented, with the scaled human model and two simple backrest configurations with different headrest widths (type A and type B) based on a parameterized backrest model. The contact force, pressure distribution, and neck muscle forces are simulated while sitting with a backrest recline angle of \(30^\circ \), \(40^\circ , \) and \(50^\circ \) (from the vertical direction). It is found that the analyzed different backrest designs generate different contact loadings and neck muscle forces. The type A backrest with a narrower headrest width generates 13.7 \(\pm \, 1.9\%\) higher load in the upper thoracic region but lower support on the head compared to type B. Additionally, \(17.1\%\) higher peak contact pressure at maximum was found on Type A. Regarding the muscle forces, Type A reduces the overall tension of neck muscles by 54.2% compared to Type B; the muscle activations on both backrests remain low (<11.2% of maximum muscle force). The deviation and sources of error of the neck muscle force results from the proposed model and OpenSim 4.2 were discussed. The proposed model can be applied to predict static loadings required for back support and evaluate the backrest design from the user perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Looze, M.P., Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M., Van Dieën, J.: Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics 46(10), 985–997 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campos, G.H., Xi, F.J.: Pressure sensing of an aircraft passenger seat with lumbar control. Appl. Ergon. 84, 103006 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pennestri, E., Valentini, P.P., Vita, L.: Comfort analysis of car occupants: comparison between multibody and finite element models. Int. J. Veh. Syst. Model. Test. 1(1–3), 68–78 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cappetti, N., DI Manso, E.: Study of the relationships between articular moments, comfort and human posture on a chair. Work 68, 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, Y.S., Zhong, X., Ghebreiyesus, W., Ji, J., Xi, F.J.: Analysis and modeling of human seat interaction with a focus on the upper body and backrest using biomechanics and contact mechanics. Work 68(s1), S161–S182 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, M., et al.: Quantitative evaluation of vehicle seat driving comfort during short and long term driving. IEEE Access 8, 111420–111432 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smulders, M., Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., van Grondelle, E.D., Schultheis, U., Vink, P.: Neck posture and muscle activity in a reclined business class aircraft seat watching IFE with and without head support. Appl. Ergon. 79(April), 25–37 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fewster, K.M., Mayberry, G., Callaghan, J.P.: Office chair backrest height affects physiological responses to sitting. IISE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors 8(1), 50–59 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Franz, M., Zenk, R., Vink, P., Hallbeck, S.: The effect of a lightweight massage system in a car seat on comfort and electromyogram. J. Manipul. Physiol. Ther. 34(2), 107–113 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen, J., Damsgaard, M., Surma, E., De Zee, M., Vondrak, V., Republic, T.C.: Anybody - a software system for ergonomic optimization. December 2013 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Delp, S. L., et al.: OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54(11), 1940–1950 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rasmussen, J., Tørholm, S., de Zee, M.: Computational analysis of the influence of seat pan inclination and friction on muscle activity and spinal joint forces. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39(1), 52–57 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grujicic, M., Pandurangan, B., Xie, X., Gramopadhye, A.K., Wagner, D., Ozen, M.: Musculoskeletal computational analysis of the influence of car-seat design/adjustments on long-distance driving fatigue. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40(3), 345–355 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Belytschko, T., Schwer, L., Schultz, A.: A Model for Analytic Investigation of Three-Dimensional Head-Spine Dynamics. p. 207 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kitazaki, S., Griffin, M.J.: A modal analysis of whole-body vertical vibration, using a finite element model of the human body. J. Sound Vib. 200(1), 83–103 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. White, A.A., Panjabi, M.M.: Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd edn., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pearsall, D.J., Reid, J.G., Livingston, L.A.: Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 24(2), 198–210 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Plagenhoef, S., Gaynor Evans, F., Abdelnour, T.: Anatomical data for analyzing human motion. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 54(2), 169–178 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xi, F.: Computational Dynamics. Ryerson University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Drerup, B., Hierholzer, E.: Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape. Clin. Biomech. 9(1), 28–36 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhong, X., Liu, Y., Alawneh, O., Faieghi, R., Xi, F.: Evaluation of Loadings in Head-Cervical- Thoracic Region for a Parameterized Aircraft Seat Backrest with Different Headrest Designs (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ackland, D.C., Merritt, J.S., Pandy, M.G.: Moment arms of the human neck muscles in flexion, bending and rotation. J. Biomech. 44(3), 475–486 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Crowninshield, R.D., Brand, R.A.: A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J. Biomech. 14(11), 793–801 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chancey, V.C., Nightingale, R.W., Van Ee, C.A., Knaub, K.E., Myers, B.S.: Improved estimation of human neck tensile tolerance: reducing the range of reported tolerance using anthropometrically correct muscles and optimized physiologic initial conditions. SAE Tech. Pap. 2003-October (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bruno, A.G., Bouxsein, M.L., Anderson, D.E.: Development and validation of a musculoskeletal model of the fully articulated thoracolumbar spine and rib cage. J. Biomech. Eng. 137(8), 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, H., Meng, L., Gong, Y., Wang, N.: The influence of backrest angles on the passenger neck comfort during sleep in the economy class air seat without head support. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 84(February), 2020 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Franz, M., Durt, A., Zenk, R., Desmet, P.M.A.: Comfort effects of a new car headrest with neck support. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 336–343 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianzhi Zhong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhong, X., Alawneh, O., Xi, J., Liu, Y., Faieghi, R., Xi, F. (2022). A 3D Biomechanical Model of Human-Seat Interaction. In: Larochelle, P., McCarthy, J.M. (eds) Proceedings of the 2022 USCToMM Symposium on Mechanical Systems and Robotics. USCToMM MSR 2022. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99826-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics