Skip to main content

Abstract

This essay discusses the relation between philosophical and scientific aspects of the topic of animal mentality. It defends the method of conceptual analysis both in general and with respect to the topic of animal minds (Sections 6.1–6.4). But it also argues for a type of conceptual analysis that is non-reductive and impure (Sections 6.5–6.6). This approach distinguishes the conceptual issues of philosophy from the factual issues of science, while being sensitive to the way in which these interact in specific questions, arguments, theories and research programmes. Philosophy is distinct from science, yet the two cannot proceed in isolation with respect to topics like that of animal minds, which pose both scientific and philosophical problems. A more specific reason for favouring impure conceptual analysis in the philosophy of psychology, but especially with respect to animal minds, is the importance of methodological issues which are neither straight-forwardly conceptual nor straightforwardly factual (Sections 6.7–6.8). Section 6.9 dwells on the connection between the proper analysis of mental concepts and our practice of applying many of them to animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C. Allen (2010) ‘Animal Consciousness’, The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, http://www.science.uva.nl/-seop/entries/consciousness-animal/.

  • C. Allen and M. Bekoff (1994) ‘Intentionality, Social Play and Definition’, Biology and Philosophy, 9(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Allen and M. Bekoff (1997) Species of Mind (Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Alvarez (2010) Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Austin (1970) Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bennett and P. M. S. Hacker (2003) Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carnap (1956) Meaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Cheney and R. M. Seyfarth (2007) Baboon Metaphysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • P. M. Churchland (1994) ‘Folk Psychology (2)’ in S. Guttenplan (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell), 308–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Dretske (2000) Perception, Knowledge and Belief (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Dupré (2002) Humans and Other Animals (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2009) ‘Hard and Easy Questions about Consciousness’ in H. J. Glock and J. Hyman (eds) Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 244–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (2003) Hume Variations (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Glock (1996) A Wittgenstein Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (2003) Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (2003a) ‘Neural Representationalism’, Facta Philosophica, 5(1), 147–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2008) What Is Analytic Philosophy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009a) ‘Can Animals Act for Reasons?’ Inquiry, 52(3), 232–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009b) ‘From Armchair to Reality? (Timothy Williamson’s Philosophy of Philosophy)’, Ratio (2010), XXIII(3), 339–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2012) ‘Mental Capacities and Animal Ethics’ in K. Petrus and M. Wild (eds) Animal Minds and Animal Ethics (New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. M. S. Hacker (1996) Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Centwy Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Hanfling (2000) Philosophy and Ordinary Language (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hume (1975) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Joyce (2006) The Evolution of Morality (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kripke (1980) Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Locke (1975) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Millikan (1984) Language, Thought and other Biological Categories (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. L. Morgan (1894) An Introduction to Comparative Psychology (London: Walter Scott).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997) Plato: Complete Works (Indianapolis: Hackett).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Povinelli and J. Vonk (2006) ‘We Don’t Need a Microscope to Explore the Chimpanzee’s Mind’ in S. Hurley and M. Nudds (eds) Rational Animals? (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 385–412.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • H. Putnam (1975) Mind, Language and Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • W. V. Quine (1951) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press), 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1970) ‘Philosophical Progress in Language Theory’, Metaphilosophy, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Ryle (1971) Collected Essays, Vol. II (London: Hutchinson).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sober (2009) ‘Parsimony and Models of Animal Mind’ in Robert W. Lurz (ed.) The Philosophy of Animal Minds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 250–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. P. Strawson (1963) ‘Carnap’s Views on Constructed Systems vs. Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy’ in P. A. Schilpp (ed.) The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Library of Living Philosophers (La Salle: Open Court), 503–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1992) Analysis and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Tomasello and J. Call (1997) Primate Cognition (Oxford: University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2006) ‘Do Chimpanzees Know What Others See — or Only What they are Looking At?’ In S. Hurley and M. Nudds (eds) Rational Animals? (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 371–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • A. White (1987) Methods of Metaphysics (London: RKP).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wild (2006) Die Anthropologische Differenz (Berlin: de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Hans-Johann Glock

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glock, HJ. (2013). Animal Minds: Philosophical and Scientific Aspects. In: Racine, T.P., Slaney, K.L. (eds) A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384287_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics