Abstract
The biological timekeeper is crucial for maintaining delicate temporal organization of physiological and molecular events that are necessary for survival. Throughout the human body, the timekeeper controls a variety of rhythms that oscillate at rates as short as 1 second and as long as 1 year. Biological rhythms that oscillate with an approximately 24-hour rhythm are known as circadian rhythms. The circadian system is an intrinsic feature of all organisms and is encoded by a molecular negative feedback loop to maintain an approximately 24-hour rhythm, matching the Earth’s 24-hour rotation with respect to the sun. Due to its fundamental role in nature, nearly all physiological processes have been shown to be directly under the control of the circadian system. Investigators are now starting to unravel the importance of the circadian timekeeping system for the optimization of these processes as well as the detrimental consequences associated with its disruption. Recent clinical and preclinical research have demonstrated that chronic disruption of circadian rhythms is linked to an increasing risk of developing a variety of diseases such as cancer and metabolic syndrome. Therefore, it is critical to further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the circadian system to develop new therapies and strategies for maintenance of the circadian clock in our 24/7 world.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The timekeeper, often underappreciated, is an individual or device in competition, experimentation, and daily life that records and regulates the initiation and termination of key processes. In physiology, the timekeeper or pacemaker is crucial for maintaining delicate temporal organization of molecular and physiological events that dictate the survival of an organism. Throughout the human body, there are a myriad of biological rhythms that oscillate at rates as short as 1–2 seconds (i.e., sinoatrial node of the heart) and as long as weeks to months (i.e., estrous cycle) that are essential to life. A circadian rhythm is the term for a process that is under the control of our internal pacemakers with a period of approximately 24 hours [1]. Rhythms shorter than a day are referred to as ultradian rhythms, while rhythms longer than a day are called infradian rhythms [2]. The word circadian is derived from the Latin words circa (“approximately”) and dies (“day”) [1]. As such, circadian rhythms adapt to, follow, and oscillate with a period nearly matching the Earth’s 24-hour rotation with respect to the sun.
It is becoming clear that nearly all fundamental physiological processes are under the control of the circadian system [3]. From the autonomic control of blood pressure to the coordination of hormonal secretion, investigators are starting to unravel the importance of the circadian system for anticipating and optimizing the timing of various physiological functions [4]. In concert with these findings, recent clinical and preclinical research have begun to shed light on the detrimental consequences associated with chronic disruption of circadian rhythms [5,6,7,8,9]. The information technology revolution of the twenty-first century has inadvertently created a “24/7” environment that does not abide the natural rhythms of the Earth. In 2018, Nielsen estimated American adults spent an average of 11 hours per day exposed to artificial light emitted from electronic screens, an increase of 25% over the past 5 years [10]. This time does not even include the time that is spent using these devices at work or school which are becoming ever more digital. Additionally, shift work is becoming increasingly common in our connected world. It is estimated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer that 15–30% of the Western population is exposed to rotating shift work [11]. Taken together, modern humans are exposed to stressors that negatively regulate the circadian system. Due to its fundamental role in essential physiological processes, disruption of one’s circadian rhythm has been linked to an increasing risk of developing cancer [12], type 2 diabetes [4, 13], neurological disorders [14, 15], and cardiovascular disease [16, 17], among other adverse health consequences. Therefore, it is critical to further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the circadian system to develop new therapies and strategies for maintenance of the circadian clock in our twenty-first-century environment.
History of Chronobiology
The concept of timekeeping has permeated civilization for millennia; however, endogenous biological clocks were not truly appreciated until the eighteenth century [18]. Although ancient physicians such as Galen and Hippocrates noted that conditions like fevers exhibited periodic 24-hour rhythms, they unlikely appreciated that these rhythms were controlled, in part, by an endogenous timekeeper which persists independent of environmental cues [19]. In 1729, French astronomer Jean Jacques d’Ortous de Mairan was the first to realize that daily rhythms were intrinsically controlled and were not simply a response to the rhythmic light cycle of the Earth [18]. He observed that Mimosa leaves moved with a 24-hour cycle, even when placed in constant darkness, and therefore concluded that the movements could not have been affected by the light-dark cycle. Following de Mairan’s work, many confirmed his findings and demonstrated that the circadian rhythms in plants were independent of other rhythmic external stimuli. However, it was still unclear exactly what internal factors drove the maintenance of the circadian rhythm. With the explosion of Mendelian genetics in the early 1900s, Dr. Erwin Bunning, a German botanist, crossed bean plants with various period lengths and demonstrated that the period length of the offspring was an intermediate of the previous generation [20]. As a result, Bunning inferred that endogenous circadian clocks were “heritable” from the genetic code. Bunning’s pioneering work unraveling the interaction between intrinsic clocks and light sensitivity in plants set the stage for an explosion in the understanding of circadian rhythms throughout the rest of the twentieth century.
The modern field of chronobiology is an ever-growing discipline which traverses a broad range of basic and clinical research [21]. Nevertheless, the diversity in the field today mirrors its composition upon its founding in the early 1960s [22]. At the time, the field was led by Dr. Colin Pittendrigh and Dr. Jurgen Aschoff, often considered the fathers of chronobiology. Both pioneered early studies defining the properties and characteristics of circadian rhythms [23]. Most notably, Pittendrigh developed a parametric model describing how circadian rhythms can be reset or disrupted by a singular pulse of light [24]. Aschoff, meanwhile, showed that humans have intrinsic clocks and that these clocks could be synchronized by external cues. He coined the term zeitgeber , a German word meaning time-giver, to describe the environmental stimuli that can synchronize internal clocks [25]. While Aschoff, Pittendrigh, and others were unraveling the underpinnings of the biological clock, there was a push to apply these principles to improve human health. Dr. Franz Halberg, a physician at the University of Minnesota, led this charge at the time by pioneering novel preclinical and clinical studies that actively considered circadian time as a biological variable [1]. In one of his early studies, Halberg measured the circadian variability in the temperature of oral tumors, as a metric of their circadian metabolism, in order to optimize radiation therapy treatment [26]. He observed that patients who received treatment at peak tumor temperature were twice as likely to be cancer-free 2 years following radiation. Despite their diverse approaches and methods, these individuals clearly understood the importance in maintaining robust circadian rhythms and provided the guiding principles being applied today to improve human health.
Measurement and Assessment of Circadian Rhythms
Circadian rhythms, like any other biological or physical rhythm, consist of predictable patterns of oscillations over a finite element of time [22]. In order to describe and compare how circadian patterns of motor activity, temperature, food intake, and other rhythmic behaviors vary between individuals or organisms, one must appreciate the distinct features of a rhythm. To identify whether a process is truly a circadian rhythm, the period or frequency must be assessed. The period is the time to complete one cycle, while the frequency, also known as the inverse period, is the number of cycles completed over a unit of time. In many scientific disciplines, Fourier analysis, pioneered by Joseph Fourier in the late eighteenth century, is used to quantify the various frequency components of a signal [27]. Simply put, Fourier analysis transforms a discrete or continuous rhythmic signal into a sum of sinusoidal functions with varying frequencies. The relative contribution of each frequency to the signal can then be visualized by calculating their spectral densities, otherwise known as a periodogram. In circadian biology, modified periodogram analysis such as the chi-squared periodogram, which utilizes least squares regression, is used to measure the dominant period of physiological rhythms [28]. Periodogram analysis also reveals the strength or robustness of the rhythm. Essentially, periods that are “neater” and more consistent will have a larger power because the period has a greater contribution to the overall sinusoidal signal. The power is different than the amplitude of the signal as the latter only quantifies the relative deviation from the mean to the peak value, while the former is not affected by signal deviation and relies solely on the contribution of the various frequency components of the rhythm. Although the rhythm’s period may describe whether processes occur under the control of the circadian system, it does not explain why they occur and why they are optimized to occur at different times of the day. The secretion of cortisol and melatonin, for example, both occur with a robust 24-hour period; however, their peak secretion occurs at different times of the circadian cycle [29]. Typically, plasma cortisol levels rise throughout the solar day and begin to fall just as melatonin levels begin to rise in anticipation of the biological night. The relationship of the opposing rhythms can be quantified by the phase, which describes the initial time (or angle) at the signal’s origin. The lag in the phase of the melatonin rhythm relative to the cortisol rhythm is referred to as the phase difference.
The use of melatonin and cortisol secretion as markers of circadian timekeeping exemplifies how the field of chronobiology still mainly relies on indirect, noninvasive methods such as hormonal secretion, internal temperature, and voluntary locomotor activity to “keep time” in vivo [30, 31]. With the development of mobile, noninvasive devices for monitoring of voluntary locomotor activity, assessment of circadian activity rhythms is most commonly used to indirectly measure circadian pacemaking in humans [32]. Activity rhythms are typically visualized by means of an actogram, which vertically organizes each day of behavior allowing for the efficient visual analysis of the period and phase of this circadian output [33]. Nevertheless, novel methods to directly measure circadian pacemaking are currently being explored. Recent preclinical animal studies visualizing fluorescently tagged circadian genes have started to allow for the longitudinal and direct measurement of circadian rhythms in pacemakers of mice; however, it is unclear whether such techniques will become applicable to humans [34]. Advances in imaging technology such as BOLD fMRI show promise, as they may be able to directly quantify biological timekeeping activity via blood flow to the pacemaking region [35]. Moreover, novel computational methods using integrated transcriptomic data are also being explored in humans to estimate the internal circadian time from a single blood or tissue sample [31, 36, 37]. Taken together, these metrics and tools will be essential to allow for the direct assessment of circadian rhythms in humans under various physiological and pathophysiological conditions.
Properties of Circadian Rhythms
Over the past 300 years, endogenous circadian rhythms have been assessed in a diverse group of plants, insects, birds, fish, amphibians, and mammals. Although the underlying molecular mechanisms that encode circadian processes may not be completely conserved between species, the essential properties of their circadian rhythms remain. The three key properties that define a circadian rhythm are (1) persistence under constant conditions with a free-running period of approximately 24 hours, (2) ability to entrain to a 24-hour cycle via rhythmic environmental stimuli, and (3) free-running periods which are temperature compensated such that an organism maintains an approximately 24-hour circadian period regardless of temperature fluctuations [22].
Circadian Rhythms Persist Under Constant Conditions
Jean Jacques d’Ortous de Mairan’s initial observation that the Mimosa plant maintained a 24-hour period in constant darkness suggested that circadian rhythms persist with a free-running period (FRP) of ~24 hours. The FRP is the period of activity in constant conditions and is also referred to as tau (t) or the inverse/frequency of the FRP [38]. An intrinsic FRP in organisms is critical for biological timekeeping because it ensures that the “clock keeps ticking” regardless of external stimuli. Nevertheless, it was unclear for many years whether this was conserved in higher mammals such as humans. In order to test this hypothesis, subjects were placed in an underground bunker devoid of any timing cues or potential zeitgebers [39] and were asked to maintain a “regular” life for 3–4 weeks. The light intensity and internal temperature were carefully controlled from the outside. Upon recording activity, temperature, and urine rhythms, Aschoff’s team calculated an average free-running period of ~25 hours in the subjects. Future studies led to uncertainty in the study’s findings [40, 41], and researchers further attempted to refine measurements by desynchronizing subjects’ sleep-wake cycles from their circadian pacemakers. Nathaniel Kleitman pioneered a technique whereby subjects are exposed to a 28-hour “day”, such that the zeitgebers related to the sleep-wake schedule are equally distributed throughout the circadian cycle over the duration of the experiment [30]. Indirect measurement of the periods of activity, core temperature, plasma melatonin, and plasma cortisol all revealed an intrinsic period of 24.18 hours with 90% of measurements ranging between 24.00 and 24.35 hours. This study demonstrated that the intrinsic human pacemaker was precise and truly circadian.
Rhythmic Environmental Stimuli Can Entrain Circadian Rhythms
Although the internal timekeeper maintains an approximately 24-hour rhythm, environmental cues are required to continually tune the internal timekeeper to maintain a precise period and phase. Consider an intrinsic period of 24.18 hours described above, which is only 12 minutes longer than the Earth’s 24-hour solar cycle. After only 1 week, individuals would be subjected to an ~1-hour phase shift which would progressively push one to a nocturnal state after a few months. Without tuning, our internal pacemakers would create an asynchronous and inefficient world that would overthrow our modern societal norms. Most typically, the Earth’s light-dark cycle is considered the foremost entrainment agent; however, other agents such as food availability and external temperature have been also shown to act as zeitgebers for internal clocks [25, 42].
The paradigm describing how light tunes the period and phase of the biological clock was championed by Pittendrigh, leading to the development of a nonparametric, discrete model of synchronization [43]. The model suggests that the circadian pacemaker maintains equilibrium by shifting its phase in response to a stimulus of light outside of its current circadian phase. In order to visualize how pulses of light affect the phase of the pacemaker, phase response curves (PRCs) can be constructed describing whether the light pulse will advance, delay, or have little effect [44]. Intuitively, the effect of a light pulse during the active phase of a diurnal mammal will be minimal, while exposure to light during the night will significantly phase shift the FRP. This concept has been translated and repeatedly demonstrated in humans by exposing subjects to a 3–6-hour light stimulus at various times throughout the circadian cycle and subsequently measuring physiological rhythms in the absence of entrainment cues [45,46,47,48]. Researchers demonstrated that there is variability in response to the pulses of light; however, humans generally experience a phase delay when exposed to light early in sleep and a phase advance as the sleep phase approaches dawn [49]. Practically, PRCs have been a valuable tool in assessing the efficacy of chronotherapies for individuals exposed to circadian disruptions [50, 51].
Free-Running Periods Are Temperature Compensated
The light-dark cycle plays a dominant role in resetting and entraining the circadian clock; however, the biological pacemaker encodes these environmental cues through a series of biochemical reactions that are directly affected by the temperature of the reaction environment. Dr. Hans Kalmus first demonstrated that the rate of the circadian cycle in drosophila increased threefold with every 10 °C increase in temperature [52, 53]. Intuitively, a temperature-dependent clock would present significant challenges as the clock would run faster on a hot, summer day and slower on a cold, winter day, resulting in unreliable period measurements from 1 day or one season to the next. As such, further investigations on bees, mice, drosophila, and cultured human cells have refuted this initial finding [54,55,56]. In the presence of increasing ambient temperature, the FRP has been shown to remain relatively constant and, therefore, temperature compensated. Despite this finding, in vitro studies of chick pineal cells demonstrated that a heat pulse, similar to light pulses described above, could cause a phase shift of the circadian clock as measured by melatonin secretion [57]. Recently, Buhr et al. demonstrated that ex vivo tissue, absent of photic cues, can also be entrained to a new phase by a heat pulse while still maintaining an approximately 24-hour period [58]. Taken together, these findings revealed that an organism’s innate circadian period is insensitive to temperature; however, it also demonstrates that other rhythmic environmental stimuli, such as the daily circadian rhythm in body temperature, play a role in setting the phase of the circadian pacemaker.
Organization and Entrainment of the Circadian System
Provided the knowledge that the circadian pacemaker can be tuned by external cues, it is clear that it is actively engaged with the surrounding environment rather than passively counting time [59]. In turn, the circadian system can be directly modeled by simple oscillator networks. An oscillator is a rhythmic signal that provides inputs into a system to initiate change (i.e., response to light pulse), records and measures feedback from the system, and institutes a delay in response to feedback from a system not at equilibrium. Early models of the circadian oscillator system considered various configurations including a single, master pacemaker that drives systemic circadian outputs, coupled master oscillators that drive dependent or independent peripheral outputs, and a hierarchical oscillator system that couples a master timekeeper to peripheral oscillators that control local circadian outputs [60, 61].
The discovery of the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus as the master pacemaker in mammals by two independent teams in 1972 began to eliminate the concept of a coupled oscillator model [62, 63]. Lesioning of the SCN resulted in loss of circadian regulation of locomotor activity, drinking behavior, and cortisol rhythms. Electrical recordings of SCN neurons in vivo and in vitro demonstrated that the SCN functions as a self-sustained oscillator as the neurons have the ability to intrinsically maintain a rhythm in electrical activity regardless of external input [64, 65]. Additionally, transplantation studies that implanted the SCN into an arrhythmic animal were successful in restoring the circadian rhythmicity of the donor animals [66, 67]. Although the SCN was demonstrated as the master circadian pacemaker, peripheral cells and tissues were also found to have intrinsic circadian oscillations [68, 69]. In the absence of SCN input, ex vivo examination of the mammalian liver, lung, and skeletal muscle revealed that these tissues displayed a robust circadian oscillation in gene expression. Recent studies using a luciferase (light) reporter as a real-time marker of circadian rhythms in mice confirmed the existence of self-sustainable peripheral oscillators in nearly all peripheral tissues [70, 71]. The growing experimental evidence suggests that the circadian system exhibits a hierarchical oscillator structure whereby a master oscillator provides inputs and tunes a network of peripheral oscillators that control downstream physiological outputs.
Light Is Encoded at the Master Timekeeper by a Specialized Detection Mechanism
Light, as the primary zeitgeber, requires an efficient communication system to relay changes in the light-dark cycle to the SCN. Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) contain specialized melanopsin receptors which are present in only ~1% of RGCs [72, 73]. Melanopsin is a photopigment sensitive to short wavelengths of light with a peak absorption at ~480 nm corresponding to blue/green light [74]. Activation of melanopsin leads to an intracellular signaling cascade causing ipRGCs to depolarize, initiating an action potential that travels down the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) and directly innervates the SCN [75]. Lesioning the RHT causes animals to free-run, despite a rhythmic light-dark cycle, exemplifying its role in entrainment [76]. Simply put, the fundamental role of the RHT is to indicate the start and end of the day in order to entrain the master oscillator to a consistent phase response.
The symbiotic relationship between the SCN and RHT is the key to maintaining precise timing and is best illustrated by the monosynaptic connection between them [77]. Increase in the activity of the RHT at dawn, for instance, is directly received by SCN neurons. Inappropriate exposure to light stimuli due to jetlag or shift work can induce spiking activity of the RHT which results in a phase shift of SCN neuronal activity, as described by the PRC previously discussed. Synaptic communication between the RHT and SCN occurs via presynaptic release of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate [78]. The released glutamate is received postsynaptically by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, causing an influx of intracellular Ca2+ into SCN neurons and a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent signaling cascade that resets and entrains the pacemaker to the light input [79]. Thus, a light stimulus can be quickly detected and communicated by ipRGCs to SCN neurons via an elegant and efficient signal transduction system.
Organization of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus (SCN): The Master Timekeeper
The SCN is located in the ventral periventricular zone of the hypothalamus, dorsal to the optic chiasm, and is composed of approximately 20,000 neurons that have a circadian pattern of electrical activity [80]. Division of SCN neurons by amplitude of electrical activity, neuropeptide expression, and afferent inputs reveals two distinct subpopulations [81]. The core SCN neurons receive the majority of photic input, fire with low-amplitude rhythms that can be easily reset by environmental stimuli, and express a variety of neuropeptides including vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) [82, 83]. Moreover, light-induced rhythmic oscillations occur exclusively in core neurons, suggesting that the core is primarily responsible for sensory processing of environmental cues and entrainment of the circadian system to the light-dark cycle [84, 85]. In contrast, shell SCN neurons primarily express arginine vasopressin (AVP), experience high-amplitude, self-sustaining oscillations, and receive little photic input [83]. These features highlight the shell’s role in relaying SCN outputs to modulate the clock in peripheral tissue oscillators [86]. Despite these differences, communication between the core and shell SCN neurons is critical for maintaining the central pacemaker’s 24-hour circadian rhythm. In an ex vivo SCN preparation, separation of the shell and core neurons caused the shell SCN to desynchronize [87]. Elimination of VIP in the SCN, a key marker of the core, abolished behavioral rhythms and highlighted the downstream role the substance plays in entraining SCN outputs to light stimuli [88]. In combination with studies tracing neuronal circuits [83], it is clear that signaling from the core to the shell is necessary for the entrainment of the master circadian pacemaker.
SCN-Dependent Outputs Entrain Peripheral Oscillators
The hierarchical oscillator model of the circadian system suggests that outputs from the master pacemaker can modulate peripheral circadian oscillators. The SCN directly and indirectly entrains peripheral clocks through a combination of synaptic and neuroendocrine outputs [89]. Projections from SCN neurons mainly innervate the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). The PVN serves as the hypothalamic hub for hormonal and autonomic control and thus effectively relays SCN outputs for the circadian control of physiological outputs. Pre-autonomic neurons in the PVN are directly innervated by the SCN and subsequently project to sympathetic and parasympathetic motor nuclei controlling several organs including the heart, pancreas, and liver [90,91,92]. Lesioning the connection between the SCN and PVN was effective in eliminating the circadian rhythmicity in heart rate suggesting that the SCN plays a direct role in autonomic regulation of cardiac, as well as other peripheral rhythms [91].
Additionally, the PVN relays SCN outputs to the pineal gland for the circadian regulation of melatonin secretion. The pineal gland is indirectly controlled through a multisynaptic connection. SCN outputs travel from the PVN to the intermediolateral cell column and finally to the superior cervical ganglion (SCG) which innervates the pineal gland [93]. During the day, the SCN provides an inhibitory signal (via γ-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) to this pathway in order to suppress melatonin secretion [94]. These inhibitory signals suppress the expression and activity of the enzymes responsible for synthesizing melatonin from serotonin, arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT) and methionine adenosyltransferase 2a (MAT2A) [95]. Conversely, glutamatergic output from the SCN to the PVN has been demonstrated to be responsible for enhanced melatonin synthesis and secretion during the night in mammals [96]. Importantly, the nightly increase in melatonin secretion has been shown to functionally impact a wide range of tissues and processes and is considered a potential zeitgeber for peripheral tissue oscillators [97,98,99,100].
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis also receives SCN output. In a series of experiments by Kalsbeek and Buijis, they demonstrated that the SCN mediates its effect on the HPA by secretion of the neuropeptide vasopressin during an organism’s inactive cycle. In turn, this inhibits the secretion of corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) and vasopressin from PVN neurons [101,102,103,104]. During an organism’s active cycle when the SCN ceases to secrete vasopressin, CRH and vasopressin subsequently induce the secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary, which can then act directly on the adrenal cortex, modulating the release of glucocorticoids, catecholamines, and mineralocorticoids [105,106,107]. Similar to the role of melatonin, the daytime increase in stress hormone (i.e., corticosterone) secretion from the adrenal cortex has been proposed as an SCN-dependent mechanism of peripheral oscillator entrainment [108]. Through local control of its synaptic output, the SCN exerts its role as master timekeeper by controlling downstream autonomic and endocrine outputs to entrain peripheral clocks.
Non-photic Entrainment of Peripheral Oscillators
Although the SCN is fundamentally required to entrain peripheral tissues to the light-dark cycle via direct and indirect pathways, peripheral circadian rhythms are thought to also be modulated and entrained by SCN-independent mechanisms. The timing of a variety of rhythmic behaviors such as food intake and exercise has been demonstrated to phase shift peripheral oscillators while leaving SCN rhythms unaffected [42, 109, 110]. One of the strongest non-photic entrainment agents is food, specifically the timing of feeding patterns, and is likely due to feeding’s role in mammalian survival [111]. Precise timing of feeding patterns or time-restricted feeding (tRF) can act as a zeitgeber for peripheral food entrainable oscillators (FEO). The concept that FEOs are independent of the SCN was confirmed in a seminal study where tRF during the inactive cycle of a mouse shifted the phase of the liver, pancreas, heart, and kidney while leaving the phase of the SCN unchanged [42]. Current research is building on this finding to identify the signals that mediate feeding-dependent phase responses. Centrally, FEOs seem to depend in part on orexin, a neuropeptide regulating appetite, because ablation of orexin-expressing neurons effectively prohibited food anticipatory activity in response to tRF [112]. Dopamine and ghrelin have also been implicated as responsible for food anticipation in response to tRF [113, 114].
In peripheral tissues, nutritional signals have been thoroughly investigated as the potential zeitgeber for FEOs. By feeding nutritionally homogeneous food to mice during their inactive phase, it was discovered that a combination of glucose and protein (casein) resulted in a significant phase advance in the liver that was not observed with mono-nutrient diets, suggesting that a balanced diet is required for entrainment of peripheral oscillators [115]. Parallel studies also demonstrated that glucose controls peripheral clock oscillations via an AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling cascade [116, 117]. Hormones responsible for the systemic response to feeding and fasting such as insulin, incretins, and glucagon exhibit a robust circadian rhythm and thus have been suggested as potential entrainment agents for FEOs [118,119,120].
In addition to feeding, timing of exercise has also been implicated in entraining peripheral tissue oscillators. In humans, exposure to an acute bout of high-intensity exercise during the evening caused a significant phase shift in melatonin onset relative to the baseline melatonin onset [121]. Additional studies exposing subjects to various exercise routines have confirmed the potential role of exercise in non-photic entrainment [122]. In animal studies, wheel-running during the inactive phase caused a phase advance in the liver and kidney clocks without affecting SCN rhythms [123]. The exercise-induced entrainment was likely coupled to an SCN-independent (exercise-dependent) secretion of corticosterone and/or catecholamines. Nevertheless, other exercise-induced signals such as local hypoxia and acute inflammation have been demonstrated to modulate the peripheral circadian clock [124, 125]. Overall, non-photic cues clearly play an important role in entraining peripheral tissues to the rhythmic environment for the optimization of physiological outputs.
Molecular Basis for Circadian Rhythms
Thus far, we have considered central and peripheral circadian rhythms as cellular and physiological outputs in response to various environmental cues. This is an overly simplified view of the circadian system which ignores the intracellular mechanisms that transduce an external stimulus into a physiological response. The circadian system is centrally and peripherally encoded by a transcriptional-translational negative feedback loop (TTFL) that was first proposed by Hall, Robash, and Young [126]. Their work deciphering the molecular clock in drosophila was recognized with the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2017. The TTFL is an elegant and efficient negative feedback loop that encodes and maintains an organism’s circadian rhythm [127]. In short, the TTFL comprises an integrated circuit whereby the positive limb initiates the transcription of a negative limb that, upon translation, translocates back into the nucleus to negatively regulate its own transcription. The discovery of this approximately 24-hour oscillator network effectively described Bunning’s initial observation that the inherited FRP is derived from the period of the molecular clock and encodes the circadian rhythm.
Organization of the Mammalian Molecular Clock
The components and structure of the mammalian molecular clock are highly conserved, allowing for the translatable study of this framework in various model organisms [128]. The positive limb of the mammalian TTFL is comprised of the core circadian transcription factors circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK) and its heterodimer partner brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like 1 (BMAL1), encoded by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (ARNTL) gene [127]. Genetic deletion of BMAL1 leads to loss of behavioral and physiological circadian rhythms because BMAL1 is the only mammalian circadian clock gene that does not have a compensatory paralogue [129]. In contrast, loss of CLOCK expression leads to mixed phenotypes because neuronal period-aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein-single-minded protein (PAS) domain protein 2 (NPAS2) can compensate since it is a paralogue to CLOCK [130]. The CLOCK-BMAL1 heterodimer promotes transcription of genes period 1–3 (PER1, PER2, PER3) and cryptochrome 1–2 (CRY1, CRY2), comprising the negative limb of the TTFL [131, 132]. PER and CRY proteins, along with the stabilizing casein kinases 1δ and 1ε (CK1δ, CK1ε), join together upon translation and translocate into the nucleus where they interact with CLOCK-BMAL1 to inhibit their own transcription [133]. The TTFL is further stabilized by the nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 1 and 2 (REV-ERBα/β) and nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group F, member 1 (RORα/β) that, respectively, repress and activate the transcription of ARNTL as part of secondary regulatory loops [134]. Overall, the molecular oscillator ensures the generation of robust circadian rhythms by encoding a 24-hour period into the TTFL.
Outside of its role as the master molecular timekeeper, the CLOCK-BMAL1 heterodimer activates transcription of target genes by binding to E-box regions in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which are conserved promoters coded by a palindromic CACGTG sequence [135]. The binding of the heterodimer also includes recruitment and interaction with a variety of epigenetic factors such as histone acetyltransferases (i.e., p300), the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), and cell-specific enhancers (i.e., pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1) to increase expression of target genes [135,136,137,138]. A seminal study by Koike et al. demonstrated that CLOCK and BMAL1 bind to more than 10,000 combined sites regulating ~3000 unique genes in the mammalian liver [139]. Highlighting the critical role of the circadian architecture, these genes were significantly enriched for pathways regulating liver metabolism, cancer development, and insulin signaling. The negative repressors, PER1/PER2 and CRY1/CRY2, were demonstrated to bind to more than 12,000 and 25,000 liver sites, respectively. Consistent with this study, CRY1–CRY2 are thought to regulate nuclear receptors such as the glucocorticoid receptor, which are critical for non-photic entrainment [140]. PER1/PER2, meanwhile, have been shown to directly control cell proliferation and lipid metabolism; however, additional work is needed to fully investigate their downstream role in cellular physiology [141, 142]. Overall, the circadian control of molecular processes effectively transduces environmental cues into precisely timed physiological outputs.
Entrainment of the Molecular Clock
The entrainment of central and peripheral pacemakers is mediated by both photic and non-photic cues. These zeitgebers cause a distinct phase response by modulating the molecular clock through intricate intracellular signaling cascades. The phase shifting effects of light on SCN neurons described previously can be directly attributed to the plasticity of the system’s molecular framework. Glutamatergic signaling induced by a light stimulus elicits an influx of Ca2+ and activation of cAMP in SCN core neurons [143]. The transcription of PER1 and PER2 is directly stimulated at the core because the PER1/PER2 promoter region contains a cAMP/Ca2+ response element (CRE), in addition to the E-box element [144]. Communication from the core to the shell is mainly mediated by VIP, a potent adenylate cyclase activator, which leads to an activation of cAMP and, in turn, PER1/PER2 expression within a few hours [145]. This allows the circadian system to quickly adapt to inappropriate light exposure (i.e., jet lag) because the expression of PER1/PER2 will reset the TTFL to a new phase as it interacts with and inhibits the BMAL1-CLOCK heterodimer. Relative to the PRC, light exposure toward dawn while endogenous PER1/PER2 expression is low will accelerate and advance the cycle, while light during the day has essentially no impact on PER1/PER2. Non-photic entrainment, meanwhile, has been shown to utilize both CRE-dependent and CRE-independent mechanisms to modulate the phase of peripheral oscillators [116]. Time-restricted feeding, for instance, has been demonstrated to effectively modulate the phase of CREB, resulting in a resetting of the hepatic clock [146]. Nevertheless, parallel studies have demonstrated that inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinases and phosphoinositide 3-kinases prevents the entrainment of the liver oscillator by insulin, suggesting that these kinases are likely involved in the signaling cascade responsible for resetting peripheral clocks [119]. Moreover, the nutrient regulated AMP-activated protein kinase has also been demonstrated to directly regulate the stability of CRY1 in vitro, providing additional evidence that CRE-independent pathways may be required for entrainment of peripheral clocks [116]. Finally, the heat shock signaling pathway mediated by heat shock factor 1 has been shown to be necessary for the peripheral entrainment by both heat and feeding [58, 147]. Taken together, the phase response of circadian oscillators to entrainment cues is transduced via intracellular signaling cascades that allow the circadian system to quickly adapt to its environment, the details of which are only beginning to be fully appreciated.
Conclusion
In summary, the circadian system is an endogenous feature of organisms that precisely maintains an approximately 24-hour period, driven by a molecular negative feedback loop. The tight and stable control of intrinsic circadian rhythms allows for the anticipation of external stimuli such that relevant physiological outputs can be optimized for efficient and effective responses. This chapter highlights the extensive investigations over the last 300 years that delineate the physiological and molecular mechanisms which form the framework of the circadian system. Recent clinical and preclinical studies have confirmed that disruption of these mechanisms through genetic or environmental stressors produces a state of circadian misalignment which is associated with the development of a variety of diseases. As such, further investigation defining the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling the circadian machinery is needed to identify potential therapeutic targets and to restore the body’s temporal balance in our 24/7 world.
References
Halberg F. Circadian (about twenty-four-hour) rhythms in experimental medicine [abridged]. Proc R Soc Med. SAGE Publications. 1963;56:253.
Aschoff J. A survey on biological rhythms. In: Biological Rhythms. Boston: Springer; 1981. p. 3–10.
Matveyenko AV. Consideration for circadian physiology in rodent research. Bethesda: American Physiological Society; 2018.
Javeed N, Matveyenko AV. Circadian etiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Physiology. 2018;33(2):138–50.
Qian J, Dalla Man C, Morris CJ, Cobelli C, Scheer FA. Differential effects of the circadian system and circadian misalignment on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in humans. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(10):2481–5.
Sharma A, Laurenti MC, Dalla Man C, Varghese RT, Cobelli C, Rizza RA, et al. Glucose metabolism during rotational shift-work in healthcare workers. Diabetologia. 2017;60(8):1483–90.
Davis S, Mirick DK, Stevens RG. Night shift work, light at night, and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(20):1557–62.
Haus EL, Smolensky MH. Shift work and cancer risk: potential mechanistic roles of circadian disruption, light at night, and sleep deprivation. Sleep Med Rev. 2013;17(4):273–84.
Knutsson A, Jonsson B, Akerstedt T, Orth-Gomer K. Increased risk of ischaemic heart disease in shift workers. Lancet. 1986;328(8498):89–92.
Nielsen. Time flies: U.S. adults now spend nearly half a day interacting with media. Nielsen Insights. 2018. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2018/time-flies-us-adults-now-spend-nearly-half-a-day-interacting-with-media.html. Accessed 6 Aug 2019.
Stevens RG, Hansen J, Costa G, Haus E, Kauppinen T, Aronson KJ, et al. Considerations of circadian impact for defining ‘shift work’in cancer studies: IARC Working Group Report. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(2):154–62.
Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, et al. Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting. The Lancet Oncology. 2007;8(12):1065–6.
Pan A, Schernhammer ES, Sun Q, Hu FB. Rotating night shift work and risk of type 2 diabetes: two prospective cohort studies in women. PLoS Med. 2011;8(12):e1001141.
Musiek ES, Xiong DD, Holtzman DM. Sleep, circadian rhythms, and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. Exp Mol Med. 2015;47(3):e148.
Wulff K, Gatti S, Wettstein JG, Foster RG. Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption in psychiatric and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(8):589.
Scheer FA, Hilton MF, Mantzoros CS, Shea SA. Adverse metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of circadian misalignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(11):4453–8.
Rüger M, Scheer FA. Effects of circadian disruption on the cardiometabolic system. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2009;10(4):245–60.
Roenneberg T, Merrow M. Circadian clocks—the fall and rise of physiology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(12):965.
Pittendrigh CS. Temporal organization: reflections of a Darwinian clock-watcher. Annu Rev Physiol. 1993;55(1):17–54.
Chandrashekaran M. Erwin Bünning (1906–1990): a centennial homage. J Biosci. 2006;31(1):5–12.
Takahashi JS, Hong H-K, Ko CH, McDearmon EL. The genetics of mammalian circadian order and disorder: implications for physiology and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(10):764.
Pittendrigh CS, editor. Circadian rhythms and the circadian organization of living systems. In: Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1960.
Daan S. Colin Pittendrigh, Jürgen Aschoff, and the natural entrainment of circadian systems. J Biol Rhythms. 2000;15(3):195–207.
Pittendrigh CS. Circadian systems: entrainment. In: Biological rhythms. Boston: Springer; 1981. p. 95–124.
Aschoff J, editor. Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. In: Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1960.
Halberg F, Prem K, Halberg F, Norman C, Cornélissen G. Origins of timed cancer treatment: early marker rhythm-guided individualized chronochemotherapy. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2006;6(1):55–61.
Coppel W. JB Fourier—on the occasion of his two hundredth birthday. Am Math Mon. 1969;76(5):468–83.
Enright JT. Data analysis. In: Biological rhythms. Boston: Springer; 1981. p. 21–39.
Sharma M, Palacios-Bois J, Schwartz G, Iskandar H, Thakur M, Quirion R, et al. Circadian rhythms of melatonin and cortisol in aging. Biol Psychiatry. 1989;25(3):305–19.
Czeisler CA, Duffy JF, Shanahan TL, Brown EN, Mitchell JF, Rimmer DW, et al. Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker. Science. 1999;284(5423):2177–81.
Decoursey PJ, Pius S, Sandlin C, Wethey D, Schull J. Relationship of circadian temperature and activity rhythms in two rodent species. Physiol Behav. 1998;65(3):457–63.
Bellone GJ, Plano SA, Cardinali DP, Chada DP, Vigo DE, Golombek DA. Comparative analysis of actigraphy performance in healthy young subjects. Sleep Sci. 2016;9(4):272–9.
Lieberman HR, Wurtman JJ, Teicher MH. Circadian rhythms of activity in healthy young and elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging. 1989;10(3):259–65.
Mei L, Fan Y, Lv X, Welsh DK, Zhan C, Zhang EE. Long-term in vivo recording of circadian rhythms in brains of freely moving mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(16):4276–81.
McGlashan EM, Poudel GR, Vidafar P, Drummond SP, Cain SW. Imaging individual differences in the response of the human suprachiasmatic area to light. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1022.
Wittenbrink N, Ananthasubramaniam B, Münch M, Koller B, Maier B, Weschke C, et al. High-accuracy determination of internal circadian time from a single blood sample. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(9):3826–39.
Ruben MD, Wu G, Smith DF, Schmidt RE, Francey LJ, Lee YY, et al. A database of tissue-specific rhythmically expressed human genes has potential applications in circadian medicine. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(458):eaat8806.
Pittendrigh CS, Daan S. A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. J Comp Physiol. 1976;106(3):223–52.
Aschoff J. Circadian rhythms in man. Science. 1965;148(3676):1427–32.
Proll J, Wever RA. The circadian system of man, results of experiments under temporal isolation. XII und 276 Seiten, 181 Abb. Springer Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin (West) 1979. Preis: 98,—DM. Food/Nahrung. 1981;25(7):708–709.
Campbell SS, Dawson D, Zulley J. When the human circadian system is caught napping: evidence for endogenous rhythms close to 24 hours. Sleep. 1993;16(7):638–40.
Damiola F, Le Minh N, Preitner N, Kornmann B, Fleury-Olela F, Schibler U. Restricted feeding uncouples circadian oscillators in peripheral tissues from the central pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Genes Dev. 2000;14(23):2950–61.
Pittendrigh CS, Minis DH. The entrainment of circadian oscillations by light and their role as photoperiodic clocks. Am Nat. 1964;98(902):261–94.
Johnson CH. Forty years of PRCs-what have we learned? Chronobiol Int. 1999;16(6):711–43.
Khalsa SBS, Jewett ME, Cajochen C, Czeisler CA. A phase response curve to single bright light pulses in human subjects. J Physiol. 2003;549(3):945–52.
Minors DS, Waterhouse JM, Wirz-Justice A. A human phase-response curve to light. Neurosci Lett. 1991;133(1):36–40.
Honma K, Honma S, Wada T. Phase-dependent shift of free-running human circadian rhythms in response to a single bright pulse. Experientia. 1987;43(11–12):1205–7.
Czeisler CA, Kronauer RE, Allan JS, Duffy JF, Jewett ME, Brown EN, et al. Bright light induction of strong (type 0) resetting of the human circadian pacemaker. Science. 1989;244(4910):1328–33.
Boivin DB, Duffy JF, Kronauer RE, Czeisler CA. Sensitivity of the human circadian pacemaker to moderately bright light. J Biol Rhythms. 1994;9(3–4):315–31.
Ancoli-Israel S, Martin JL, Kripke DF, Marler M, Klauber MR. Effect of light treatment on sleep and circadian rhythms in demented nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(2):282–9.
Eastman CI, Gazda CJ, Burgess HJ, Crowley SJ, Fogg LF. Advancing circadian rhythms before eastward flight: a strategy to prevent or reduce jet lag. Sleep. 2005;28(1):33–44.
Pittendrigh CS. On temperature independence in the clock system controlling emergence time in Drosophila. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1954;40(10):1018–29.
Kalmus H. Periodizität und autochronie (ideochronie) als zeitregelnde eigenschaffen der organismen. Biologia generalis. 1935;11:93–114.
Sweeney BM, Hastings JW, editors. Effects of temperature upon diurnal rhythms. In: Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1960.
Wahl O. Neue untersuchungen über das zeitgedächtnis der bienen. Z Vgl Physiol. 1932;16(3):529–89.
Tsuchiya Y, Akashi M, Nishida E. Temperature compensation and temperature resetting of circadian rhythms in mammalian cultured fibroblasts. Genes Cells. 2003;8(8):713–20.
Barrett RK, Takahashi JS. Temperature compensation and temperature entrainment of the chick pineal cell circadian clock. J Neurosci. 1995;15(8):5681–92.
Buhr ED, Yoo S-H, Takahashi JS. Temperature as a universal resetting cue for mammalian circadian oscillators. Science. 2010;330(6002):379–85.
Bünning E, editor. Opening address: biological clocks. In: Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1960.
Winfree AT. Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators. J Theor Biol. 1967;16(1):15–42.
Pavlidis T. Populations of interacting oscillators and circadian rhythms. J Theor Biol. 1969;22(3):418–36.
Moore RY, Eichler VB. Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat. Brain Res. 1972;42:201–6.
Stephan FK, Zucker I. Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomotor activity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1972;69(6):1583–6.
Inouye S-I, Kawamura H. Persistence of circadian rhythmicity in a mammalian hypothalamic “island” containing the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76(11):5962–6.
Schaap J, Pennartz CM, Meijer JH. Electrophysiology of the circadian pacemaker in mammals. Chronobiol Int. 2003;20(2):171–88.
Sawaki Y, Nihonmatsu I, Kawamura H. Transplantation of the neonatal suprachiasmatic nuclei into rats with complete bilateral suprachiasmatic lesions. Neurosci Res. 1984;1(1):67–72.
Drucker-Colín R, Aguilar-Roblero R, García-Hernández F, Fernández-Cancino F, Rattoni FB. Fetal suprachiasmatic nucleus transplants: diurnal rhythm recovery of lesioned rats. Brain Res. 1984;311(2):353–7.
Balsalobre A, Damiola F, Schibler U. A serum shock induces circadian gene expression in mammalian tissue culture cells. Cell. 1998;93(6):929–37.
Yamazaki S, Numano R, Abe M, Hida A, Takahashi R-I, Ueda M, et al. Resetting central and peripheral circadian oscillators in transgenic rats. Science. 2000;288(5466):682–5.
Konturek P, Brzozowski T, Konturek S. Gut clock: implication of circadian rhythms in the gastrointestinal tract. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011;62(2):139–50.
Yoo S-H, Yamazaki S, Lowrey PL, Shimomura K, Ko CH, Buhr ED, et al. PERIOD2:: LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(15):5339–46.
Freedman MS, Lucas RJ, Soni B, von Schantz M, Muñoz M, David-Gray Z, et al. Regulation of mammalian circadian behavior by non-rod, non-cone, ocular photoreceptors. Science. 1999;284(5413):502–4.
Provencio I, Jiang G, Willem J, Hayes WP, Rollag MD. Melanopsin: an opsin in melanophores, brain, and eye. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(1):340–5.
Takahashi JS, DeCoursey PJ, Bauman L, Menaker M. Spectral sensitivity of a novel photoreceptive system mediating entrainment of mammalian circadian rhythms. Nature. 1984;308(5955):186.
Berson DM, Dunn FA, Takao M. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science. 2002;295(5557):1070–3.
Johnson RF, Moore RY, Morin LP. Loss of entrainment and anatomical plasticity after lesions of the hamster retinohypothalamic tract. Brain Res. 1988;460(2):297–313.
Cahill GM, Menaker M. Responses of the suprachiasmatic nucleus to retinohypothalamic tract volleys in a slice preparation of the mouse hypothalamus. Brain Res. 1989;479(1):65–75.
Ding JM, Chen D, Weber ET, Faiman LE, Rea MA, Gillette MU. Resetting the biological clock: mediation of nocturnal circadian shifts by glutamate and NO. Science. 1994;266(5191):1713–7.
Wang L, Schroeder A, Loh D, Smith D, Lin K, Han J, et al. Role for the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in mediating light input to the circadian system. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27(7):1771–9.
Schwartz WJ, Gross RA, Morton MT. The suprachiasmatic nuclei contain a tetrodotoxin-resistant circadian pacemaker. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84(6):1694–8.
Leak RK, Moore RY. Topographic organization of suprachiasmatic nucleus projection neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2001;433(3):312–34.
Pulivarthy SR, Tanaka N, Welsh DK, De Haro L, Verma IM, Panda S. Reciprocity between phase shifts and amplitude changes in the mammalian circadian clock. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(51):20356–61.
Yan L, Karatsoreos I, LeSauter J, Welsh D, Kay S, Foley D, et al., editors. Exploring spatiotemporal organization of SCN circuits. In: Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2007.
Schwartz W, Carpino A Jr, De la Iglesia H, Baler R, Klein D, Nakabeppu Y, et al. Differential regulation of fos family genes in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial subdivisions of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroscience. 2000;98(3):535–47.
Hamada T, Antle MC, Silver R. Temporal and spatial expression patterns of canonical clock genes and clock-controlled genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(7):1741–8.
Evans JA, Suen T-C, Callif BL, Mitchell AS, Castanon-Cervantes O, Baker KM, et al. Shell neurons of the master circadian clock coordinate the phase of tissue clocks throughout the brain and body. BMC Biol. 2015;13(1):43.
Yamaguchi S, Isejima H, Matsuo T, Okura R, Yagita K, Kobayashi M, et al. Synchronization of cellular clocks in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Science. 2003;302(5649):1408–12.
Aton SJ, Colwell CS, Harmar AJ, Waschek J, Herzog ED. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide mediates circadian rhythmicity and synchrony in mammalian clock neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(4):476.
Dibner C, Schibler U, Albrecht U. The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010;72:517–49.
Buijs RM, Chun SJ, Niijima A, Romijn HJ, Nagai K. Parasympathetic and sympathetic control of the pancreas: a role for the suprachiasmatic nucleus and other hypothalamic centers that are involved in the regulation of food intake. J Comp Neurol. 2001;431(4):405–23.
Scheer F, Ter Horst G, van Der Vliet J, Buijs R. Physiological and anatomic evidence for regulation of the heart by suprachiasmatic nucleus in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280(3):H1391–9.
la Fleur SE, Kalsbeek A, Wortel J, Buijs RM. Polysynaptic neural pathways between the hypothalamus, including the suprachiasmatic nucleus, and the liver. Brain Res. 2000;871(1):50–6.
Klein D, Smoot R, Weller J, Higa S, Markey S, Creed G, et al. Lesions of the paraventricular nucleus area of the hypothalamus disrupt the suprachiasmatic→ spinal cord circuit in the melatonin rhythm generating system. Brain Res Bull. 1983;10(5):647–52.
Kalsbeek A, Garidou ML, Palm IF, Van Der Vliet J, Simonneaux V, Pévet P, et al. Melatonin sees the light: blocking GABA-ergic transmission in the paraventricular nucleus induces daytime secretion of melatonin. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12(9):3146–54.
Kim J-S, Coon SL, Blackshaw S, Cepko CL, Møller M, Mukda S, et al. Methionine adenosyltransferase: adrenergic-cAMP mechanism regulates a daily rhythm in pineal expression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(1):677–84.
Perreau-Lenz S, Kalsbeek A, Pévet P, Buijs RM. Glutamatergic clock output stimulates melatonin synthesis at night. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(2):318–24.
Costes S, Boss M, Thomas AP, Matveyenko AV. Activation of melatonin signaling promotes β-cell survival and function. Mol Endocrinol. 2015;29(5):682–92.
Thomas AP, Hoang J, Vongbunyong K, Nguyen A, Rakshit K, Matveyenko AV. Administration of melatonin and metformin prevents deleterious effects of circadian disruption and obesity in male rats. Endocrinology. 2016;157(12):4720–31.
Ahluwalia A, Brzozowska IM, Hoa N, Jones MK, Tarnawski AS. Melatonin signaling in mitochondria extends beyond neurons and neuroprotection: implications for angiogenesis and cardio/gastroprotection. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(9):E1942–3.
Pevet P, Challet E. Melatonin: both master clock output and internal time-giver in the circadian clocks network. J Physiol Paris. 2011;105(4–6):170–82.
Kalsbeek A, Buijs RM. Output pathways of the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus: coding circadian time by transmitter selection and specific targeting. Cell Tissue Res. 2002;309(1):109–18.
Buijs RM, Kalsbeek A. Hypothalamic integration of central and peripheral clocks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(7):521.
Waite EJ, McKenna M, Kershaw Y, Walker JJ, Cho K, Piggins HD, et al. Ultradian corticosterone secretion is maintained in the absence of circadian cues. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;36(8):3142–50.
Buijs RM, Kalsbeek A, van der Woude TP, van Heerikhuize JJ, Shinn S. Suprachiasmatic nucleus lesion increases corticosterone secretion. Am J Physiol. 1993;264(6):R1186–92.
Ulrich-Lai YM, Herman JP. Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(6):397.
Valenta LJ, Elias AN, Eisenberg H. ACTH stimulation of adrenal epinephrine and norepinephrine release. Horm Res. 1986;23(1):16–20.
Kem DC, Weinberger MH, Gomez-Sanchez C, Kramer NJ, Lerman R, Furuyama S, et al. Circadian rhythm of plasma aldosterone concentration in patients with primary aldosteronism. J Clin Invest. 1973;52(9):2272–7.
Balsalobre A, Brown SA, Marcacci L, Tronche F, Kellendonk C, Reichardt HM, et al. Resetting of circadian time in peripheral tissues by glucocorticoid signaling. Science. 2000;289(5488):2344–7.
Stokkan K-A, Yamazaki S, Tei H, Sakaki Y, Menaker M. Entrainment of the circadian clock in the liver by feeding. Science. 2001;291(5503):490–3.
Edgar DM, Dement WC. Regularly scheduled voluntary exercise synchronizes the mouse circadian clock. Am J Physiol. 1991;261(4):R928–R33.
Piggins HD, Bechtold DA. Circadian rhythms: feeding time. Elife. 2015;4:e08166.
Akiyama M, Yuasa T, Hayasaka N, Horikawa K, Sakurai T, Shibata S. Reduced food anticipatory activity in genetically orexin (hypocretin) neuron-ablated mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(11):3054–62.
LeSauter J, Hoque N, Weintraub M, Pfaff DW, Silver R. Stomach ghrelin-secreting cells as food-entrainable circadian clocks. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13582–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906426106.
Gallardo CM, Darvas M, Oviatt M, Chang CH, Michalik M, Huddy TF, et al. Dopamine receptor 1 neurons in the dorsal striatum regulate food anticipatory circadian activity rhythms in mice. Elife. 2014;3:e03781.
Hirao A, Tahara Y, Kimura I, Shibata S. A balanced diet is necessary for proper entrainment signals of the mouse liver clock. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e6909.
Lamia KA, Sachdeva UM, DiTacchio L, Williams EC, Alvarez JG, Egan DF, et al. AMPK regulates the circadian clock by cryptochrome phosphorylation and degradation. Science. 2009;326(5951):437–40.
Qian J, Block GD, Colwell CS, Matveyenko AV. Consequences of exposure to light at night on the pancreatic islet circadian clock and function in rats. Diabetes. 2013;62:3469–78. https://doi.org/10.2337/db12-1543.
Gil-Lozano M, Mingomataj EL, Wu WK, Ridout SA, Brubaker PL. Circadian secretion of the intestinal hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1, by the rodent L-cell. Diabetes. 2014;63:3674–85. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-1501.
Yamajuku D, Inagaki T, Haruma T, Okubo S, Kataoka Y, Kobayashi S, et al. Real-time monitoring in three-dimensional hepatocytes reveals that insulin acts as a synchronizer for liver clock. Sci Rep. 2012;2:439.
Sun X, Dang F, Zhang D, Yuan Y, Zhang C, Wu Y, et al. Glucagon-CREB/CRTC2 signaling cascade regulates hepatic BMAL1 protein. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(4):2189–97.
Buxton OM, Lee CW, L’Hermite-Balériaux M, Turek FW, Van Cauter E. Exercise elicits phase shifts and acute alterations of melatonin that vary with circadian phase. Am J Physiol. 2003;284(3):R714–R24.
Yamanaka Y, Hashimoto S, Masubuchi S, Natsubori A, Nishide S-Y, Honma S, et al. Differential regulation of circadian melatonin rhythm and sleep-wake cycle by bright lights and nonphotic time cues in humans. Am J Physiol. 2014;307(5):R546–R57.
Tahara Y, Shiraishi T, Kikuchi Y, Haraguchi A, Kuriki D, Sasaki H, et al. Entrainment of the mouse circadian clock by sub-acute physical and psychological stress. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11417.
Javeed N, Rakshit K, Matveyenko A. Assessment of proinflammatory mediators of beta-cell circadian clock dysfunction in diabetes. Diabetes. 2018;67((Suppl 1):193-OR.
Wu Y, Tang D, Liu N, Xiong W, Huang H, Li Y, et al. Reciprocal regulation between the circadian clock and hypoxia signaling at the genome level in mammals. Cell Metab. 2017;25(1):73–85.
Burki T. Nobel Prize awarded for discoveries in circadian rhythm. Lancet. 2017;390(10104):e25.
Dunlap JC. Molecular bases for circadian clocks. Cell. 1999;96(2):271–90.
Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18(3):164.
Bunger MK, Wilsbacher LD, Moran SM, Clendenin C, Radcliffe LA, Hogenesch JB, et al. Mop3 is an essential component of the master circadian pacemaker in mammals. Cell. 2000;103(7):1009–17.
DeBruyne JP, Weaver DR, Reppert SM. CLOCK and NPAS2 have overlapping roles in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(5):543.
Zheng B, Albrecht U, Kaasik K, Sage M, Lu W, Vaishnav S, et al. Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock. Cell. 2001;105(5):683–94.
Vitaterna MH, Selby CP, Todo T, Niwa H, Thompson C, Fruechte EM, et al. Differential regulation of mammalian period genes and circadian rhythmicity by cryptochromes 1 and 2. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(21):12114–9.
Lee C, Etchegaray J-P, Cagampang FR, Loudon AS, Reppert SM. Posttranslational mechanisms regulate the mammalian circadian clock. Cell. 2001;107(7):855–67.
Forman BM, Chen J, Blumberg B, Kliewer SA, Henshaw R, Ong ES, et al. Cross-talk among ROR alpha 1 and the Rev-erb family of orphan nuclear receptors. Mol Endocrinol. 1994;8(9):1253–61.
Ripperger JA, Schibler U. Rhythmic CLOCK-BMAL1 binding to multiple E-box motifs drives circadian Dbp transcription and chromatin transitions. Nat Genet. 2006;38(3):369.
Hosoda H, Asano H, Ito M, Kato H, Iwamoto T, Suzuki A, et al. CBP/p300 is a cell type-specific modulator of CLOCK/BMAL1-mediated transcription. Mol Brain. 2009;2(1):34.
Etchegaray J-P, Lee C, Wade PA, Reppert SM. Rhythmic histone acetylation underlies transcription in the mammalian circadian clock. Nature. 2003;421(6919):177.
Glick E, Leshkowitz D, Walker MD. Transcription factor BETA2 acts cooperatively with E2A and PDX1 to activate the insulin gene promoter. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(3):2199–204.
Koike N, Yoo S-H, Huang H-C, Kumar V, Lee C, Kim T-K, et al. Transcriptional architecture and chromatin landscape of the core circadian clock in mammals. Science. 2012;338(6105):349–54.
Lamia KA, Papp SJ, Ruth TY, Barish GD, Uhlenhaut NH, Jonker JW, et al. Cryptochromes mediate rhythmic repression of the glucocorticoid receptor. Nature. 2011;480(7378):552.
Yang X, Wood PA, Ansell CM, Quiton DFT, Oh E-Y, Du-Quiton J, et al. The circadian clock gene Per1 suppresses cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth at specific times of day. Chronobiol Int. 2009;26(7):1323–39.
Grimaldi B, Bellet MM, Katada S, Astarita G, Hirayama J, Amin RH, et al. PER2 controls lipid metabolism by direct regulation of PPARγ. Cell Metab. 2010;12(5):509–20.
Kuhlman SJ, Silver R, Le Sauter J, Bult-Ito A, McMahon DG. Phase resetting light pulses induce Per1 and persistent spike activity in a subpopulation of biological clock neurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23(4):1441–50.
Obrietan K, Impey S, Smith D, Athos J, Storm DR. Circadian regulation of cAMP response element-mediated gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(25):17748–56.
Yan L, Silver R. Differential induction and localization of mPer1 and mPer2 during advancing and delaying phase shifts. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16(8):1531–40.
Vollmers C, Gill S, DiTacchio L, Pulivarthy SR, Le HD, Panda S. Time of feeding and the intrinsic circadian clock drive rhythms in hepatic gene expression. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(50):21453–8.
Reinke H, Saini C, Fleury-Olela F, Dibner C, Benjamin IJ, Schibler U. Differential display of DNA-binding proteins reveals heat-shock factor 1 as a circadian transcription factor. Genes Dev. 2008;22(3):331–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, M.R., Matveyenko, A.V. (2020). Biological Timekeeping: Scientific Background. In: Auger, R. (eds) Circadian Rhythm Sleep-Wake Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43803-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43803-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43802-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43803-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)