Abstract
How did the widespread and lasting assumption of an analogy between animal and human bodies affect ideas about the mind-body relationship? In particular, how did seventeenth-century men of science justify their employment of animal brains to talk about human brains and minds? Galenic ideas of the structure of the brain, based on animals, gave way to a multiplicity of ideas about the relationship between the brain and the mind (or soul). The continued reliance on animal models would seem to conflict with a new emphasis on specifically human structures and behaviors. But at the same time anatomists and philosophers also looked anew at animal cognition. The work of Marin Cureau de la Chambre, Niels Stensen, and Thomas Willis reveals some of these new ideas and the tensions that resulted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
von Staden 2013.
- 2.
Descartes 1985, I:141.
- 3.
Frank 1980.
- 4.
Vidal 2009.
- 5.
Atran 1987.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Wilson 1997 gives a good survey of the interpretive issues surrounding Aristotle’s concept of analogy, which I will not repeat here.
- 9.
Balme 1972, 148.
- 10.
Harrison 1998, 465.
- 11.
Balme 1972, 147–48.
- 12.
Lloyd 1975, 142.
- 13.
Galen 1956.
- 14.
Anatomia Cophonis 1927.
- 15.
Hippocrates 1978.
- 16.
von Staden 1989, 157–58.
- 17.
- 18.
Hankinson 1991.
- 19.
- 20.
Pranghofer 2009.
- 21.
Vesalius 1952, 3.
- 22.
Vesalius 1952, 4.
- 23.
Vesalius 1952, 6–7.
- 24.
Vesalius 1952, 39–40.
- 25.
Riolan 1628–29, 91.
- 26.
Du Laurens 1600, 531.
- 27.
Bynum 1973, 445.
- 28.
- 29.
Descartes 1985, I:107.
- 30.
Descartes 1985, I:100.
- 31.
Descartes 1985, III: 143.
- 32.
Bitbol-Hespériès 1990, 97; my translation.
- 33.
- 34.
Guerrini 2015.
- 35.
Bayle 1684, I:19–20.
- 36.
Cureau de la Chambre 1658, “Advis necessaire au lecteur”. All translations from Cureau de la Chambre are mine.
- 37.
Ibid.
- 38.
- 39.
See, for example, du Laurens 1600, Riolan 1628–29.
- 40.
Dictionnaire 1694.
- 41.
- 42.
- 43.
Cureau de la Chambre 1660b, 49–55.
- 44.
- 45.
Descartes 1985 III: 62–63.
- 46.
Chanet 1643, 47, 57.
- 47.
Chanet 1646, 2.
- 48.
Ibid., 4.
- 49.
Ibid., 120, 160–63.
- 50.
Cureau de la Chambre 1648, Epistre.
- 51.
Guerrini 2015.
- 52.
Cureau de la Chambre 1648, 4–5.
- 53.
- 54.
Cureau de la Chambre 1648, 275–390.
- 55.
Descartes 1985 I: 356, 360–61.
- 56.
Guerrini 2015.
- 57.
Stensen 1669, 5.
- 58.
Ibid., 13.
- 59.
Ibid., 13–14.
- 60.
Finger 1995.
- 61.
Stensen 1669, 21.
- 62.
Guerrini 2013.
- 63.
Stensen 1669, 36; Pecquet 1651.
- 64.
Stensen 1669, 54.
- 65.
Ibid., 55.
- 66.
Frank 1980, 126.
- 67.
- 68.
Willis 1672; Bynum 1973, 449.
- 69.
Willis 1667.
- 70.
See also Crignon 2017.
- 71.
Willis 1684, 46.
- 72.
Willis 1684, 46.
- 73.
Vesalius 1952.
- 74.
Willis 1684, 76.
- 75.
Ibid.
- 76.
Ibid., 100–101; Martensen 2004, 138–39.
- 77.
Willis 1684, 91–92.
- 78.
Frank 1980.
- 79.
Willis 1683, 41–42.
- 80.
Ibid., 153; Bynum 1973, 456.
- 81.
Knoeff 2004, 431.
- 82.
- 83.
Tyson 1680, 40.
- 84.
Tyson 1699, 54–55; Kruger 2003, 345–46.
- 85.
Tyson 1699, 55.
Bibliography
Anatomia Cophonis. 1927. In Anatomical texts of the earlier middle ages: A study in the transmission of culture with a revised Latin text of the Anatomia Cophonis and translations of four texts, ed. G.W. Corner. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution.
Aristotle. 1965. History of animals. Books 1–3, Trans. A.J. Peck. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Atran, Scott. 1987. Origin of the species and genus concepts: An anthropological perspective. Journal of the History of Biology 20: 195–279.
Balme, D.M. 1972. Aristotle’s De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bayle, Pierre. 1684. Nouvelles de la république des lettres, mars 1684.
Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 1990. Le principe de vie chez Descartes. Paris: Vrin.
Boas, George. 1933. The happy beast in French thought of the seventeenth century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bynum, William F. 1973. The anatomical method, natural theology, and the functions of the brain. Isis 64: 444–468.
Chanet, Pierre. 1643. Considerations de la sagesse de Charron. Paris: Claude Le Groult and Jean Le Mire.
———. 1646. De l’instinct et de la connoissance des animaux. Toussaincts De Gouy: La Rochelle.
Clarke, Desmond. 2003. Descartes’s theory of mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cranefield, Paul. 1961. A seventeenth-century view of mental deficiency and schizophrenia: Thomas Willis on ‘stupidity or foolishness’. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 35: 291–316.
Crignon, Claire. 2017. How animals may help us understand men. Thomas Willis’s anatomy of the brain (1664) & Two discourses concerning the Soules of Brutes (1672). In Human & animal cognition in early modern philosophy & medicine, ed. Stefanie Buchenau and Roberto Lo Presti, 173–185. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin. 1648. Traité de la connoissance des animaux. Paris: Pierre Rocolet.
———. 1658. Les charactères des passions. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Antoine Michel.
———. 1660a. Les charactères des passions. Vol. 2. Paris: Pierre Rocolet.
———. 1660b. Quelle est la connoissance des bestes, et iusques où elle peut aller. In Les charactères des passions. Vol. 2, separately paginated.
———. 1664. Le système de l’âme. Paris: Jacques Allin.
Descartes, René. 1985. Philosophical works of Descartes, ed. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dewhurst, Kenneth. 1968. Willis and Steno. In Steno and brain research in the seventeenth century, ed. Gustav Scherz, 43–48. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Dictionnaire de l’académie Française. 1694. https://artfl-project.uchicago.edu/content/dictionnaires-dautrefois. Accessed 30 Apr 2014.
Dolan, Brian. 2007. Soul searching: A brief history of the mind/body debate in the neurosciences. Neurosurgical Focus 23 (2007): 1–7.
du Laurens, André. 1600. Historia anatomica humani corporis. Paris: Marc Orry.
Finger, Stanley. 1994. Origins of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
———. 1995. Descartes and the pineal gland in animals: A frequent misinterpretation. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 4: 166–182.
Frank, Robert G. 1980. Harvey and the Oxford physiologists. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Galen. 1956. On anatomical procedures. Trans. Charles Singer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1962. On anatomical procedures, the later books. Trans. M.C. Duckworth, ed. M.C. Lyons and B. Towers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1968. On the usefulness of the parts of the body. Trans. Margaret Talmadge May. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Guerrini, Anita. 2013. Experiments, causation, and the uses of vivisection in the first half of the seventeenth century. Journal of the History of Biology 46: 227–254.
———. 2015. The courtiers’ anatomists. Animals and humans in Louis XIV’s Paris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hankinson, R.J. 1991. Galen’s anatomy of the soul. Phronesis 36: 197–233.
Harrison, Peter. 1998. The virtues of animals in seventeenth-century thought. Journal of the History of Ideas 59: 463–484.
Hippocrates. 1978. The Sacred Disease. In Hippocratic writings, ed. G.E.R. Lloyd. London: Penguin.
Knoeff, Rina. 2004. The reins of the soul: The centrality of the intercostal nerves to the neurology of Thomas Willis and in Samuel Parker’s theology. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 59: 413–440.
Kruger, Lawrence. 2003. Edward Tyson’s 1680 account of the ‘Porpess’: Brain and its place in the history of comparative neurology. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 12: 339–349.
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1961. The development of Aristotle’s theory of the classification of animals. Phronesis 7: 59–81.
———. 1975. Alcmaeon and the early history of dissection. Sudhoffs Archiv 59: 113–147.
Martensen, Robert L. 2004. The brain takes shape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pranghofer, Sebastian. 2009. ‘It could be seen more clearly in unreasonable animals than in humans’: The representation of the rete mirabile in early modern anatomy. Medical History 53: 561–586.
Riolan, Jean. 1628–29. Les oeuvres anatomiques. Paris: Denys Moreau.
Sorabji, Richard. 1993. Animal minds and human morals. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Stensen, Niels. 1669. Discours de Monsieur Stenon, sur L’anatomie du cerveau. Paris: Robert de Ninville.
Thomas, Keith. 1983. Man and the natural world. New York: Pantheon.
Tyson, Edward. 1680. Phocaena, or the anatomy of a Porpess. London: Benj. Tooke.
Vesalius. 1952. Vesalius on the human brain. Intro. and Trans. Charles Singer. London: Oxford University Press.
Vidal, Fernando. 2009. Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences 22: 5–36.
Von Staden, Heinrich. 1989. Herophilus the art of medicine in early Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2013. Writing the animal: Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, Galen. In Writing science: Medical and mathematical authorship in ancient Greece, ed. Markus Asper and Anna Maria Kanthak, 111–144. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Wild, Markus. 2008. Marin Cureau de la Chambre on the natural cognition of the vegetative soul: An early modern theory of instinct. Vivarium 46: 443–461.
Willis, Thomas. 1683. Two discourses concerning the Soul of Brutes. Trans. Samuel Pordage. London: Thomas Dring et al.
———. 1684. The anatomy of the brain. In Dr Willis’s practice of physick. London: for T. Dring et al., separately paginated.
Wilson, Malcolm. 1997. Analogy in Aristotle’s biology. Ancient Philosophy 17: 335–358.
Wright, John. 1991. The embodied soul in seventeenth-century French medicine. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History 8: 21–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guerrini, A. (2020). Animal Bodies and Human Minds: The Anatomy of the Brain and the Analogy of Nature. In: Manning, G. (eds) Testimonies: States of Mind and States of the Body in the Early Modern Period. Archimedes, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39375-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39375-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39374-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39375-5
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)