Abstract
The concerns about the environment and the associated damages to natural resources in times of armed conflict have emerged in distinct phases of the history reflecting the existing connection between the progress achieved through technology and the application of such scientific knowledge with the way they have transformed the concept of military operations. In the last century important protecting rules and criteria have been implemented to protect civilians, to safeguard those who no longer take part in hostilities, to distinguish civilian objects from military ones, and also to protect the environment as a whole in armed conflicts. However the issue of damages in times of war still remains highly controversial. The absence of an integrated and holistic approach in the normative framework applicable to armed conflict makes the environment extremely vulnerable and at risk, regardless of the incredible expansion of environmental law since the 1960. The three subsystems of international law, namely humanitarian law, international criminal law and international environmental law, although have incredibly broadened the legal basis for the protection in wartimes, present conflicting criteria, especially in determining liabilities for damages in armed conflict. Nevertheless balancing military operational requirements with environmental protection and security should not be viewed as an impossible task, even in conflicts. There is a critical need to increase the protecting efforts of nature and ecosystems both in peacetime and in war, exploring concepts that nature itself has developed and looking at new legal instruments from the perspective of common good and global commons, a revisited notion of national interest and of responsible sovereignty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
“Advisory Opinion on Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapon”, in ICJ Reports Year 1996, p. 226 e seq. (241, para. 28 and 29)
Bosselmann K (2015) Earth governance: trusteeship of the global commons. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Capra F (2015) Laudato Sì – the ecological ethics and systemic thought of Pope Francis, 22 June 2015. http://www.fritjofcapra.net/laudato-si-the-ecological-ethics-and-systemic-thought-of-pope-francis/. Accessed 15 Oct 2019
Dinstein Y (2001) Protection of the environment in international armed conflict. Max Planck UNYB 5, p. 541
Enciclycal Letter Laudato Si of the Holy Father Francis on Care for Our Common Home. Available at http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2019
ENMOD Convention available at https://treaties.un.org/. Accessed 3 Nov 2019
Greenwood C (1996) State responsibility and civil liability for environmental damage caused by military operations. In: Grunawalt RJ, King JE, McClain RS (eds) Protection of the environment during armed conflict, International Law Studies vol 9. US Naval War College, Newport https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ils/vol69/iss1/43/
International Court of Justice, Judgment on Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (HungarylSlovakia), 25 September 1997. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/92/092-19970925-JUD-01-00-EN.pd. Accessed 15 Oct 2019, [140]
International Law Commission (I.L.C.), Draft Articles on State Responsibility, Part I, Art. 1 at https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf
“Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment” Stockholm Declaration (Stockholm 516 June 1972) UN Doc A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, part II, Principle 21
“Rio Declaration on Environment and Development” UN Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro 3-14 June 1992) UN Doc A/CONF.151/26, vol. I, Principle 2
Rule 44. Due Regard for the Natural Environment in Military Operations
Worboys GL, Francis WL, Lockwood M (2010) Connectivity conservation management: a global guide. Earthscan, London, ecopy available at
World Charter of Nature. Available at https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f22a10.html. Accessed 2 Oct 2019
Wyatt J (2010) Law-making at the intersection of international environmental, humanitarian and criminal law: the issue of damage to the environment in international armed conflict. Int Rev Red Cross 92(879):593–646
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Colao, G. (2020). Environmental Damages and Armed Conflict. In: Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., Fermeglia, M. (eds) Ecological Integrity in Science and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46258-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46259-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)