Abstract
Lymph nodes are highly specialized structures which play key roles in the lymphatic and adaptive immune systems. Situated at strategic locations along lymphatic drainage channels, lymph nodes serve as a site for the immune system to sample the contents of lymphatic fluid and as a filter for foreign particles. Due to these functions, lymph nodes are frequently involved by disease, ranging from benign disorders such as infectious or inflammatory lymphadenitides to malignant processes such as metastatic tumors or lymphomas.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Lymph nodes are small secondary lymphoid organs which play a key role in two important biological systems: the lymphatic system and the immune system. The normal lymph node is a small soft bean-shaped organ covered by a fibrous capsule. Approximately 500–600 lymph nodes can be found throughout the human body [1], with the exception of the central nervous system, and are concentrated at strategic sites which maximize the potential of identifying foreign antigens, such as at the proximal ends of extremities [2].
Lymph nodes have a highly specialized internal architecture, reflecting their dual functions. They are designed to allow for the passage of lymphatic fluid through the node while maximizing its exposure to a mixture of specialized immune cells [3]. Lymph nodes form as specialized nodules of fibrovascular tissue, which grow into and fill lymph sacs – areas of dilatation within lymphatic vessels [4, 5]. The architecture of the lymph node is maintained by a reticular meshwork of fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs), immunologically specialized myofibroblasts of mesenchymal origin [6]. In addition to maintaining the structure of the node, FRCs play a key role in regulating the hematolymphoid population of the node, providing scaffolds along which lymphocytes and dendritic cells migrate, as well as forming conduits which allow for the transport of soluble antigens and signaling molecules deep into the lymph node [3, 7].
After lymph enters the lymph node via any of the afferent lymphatic vessels, it drains into the subcapsular sinus of the node, and from there filters through the sinuses of the node to leave in the efferent lymph vessel [2]. As the subcapsular sinus is the point of entry for lymph-borne materials, nodal metastases are frequently identified in the peripheral regions of the lymph node.
Lymphocytes are the main hematopoietic cell present in lymph nodes, consisting of B cells and the various subclasses of T cells, which interact constantly with each other, with other hematopoietic cells in the lymph node, and with the stromal cells [8]. However, in spite of their relative dominance, lymphocytes are nomads in the lymph node, entering from the peripheral blood, homing to specially designated compartments following chemokine gradients, and then leaving in the absence of an appropriate stimulus to re-enter circulation [9]. This constant turnover of lymphocytes maximizes the supply of naïve lymphocytes to the node. In conditions of immunological stress, such as infection, the influx of lymphocytes is increased by dilation of the lymph node arteriole [10].
The compartmentalization of the lymph node by cell population results in three distinct regions, each with their own characteristic cellular population and function: the superficial cortex, the deep cortex (or “paracortex”), and the medulla [11, 12]. Anatomically, these regions can be grouped together into functional lobules, which vary in size and number per lymph node (Fig. 5.1) [2].
5.1 Superficial Cortex
The superficial cortex is the outermost part of the lymphoid lobule, and the first region through which lymph travels after entering the subcapsular sinus. In clinical practice, the superficial cortex is often referred to simply as the “cortex” of the lymph node, with the corresponding deep cortex referred to as the “paracortex.” The lymphoid population of the superficial cortex consists predominantly of B cells, arranged in small primary follicles. The cortical tissue between the follicles is the interfollicular cortex, which contains T cells. After entering the lymph node, B cells home to primary follicles, following a chemokine gradient emitted by follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) [13]. FDCs are specialized antigen-presenting cells which capture and present antigen to B cells, and also serve to maintain the structure of the follicle [14].
When stimulated by antigens presented by FDCs, the B cells within primary follicles begin to proliferate rapidly. As the B cells proliferate, they create specialized structures termed germinal centers within primary follicles, leading to the formation of a secondary follicle [15, 16]. Germinal centers serve as transient, specialized compartments within which the T-cell-dependent immune response occurs [17]. Inside the germinal centers, antigen-stimulated B cells proliferate and undergo somatic hypermutation of their immunoglobulin genes, accompanied by switching of the produced immunoglobulin from IgM or IgD to either IgG, IgA, or IgE [18,19,20,21]. Following creation of a germinal center, non-proliferating B cells which were present in the primary follicle are pushed aside and form a ring of concentric layers of lymphocytes around the germinal center, referred to as the mantle zone.
Two main subtypes of proliferating B cell are present in the germinal center – centrocytes and centroblasts [22]. Centroblasts are rapidly proliferating B cells, with large, dark, round nuclei, whereas centrocytes have smaller, cleaved-appearing nuclei. A maturing germinal center displays polarization, with centroblasts and centrocytes clustered at opposite ends of the germinal center to form dark zones and light zones, respectively. Successful B-cell maturation leads to the expression of high-avidity antibodies on the B cell’s surface [20]. These cells may subsequently serve as memory cells, or translocate to the medullary cords of the bone marrow to develop into plasma cells. Cells which fail to mature successfully undergo apoptosis and are ingested by so-called tingible-body macrophages, large macrophages containing apoptotic nuclear debris. A subclass of T cells, termed follicular helper T cells, play a critical role in supporting the germinal center reaction and plasmacytic differentiation of B cells (Fig. 5.2) [23].
5.2 Deep Cortex (Paracortex)
More commonly referred to as the “paracortex” in clinical practice, the deep cortex of the lymph node is predominantly populated by T cells. Similar to the interaction between FDCs and B cells in the superficial cortex, antigens are presented to T cells in the paracortex by interdigitating-type dendritic cells (IDCs). The deep cortical structures of adjacent lobules may fuse and become functionally shared [2].
The deep cortex serves as an important branching point in the vascular supply of the lymph node. After entering the lymph node through the medullary arterioles, blood is carried throughout the deep and superficial cortex by progressively arborizing arterioles to capillary beds, before entering specialized vascular channels called high endothelial venules (HEVs). HEVs are a key component of the deep cortex, consisting of small blood vessels lined by plump specialized endothelial cells. HEVs are the main site at which lymphocytes enter the lymph node from the systemic circulation and control the type of cell, which may enter through the expression of adhesion molecules and chemokines in coordination with adjacent dendritic cells (Fig. 5.3) [24,25,26].
5.3 Medulla
The medulla is the third main component of the lymph node and the final region through which lymph travels before exiting the node via the efferent lymphatic vessel at the hilus. The hilus also serves as the site of entry and exit of the lymph node’s blood supply, and thus the effective anchoring point of the lymphoid lobules. The medulla can be divided into two main functional components: the medullary cords and medullary sinuses [2].
The medullary cords consist of lymphocytes and plasma cells arranged in cords and ribbons (see Fig. 5.4). Between the cords run the medullary sinuses, which are lined by fibroblastic reticular cells and histiocytes. The sinuses carry lymph draining from the smaller sinuses of the deep cortex toward the efferent lymphatic vessel. The sinuses are lined by fibroblastic reticular cells. The sinuses also contain histiocytes, which often cling to the lining, and remove cells, debris, and antigens from the lymph as it flows through the sinus system. After the lymph has traversed the various zones of the lobule, or circumvented the lobules through the transverse sinuses, it exits the lymph node through the efferent lymphatic vessel [27].
5.4 Lymph Node Pathology
As lymph nodes are at the crossroad of many different biological systems, they frequently demonstrate pathologic changes. The following section reviews a set of the most frequent changes observed in lymph nodes, divided into benign and malignant conditions.
5.4.1 Reactive/Benign Conditions
Reactive follicular hyperplasia is one of the most common changes observed in lymph nodes. It is characterized by an increase in the number of secondary follicles, typically accompanied by germinal centers of increased size and variably irregular shapes (Fig. 5.5). Follicular hyperplasia usually occurs in response to an unknown antigen and demonstrates evidence of proliferation in the germinal center, with tingible-body macrophages containing apoptotic cellular debris, well-defined polarization into dark and light zones, and an elevated proliferative index [22]. Follicular hyperplasia may be observed in conjunction with systemic disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis or other conditions which lead to long-standing immunologic stimulation [28].
In contrast to reactive follicular hyperplasia , in which the superficial cortex is expanded, paracortical hyperplasia is characterized by expansion of the deep cortex. This process is similarly etiologically non-specific and may be seen in reaction to viral infections, autoimmune processes, or nearby malignancies [29]. Prominent paracortical hyperplasia may also be seen in lymph nodes draining regions of chronically irritated skin, wherein the expanded T-cell population is accompanied by increased histiocytes, IDCs, and Langerhans cells, a pattern of findings termed “dermatopathic lymphadenitis” [30].
Sinus histiocytosis is a common and etiologically non-specific finding observed in lymph nodes, which is caused by the filling and expansion of sinuses by histiocytes. It may often be observed in chronically irritated lymph nodes, especially those of the mediastinum which are exposed to inhaled antigens, but may also be seen in other contexts, such as in nodes draining tumors [22]. An increased quantity of histiocytes may also be observed in lymph nodes draining prosthetic implants, or in conditions such as histiocytic storage disorders, Whipple’s disease, or sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) [31,32,33,34].
Most non-reactive conditions do not limit themselves to a particular region of the lymph node. For example, granulomatous diseases of the lymph node typically do not display a zonal predilection. While a specific etiology or infectious agent is often not identifiable in these cases, granuloma formation may be seen in response to a wide variety of infections. Granulomatous disease is divided into non-necrotizing disease and necrotizing disease, depending on the presence of necrosis within granulomas. One of the best-known diseases causing a non-necrotizing granulomatous lymphadenitis is sarcoidosis , which is characterized by well-formed epithelioid granulomas, often surrounded by a small rim of fibrosis. Necrotizing granulomatous disease is typically associated with infection, with the most common causes being mycobacterial or fungal infection. Bacterial infections, such as cat-scratch disease, may also cause necrotizing granulomas (Fig. 5.6) [22].
Several diseases may lead to expansion of many compartments of the lymph node. For example, IgG4-related disease may yield a fibro-inflammatory pseudotumor, as at other anatomic locations, but may also present with a wide range of hyperplastic changes in different compartments of the node [35]. Finally, several disorders may display large areas of necrosis within the lymph node, such as Kikuchi’s lymphadenitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and viral lymphadenitis [36]. Viral lymphadenitis may also yield diffuse changes in the lymph node parenchyma and prominent reactive changes in lymphoid cells, which may be challenging to differentiate from lymphoma.
5.4.2 Metastatic Disease
The presence of lymph node metastases is a key prognostic factor for many malignancies, and it is a key indicator of tumor aggressiveness [37]. As such, it is also a strong predictor of survival, and it is an important parameter used when determining disease stage and treatment options [38]. While lymphatic spread is observed relatively frequently in epithelial-derived malignancies (carcinomas), it is significantly less common in mesenchymal-derived malignancies (sarcomas) [39].
The presence of lymph node metastases is evidence of a fascinating interaction between the tumor and the lymphatic system. Tumor cells access small lymphatic vessels, which are simple endothelial-lined tubes without protective smooth muscle coats and only intermittent basement membranes [40], and from there travel through the subsequent lymphatic chain to arrive first in the nearest lymph node (the sentinel lymph node) [41], and then on through the subsequent nodes to re-enter the systemic circulation [42]. However, it has long been understood that metastases require an appropriate microenvironment to support them (the “seed and soil” theory, first proposed in the late nineteenth century) [43, 44]. Recent work has shown the extent to which the presence of an upstream tumor can modify downstream lymph nodes to prepare for metastases, such as by tumor-driven stimulation of lymphangiogenesis to significantly increase the flow of lymph through a node [45,46,47], tumor cells following chemokine signals to enter a lymph node [38, 48], and alteration of the mRNA profiles expressed in lymphatic endothelial cells [49].
When lymphatic involvement is present, the tumor will typically metastasize to a lymph node in a sequential fashion, first invading peritumoral lymphatics, and then spreading from node to node along the lymphatic channel. Metastases are often initially identified within or adjacent to the subcapsular sinus, the point of entry into the lymph node. Tumors may demonstrate characteristic morphologic features of their primary tumors , such as the papillary growth pattern and intranuclear inclusions of papillary thyroid carcinoma (Fig. 5.7), or the prominent cherry-red nucleoli of melanoma. However, tumor metastases present within a lymph node may often be poorly differentiated and challenging to diagnose on morphologic features alone. In the absence of characteristic histologic features, immunohistochemistry is often helpful in confirming the primary site of the tumor (see Table 5.1 for a list of commonly-used immunostains in metastatic disease).
5.4.3 Hematolymphoid Neoplasia
As lymphoid organs, the lymph nodes may become also be involved by a wide range of hematolymphoid neoplasms, especially lymphomas. Lymphomas may be of B- or T-cell origin, with B-cell lymphomas further divided into Hodgkin lymphomas and non-Hodgkin lymphomas [50].
Hodgkin lymphomas are characterized by a combination of scattered malignant B cells in a background of a prominent reactive inflammatory response, leading to prominent lymphadenopathy. The two main categories of Hodgkin lymphoma are classic Hodgkin lymphoma, further subclassified by the background inflammatory component , and nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL). Although NLPHL displays the same overall features as classical Hodgkin lymphoma, the malignant cells of NLPHL (LP cells) have a distinct genetic and immunohistochemical profile from Reed-Sternberg cells – the malignant cells of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (Fig. 5.8) [51].
Non-Hodgkin lymphomas consist of a diffuse infiltrate of abnormal neoplastic B cells. Multiple distinct entities are defined based on cell morphology, genetic abnormalities, and immunophenotype (see Table 5.2 for a list of common immunostains used in evaluating hematolymphoid tissue).
Common examples of low-grade NHLs include chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), which leads to diffuse effacement of lymph node architecture by small, mature lymphoid cells and occasional larger cells (prolymphoblasts) with characteristic CD5 and CD23 positivity, or mantle cell lymphoma, whose small CD5-positive cells may mimic those are SLL, but are distinguished by MCL’s characteristic t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation, which forces overexpression of cyclin D1 [52]. Overexpression of SOX11 is also observed in the majority of mantle cell lymphomas [53].
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is another common NHL, characterized by a proliferation of relatively uniform neoplastic follicles. In most cases of FL, the cells of the neoplastic germinal center contain a t(14;18) rearrangement which places the anti-apoptotic BCL2 gene under the IGH promoter, protecting the neoplastic cells from apoptosis. Most cases of FL are low grade, but as the grade increases the absolute and relative quantity of centroblasts in the follicles increases, and the follicular architecture tends to give way to a diffuse growth pattern. The highest grade of FL overlaps with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Fig. 5.9).
More high-grade NHLs include Burkitt lymphoma (BL), which is a highly aggressive B-cell lymphoma with three distinct clinical variants: endemic BL, which occurs most commonly in equatorial Africa and is associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection [54, 55]; sporadic BL, which occurs in immunocompetent patients in developed countries; and immunodeficiency-associated BL, which is most commonly identified in patients with HIV. Histologically, the different clinical variants are indistinguishable, with a diffuse infiltrate of medium-sized lymphoid cells demonstrating extremely high proliferative activity, and frequent macrophages consuming apoptotic debris to yield a “starry sky” appearance [56]. Translocations involving MYC are characteristic of BL, most commonly yielding a t(8;14) rearrangement (Fig. 5.10) [57].
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a biologically heterogeneous group of aggressive B-cell lymphomas, and it is the most common NHL worldwide [58]. Histologically, DLBCL is defined by a diffuse infiltrate of neoplastic B cells with large nuclei, with a wide variety of mutations and translocations described. Gene expression profiling has traditionally allowed for subdivision of DLBCL into two groups based on the resemblance of tumor cell profiles to germinal center B cells or activated B cells [59], although recent work has led to the identification of at least four different subtypes based on shared genomic abnormalities [60].
Other B-cell neoplasms which may involve lymph nodes include lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas or plasma cell neoplasms. T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms may similarly involve lymph nodes, but they are significantly less frequent than those discussed above.
5.5 Note on Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining is a simple yet indispensable tool, which allows the pathologist to evaluate expression of specific proteins in a cellular population of interest. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) involves antibodies targeted at proteins present in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. After the primary antibody binds its target antigen, a detection system is introduced to highlight the bound primary antibody. Various systems have been developed, but they all share the end goal of bringing a chromogenic substrate into proximity of the primary antibody, followed by activation of the substrate by an enzyme. The chromogen is then detectable by light microscopy, demonstrating expression of the antigen of interest.
By evaluating the immunohistochemical expression profile of a cell, it is possible to subclassify the nature of the cell in far greater detail than by light microscopy alone. This is especially important in lymphoid populations, where the histology of the various subtypes of hematolymphoid cells overlaps to the extent that they are histologically indistinguishable. B and T cells, for example, are identical by light microscopy, but these may be quickly and confidently distinguished by their expression of B-cell markers, such as CD20, or T-cell markers, such as CD3. Table 5.1 includes a list of common immunohistochemical markers used in hematolymphoid populations. Table 5.2 reviews commonly used stains when evaluating metastases.
References
Moore JE Jr, Bertram CD. Lymphatic system flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2018;50:459–82.
Willard-Mack CL. Normal structure, function, and histology of lymph nodes. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34(5):409–24.
Fletcher AL, Malhotra D, Turley SJ. Lymph node stroma broaden the peripheral tolerance paradigm. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(1):12–8.
Mebius RE. Organogenesis of lymphoid tissues. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(4):292–303.
Eikelenboom P, et al. The histogenesis of lymph nodes in rat and rabbit. Anat Rec. 1978;190(2):201–15.
Kaldjian EP, et al. Spatial and molecular organization of lymph node T cell cortex: a labyrinthine cavity bounded by an epithelium-like monolayer of fibroblastic reticular cells anchored to basement membrane-like extracellular matrix. Int Immunol. 2001;13(10):1243–53.
Malhotra D, et al. Transcriptional profiling of stroma from inflamed and resting lymph nodes defines immunological hallmarks. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(5):499–510.
Garside P, et al. Visualization of specific B and T lymphocyte interactions in the lymph node. Science. 1998;281(5373):96–9.
Young AJ. The physiology of lymphocyte migration through the single lymph node in vivo. Semin Immunol. 1999;11(2):73–83.
Soderberg KA, et al. Innate control of adaptive immunity via remodeling of lymph node feed arteriole. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(45):16315–20.
Haley P, et al. STP position paper: best practice guideline for the routine pathology evaluation of the immune system. Toxicol Pathol. 2005;33(3):404–7. discussion 408
Elmore SA. Enhanced histopathology of the immune system: a review and update. Toxicol Pathol. 2012;40(2):148–56.
Cyster JG. Chemokines and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Science. 1999;286(5447):2098–102.
Bergtold A, et al. Cell surface recycling of internalized antigen permits dendritic cell priming of B cells. Immunity. 2005;23(5):503–14.
Mesin L, Ersching J, Victora GD. Germinal center B cell dynamics. Immunity. 2016;45(3):471–82.
Victora GD, Nussenzweig MC. Germinal centers. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:429–57.
De Silva NS, Klein U. Dynamics of B cells in germinal centres. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(3):137–48.
Jacob J, et al. Intraclonal generation of antibody mutants in germinal centres. Nature. 1991;354(6352):389–92.
Gitlin AD, Shulman Z, Nussenzweig MC. Clonal selection in the germinal centre by regulated proliferation and hypermutation. Nature. 2014;509(7502):637–40.
Ziegner M, Steinhauser G, Berek C. Development of antibody diversity in single germinal centers: selective expansion of high-affinity variants. Eur J Immunol. 1994;24(10):2393–400.
Berek C, Berger A, Apel M. Maturation of the immune response in germinal centers. Cell. 1991;67(6):1121–9.
Jaffe ES, editor. Hematopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017.
McHeyzer-Williams LJ, et al. Follicular helper T cells as cognate regulators of B cell immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21(3):266–73.
De Bruyn PP, Cho Y. Structure and function of high endothelial postcapillary venules in lymphocyte circulation. Curr Top Pathol. 1990;84(Pt 1):85–101.
Girard JP, Moussion C, Forster R. HEVs, lymphatics and homeostatic immune cell trafficking in lymph nodes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(11):762–73.
Moussion C, Girard JP. Dendritic cells control lymphocyte entry to lymph nodes through high endothelial venules. Nature. 2011;479(7374):542–6.
Sainte-Marie G, Peng FS, Belisle C. Overall architecture and pattern of lymph flow in the rat lymph node. Am J Anat. 1982;164(4):275–309.
Kondratowicz GM, et al. Rheumatoid lymphadenopathy: a morphological and immunohistochemical study. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43(2):106–13.
Weiss LM, O’Malley D. Benign lymphadenopathies. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(Suppl 1):S88–96.
Gould E, et al. Dermatopathic lymphadenitis. The spectrum and significance of its morphologic features. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988;112(11):1145–50.
Gray MH, et al. Changes seen in lymph nodes draining the sites of large joint prostheses. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13(12):1050–6.
Lee RE, Peters SP, Glew RH. Gaucher’s disease: clinical, morphologic, and pathogenetic considerations. Pathol Annu. 1977;12(Pt 2):309–39.
Cai Y, Shi Z, Bai Y. Review of Rosai-Dorfman disease: new insights into the pathogenesis of this rare disorder. Acta Haematol. 2017;138(1):14–23.
Lamberty J, et al. Whipple disease: light and electron microscopy study. Arch Pathol. 1974;98(5):325–30.
Stone JH, Zen Y, Deshpande V. IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(6):539–51.
Kuo TT. Kikuchi’s disease (histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis). A clinicopathologic study of 79 cases with an analysis of histologic subtypes, immunohistology, and DNA ploidy. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(7):798–809.
Amin MB, et al. American joint commission on cancer cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Springer International Publishing; 2017.
Das S, et al. Tumor cell entry into the lymph node is controlled by CCL1 chemokine expressed by lymph node lymphatic sinuses. J Exp Med. 2013;210(8):1509–28.
Fong Y, et al. Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients. Ann Surg. 1993;217(1):72–7.
Schmid-Schonbein GW. Microlymphatics and lymph flow. Physiol Rev. 1990;70(4):987–1028.
Nathanson SD, Shah R, Rosso K. Sentinel lymph node metastases in cancer: causes, detection and their role in disease progression. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;38:106–16.
Ruddle NH. Lymphatic vessels and tertiary lymphoid organs. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(3):953–9.
Paget S. The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1989;8(2):98–101.
Peinado H, Lavotshkin S, Lyden D. The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: old sayings and new thoughts. Semin Cancer Biol. 2011;21(2):139–46.
Harrell MI, Iritani BM, Ruddell A. Tumor-induced sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and increased lymph flow precede melanoma metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(2):774–86.
Hirakawa S, et al. VEGF-A induces tumor and sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and promotes lymphatic metastasis. J Exp Med. 2005;201(7):1089–99.
Hirakawa S, et al. VEGF-C-induced lymphangiogenesis in sentinel lymph nodes promotes tumor metastasis to distant sites. Blood. 2007;109(3):1010–7.
Cabioglu N, et al. CCR7 and CXCR4 as novel biomarkers predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in T1 breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(16):5686–93.
Oliveira-Ferrer L, et al. Mechanisms of tumor-lymphatic interactions in invasive breast and prostate carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(2):602.
Swerdlow SH, et al. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2016. p. 421.
Brune V, et al. Origin and pathogenesis of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma as revealed by global gene expression analysis. J Exp Med. 2008;205(10):2251–68.
Jares P, Colomer D, Campo E. Molecular pathogenesis of mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(10):3416–23.
Ek S, et al. Nuclear expression of the non B-cell lineage Sox11 transcription factor identifies mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2008;111(2):800–5.
Brady G, MacArthur GJ, Farrell PJ. Epstein-Barr virus and Burkitt lymphoma. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(12):1397–402.
Kelly GL, Rickinson AB. Burkitt lymphoma: revisiting the pathogenesis of a virus-associated malignancy. Hematology. 2007;2007(1):277–84.
Ferry JA. Burkitt’s lymphoma: clinicopathologic features and differential diagnosis. Oncologist. 2006;11(4):375–83.
Dominguez-Sola D, Dalla-Favera R. Burkitt lymphoma: much more than MYC. Cancer Cell. 2012;22(2):141–2.
Li S, Young KH, Medeiros LJ. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Pathology. 2018;50(1):74–87.
Alizadeh AA, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000;403(6769):503–11.
Schmitz R, et al. Genetics and pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1396–407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crotty, R.K. (2021). Lymph Node Pathology. In: Harisinghani, M.G. (eds) Atlas of Lymph Node Anatomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80899-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80899-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80898-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80899-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)