Abstract
The chapter recapitulates the development of campaigning during the twentieth century, and it reflects changes in the nature of relationships among political parties and their voters. The discussion starts with Stein Rokkan’s concept of cleavages (which explains the origin of political parties in most European countries) and his finding about ‘freezing of the party systems’. In the first phase, voter loyalty was high; the overall purpose of party communication was to mobilise support at the right time. After WWII and the expansion of television, however, the situation changed. Voting became more individualised, and ideology became less important (at least for some) than image. Political parties also changed their approach to communication in this period: more customer-oriented and open to hiring polling, advertising, and other professionals to help with campaign planning, testing and execution. The purpose of campaigning broadened as well: besides the mobilisation of core voters, it aimed to persuade undecided and/or swing voters. The second part of the chapter explores concepts connected with campaigning which are important in understanding (post)modern political campaigns to serve as a basis for the understanding of the country case studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A leader and their personal traits can serve as heuristic, which facilitates the decision-making process (for a general discussion on heuristics in politics, see Lau 2003; cf. Popkin 1991; Lau and Redlawsk 2001; Lefevere 2011; McGraw 2000, 345–346; Sniderman et al. 1991, 19; Lupia 1994 and others).
Even a quick look at a candidate provides a voter with complex information about the candidate (like gender, age, race, overall likeability, etc.) and, in some cases, even about their political positions and competencies for holding office (in cases where the voter knows their party affiliation or simply based on stereotypes) (Fershtman et al. 2005; Rödin and Özcan 2013; Castillo and Petrie 2010; Schubert et al. 2011; Banducci et al. 2003; Buckley et al. 2007; Todorov et al. 2005).
References
Adam, Silke, and Michaela Maier. 2010. Personalization of Politics A Critical Review and Agenda for Research. Annals of the International Communication Association 34 (1): 213–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101.
Banducci, Susan, Michael Trasher, Colin Rallings, and Jeffrey Karp. 2003. Candidate Appearance Cues in Low-Information Elections. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. http://www.jkarp.com/pdf/apsa_2003.pdf.
Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanagh. 1999. The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596.
Buckley, Fiona, Neil Collins, and Theresa Reidy. 2007. Ballot Paper Photographs and Low-Information Elections in Ireland. Politics 27 (3): 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00297.x.
Castillo, Marco, and Ragan Petrie. 2010. Discrimination in the Lab: Does Information Trump Appearance? Games and Economic Behavior 68 (1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.04.015.
Crompton, John, and Charles Lamb. 1986. Marketing Government and Social Services. Chichester: Willey.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Eibl, Otto. 2016. Cesta k (experimentálnímu) výzkumu efektů osobnostní stránky politiky pod jednou konceptuální střechou: metodologická poznámka k výzkumu personalizace. European Electoral Studies 11 (1): 34–43.
Fershtman, Chaim, Uri Gneezy, and Frank Verboven. 2005. Discrimination and Nepotism: The Efficiency of the Anonymity Rule. The Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2): 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1086/429846.
Gibson, Rachel K., and Andrea Römmele. 2009. Measuring the Professionalization of Political Campaigning. Party Politics 15 (3): 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809102245.
Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Americanization, Globalization, Secularization: Understanding the Convergence of Media Systems and Political Communication. In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch, 25–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henneberg, Stephan. 2006. Leading or Following? A Theoretical Analysis of Political Marketing Postures. Journal of Political Marketing 5 (3): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v05n03_02.
Henneberg, Stephan, Margaret Scammell, and Nicholas O’Shaughnessy. 2009. Political Marketing Management and Theories of Democracy. Marketing Theory 9 (2): 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109103060.
Karvonen, Lauri. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Keith, Robert J. 1960. The Marketing Revolution. Journal of Marketing 24 (3): 35–38.
Kelley, Stanley. 1956. Professional Public Relations and Political Power. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems. In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. Joseph LaPalombra and Myron Weiner, 177–200. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Lau, Richard. 2003. Models of Decision-Making. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. David Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis, 19–59. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lau, Richard, and David Redlawsk. 2001. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–971. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334.
Lees-Marshment, Jennifer. 2001. The Marriage of Politics and Marketing. Political Studies 49 (4): 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00337.
Lefevere, Jonas. 2011. Campaign Effects on Voter Decision Making. PhD diss., University of Antwerp.
Lilleker, Darren. 2006. Key Concepts in Political Communication. London: Sage.
Lipset, Martin S., and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. The American Political Science Review 88 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944882.
Maarek, Phillipe. 2011. Campaign Communication & Political Marketing. Chichester: Willey-Blackwell.
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried Schulz. 1999. “Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication 16 (3): 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613.
McAllister, Ian. 2015. The Personalization of Politics in Australia. Party Politics 27 (3): 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813487111.
McGraw, Kathleen M. 2000. Contributions of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology. Political Psychology 21 (4): 805–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00217.
Norris, Pippa. 2000. The Evolution of Campaign Communication. In A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies, ed. Pippa Norris, 137–161. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pruysers, Scott, William P. Cross, and Richard S. Katz. 2018. Personalism, Personalization and Party Politics. In The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties, ed. William P. Cross, Richard S. Katz, and Scott Pruysers. London: ECPR Press.
Rahat, Gideon, and Tamir Sheafer. 2007. The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication 24 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739.
Reid, David. 1988. Marketing the Political Product. European Journal of Marketing 22 (9): 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005299.
Rödin, Magnus, and Gulay Özcan. 2013. Is It How You Look or Speak That Matters?: An Experimental Study Exploring the Mechanisms of Ethnic Discrimination. Working Papers 009, Bahcesehir University, Betam. https://ideas.repec.org/p/bae/wpaper/009.html.
Schubert, James N., Margaret A. Curran, and Carmen Strungaru. 2011. Physical Attractiveness, Issue Agreement, and Assimilation Effects in Candidate Appraisal. Politics and the Life Sciences 30 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.2990/30_1_33.
Shama, Avraham. 1976. The Marketing of Political Candidates. Academy of Marketing Science 4 (4): 764–777.
Sniderman, Paul, Richard Brody, and Phillip Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swanson, David L. 2004. Transnational Trends in Political Communication: Conventional Views and New Realities. In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch, 45–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swanson, David, and Paolo Mancini. 1996. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Westport: Praeger.
Thomassen, Jacques. 2005. Introduction. In The European Voter, ed. Jacques Thomassen, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Todorov, Alexander, Anesu Mandisodza, Amir Goren, and Crystal Hall. 2005. Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes. Science 308 (5728): 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589.
Wring, Dominic. 1996. Political Marketing and Party Development in Britain: A “Secret” History. European Journal of Marketing 30 (10/11): 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610149818.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eibl, O., Gregor, M. (2019). A Brief Historical Overview of Political Campaigning: Theories, Concepts, and Approaches. In: Eibl, O., Gregor, M. (eds) Thirty Years of Political Campaigning in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Campaigning and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27693-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27693-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27692-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27693-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)