Skip to main content

Surfing the Conflux: Technology, Information Environments and Great Power Competition Convergence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Great Power Competition Volume 1

Abstract

The convergence of technology, information environments and great power competition define today’s operating environment. Enabled by technology, the sources, speed and scale of change demand agility. To succeed, national security and defense challenges can leverage several arbitrage opportunities: a broader consideration of human behavior, deeper knowledge of complexity dynamics, smarter understanding of others’ cognitive bias as well as our own and finally sharper operating environment capabilities. These also necessitate maneuvering the underlying conflux of increasing connectivity, complexity and uncertainty across most human behavior to master operational art. Capitalizing on transformational computing power, big data, AI and computational social sciences are keys to preparing for alternative futures for our defense and security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B.W. Arthur, Positive Feedbacks in the Economy (Scientific American, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • B.W. Arthur, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Michigan, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • B.W. Arthur, Is the information revolution over? If history is a guide, it is not, in Business 2.0 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.R. Ashbey, An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman and Hall, London, 1956).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R. Axelrod, M.D. Cohen, Harnessing Complexity: Organisational Implications of a Scientific Frontier (Free Press, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Barksdale, https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/655987-if-we-have-data-let-s-look-at-data-if-all (2015)

  • A.B. Çambel, Applied Chaos Theory: A Paradigm for Complexity (Academic Press, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Christian, Origin Story: A Big History of Everything (Little, Brown and Company, New York, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. DeGennaro, The power of cognitive maneuver: don’t underestimate its value. Small Wars J. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense, Joint concept for human aspects of military operations (JC-HAMO) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense, Joint concepts for operating in the information environment (JCOIE) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense, Summary of the 2018 Department of Defense artificial intelligence strategy: harnessing AI to advance our security and prosperity. JAIC (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Epstein, R. Axtel, Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up (Brookings Institution Press, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.R. Ehrlich, P.H. Raven, Butterflies and plants: a study in co-evolution. Evolution 18, 586–608 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes India, The first human genome project took 12 years, technology can now do it in 3 days (2019). https://www.forbesindia.com/article/one-ceo-club/the-first-human-genome-project-took-12-years-technology-can-now-do-it-in-3-days/58961/1

  • M. Gell-Mann, What is Complexity? (Complexity Journal, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success (Little, Brown and Company, New York, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science (McDonald & Co, Cardinal, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Grossman, 2045 the year man becomes immortal. Time Magazine (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Haugland, Future military intelligence CONOPS and S&T investment roadmap 2035–2050: the Cognitive War (NSI Team, 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hausmann et al., The Atlas of Economic Complexity (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D. Hernandez, T. Brown, AI and efficiency. OpenAI (2020).https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-efficiency/#rf3

  • J. Holland, Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity (Addison Wesley, Boston, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Holland, Emergence: From Chaos to Order (Addison Wesley, Boston, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Dimension Capabilities Development Task Force (HDCDTF), Cross-cultural competence: overview of cross‐cultural training theory and practice for the army. US Army (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Business Machines, Six reasons to update your data science (2020). https://www.ibm.com/analytics/data-science

  • International Data Corporation, The digital universe of opportunities (2014). https://www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/2014iview/index.htm

  • S. Kauffman, Investigations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • V.A.W.J. Marchau et al., Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty from Theory to Practice (Springer, New York, 2019).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • B. McKelvey, Self-organization, complexity catastrophe, and microstate models at the edge of chaos, in Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell, ed. by J.A.C. Baum, B. McKelvey (Sage, 1999a)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. McKelvey, Visionary leadership vs distributed intelligence: strategy, microcoevolution, complexity, in Proceedings of EIASM Workshop, Brussels, June 1999 (1999b)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mitchell, Complexity: A Guided Tour (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mitleton-Kelly, Ten principles of complexity & enabling infrastructures in complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations: the application of complexity theory to organizations. Elsevier (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Nicolis, I. Prigogine, Exploring Complexity (W.H. Freeman, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Pike, Analysis and artificial intelligence in integrated campaigning. SMA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • RAND, Priority challenges for social and behavioral research and its modeling (2018a)

    Google Scholar 

  • RAND, Discontinuities and distractions—rethinking security for the year 2040(2018b)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.C. Redman, Bad data costs the U.S. $3 trillion per year. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Silver et al., Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature 550, 354–359 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistica, Number of mobile phone users worldwide from 2015 to 2020 (2020a). https://www.statista.com/statistics/274774/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-worldwide/

  • Statistica, Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025 (2020b). https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/

  • Strategic Multilayer Assessment White Paper, A cognitive capabilities agenda a multi-step approach for closing DoD’s cognitive capability gap. NSI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Multilayer Assessment Annual Conference, The evolving anatomy of conflict in a dynamically changing world. NSI (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Multilayer Assessment, Complex Adaptive Systems Interview with Dr (Sean Lawson, NSI, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Multilayer Assessment Periodic Publication, On the horizon: security challenges at the Nexus of state and non-state actors and emerging/disruptive technologies. NSI (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.H. Stogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (Westview Press, Nashville, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) and the Army Futures Command (AFC), Mad Scientist: Disruption and the Future Operational Environment Conference (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Waldrop, Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos (Penguin, London, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ‘small world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum, The Global Risks Report, 14th edn (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum, The Global Risks Report, 15th edn (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization, World trade developments, 2018–2019 (2020). https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2019_e/wts2019chapter03_e.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Abdollahian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abdollahian, M. (2021). Surfing the Conflux: Technology, Information Environments and Great Power Competition Convergence. In: Farhadi, A., Masys, A.J. (eds) The Great Power Competition Volume 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64473-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics