Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustaining Human Well-Being Across Time and Space—Sustainable Development, Justice and the Capability Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability, Capabilities and Human Security

Abstract

The politically influential idea of sustainable development (SD) is closely tied to the concept of intergenerational justice without clarifying what exactly is to be sustained across time and space. In developing an account of human development, the capability approach provides a partial theory of justice with a focus on intragenerational justice. This chapter first offers insights into the history of modern SD. Focusing on the ends rather than means of SD, it secondly analyses the appropriateness of using capabilities as sustainability goals. The chapter then examines how the Capability Approach (CA) could contribute to extending an intra- to an intergenerational theory of justice, before providing a summary of the contribution that the CA could make to the discussion on SD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the following, “sustainable development” and “sustainability” are used interchangeably.

References

  • Adams, W. M. (2006, January 29–31). The Future of Sustainability: Rethinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-First Century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting. Retrieved from http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf.

  • Alkire, S. (2005). Why the Capability Approach? Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). Human Development and Economic Sustainability. World Development, 28(12), 2029–2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., & Clift, R. (2005). Sustainable Development in Practice: Case studies for Engineers and Scientists. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2006). Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1997). Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice. Theoria, 45(89), 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, P. M. (2008). Sustainable Development Indicators: A Scientific Challenge, a Democratic Issue. Sapiens Journal, 1, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, F. (2009). Critical Natural Capital Revisited: Ecological Resilience and Sustainable Development. Ecological Economics, 68, 605–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown Weiss, E. (1989). In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Tokyo: The United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • BUND/MISERIOR. (1996). Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland: Ein Beitrag zu einer global nachhaltigen Entwicklung [Sustainable Germany: A Contribution to Global Sustainable Development]. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen, M., & Schmidt, S. (2011). A Formal Framework for Conceptions of Sustainability—A Theoretical Contribution to the Discourse in Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.518.

  • Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., NL Danigelis, J., Dickinson, C., Elliott, J. F., et al. (2007). Quality of Life: An Approach Integrating Opportunities, Human Needs, and Subjective Well-Being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A. (2010). Sustainable Development, Capabilities and the Missing Case of Mental Health in Figueroa. In M. B. Elling, E. Jelsøe, & K. A. Nielsen (Eds.), A New Agenda for Sustainability. Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A. (2013). Sustainable Development: Does the Capability Approach have Anything to Offer? Outlining a Legitimate Freedom Approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E., & Townsend, K. N. (1993). Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drexhage, J., & Murphy, D. (2010). Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012. New York: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions. London: Penguin Books Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eblinghaus, H., & Stickler, A. (1996). Nachhaltigkeit und Macht: Zur Kritik von Sustainable Development [Sustainability and Power: A Critique of Sustainable Development]. Frankfurt: IKO-Verlage für Interkulturelle Kommunikation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Thriving Beyond Sustainability: Pathways to a Resilient Society. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P., Folke, C., & de Groot, R. (2003). Identifying Critical Natural Capital. Ecological Economics, 44, 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. A. (2006). An Introduction to Sustainable Development (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Enquete-Kommission ‘Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt—Ziele und Rahmenbedingungen einer nachhaltig zukunftsverträglichen Entwicklung’. (1998). Konzept Nachhaltigkeit. Vom Leitbild zur Umsetzung [Concept Sustainability]. Abschlussbericht. Bundestagsdrucksache 13/11200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (1997). Indicators of Sustainable Development. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2011). Sustainable Development in the European Union: 2011 Monitoring Report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-31-11-224/EN/KS-31-11-224-EN.PDF.

  • Friends of the Earth. (1993). Action Plan Sustainable Netherlands. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friends of the Earth. (1995). Towards Sustainable Europe: The Study. Luton: Friends of the Earth Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, K. (1958). Affluent Society. London: Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwald, R., Leßmann, O., & Rechenauer, M. (2012). Intergenerational Justice. Thresholds and Capabilities; Paper to be Presented at the Annual Conference of the Human Development and Capability Association in Jakarta, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwald, R., Leßmann, O., Masson, T., & Rauschmayer, F. (2014). A Capability Approach to Intergenerational Justice? Examining the Potential of Amartya Sen’s Ethics with Regard to Intergenerational Issues. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(4), 1–14. Online first: April 23, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2014.899563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable Development: Mapping Different Approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. (1980). World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development/Prep. by the IUCN with the advice, Cooperation and Financial Assistance of the UNEP and the WWF in Collaboration with FAO and the Unesco. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2004). Models of Mammon: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey in Pursuit of the ‘Sustainable Consumer’. Working Paper Series, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Plane. London: Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. (2006). A Sufficientarian Approach? A Note. In A. Kaufman (Ed.), Capabilities Equality. Basic Issues and Problems (pp. 71–76). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopfmüller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Paetau, M., Banse, G., Coenen, R., & Grunwald, A. (2001). Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet: Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren [Integrative Sustainable Development: Elements, Principles, Indicators]. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, J., & Favor, C. (2008). Distributive Justice. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/justice-distributive/.

  • Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., Thompson, J., Millstone, E., Ely, A., Arond, E., Folke, C., & Olsson, P. (2012). Transforming Innovation for Sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04933-170211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leßmann, O. (2010, September 21–23). Sustainability and Rationality: Individual and Collective Responsibility in the CA. Paper Presented at the HDCA-Conference in Amman, Jordan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leßmann, O. (2011). Sustainability as a Challenge to the Capability Approach. In F. Rauschmayer, J. Frühmann, & I. Omann (Eds.), Sustainable Development—Capabilities Needs and Well-Being (p. 43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leßmann, O., & Rauschmayer, F. (2013). Re-conceptualising Sustainable Development on the Basis of the Capability Approach: A Model and Its Difficulties. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhyan, M. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York: The Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mebratu, D. (1998). Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18, 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Meyer (2009) ‘Intergenerationelle Suffizienzgerechtigkeit’, in Goldschmidt, Nils (ed.) Generationengerechtigkeit—Ordnungsökonomische Konzepte (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck), p. 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L., & Roser, D. (2009). Enough for the Future. In A. Gosseries & L. Meyer (Eds.), Intergenerational Justice (p. 219). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (1999). Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Elgar: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2010). Human Development and Sustainability. Human Development Research Paper, 2010/5, UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. In A. Kaufman (Ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (pp. 44–70). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2007). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press (Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (2011). The Overshadowing of Needs. In F. Rauschmayer, J. Frühmann, & I. Omann (Eds.), Sustainable Development—Capabilities Needs and Well-Being. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, K., & Döring, R. (2004). Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1989). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (2011). On What Matters: Volume II. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzoli, K. (1997). Sustainable Development: A Transdisciplinary Overview of the Literature. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40(5), 549–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polishchuk, Y., & Rauschmayer, F. (2012). Beyond “Benefits”? Looking at Ecosystem Services Through the Capability Approach. Ecological Economics, 81, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschmayer, F., & Leßmann, O. (2011). Assets and Drawbacks When Using the CA for Sustainability Economics. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1835–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschmayer, F., Omann, I., & Frühmann, J. (2011). Needs, Capabilities, and Quality of Life: Refocusing Sustainable Development. In F. Rauschmayer, J. Frühmann, & I. Omann (Eds.), Sustainable Development—Capabilities Needs and Well-Being. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice (orig ed.). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2013). Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, S. (Ed.). (2005). The Philosophy of Need. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 57. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable Development (1987–2005): An Oxymoron Comes of Age. Sustainable Development, 13, 212–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2009). Capabilities and theories of justice. In E. C. Martinetti (Ed.), Debating Global Society: Reach and Limits of the Capability Approach. Milan: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I., & van der Veen, R. J. (2007). Sustainable Quality of Life: Conceptual Analysis for a Policy-Relevant Empirical Specification. Bilthoven and Amsterdam: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency and University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the Circle? Some Thoughts on the Idea of Sustainable Development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J., Brand, F., Kopfmüller, J., & Ott, K. (2008). Building a ‘Theory of Sustainable Development’: Two Salient Conceptions Within the German Discourse. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 7, 465–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDSN. (2016). SDG Index & Dashboards. A Global Report. Gütersloh: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1980). Equality of What? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1983). Goods and People. In A. K. Sen (Ed.), Resources, Values, and Development (p. 509). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2001). Development as Freedom. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Serageldin, I., & Steer, A. (1994). Making Development Sustainable: From Concepts to Action. Washington: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1993, September). An Almost Practical Step Toward Sustainability. Resources Policy, 162–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Retrieved from http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.

  • Streeten, P. (1981). First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D. T., & McConnell, A. (2002). The Sacred Balance: A Visual Celebration of Our Place in Nature. Greystone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1972). Stockholm Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503.

  • UN. (1993). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Vol. I). Resolutions adopted by the Conference, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1997). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. Programme for further Implementation of Agenda 21. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2001). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies. Background Paper No. 3. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd/csd9_indi_bp3.pdf.

  • UN. (2002a). Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POIToc.htm.

  • UN. (2002b). Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, from our Origins to the Future. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POI_PD.htm.

  • UN. (2007). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf.

  • UN. (2008). Measuring Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/41414440.pdf.

  • UN. (2012). The Future We Want. Retrieved from http://www.uncsd2012.org/thefuturewewant.html.

  • UN. (2015). Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1997). Unser ökologischer Fußabdruck: Wie der Mensch Einfluss auf die Umwelt nimmt [Our Ecological Footprint]. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watene, K. (2013). Nussbaum’s Capability Approach and Future Generations. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 2–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our Common Future, edited. Retrieved April 03, 2010, from http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.

  • Wiggins, D. (1987). Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Torsten Masson

  2. University of Applied Sciences Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

    Torsten Masson

  3. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Ortrud Leβmann

  4. Munich School of Philosophy, Munich, Germany

    Rebecca Gutwald

Authors
  1. Felix Rauschmayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Torsten Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ortrud Leβmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rebecca Gutwald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ortrud Leβmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    Andrew Crabtree

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rauschmayer, F., Masson, T., Leβmann, O., Gutwald, R. (2020). Sustaining Human Well-Being Across Time and Space—Sustainable Development, Justice and the Capability Approach. In: Crabtree, A. (eds) Sustainability, Capabilities and Human Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38905-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation