Abstract
Mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) is a fast-growing, warm-season pulse crop that is primarily cultivated in developing countries in Asia. This crop has been showing a steady increase in production worldwide. Mung bean represents a good source of protein and contains higher folate and iron levels than other legumes. Moreover, it has a short lifecycle and can fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, making it ideal for intercropping with other major crops. Despite the importance of mung bean, there has been relatively little effort aimed at developing a breeding system for this crop, and genomic information is lacking compared to other legume species. Since mung bean has a small genome size, a short lifecycle, and is self-pollinating, it could be used as a model organism for studying legume plants. Moreover, the mung bean genome has recently been sequenced. The success of mung bean breeding depends on mining useful alleles from diverse germplasm and identifying markers closely associated with desirable phenotypes. The increasing affordability of high-throughput marker genotyping and the availability of a reference genome sequence will allow researchers and breeders to pinpoint the exact locations of genes and mutations that contribute to target phenotypes. Several research institutes and universities are currently constructing germplasm collections to maintain and secure mung bean genetic resources. Breeding via induced mutations and genetic engineering has helped improve mung bean cultivars, and genomic information from other well-studied legume species has been used to make up for the shortage of genomic information for mung bean. This chapter summarizes the current status of mung bean breeding, as well as genetic and genomic studies of this important crop.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Mung bean
- Biodiversity
- Domestication
- Developing countries
- Translational genomics
- Quantitative trait locus
- Synteny
10.1 Introduction
10.1.1 Botanical Classification and Distribution
Mung bean is a fast-growing , warm-season pulse crop belonging to the subgenus Ceratotropis of the genus Vigna in the papilionoid subfamily of the Fabaceae. This self-pollinating diploid crop has a chromosome number of 2n = 2x = 22 (Arumuganathan and Earle 1991). Mung bean is mainly cultivated in South, East, and Southeast Asia by smallholder farmers. Mung bean grows in frost-free areas within a wide range of latitudes from Asia to Africa, South America, and Australia (Nair et al. 2012). With a cultivation area of approximately 6 million hectares, Asia has the largest mung bean cultivation area, with India, China, Myanmar, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Indonesia, accounting for ~90% of world production (Lambrides and Godwin 2007). Among the Asian countries, India is the world’s largest producer of mung bean, accounting for over 50% of global annual production (Nair et al. 2012).
10.1.2 Importance
Mung bean represents a good source of dietary protein and has higher folate and iron contents than most other legumes (Keatinge et al. 2011). Mung bean roots fix atmospheric nitrogen via symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, leading to improved soil fertility and texture, making this plant valuable both economically and nutritionally (Graham and Vance 2003). Intercropping mung bean in rice-rice and rice-wheat systems increases the yields of subsequently planted cereal crops and reduces pest occurrence, as it improves soil quality and reduces the amount of nitrogen fertilizer required in the soil due to its residual effects (Faria et al. 1989; Yaqub et al. 2010). Mung bean can be consumed in the form of vegetable sprouts or cooked as an ingredient in soups, porridge, pancakes, noodles, ice cream or sweet paste for cake fillings, making it highly versatile for the human diet. In addition, mung bean forage is beneficial in the diet of sheep, without any negative effects, and the haulm is used as livestock feed (Agboola and Fayemi 1972; Garg et al. 2004). Consequently, the global consumption of mung bean increased by 22–66% from 1984 to 2006, and annual production has increased by a large percentage (Shanmugasundaram et al. 2009).
Mung bean is currently regarded as a major cash crop and has therefore attracted interest by the research community worldwide. Thus, efforts are underway to develop an international mung bean network to coordinate research activities among different research groups.
10.1.3 Domestication, Selection, and Early Improvements
Mung beanis believed to have been domesticated in India ~3500 years ago based on domesticated mung bean diversity data, morphological studies, and archeological evidence (Fuller and Harvey 2006; Jain and Mehra 1980; Singh et al. 1975; Vishnu-Mittre 1974). However, the wild form of mung bean, Vigna radiata var. sublobata, is indigenous to the subtropical and tropical regions of northern and eastern Australia and is widely distributed throughout Africa, Asia, and Australia (Lawn and Cottrell 1988). Based on studies of protein variation and enzyme diversity, mung bean in West Asia exhibits the greatest variation, and mung bean is presumed to have moved to other Asian countries and to Africa (Tomooka et al. 1992a; Dela Vina and Tomooka 1994). Therefore, modern mung bean cultivars have resulted from multiple rounds of domestication, and this plant is currently distributed throughout southern and eastern Asia, Africa, and Austronesia (Lambrides and Godwin 2007).
10.2 Cultivation and Traditional Breeding
10.2.1 Current Cultivation Practices
Mung bean is a short-day, warm-season crop. This crop grows for 90–120 days from planting to maturity during the warm season without frost conditions (Oplinger et al. 1990). The flowering of mung bean responds differentially according to day length. Short days hasten flowering, whereas long days delay flowering (Aggarwal and Poehlman 1977). Mung bean seeds require temperatures of at least 15 °C for planting, and the optimum temperature for growing mung bean is a mean temperature of 20–30 °C during the crop production period. Elevations should not exceed 1800–2000 m (Oplinger et al. 1990). Mung bean is mainly grown in semiarid to subhumid lowland tropics and subtropics with 600–1000 mm of annual rainfall. If water stress occurs during the reproductive stage, it has a negative impact on flower formation, leading to a decrease in total yields (Raza et al. 2012). High humidity and excessive rainfall can result in disease problems and low yields (Oplinger et al. 1990). Mung bean grows well under good drainage conditions in sandy loam rather than clay soil, with a pH of 6.3–7.2 (Oplinger et al. 1990). Mung bean can be sown at various row spacing, from 20 to 100 cm, and narrower rows can have potential yield benefits. In plants grown in narrower rows, the nitrogen fixation rate is 15–30% higher than in those grown in broad rows, and faster ground cover of narrow spacing can help suppress weeds (Taj et al. 2002).
10.2.2 Current Agricultural Problems and Challenges
The harvesting index of mung bean is low due to its indeterminate growth habit, late and nonsynchronous maturity, and losses due to abiotic and biotic stresses (Alam Mondal et al. 2011; Fernandez and Shanmugasundaram 1988). A major problem in mung bean cultivation is synchronicity. Mung bean has an indeterminate growth habit, and flowering and pod maturity do not occur at a uniform time but are typically spread out over a long period (Khattak et al. 2001; Tah and Saxena 2009). If harvesting is performed once at the peak of the early harvest period, a large portion of the yield potential is lost because the harvest accounts for only ~50% of the total yield that could be harvested. However, delaying harvest can also lead to yield loss because mature and dried pods may shatter or fall off, and are more likely to be exposed to pest and pathogen attack at this stage. Preventing yield loss by performing multiple harvests also has its challenges, as it results in additional costs, and each harvest must be performed with care to avoid damaging the plants, which could make the harvesting procedure and the use of mechanical tools inefficient (Iqbal et al. 2015).
Synchronous maturity is a primary objective of mung bean breeding programs, as it could contribute greatly to productivity and cost-effective harvesting. Although early and even pod maturity were shown to have a positive effect on grain yield, the genetic basis of this trait in mung bean is currently unknown (Afzal et al. 2003; Chen et al. 2008).
10.2.3 Traditional Breeding
The objectives of conventional mung bean breeding include high yields, uniform maturity, and resistance to Cercospora leaf spot, powdery mildew, mung bean yellow mosaic virus, bruchids, bean flies and mung bean pod borer (Tomooka et al. 2005). In general, wild species serve as sources of useful genes because the currently cultivated germplasm has a limited number of alleles, as many alleles have been lost due to a genetic bottleneck that has occurred during domestication and modern breeding programs (Hyten et al. 2006). Useful alleles from wild relative species have been used to improve modern mung bean cultivars (Doyle 1988; Kumar et al. 2011; Tanksley and McCouch 1997). For example, a bruchid-resistant mung bean cultivar has been developed by importing an allele from a wild mung bean relative, TC1996, which is completely resistant to bruchid beetles, Callosobruchus chinensis and C. maculatus; these pests result in serious yield losses during mung bean storage (Somta et al. 2008; Talekar 1988; Tomooka et al. 1992b). A yellow mosaic disease-resistant allele from Vigna mungo , a wild relative species, was transferred into cultivated mung bean and used to develop yellow mosaic virus-resistant mung bean cultivars (Basak et al. 2005; Gill et al. 1983; Singh 1980). Genetic maps have been constructed based on cultivated mung bean and wild mung bean accessions or related wild species, providing genetic information about agronomically-important traits such as seed quality, weathering tolerance and pest/disease resistance (Lörz and Wenzel 2007; Isemura et al. 2012; Lambrides et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2016). Since the importance of maintaining germplasms has become increasingly clear, several research institutions and universities are currently constructing germplasm collections to sustain mung bean genetic resources. AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center, Tainan, Taiwan, currently holds the world’s largest Vigna germplasm collection, consisting of 11,832 accessions (10,673 Vigna species, 881 V. angularis , 278 V. unguiculata), representing important resources for interspecific hybridization for mung bean cultivar improvement.
10.3 Germplasm Biodiversity and Conservation
10.3.1 Germplasm Diversity
The general goal of breeding is to accumulate useful alleles from various parental lines into a new plant variety. The first step in finding superior alleles or the individuals carrying them is to secure a germplasm pool with high genetic diversity. Essentially, breeders have to rely on existing natural DNA variation because DNA modification using genetic engineering is still limited and is even viewed unfavorably by the general public (Priest 2000). Therefore, the availability of natural genetic resources with rich variation is fundamental for successful breeding programs. Therefore, many institutes have been established for various research activities including mung bean germplasm conservation and cultivar improvement.
Mung bean germplasm is maintained at several centers throughout the world, including AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center, Taiwan; National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research; the Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; the Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit of the University of Georgia, USA and the University of the Philippines. Additionally, the Rural Development Administration (RDA), Korea, and the University of the Philippines house duplicates of some of the mung bean germplasm found in AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center (Ebert 2013; Kim et al. 2015). Mung bean core collections have also been established in China, India, Korea and the USA to allow breeders and researchers to have easier access to useful germplasm and to enable the efficient use of genetic resources. A core collection consisting of 1481 accessions and a mini-core collection consisting of 296 accessions were constructed by AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center based on phenotypic and molecular characterization using 20 SSR markers, respectively (Shanmugasundaram et al. 2009). Due to the importance of genetic diversity, molecular markers such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP ) markers have long been used to analyze germplasm and genetic diversity. These techniques have been applied to improve mung bean cultivars with a focus on yield, nutritional improvement, and disease resistance through linkage map construction.
10.3.2 Cultivar Characterization and Phylogeny
Kang et al. (2014) recently sequenced cultivated mung bean Vigna radiata var. VC1973A and obtained the transcriptome sequences of 22 Vigna accessions from 18 species (Table 10.1). Based on de novo transcriptome assembly, approximate divergence dates were calculated through phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 10.1). This phylogenetic study allowed the relationships of the two homoeologous genomes of the allotetraploid wild species, V. reflex-pilosa, to be traced. One genome was found to be closely related to V. trinervia (divergence date, 0.09 million years ago), and the other was found to be a sister to seven wild relatives (divergence date, 2.7 million years ago), suggesting that the diploid progenitor lineage has not been sampled or may be extinct. These studies have provided insights into the evolution within Vigna species, which may facilitate the improvement of mung bean cultivars.
10.4 Molecular Breeding
10.4.1 Molecular Marker-Assisted Breeding
The use of molecular marker systems has helped breeders identify loci associated with desirable phenotypes. Tracking the inheritance of a DNA segment with known benefits using molecular markers is more precise and efficient than traditional breeding (Collard and Mackill 2008). The recent availability of physical map data and the development of high-throughput marker genotyping based on high-coverage, whole-genome sequencing have facilitated forward genetics studies by increasing the resolution of physical maps and marker density within linkage groups (Huang et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2015).
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers were initially used to analyze the genetics of bruchid resistance in mung bean via forward genetics (Young et al. 1992). A total of 153 RFLP markers were grouped into 14 linkage groups covering 1295 centiMorgans (cM), with an average marker interval of 9.3 cM. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs ) for seed weight were also identified (Fatokun et al. 1992). The initial linkage map of mung bean, consisting of 11 linkage groups, was developed using RFLP markers from mung bean and an interspecific hybrid population generated between Vigna radiata ssp. radiata and V. radiata ssp. sublobata. The map consisted of 171 markers covering 1570 cM, with an average marker interval of 9 cM. Several important traits were mapped, such as seed size and resistance to powdery mildew and seed bruchids (Menancio-Hautea et al. 1992).
The first random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) study in mung bean was conducted to evaluate the genetic diversity among 23 accessions of wild and cultivated mung bean species including Vigna angularis , V. umbellata, V. radiata, V. aconitifolia and V. mungo (Kaga et al. 1996). By integrating 52 RFLP and 56 RAPD markers, a genetic map comprising 12 linkage groups was constructed from an F2 mapping population from a cross between V. radiata ssp. radiata and V. radiata ssp. sublobata (Lambrides et al. 2000). In addition, a genetic map consisting of 115 markers, covering 691.7 cM, was constructed using a recombinant inbred line derived from the previously examined F2 population. In addition, genes responsible for bruchid resistance were mapped to a linkage map constructed using both RFLP and RAPD markers (Kaga and Ishimoto 1998). A genetic map with higher marker density was subsequently constructed using RFLP markers alone (Humphry et al. 2002). Genetic diversity in mung bean was then assessed using RAPD and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers (Chattopadhyay et al. 2005).
Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are highly informative markers that are codominant, PCR-based, easy to generate and highly polymorphic in terms of repeat-length. The first SSR markers reported in mung bean were generated from 6 SSR sequences with 5 different types of motifs (Yu et al. 1999). Based on the close phylogenetic relationship between mung bean and adzuki bean, SSR markers from adzuki bean were used to evaluate genetic diversity in 415 cultivated, 189 wild and 11 intermediate mung bean accessions, and higher allelic polymorphisms were successfully detected in wild mung bean (Sangiri et al. 2008). Using partial linkage maps, SSR markers associated with resistance to powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot were identified (Chankaew et al. 2011; Kasettranan et al. 2010). Using 237 SSR markers from mung bean, cowpea, adzuki bean and common bean, and 193 expressed sequence taq (EST)-SSR markers from soybean, the 11 initial linkage groups were constructed, covering 727.6 cM (Isemura et al. 2012). In total, 105 QTLs and genes related to 38 domestication-related traits were identified. The positions of previously mapped genes and QTLs, such as the bruchid resistance gene, Br1, 100-seed weight QTLs and the gene controlling black mottle on the seed coat were corrected on the genetic map (Fatokun et al. 1992; Kaga and Ishimoto 1998; Lambrides et al. 2000).
Before the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) and high-throughput genotyping, the number of available polymorphic genetic markers represented a bottleneck to quantifying the genetic diversity of a population. The use of a limited number of markers can introduce bias in QTL studies because the sampled sequences may not represent the allelic diversity of the whole genome (Moragues et al. 2010). Due to advancements in NGS, researchers have focused on finding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs ) to be used as genetic markers. SNP markers are single base, biallelic, codominant, and ubiquitous over the genome (Brumfield et al. 2003). Two mung bean cultivars, Seonhwanogdu and Jangannogdu, were sequenced using the Illumina 454 sequencing platform to study resistance to stink bug (Riptortus clavatus) and adzuki bean weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis) (Moe et al. 2011). By comparing de novo assembled contigs from the two cultivars, 1334 and 1630 microsatellite repeat motifs, respectively, were identified, and 2098 single nucleotide variations were detected. A number of markers developed in this study have served as valuable resources for functional genomics studies by increasing the marker density of linkage maps. Cultivars Seonhwanogdu and Gyeonggijaerae5 were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform, and 265,001 homozygous SNPs were found.
These sequence variations identified in several mung bean cultivars can be analyzed in the context of their physical locations in the genome if a reference genome sequence is available. Seonhwanogdu (VC1973A), its polyploidy relative Vigna reflexo-pilosa var. glabra (accession V1160), and its wild relative V. radiata var. sublobata (accession TC1966) were sequenced and de novo assembled in 2014, and the reference genome sequence of mung bean was published (Kang et al. 2014). Along with the draft genome assembly, transcriptome assemblies from 22 accessions of 18 Vigna species were analyzed, facilitating genomic research in the subgenus Ceratotropis and providing insight into the evolution of Vigna species. In total, 2748 scaffolds covering 431 Mbp were anchored onto 11 pseudochromosomes using a high-density genetic map. This genetic map was constructed using 1321 SNP markers developed by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) from an F6 population of 190 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross between Seonhwanogdu (VC1973A) and Gyeonggijaerae5 (V2985). The N50 length is 1.62 Mbp, and ~80% of the estimated genome size (579 Mbp) is covered in this map. In total, 22,427 high-confidence protein-coding genes were annotated. Compared to the previous low-resolution linkage maps and fragmental genomic sequence information, this study represents an important milestone in Vigna genomic analysis. In total, 2,922,833 SNPs were revealed between wild and cultivated mung bean varieties across the genome at a frequency of 6.78 per 1 kbp. Among these SNPs, 63,294 are located in protein-coding sequence (CDS) regions, 30,405 of which represent nonsynonymous changes. Also, 55,689 of 342,853 insertions/deletions (InDels) are located around genic regions, resulting in frameshifts in 1057 genes. Microsatellite repeats (200,808 SSRs) were detected, which could possibly be used as SSR markers (Kang et al. 2014).
10.4.2 Functional Genomics
Molecular markers developed from transcriptome data are also highly informative because they are based on variations present in expressed regions of the genome. Since expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences for many crop species have been deposited in databases, data mining is a fast, cost-effective way to develop markers. In recent years, EST-based SSR markers have been developed for functional genomics studies in mung bean. Using 12,596 EST sequences from cv. Jangannogdu, 2299 SSR motifs were identified in 1848 EST sequences from which 97 PCR primer sets were designed and successfully amplified in two mung bean cultivars, TM96-2 and TARM-18 (Moe et al. 2011). Approximately 45% and 55% of the SSR motifs are located in CDS and untranslated regions (UTRs), respectively. Through data mining of the NCBI database for mung bean, EST-SSR markers were identified without incurring additional costs for sequencing (Chavan and Gacche 2014). Wang et al. (2015) used biotin-labeled oligo-probes and streptavidin-coated beads to construct an SSR-enriched library from six mung bean genotypes (ACC41, VC1973A, V2709, C01478, C01558, C01579) and discovered 308,509 SSR motifs. To characterize and validate SSR markers detected from in silico EST-SSR markers, the mung bean transcriptome was sequenced using Illumina paired-end sequencing (Chen et al. 2015). Putative SSR markers were identified by analyzing repetitive sequences in the assembled unigenes, and 13,134 EST-SSRs were detected. Among the primers designed from randomly chosen EST-SSRs, 66 primers were successfully amplified and found to be polymorphic among 31 mung bean accessions. By annotating the unigenes harboring SSRs verified by PCR, the possible effects of EST-SSRs were identified. These recent studies have resulted in the development of a number of SSR markers, thus resulting in advances in linkage map and QTL mapping analysis, which could further facilitate mung bean breeding programs.
10.4.3 Translational Genomics
Genomic information from well-studied species can be used to analyze other species; this concept is referred to as translational genomics (Varshney et al. 2015). By applying genomic information from model species to crops that are poorly understood, translational genomics has helped breeders and researchers improve and study various crops more easily (Stacey and VandenBosch 2005). Genomic sequences are currently available for mung bean, but few QTL studies have been performed. Several studies have been performed to characterize the mung bean genome using translational genomics. Flowering genes in mung bean have been identified using genome-wide comparisons between mung bean and Arabidopsis (Kim et al. 2014). In Arabidopsis, 207 genes are known to be involved in flowering, 129 of which are homologous to mung bean genes. Some of these genes are located close to SSR markers on a genetic map previously constructed for mung bean (Isemura et al. 2012). In addition, by comparing the mung bean and soybean genomes, five putative flowering-related genes in mung bean were found to be homologous to soybean flowering genes (Kim et al. 2014).
Comparative analysis between mung bean and soybean would facilitate analysis of mung bean, as SoyBase (the USDA-ARS soybean genetic database) lists over 1000 QTLs associated with more than 100 agronomically-important traits, such as seed weight, days to first flowering, seed oil content, plant height and so on. Based on sequence similarity and conserved synteny between soybean and mung bean, 1089 putative mung bean QTLs were identified using marker sequence information associated with QTLs in soybean (Table 10.2; Fig. 10.2) (Kim et al. 2015). For example, synteny blocks in soybean containing QTLs for seed weight and nematode resistance are homologous to synteny blocks in mung bean harboring QTLs for seed size/germination and bruchid resistance (Fig. 10.3) (Kang et al. 2014).
Another synteny analysis identified a candidate gene for QTLs found in mung bean (Fig. 10.4). A mung bean genomic region containing a QTL for both days-to-flowering and days-to-first-flowering has a syntenic relationship with a soybean genomic region containing QTLs for first flowering that mapped to key flowering genes encoding phytochrome A. Through this comparative analysis, a candidate flowering gene was identified in mung bean, as well as QTLs for flowering (Hwang et al. 2017). To date, a few QTL studies involving the identification of putative candidate genes for these QTLs have been conducted in mung bean. With the availability of the mung bean reference genome sequence , translational genomics studies could be performed, which would facilitate molecular studies in mung bean leading to functional characterization of the genes of interest.
10.5 Genetic Engineering
10.5.1 Limitations of Conventional Breeding
Efforts to develop new mung bean varieties via traditional breeding have achieved limited success due to the narrow genetic variation in this crop, as mung bean is a self-pollinated species, and only a few parental lines have been used repeatedly in breeding programs. In addition to increasing genetic diversity using wild relatives as breeding materials, the use of biotechnological tools for improving mung bean cultivars has emerged as a powerful way to overcome bottlenecks in mung bean breeding, as these tools enable key genes to be introduced into elite plant lines.
10.5.2 Regeneration in Mung Bean
The ability to regenerate whole plants through tissue culture allows genes to be transferred into plant cells, followed by regeneration to produce stably transformed plants (Chandra and Pental 2003). Progress in transgenic research in mung bean has been very slow due to its highly recalcitrant nature in tissue culture and its very low frequency of regeneration, especially after transformation (Dita et al. 2006; Eapen 2008; Varshney et al. 2015). Although several research studies have reported regeneration protocols for mung bean via embryogenesis (Kaviraj et al. 2006; Sivakumar et al. 2010) and organogenesis (Gulati and Jaiwal 1994; Himabindu et al. 2014; Rao et al. 2005), the regeneration efficiency is very low, except for a few reports using cotyledonary node explants (Amutha et al. 2006; Sagare and Mohanty 2015; Vijayan et al. 2006; Yadav et al. 2010). To date, there are only a few reports of the production of stably transformed mung bean where whole transgenic plants have been recovered and transgenes have been stably inherited and passed to subsequent generations (Baloda et al. 2017; Mahalakshmi et al. 2006; Sonia et al. 2007; Vijayan and Kirti 2012; Yadav et al. 2012).
10.5.3 Genetic Transformation
Genetic transformation in mung bean was first conducted using hypocotyls and primary leaves (Jaiwal et al. 2001). A binary vector containing the reporter gene GUS and the selection marker nptII was successfully transformed into mung bean. Mahalakshmi et al. (2006) developed a genotype-independent, high-frequency plant regeneration protocol for mung bean with a survival rate of ~90% and successfully transformed primary leaf explants. Subsequently, the insecticidal α-amylase inhibitor-1 gene from Phaseolus vulgaris and the bialaphos resistance (bar) gene were successfully expressed in mung bean using cotyledonary node explants (Sonia et al. 2007). After introducing a pathogenesis-related gene (BjNPR1) from mustard into mung bean, transgenic mung bean plants showed resistance against fungal-related diseases (Vijayan and Kirti 2012). Yadav et al. (2012) transformed the annexin 1 bj gene into mung bean and the resulting transgenic plants showed improved drought stress tolerance. Transgenic mung bean plants with increased salt tolerance were obtained by introducing the codA gene into mung bean (Baloda et al. 2017).
Despite its recalcitrant nature in tissue culture and its low regeneration frequency, researchers have developed protocols for regenerating and transforming mung bean at high frequency. Although DNA modification of food crops is viewed negatively by consumers, genetic engineering can help save time and labor, thereby overcoming the limitations of traditional breeding. Advances in the development of biotechnological tools, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) Cas9/dCas9, and their successful application to food crops might help mitigate public concerns while improving mung bean cultivars (Ran et al. 2013).
10.6 Mutation Breeding
10.6.1 Mutagenesis and Genetic Diversity
Conventional breeding methods have limited effects in enhancing yields in mung bean due to their low genetic variability within the existing germplasm. There has been a continuous decline in the genetic diversity of this crop, prompting breeders to induce mutations artificially. Inducing mutations using physical and chemical mutagens can be one of the most effective ways to create genetic variability. This technique has played a key role in modern plant breeding and genetic studies (Raina et al. 2016).
10.6.2 Cultivars Developed by Mutagenesis
Several mutagens have been used in mung bean, including ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS ), sodium azide (SA), hydrazine hydrate (HZ) and gamma rays. Significant increases in the number of fertile branches and pods as well as seed yields were detected in mutant mung bean obtained through the use of EMS and HZ (Wani 2006). Several mung bean cultivars were treated with EMS and gamma rays, thereby generating genetic variability and leading to the development of new cultivars with high yields and increased resistance to bean fly infestation (Khan and Goyal 2009; Wani 2006). Mutants with variegated leaves or synchronous pod maturity were obtained through the use of gamma irradiation (Sangsiri et al. 2007; Tah and Saxena 2009). SA, EMS, and gamma rays were used to produce a wide range of viable morphological and physiological mutants (Auti and Apparao 2009). To date, 39 mutant mung bean cultivars have been officially released, including cultivars derived from crossing with mutant varieties (Table 10.3). The availability of these varieties increases genetic diversity, and they provide breeding materials for conventional plant breeding, thus contributing to the genetic improvement of mung bean. The mutagens that were used to produce these varieties are not targeted to specific genetic regions, and the casual variations resulting from mutagenesis have not been identified. The availability of the mung bean reference genome combined with recent advances in targeted mutagenesis and sequencing techniques will enable researchers and breeders to identify the casual variations induced by mutagens, thereby facilitating forward genetics analysis to characterize the links between genes and phenotypes (Kang et al. 2014; Ran et al. 2013). Mutation-assisted plant breeding will play a crucial role in the generation of optimized crop cultivars to migrate the threats posed by global climate change and food shortages.
10.7 Diseases in Mung Bean
10.7.1 Impact of Pathogens
Numerous types of pathogens affect mung bean, including viruses, fungi, bacteria and nematodes. Diseases in mung bean can affect various tissues, including but not limited to seeds, leaves, flowers, roots and stems. Pathogens can reduce mung bean yields by affecting nearly all stages of development, including seed germination, shoot development, flower development and so on. These reduced yields can have a detrimental impact on the wellbeing of the many people dependent on mung bean. A complete list of pests that use mung bean as a major and minor host can be found at the Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI, https://www.cabi.org/) (Tables 10.4 and 10.5). However, few cultivars have been bred for full resistance against such pathogens, and few studies have focused on the identification and characterization of pathogens of mung bean.
10.7.2 Viral Pathogens
One of the best-studied viruses in mung bean is the geminivirus mung bean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV). This virus is composed of two DNA components, DNA 1 and DNA 2, each comprising roughly 2.7 kb; the full reference genome for MYMV is currently available (Morinaga et al. 1993). The leaves of MYMV-infected plants show yellow discoloration. MYMV is the most devastating virus in mung bean, with yield losses of up to 85% (Karthikeyan et al. 2014). There are currently no fully-resistant cultivars available, and even highly resistant lines show high levels of variation, depending on the geographic location (Nair et al. 2017). MYMV is transmitted by the tobacco whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.), a vector of many other geminiviruses as well, including other mung bean viral diseases such as mung bean yellow India mosaic virus (MYIMV) (Baker et al. 2013; Markham et al. 1994). Fortunately, as tobacco whitefly is one of the most important crop disease vectors, its occurrence, distribution and transmission mechanisms are well understood, which could potentially help combat the spread of MYMV in mung bean. There is no clear consensus on whether the MYMV resistance genes are monogenic or digenic traits, which in theory could make breeding resistant plants easier; however, variations in pathogen load and other factors could make the breeding process more difficult (Alam et al. 2014).
10.7.3 Fungal Pathogens
Traditionally, fungi are not well-studied. Only recently, owing to rapid improvements in molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and NGS, have mycologists been able to grasp the scale of this kingdom and to accurately identify fungal species (Blackwell 2011; Hawksworth and Rossman 1997). This improvement in molecular techniques will indeed lead to better fungal identification and allow for better diagnosis of fungal diseases in mung bean. One of the most important fungal pathogens is Cercospora canescens Ellis & G. Martin, which causes the foliar disease known as Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) in mung bean and other agriculturally-important plants. Cercospora canescens belongs to the Ascomycota phylum, which contains many other important plant and human pathogens. This pathogen also infects other closely-related legume species such as Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) and Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) (Dhingra and Asmus 1983; Williams 1975). Even though it can reduce yields by approximately 40%, there is little consensus on the genetic basis for CLS resistance, and whether the resistance gene is monogenic or multigenic is a source of disagreement (Chankaew et al. 2011). What makes breeding CLS-resistant lines or cultivars more difficult is the variation of C. canescens among strains, even when isolated from the same region and the same host (mung bean). This pathogen shows variation in terms of pigmentation and mycelial characteristics, as well as genetic markers such as ITS and RAPD markers (Joshi et al. 2006). Indeed, the natural variation in this species may hinder the development of CLS-resistant lines.
10.7.4 Bacterial Pathogens
Traditionally, isolating and culturing pure microorganisms has been difficult, especially for obligate pathogens, as artificial or natural medium may not be able to replicate the niche of the pathogen due to our limited understanding of a particular organism (Stewart 2012). Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli, previously known as Xanthomonas phaseoli, belongs to the class of gammaproteobacteria that causes bacterial leaf blight. Depending on the pathovar, this bacterium can affect a wide range of plant species, from legumes (pv. phaseoli) to citrus (pv. citri). Xanthomonas axonopodis affects a wide range of hosts, including common beans, mung bean, black gram, cowpea and so on. One of the most effective prevention methods for X. axonopodis is pretreating seeds since they represent the primary source of this pathogen (Baker and Smith 1966). Xanthomonas axonopodis has potentially devastating effects on crop yields and poses one of the major constraints to common bean production in Ethiopia, as it causes common bean blight (Belete and Bastas 2017). However, it is not yet clear whether this is also the case in mung bean.
10.7.5 Nematodes Affecting Mung Bean
Nematodes, belonging to the kingdom Animalia, include various pathogens affecting animals and plants. Although they are often viewed as having harmful impacts on agriculture or human health, some nematodes play important roles in ecology, such as the essential cycling of nutrients and toxins alike (Barker et al. 1994). Heterodera cajani Koshy (pigeon pea cyst nematode, also referred to as Heterodera vigni Edward & Misra), is a nematode that infects crops such as pigeon pea, mung bean and some Phaseolus species. Nematodes can affect both the dry matter content and grain yield of crops. In some cases, up to 86% of grain yield can be lost due to nematodes. Furthermore, to properly control nematodes, a population-monitoring system is required throughout the growth period (Saxena and Reddy 1987). Various methods have been tested for their nematocidal efficiency against H. cajani, including using fungi or essential oil derived from herbs (Sangwan et al. 1990; Siddiqui and Mahmood 1996).
10.8 Conclusion and Prospects
As mung bean has become an important crop in many Asian countries due to its high nutritional contents, most studies in mung bean have focused on yield-related traits, such as resistance to yellow mosaic disease (Kitsanachandee et al. 2013), bruchid (Mei et al. 2009), Cercospora leaf spot (Chankaew et al. 2011) and other domestication-related traits (Isemura et al. 2012). Since mung bean is mainly cultivated in developing countries, relatively little attention has been paid to this crop, and progress in mung bean breeding has been slow due to the lack of genomic information. In 2014, the reference genome sequence of mung bean was published, allowing breeders and researchers to study the genetic and genomic backgrounds of agronomically-important traits. A number of markers and putative QTLs have been developed based on this genome sequence, along with phenotypic data, represent valuable resources for identifying and locating casual genes for important traits. The use of genomic information from other legume species, especially soybean, will help researchers investigate QTLs and identify candidate genes in mung bean through analysis of sequence similarity and synteny.
A mung bean core collection consisting of 1481 accessions developed by AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center has been used to evaluate various agronomic traits, such as plant height, flowering time, 1000 seed weight and so on (Schafleitner et al. 2015). This collection could be valuable for genome-wide association studies (GWAS ) to further detect promising candidate genes.
Collections of wild mung beans from diverse origins grown under different climatic conditions are needed. Analysis of the genetic diversity of these lines would help breeders develop cultivars that can grow in semiarid regions by investigating allelic variations in beneficial traits, especially drought tolerance. As mung bean is a fast-growing crop with a small genome, it represents a good model system for genomic studies of legume species. The recent availability of a mung bean reference genome sequence has facilitated translational genomics studies using the well-studied soybean genome, which could in turn facilitate QTL analysis, GWAS and candidate gene identification in mung bean.
References
Afzal M, Bakr M, Luna NK et al (2003) Registration of ‘Barimung-5’ mungbean. Crop Sci 43:2304–2306
Agboola AA, Fayemi AA (1972) Fixation and excretion of nitrogen by tropical legumes. Agron J 64:409–412
Aggarwal DV, Poehlman JM (1977) Effects of photoperiod and temperature on flowering in mungbean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Euphytica 26:207–219
Alam Mondal MM, Ali Fakir MS, Juraimi AS et al (2011) Effects of flowering behavior and pod maturity synchrony on yield of mungbean [‘Vigna radiata’(L.) Wilczek]. Aust J Crop Sci 5(8):945–953
Alam AM, Somta P, Srinives P (2014) Identification and confirmation of quantitative trait loci controlling resistance to mungbean yellow mosaic disease in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Mol Breed 34:1497–1506
Amutha S, Muruganantham M, Ganapathi A (2006) Thidiazuron-induced high-frequency axillary and adventitious shoot regeneration in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 42:26–30
Arumuganathan K, Earle E (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Report 9:208–218
Auti S, Apparao B (2009) Induced mutagenesis in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). In: Shu QY (ed) Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. FAO/IAEA, Rome, pp 107–110
Baker KF, Smith SH (1966) Dynamics of seed transmission of plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 4:311–332
Baker R, Bragard C, Candresse T et al (2013) Scientific opinion on the risks to plant health posed by Bemisia tabaci species complex and viruses it transmits for the EU territory. EFSA J 11:3162
Baloda A, Madanpotra S, Aiwal PKJ (2017) Transformation of mungbean plants for salt and drought tolerance by introducing a gene for an osmoprotectant glycine betaine. J Plant Stress Physiol 3:5–11
Barker K, Hussey R, Krusberg L et al (1994) Plant and soil nematodes: societal impact and focus for the future. J Nematol 26:127
Basak J, Kundagrami S, Ghose T, Pal A (2005) Development of yellow mosaic virus (YMV) resistance linked DNA marker in Vigna mungo from populations segregating for YMV-reaction. Mol Breed 14:375–383
Belete T, Bastas K (2017) Common bacterial blight (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli) of beans with special focus on Ethiopian condition. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 8:403. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000403
Blackwell M (2011) The fungi: 1, 2, 3… 5.1 million species? Am J Bot 98:426–438
Brumfield RT, Beerli P, Nickerson DA, Edwards SV (2003) The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history. Trends Ecol Evol 18:249–256
Chandra A, Pental D (2003) Regeneration and genetic transformation of grain legumes: an overview. Curr Sci 84:381–387
Chankaew S, Somta P, Sorajjapinun W, Srinives P (2011) Quantitative trait loci mapping of Cercospora leaf spot resistance in mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Mol Breed 28:255–264
Chattopadhyay K, Ali MN, Sarkar H et al (2005) Diversity analysis by RAPD and ISSR markers among the selected mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 65:173–175
Chavan SP, Gacche R (2014) Identification and characterization of EST-SSRs in mungbean. Webmedcentral 5:WMC004598. https://doi.org/10.9754/journal.wmc.2014.004598
Chen L-R, Markhart AH, Shanmugasundaram S, Lin T-Y (2008) Early developmental and stress responsive ESTs from mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek, seedlings. Plant Cell Rep 27:535–552
Chen H, Wang L, Wang S et al (2015) Transcriptome sequencing of mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) genes and the identification of EST-SSR markers. PLoS One 10:e0120273
Collard BC, Mackill DJ (2008) Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 363:557–572
de Faria S, Lewis G, Sprent J, Sutherland J (1989) Occurrence of nodulation in the Leguminosae. New Phytol 111:607–619
Dela Vina AC, Tomooka N (Philippines ULB (1994) Genetic diversity in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] based on two enzyme systems. Philipp J Crop Sci 19(1):1–9
Dhingra O, Asmus G (1983) An efficient method of detecting Cercospora canescens in bean seeds. Trans Br Mycol Soc 81:425–426
Dita MA, Rispail N, Prats E et al (2006) Biotechnology approaches to overcome biotic and abiotic stress constraints in legumes. Euphytica 147:1–24
Doyle J (1988) 5S ribosomal gene variation in the soybean and its progenitor. Theor Appl Genet 75:621–624
Eapen S (2008) Advances in development of transgenic pulse crops. Biotechnol Adv 26:162–168
Ebert AW (2013) Ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources of major vegetables. In: Normah MN, Chin HF, Reed BM (eds) Conservation of tropical plant species. Springer, New York, pp 373–417
Fatokun CA, Menancio-Hautea DI, Danesh D, Young ND (1992) Evidence for orthologous seed weight genes in cowpea and mung bean based on RFLP mapping. Genetics 132:841–846
Fernandez G, Shanmugasundaram S (1988) The AVRDC mungbean improvement program: the past, present and future. In: Shanmugasundaram S, McLean BT (eds) Mungbean: proceedings of the second international symposium. AVRDC, Shanhua, pp 58–70
Fuller DQ, Harvey EL (2006) The archaeobotany of Indian pulses: identification, processing and evidence for cultivation. Environ Archaeol 11:219–246
Garg D, Arya R, Sharma T, Dhuria R (2004) Effect of replacement of sewan straw (Lasirus sindicus) by moong (Phaseolus aureus) chara on rumen and haemato-biochemical parameters in sheep. Vet Pract 5:70–73
Gill A, Verma M, Dhaliwal H, Sandhu T (1983) Interspecific transfer of resistance to mungbean yellow mosaic virus from Vigna mungo to Vigna radiata. Curr Sci 52:31–33
Graham PH, Vance CP (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131:872–877
Gulati A, Jaiwal PK (1994) Plant regeneration from cotyledonary node explants of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Plant Cell Rep 13:523–527
Hawksworth DL, Rossman AY (1997) Where are all the undescribed fungi? Phytopathology 87:888–891
Himabindu Y, Reddy M, Chandrasekhar T (2014) In vitro regeneration of green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) cultivar Vamban-2 using cotyledonary nodes. CIB Tech J Biotechnol 3:11–15
Huang X, Sang T, Zhao Q et al (2010) Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet 42:961–967
Humphry M, Konduri V, Lambrides C et al (2002) Development of a mungbean (Vigna radiata) RFLP linkage map and its comparison with lablab (Lablab purpureus) reveals a high level of colinearity between the two genomes. Theor Appl Genet 105:160–166
Hwang WJ, Ha J, Lee T et al (2017) A candidate flowering gene in mungbean is homologous to a soybean Phytochrome A gene. Euphytica 213:79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1866-8
Hyten DL, Song Q, Zhu Y et al (2006) Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:16666–16671
Iqbal J, Ahsan M, Saleem M, Ali A (2015) Appraisal of gene action for indeterminate growth in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Front Plant Sci 6:665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00665
Isemura T, Kaga A, Tabata S et al (2012) Construction of a genetic linkage map and genetic analysis of domestication related traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata). PLoS One 7:e41304
Jain H, Mehra K (1980) Evolution, adaptation, relationships, and uses of the species of Vigna cultivated in India. In: Summerfield RJ, Bunting AH (eds) Advances in legume science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 459–468
Jaiwal PK, Kumari R, Ignacimuthu S et al (2001) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) – a recalcitrant grain legume. Plant Sci 161:239–247
Joshi A, Souframanien J, Chand R, Pawar S (2006) Genetic diversity study of Cercospora canescens (Ellis & Martin) isolates, the pathogen of Cercospora leaf spot in legumes. Curr Sci 90:564–568
Kaga A, Ishimoto M (1998) Genetic localization of a bruchid resistance gene and its relationship to insecticidal cyclopeptide alkaloids, the vignatic acids, in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Mol Gen Genet 258:378–384
Kaga A, Tomooka N, Egawa Y et al (1996) Species relationships in the subgenus Ceratotropis (genus Vigna) as revealed by RAPD analysis. Euphytica 88:17–24
Kang YJ, Kim SK, Kim MY et al (2014) Genome sequence of mungbean and insights into evolution within Vigna species. Nat Commun 5:5443
Karthikeyan A, Shobhana VG, Sudha M et al (2014) Mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV): a threat to green gram (Vigna radiata) production in Asia. Int J Pest Manag 60:314–324
Kasettranan W, Somta P, Srinives P (2010) Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling powdery mildew resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). J Crop Sci Biotechnol 13:155–161
Kaviraj C, Kiran G, Venugopal R et al (2006) Somatic embryogenesis and plant generation from cotyledonary explants of green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]- a recalcitrant grain legume. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 42:134–138
Keatinge J, Easdown W, Yang R et al (2011) Overcoming chronic malnutrition in a future warming world: the key importance of mungbean and vegetable soybean. Euphytica 180:129–141
Khan S, Goyal S (2009) Improvement of mungbean varieties through induced mutations. African J Plant Sci 3:174–180
Khattak G, Haq M, Ashraf M et al (2001) Detection of epistasis, and estimation of additive and dominance components of genetic variation for synchrony in pod maturity in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Field Crop Res 72:211–219
Kim SK, Lee T, Kang YJ et al (2014) Genome-wide comparative analysis of flowering genes between Arabidopsis and mungbean. Genes Genomics 36:799–808
Kim SK, Nair RM, Lee J, Lee S-H (2015) Genomic resources in mungbean for future breeding programs. Front Plant Sci 6:626. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00626
Kitsanachandee R, Somta P, Chatchawankanphanich O et al (2013) Detection of quantitative trait loci for mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV) resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) in India and Pakistan. Breed Sci 63:367–373
Kumar J, Choudhary AK, Solanki RK, Pratap A (2011) Towards marker-assisted selection in pulses: a review. Plant Breed 130:297–313
Lambrides C, Godwin I (2007) Mungbean. In: Kole C (ed) Pulses, sugar and tuber crops. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–90
Lambrides C, Lawn R, Godwin I et al (2000) Two genetic linkage maps of mungbean using RFLP and RAPD markers. Aust J Agric Res 51:415–425
Lawn R, Cottrell A (1988) Wild mungbean and its relatives in Australia. Biologist 35(5):267–273
Lörz H, Wenzel G (2007) Molecular marker systems in plant breeding and crop improvement. Springer, Berlin
Mahalakshmi LS, Leela T, Kumar SM et al (2006) Enhanced genetic transformation efficiency of mungbean by use of primary leaf explants. Curr Sci 91:93–99
Markham PG, Bedford ID, Liu S, Pinner MS (1994) The transmission of geminiviruses by Bemisia tabaci. Pest Manag Sci 42:123–128
Mei L, Cheng X, Wang S et al (2009) Relationship between bruchid resistance and seed mass in mungbean based on QTL analysis. Genome 52:589–596
Menancio-Hautea D, Kumar L, Danesh D, Young N (1992) A genome map for mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] based on DNA genetic markers (2n= 2x= 22). In: O’Brien SJ (ed) Genome maps. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, pp 259–261
Moe KT, Chung J, Cho Y et al (2011) Sequence information on simple sequence repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms through transcriptome analysis of mungbean. J Integr Plant Biol 53:63–73
Moragues M, Comadran J, Waugh R et al (2010) Effects of ascertainment bias and marker number on estimations of barley diversity from high-throughput SNP genotype data. Theor Appl Genet 120:1525–1534
Morinaga T, Ikegami M, Miura K (1993) The nucleotide sequence and genome structure of mung bean yellow mosaic geminivirus. Microbiol Immunol 37:471–476
Nair R, Schafleitner R, Kenyon L et al (2012) Genetic improvement of mungbean. SABRAO J Breed Genet 44:177–190
Nair R, Götz M, Winter S et al (2017) Identification of mungbean lines with tolerance or resistance to yellow mosaic in fields in India where different begomovirus species and different Bemisia tabaci cryptic species predominate. Eur J Plant Pathol 149(2):349–365
Oplinger E, Hardman L, Kaminski A et al (1990) Mungbean. In: Alternative field crop manual. University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Services, Madison
Priest SH (2000) US public opinion divided over biotechnology? Nat Biotechnol 18:939–942
Raina A, Laskar RA, Khursheed S et al (2016) Role of mutation breeding in crop improvement- past, present and future. Asian Res J Agric 2:1–13
Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J et al (2013) Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc 8:2281
Rao S, Patil P, Kaviraj C (2005) Callus induction and organogenesis from various explants in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Indian J Biotechnol 4:556–560
Raza MH, Sadozai GU, Baloch MS et al (2012) Effect of irrigation levels on growth and yield of mungbean. Pak J Nutr 11(10):876
Sagare DB, Mohanty I (2015) In vitro regeneration system in green gram (Vigna radiata L., Wilczek, cv. Sujata): a recalcitrant legume crop. Res J Agric Sci 6:64–67
Sangiri C, Kaga A, Tomooka N et al (2008) Genetic diversity of the mungbean (Vigna radiata, Leguminosae) genepool on the basis of microsatellite analysis. Aust J Bot 55:837–847
Sangsiri C, Sorajjapinun W, Srinives P (2007) Inheritance and ultrastructure of variegated leaf mutant in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Thai J Agric Sci 40:159–166
Sangwan NK, Verma BS, Verma KK, Dhindsa KS (1990) Nematicidal activity of some essential plant oils. Pest Manag Sci 28:331–335
Saxena R, Reddy D (1987) Crop losses in pigeonpea and mungbean by pigeonpea cyst nematodes, Heterodera cajani. Indian J Nematol 17:91–94
Schafleitner R, Nair RM, Rathore A et al (2015) The AVRDC–the world vegetable center mungbean (Vigna radiata) core and mini core collections. BMC Genomics 16:344
Shanmugasundaram S, Keatinge J, Hughes J d’A (2009) Counting on beans: mungbean improvements in Asia. In: Spielman DJ, Pandya-Lorch R (eds) Millions fed proven successes in agricultural development. IFPRI, Washington, DC, pp 103–108
Siddiqui ZA, Mahmood I (1996) Biological control of plant parasitic nematodes by fungi: a review. Bioresour Technol 58:229–239
Singh D (1980) Inheritance of resistance to yellow mosaic virus in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Theor Appl Genet 57:233–235
Singh H, Joshi B, Chandel K et al (1975) Genetic diversity in some Asiatic Phaseolus species and its conservation. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 34A:52–57
Sivakumar P, Gnanam R, Ramakrishnan K, Manickam A (2010) Somatic embryogenesis and regeneration of Vigna radiata. Biol Plant 54:245–251
Somta P, Musch W, Kongsamai B et al (2008) New microsatellite markers isolated from mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Mol Ecol Resour 8:1155–1157
Sonia N, Saini R, Singh RP, Jaiwal PK (2007) Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transfer of Phaseolus vulgaris alpha-amylase inhibitor-1 gene into mungbean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek using bar as selectable marker. Plant Cell Rep 26:187–198
Stacey G, VandenBosch K (2005) “Translational” legume biology. Models to crops. Plant Physiol 137:1173
Stewart EJ (2012) Growing unculturable bacteria. J Bacteriol 194:4151–4160
Tah PR, Saxena S (2009) Induced synchrony in pod maturity in mungbean (Vigna radiata). Int J Agric Biol 11:321–324
Taj FH, Akbar H, Basir A, Ullah N (2002) Effect of row spacing on agronomic traits and yield of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Asian J Plant Sci 1:328–329
Talekar N (1988) Biology, damage and control of bruchid pests of mungbean. In: Shanmugasundaram S, McLean BT (eds) Mungbean: proceedings of the second international symposium. AVRDC, Shanhua, pp 329–342
Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066
Tomooka N, Lairungreang C, Nakeeraks P et al (1992a) Center of genetic diversity and dissemination pathways in mung bean deduced from seed protein electrophoresis. Theor Appl Genet 83:289–293
Tomooka N, Lairungreang C, Nakeeraks P et al (1992b) Development of bruchid-resistant mungbean line using wild mungbean germplasm in Thailand. Plant Breed 109:60–66
Tomooka N, Vaughan D, Kaga A (2005) Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Genet Resour Chrom Eng Crop Improv Grain Legume 1:325–345
Varshney RK, Kudapa H, Pazhamala L et al (2015) Translational genomics in agriculture: some examples in grain legumes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 34:169–194
Vijayan S, Kirti P (2012) Mungbean plants expressing BjNPR1 exhibit enhanced resistance against the seedling rot pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani. Transgenic Res 21:193–200
Vijayan S, Beena M, Kirti P (2006) Simple and effective regeneration of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek) using cotyledonary node explants. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 15:131–134
Vishnu-Mittre B (1974) Palaeobotanical evidence in India. In: Hutchinson J (ed) Evolutionary studies in world crops: diversity and change in the Indian sub-continent. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–30
Wang LX, Elbaidouri M, Abernathy B, Chen HL, Wang SH, Lee SH, Jackson SA, Cheng XZ (2015) Distribution and analysis of SSR in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) genome based on an SSR-enriched library. Mol Breed 35(1)
Wang L, Wu C, Zhong M et al (2016) Construction of an integrated map and location of a bruchid resistance gene in mung bean. Crop J 4:360–366
Wani MR (2006) Estimates of genetic variability in mutated populations and the scope of selection for yield attributes in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Egypt J Biol 8:1–6
Williams R (1975) Diseases of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Nigeria. Pest Artic News Summ 21:253–267
Yadav S, Gopala Krishna M, Maheswari M et al (2010) High frequency induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration from cotyledonary node explant of mung bean (Vigna radiata L Wilczek). J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 19:267–270
Yadav SK, Katikala S, Yellisetty V et al (2012) Optimization of Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation of cotyledonary node explants of Vigna radiata. Springerplus 1:59
Yaqub M, Mahmood T, Akhtar M et al (2010) Induction of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] as a grain legume in the annual rice-wheat double cropping system. Pak J Bot 42:3125–3135
Young N, Kumar L, Menancio-Hautea D et al (1992) RFLP mapping of a major bruchid resistance gene in mungbean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek). Theor Appl Genet 84:839–844
Yu K, Park SJ, Poysa V (1999) Abundance and variation of microsatellite DNA sequences in beans (Phaseolus and Vigna). Genome 42:27–34
Zhou Z, Jiang Y, Wang Z et al (2015) Resequencing 302 wild and cultivated accessions identifies genes related to domestication and improvement in soybean. Nat Biotechnol 33:408–414
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from the Next Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Code No. PJ01326101), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea and Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through the Agri-Bio Industry Technology Development Program, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (114054-3), Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
10.1.1 Appendix I: Research Institutes Maintaining Mung Bean Germplasms
Institution | Country | Contact information and website |
---|---|---|
AVRDC-The world vegetable center | Taiwan | |
National bureau of plant genetic resources of the Indian council of agricultural research | India | |
Institute of crop germplasm resources, Chinese academy of agricultural sciences | China | |
Plant genetic resources conservation unit, University of Georgia | USA | |
University of the Philippines | Philippines | |
Rural Development Administration | South Korea |
10.1.2 Appendix II: List of Mung Bean Mini Core Collection Provided by AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center
AVRDC genebank number | Characteristicsa | Origin | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLL | PLW | PHF | PHM | DF | PL | SP | SW | ||
VI000020 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 28 | 40 | 53 | 9 | 8.8 | 71.47 | Southeast Asia |
VI000099 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 22 | 56 | 43 | 8.3 | 12 | 32.39 | South Asia |
VI000105 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 25 | 42 | 43 | 7.2 | 10.8 | 35.29 | South Asia |
VI000164 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 30 | 34 | 43 | 5.6 | 10.2 | 29.69 | Southwest Asia |
VI000170 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 14 | 33 | 40 | 7.5 | 10 | 33.71 | Southwest Asia |
VI000175 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 26 | 43 | 43 | 7.6 | 10.8 | 38.67 | South Asia |
VI000188 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 19 | 43 | 40 | 7.1 | 11.6 | 28.88 | Southwest Asia |
VI000203 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 21 | 35 | 43 | 7.4 | 11.4 | 30.98 | Southwest Asia |
VI000212 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 25 | 43 | 43 | 5.3 | 9.6 | 27.34 | North America |
VI000232 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 20 | 33 | 40 | 8.3 | 10.6 | 37.71 | Southwest Asia |
VI000238 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 21 | 45 | 43 | 6.7 | 11.4 | 30.19 | Southwest Asia |
VI000253 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 19 | 58 | 46 | 8 | 12.8 | 31.13 | South Asia |
VI000316 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 18 | 34 | 43 | 7 | 9.8 | 31.21 | Southwest Asia |
VI000317 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 14 | 40 | 43 | 7.7 | 12.2 | 33.87 | Southwest Asia |
VI000319 | 4 | 1.4 | 17 | 34 | 43 | 6.7 | 10.8 | 30.92 | Southwest Asia |
VI000380 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 23 | 47 | 43 | 9.7 | 9 | 70.69 | Southeast Asia |
VI000461 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 26 | 54 | 46 | 7.8 | 12.2 | 32.09 | Southeast Asia |
VI000470 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 35 | 43 | 8 | 8.6 | 66.94 | Southwest Asia |
VI000532 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 19 | 49 | 46 | 7.6 | 14.4 | 26.46 | South Asia |
VI000537 | 4 | 1.5 | 25 | 47 | 46 | 7.1 | 12.6 | 25.9 | South Asia |
VI000542 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 18 | 28 | 43 | 6.5 | 10.6 | 25.29 | South Asia |
VI000551 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 22 | 41 | 43 | 6.7 | 11.8 | 28.62 | South Asia |
VI000554 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 21 | 43 | 43 | 7.1 | 11.6 | 30.23 | South Asia |
VI000559 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 23 | 43 | 43 | 7.1 | 11.6 | 29.35 | South Asia |
VI000578 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 28 | 63 | 53 | 7.1 | 10.4 | 26.99 | South Asia |
VI000589 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 22 | 39 | 40 | 7.1 | 11.4 | 33.25 | South Asia |
VI000616 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 20 | 50 | 39 | 7.6 | 13.6 | 32.76 | South Asia |
VI000618 | 4 | 1.5 | 25 | 29 | 40 | 6.1 | 8.6 | 31.83 | South Asia |
VI000625 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 21 | 51 | 43 | 7.5 | 11.6 | 35.66 | South Asia |
VI000680 | 5.1 | 2 | 23 | 33 | 40 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 39.58 | North America |
VI000723 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 22 | 29 | 40 | 7 | 10.6 | 29.85 | Southwest Asia |
VI000732 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 19 | 35 | 43 | 6.6 | 9 | 39.7 | South Asia |
VI000735 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 21 | 41 | 47 | 6.9 | 10.6 | 39.3 | South Asia |
VI000736 | 5.4 | 2 | 26 | 60 | 53 | 9.9 | 11.4 | 60.78 | South Asia |
VI000749 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 23 | 51 | 43 | 7.7 | 11 | 31.98 | South Asia |
VI000764 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 20 | 61 | 43 | 6.6 | 10 | 37.88 | South Asia |
VI000766 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 23 | 46 | 40 | 7.1 | 11 | 34.56 | South Asia |
VI000805 | 4.9 | 2 | 24 | 39 | 43 | 8.1 | 11.8 | 48.38 | South Asia |
VI000815_1 | 4 | 1.5 | 19 | 26 | 53 | 8.2 | 9.4 | 34.74 | South Asia |
VI000818 | 5 | 1.9 | 22 | 44 | 40 | 7.2 | 10.6 | 30.97 | South Asia |
VI000852 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 17 | 20 | 40 | 7.1 | 10.8 | 30.94 | South Asia |
VI000938 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 16 | 44 | 47 | 7.1 | 9.8 | 33.49 | South Asia |
VI000942 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 17 | 41 | 40 | 8.8 | 10.8 | 46.06 | South Asia |
VI000953 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 24 | 44 | 43 | 8.6 | 10.8 | 66.37 | South Asia |
VI000981 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 20 | 33 | 42 | 7 | 10.8 | 38.47 | Southeast Asia |
VI001023 | 5.4 | 2 | 18 | 43 | 43 | 8.1 | 12.2 | 34.71 | South Asia |
VI001066 | 4.6 | 1.9 | 21 | 39 | 53 | 8.6 | 11.8 | 40.68 | Oceania/Pacific |
VI001096 | 5.5 | 2 | 21 | 37 | 43 | 8 | 12 | 52.69 | Oceania/Pacific |
VI001124 | 5.6 | 2.4 | 28 | 58 | 45 | 7.9 | 9.6 | 65.3 | Oceania/Pacific |
VI001126 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 47 | 56 | 53 | 8.6 | 13.6 | 39.77 | Oceania/Pacific |
VI001162 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 13 | 47 | 42 | 6.4 | 11 | 27.34 | Oceania/Pacific |
VI001191 | 5 | 1.9 | 26 | 50 | 46 | 9.9 | 13.8 | 52.93 | Southeast Asia |
VI001211 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 22 | 50 | 46 | 7.7 | 9.8 | 53.68 | Southeast Asia |
VI001221 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 28 | 45 | 44 | 9.1 | 10.6 | 69.72 | Southeast Asia |
VI001244 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 26 | 43 | 44 | 8.7 | 7.4 | 74.78 | Southeast Asia |
VI001268 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 20 | 39 | 46 | 6.5 | 10 | 34.34 | South Asia |
VI001282 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 21 | 43 | 43 | 7.4 | 13 | 31.64 | South Asia |
VI001284 | 5 | 1.7 | 21 | 42 | 43 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 31.7 | South Asia |
VI001339 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 28 | 61 | 46 | 9.8 | 10.8 | 64.42 | Southeast Asia |
VI001385 | 4 | 1.3 | 27 | 46 | 53 | 6.8 | 11.4 | 29.29 | South Asia |
VI001400 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 23 | 58 | 46 | 6.6 | 10.6 | 34.27 | South Asia |
VI001403 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 35 | 38 | 53 | 7.5 | 13 | 32.22 | South Asia |
VI001406_1 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 17 | 49 | 43 | 7 | 9.8 | 32.79 | South West Asia |
VI001408 | 4 | 1.5 | 21 | 52 | 43 | 7.4 | 11.6 | 30.18 | South Asia |
VI001411 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 25 | 49 | 43 | 6.3 | 10.8 | 27.38 | South Asia |
VI001412 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 28 | 66 | 47 | 7.2 | 11 | 33.41 | South Asia |
VI001419 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 21 | 50 | 43 | 6.8 | 10.6 | 28.78 | South Asia |
VI001435 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 18 | 37 | 43 | 6.4 | 8.2 | 31.76 | North America |
VI001448 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 15 | 58 | 43 | 6.9 | 10.4 | 21.15 | South Asia |
VI001471 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 27 | 43 | 43 | 7.1 | 9.6 | 33.54 | South Asia |
VI001482 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 21 | 45 | 43 | 7.8 | 12.8 | 31.99 | South Asia |
VI001490 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 15 | 43 | 40 | 6.6 | 10.6 | 29.79 | South West Asia |
VI001509 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 17 | 40 | 43 | 6.6 | 12 | 32.21 | South West Asia |
VI001514 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 18 | 48 | 43 | 7 | 11.4 | 31.03 | South Asia |
VI001520 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 18 | 24 | 40 | 6.7 | 11.8 | 23.85 | South Asia |
VI001533 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 27 | 59 | 53 | 7.3 | 12.4 | 29.89 | South Asia |
VI001535 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 22 | 56 | 45 | 6.8 | 11.8 | 52.82 | South Asia |
VI001539_1 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 39 | 71 | 55 | 7.6 | 11 | 28.62 | South Asia |
VI001548 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 33 | 73 | 53 | 7.1 | 11.2 | 30.45 | South Asia |
VI001556_1 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 38 | 72 | 43 | 6.6 | 10 | 27.98 | South Asia |
VI001557 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 18 | 39 | 47 | 6 | 8.4 | 30.11 | North America |
VI001562 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 14 | 36 | 47 | 6.9 | 10.2 | 29.11 | South Asia |
VI001576 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 26 | 52 | 43 | 8.6 | 12.8 | 28.51 | South Asia |
VI001579 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 20 | 48 | 40 | 7.1 | 13 | 34.95 | South Asia |
VI001605 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 21 | 50 | 43 | 6.9 | 11 | 31.39 | South Asia |
VI001612 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 22 | 41 | 45 | 6.7 | 9.4 | 30.8 | unknown |
VI001628 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 21 | 44 | 43 | 6.5 | 11.2 | 28 | South Asia |
VI001651 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 18 | 34 | 44 | 6.1 | 8.6 | 33.35 | South Asia |
VI001652 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 17 | 44 | 46 | 6.6 | 11.6 | 33 | South Asia |
VI001654 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 19 | 48 | 47 | 7.1 | 10.8 | 31.85 | South Asia |
VI001678 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 14 | 23 | 41 | 6.7 | 10.8 | 36.83 | South Asia |
VI001692 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 23 | 29 | 43 | 7.1 | 11.4 | 27.29 | South Asia |
VI001698 | 5.1 | 2 | 20 | 31 | 42 | 7.7 | 13.2 | 32.92 | South Asia |
VI001728 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 18 | 34 | 43 | 5.7 | 10.4 | 28.18 | South Asia |
VI001733 | 5.3 | 2 | 18 | 41 | 42 | 6.9 | 9.2 | 40.23 | South Asia |
VI001743 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 14 | 36 | 43 | 6.8 | 12.2 | 31.84 | South Asia |
VI001756 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 19 | 45 | 44 | 7.4 | 12 | 34.48 | South Asia |
VI001762 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 20 | 48 | 45 | 6.6 | 11.8 | 31.9 | South Asia |
VI001806 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 24 | 42 | 40 | 6.3 | 8.8 | 28.48 | Southwest Asia |
VI001806_1 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 20 | 34 | 40 | 8.2 | 11.4 | 33.16 | Southwest Asia |
VI001820 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 20 | 50 | 48 | 7 | 11 | 32.08 | Europe |
VI001859 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 37 | 46 | 53 | 9.4 | 11 | 48.89 | Southeast Asia |
VI001974 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 21 | 33 | 44 | 7.2 | 11.4 | 36.62 | East Asia |
VI001993 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 24 | 42 | 45 | 7.7 | 11.6 | 37.51 | East Asia |
VI002009 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 17 | 25 | 44 | 6.9 | 11 | 33.63 | South Asia |
VI002012 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 22 | 21 | 46 | 7.6 | 8.8 | 33.21 | South Asia |
VI002051 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 26 | 59 | 46 | 6.7 | 10.8 | 36.36 | South Asia |
VI002063 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 38 | 49 | 46 | 9.7 | 13.2 | 45.67 | North America |
VI002173 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 20 | 56 | 48 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 36.8 | South Asia |
VI002173_1 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 23 | 51 | 48 | 7.5 | 12 | 32 | South Asia |
VI002176 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 17 | 37 | 40 | 7.7 | 13.2 | 31.1 | South Asia |
VI002176_1 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 18 | 43 | 40 | 7.2 | 12.2 | 34.2 | South Asia |
VI002190 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 19 | 22 | 43 | 6.4 | 10.6 | 30.13 | South Asia |
VI002195 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 29 | 43 | 43 | 8.8 | 11.2 | 57.9 | Southeast Asia |
VI002197 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 20 | 40 | 44 | 7.8 | 10.6 | 37.7 | East Asia |
VI002206 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 27 | 35 | 42 | 8.7 | 11.8 | 50.01 | Southeast Asia |
VI002239 | 4 | 1.5 | 16 | 25 | 42 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 34.3 | Southwest Asia |
VI002274 | 5.9 | 2 | 14 | 53 | 43 | 5.5 | 6.4 | 56.2 | Southwest Asia |
VI002284 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 13 | 28 | 41 | 6.6 | 11 | 34.1 | Southwest Asia |
VI002402 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 24 | 32 | 43 | 8.1 | 12.6 | 50.5 | Southeast Asia |
VI002432 | 4.8 | 2 | 18 | 27 | 50 | 9.1 | 11 | 57.4 | Southeast Asia |
VI002437 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 23 | 46 | 46 | 7.5 | 12.4 | 35.6 | East Asia |
VI002456 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 12 | 40 | 43 | 11.2 | 13.6 | 52 | East Asia |
VI002469 | 4.4 | 1.9 | 23 | 66 | 50 | 8.8 | 13 | 51.6 | Southeast Asia |
VI002487 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 20 | 51 | 43 | 7.5 | 12.2 | 31 | Southwest Asia |
VI002523 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 18 | 48 | 60 | 7.9 | 11.8 | 52.5 | Southeast Asia |
VI002529 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 63 | 50 | 5 | 7.4 | 57.1 | Southeast Asia |
VI002532 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 21 | 28 | 44 | 7.7 | 8.6 | 38.2 | South Asia |
VI002537 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 16 | 18 | 44 | 6.8 | 10.2 | 43.3 | Southwest Asia |
VI002569 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 22 | 50 | 50 | 8.6 | 11.4 | 53.5 | Africa |
VI002587 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 14 | 26 | 42 | 7.8 | 11.4 | 54.1 | Oceania/Pacific |
VI002611 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 19 | 46 | 49 | 8.1 | 10.4 | 48.3 | Southeast Asia |
VI002646 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 19 | 32 | 50 | 7.9 | 9 | 56.5 | Southeast Asia |
VI002647 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 26 | 36 | 49 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 69.3 | Southeast Asia |
VI002672 | 5 | 2 | 22 | 32 | 49 | 8.3 | 10.4 | 54.3 | Southeast Asia |
VI002739 | 5 | 1.9 | 19 | 24 | 49 | 9 | 9 | 68.3 | Southwest Asia |
VI002802 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 17 | 22 | 40 | 6.2 | 10.4 | 29.3 | Southwest Asia |
VI002859 | 4 | 1.4 | 12 | 29 | 40 | 6.5 | 10.4 | 33.8 | Southwest Asia |
VI002860 | 4 | 1.5 | 10 | 23 | 39 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 31.3 | Southwest Asia |
VI002872 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 13 | 41 | 41 | 6.8 | 12.2 | 36.2 | Southwest Asia |
VI002877 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 25 | 51 | 44 | 8.2 | 12.4 | 43.9 | Southwest Asia |
VI002894 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 27 | 45 | 49 | 8.2 | 13.6 | 40.4 | Southwest Asia |
VI002926 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 23 | 47 | 45 | 7.1 | 11 | 32.2 | South Asia |
VI002934 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 30 | 54 | 45 | 7.9 | 13.4 | 34.9 | South Asia |
VI002986 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 21 | 39 | 47 | 7 | 10.6 | 34.2 | South Asia |
VI002993 | 5 | 1.6 | 38 | 66 | 45 | 7.5 | 13 | 31.1 | South Asia |
VI002999 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 29 | 50 | 45 | 7.2 | 11.8 | 33.1 | South Asia |
VI003019 | 4.1 | 1.7 | 32 | 41 | 43 | 7.6 | 11.4 | 40 | unknown |
VI003019_1 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 34 | 49 | 44 | 7.3 | 11.2 | 42 | unknown |
VI003034 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 30 | 48 | 46 | 7.4 | 13.2 | 30.1 | South Asia |
VI003035 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 33 | 56 | 45 | 6.8 | 11.4 | 31.2 | South Asia |
VI003057 | 4 | 1.4 | 21 | 49 | 45 | 7.8 | 11.4 | 30.9 | South Asia |
VI003062 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 29 | 48 | 45 | 7.5 | 10.2 | 32 | South Asia |
VI003068 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 25 | 51 | 45 | 7.5 | 10.8 | 30.7 | South Asia |
VI003070 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 30 | 49 | 45 | 7.1 | 11.8 | 29.8 | South Asia |
VI003083 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 27 | 49 | 43 | 7.6 | 10.8 | 33.2 | South Asia |
VI003114 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 31 | 47 | 45 | 6.6 | 11.6 | 29.8 | South Asia |
VI003135 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 34 | 43 | 49 | 6.3 | 10 | 24.7 | South Asia |
VI003159 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 24 | 66 | 49 | 6.5 | 11.6 | 26.7 | South Asia |
VI003172 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 27 | 52 | 45 | 7.1 | 10.8 | 33.8 | South Asia |
VI003181 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 13 | 30 | 46 | 6.8 | 11.6 | 36.6 | South Asia |
VI003183 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 23 | 51 | 46 | 7.9 | 14.4 | 36 | South Asia |
VI003187 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 19 | 40 | 46 | 7.2 | 12.2 | 40 | South Asia |
VI003212 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 13 | 28 | 41 | 6.5 | 11 | 32.6 | South Asia |
VI003220 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 28 | 52 | 45 | 7.3 | 10.6 | 42 | South Asia |
VI003232 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 23 | 55 | 47 | 6.7 | 12.2 | 29.7 | South Asia |
VI003235 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 23 | 52 | 48 | 7.2 | 11 | 32.9 | South Asia |
VI003242 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 25 | 41 | 44 | 7.2 | 10.4 | 44.6 | South Asia |
VI003251 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 25 | 43 | 46 | 6.7 | 12.2 | 25.6 | South Asia |
VI003251_1 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 23 | 43 | 46 | 6.8 | 11.6 | 31.4 | South Asia |
VI003252 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 21 | 45 | 46 | 6.4 | 12.8 | 31.7 | South Asia |
VI003255 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 17 | 48 | 48 | 6.3 | 11.2 | 28.6 | South Asia |
VI003276 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 18 | 35 | 48 | 7.5 | 13 | 26.2 | South Asia |
VI003329 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 30 | 63 | 48 | 7.8 | 13.4 | 34.4 | South Asia |
VI003332 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 27 | 47 | 46 | 6.9 | 11.6 | 35.8 | South Asia |
VI003337 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 28 | 61 | 47 | 7.5 | 13 | 33.3 | South Asia |
VI003364 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 21 | 37 | 46 | 9.1 | 11.8 | 50.6 | South Asia |
VI003379 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 37 | 60 | 47 | 8 | 12.8 | 41.9 | South Asia |
VI003382 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 34 | 47 | 48 | 6.9 | 11.4 | 41.2 | South Asia |
VI003407 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 18 | 51 | 48 | 7.1 | 9 | 31.2 | South Asia |
VI003413_1 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 26 | 44 | 45 | 7.2 | 11.8 | 37.5 | South Asia |
VI003440 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 26 | 47 | 45 | 7 | 9.8 | 38.3 | South Asia |
VI003455 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 23 | 51 | 46 | 7.2 | 12 | 39.1 | South Asia |
VI003456 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 36 | 52 | 48 | 6.5 | 10 | 30.3 | unknown |
VI003465 | 4.1 | 1.7 | 21 | 48 | 47 | 7.4 | 11.8 | 33.6 | South Asia |
VI003470 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 34 | 52 | 55 | 6.9 | 11 | 25 | South Asia |
VI003480 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 23 | 60 | 47 | 7.8 | 10.8 | 59.9 | South Asia |
VI003490 | 4 | 1.6 | 19 | 40 | 46 | 6 | 9.8 | 31.6 | South Asia |
VI003493 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 18 | 39 | 45 | 6.6 | 10.8 | 31 | South Asia |
VI003514 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 19 | 43 | 44 | 6.7 | 10.4 | 31.1 | South Asia |
VI003517_1 | 5.1 | 1.6 | 34 | 58 | 44 | 6.7 | 10.6 | 29.9 | South Asia |
VI003534 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 17 | 44 | 45 | 7.2 | 9 | 33.8 | South Asia |
VI003534_1 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 20 | 56 | 46 | 7.8 | 11.8 | 37.1 | South Asia |
VI003548 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 23 | 53 | 47 | 7 | 11.8 | 30.6 | South Asia |
VI003554 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 36 | 65 | 49 | 6.7 | 10.2 | 36.1 | South Asia |
VI003560_1 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 24 | 55 | 46 | 6.3 | 8.2 | 32.7 | South Asia |
VI003563 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 33 | 65 | 47 | 7.1 | 11.4 | 36.9 | South Asia |
VI003577 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 25 | 50 | 48 | 6.8 | 9.8 | 34.1 | South Asia |
VI003602 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 24 | 57 | 49 | 8 | 10.4 | 42.1 | South Asia |
VI003642 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 24 | 54 | 46 | 7.5 | 12 | 40.9 | South Asia |
VI003648 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 30 | 43 | 45 | 7.8 | 11.6 | 38.9 | South Asia |
VI003658 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 27 | 44 | 45 | 7 | 12 | 37.8 | South Asia |
VI003664 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 30 | 46 | 46 | 8.3 | 12.4 | 38.8 | South Asia |
VI003678 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 26 | 42 | 46 | 6.4 | 11.8 | 36.8 | South Asia |
VI003685 | 4 | 1.5 | 29 | 50 | 47 | 7.2 | 11.2 | 35.2 | South Asia |
VI003699 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 15 | 55 | 48 | 5.9 | 10.8 | 29.4 | South Asia |
VI003720 | 4 | 1.5 | 18 | 37 | 46 | 6.9 | 11.8 | 28.5 | South Asia |
VI003725 | 5.9 | 2 | 32 | 35 | 45 | 9.1 | 11.2 | 42.2 | South Asia |
VI003733_1 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 26 | 49 | 46 | 6.5 | 10.8 | 32.8 | South Asia |
VI003734_1 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 26 | 48 | 46 | 7.8 | 11.6 | 41.8 | South Asia |
VI003734_2 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 26 | 48 | 46 | 7.8 | 11.6 | 45.8 | South Asia |
VI003744 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 22 | 51 | 50 | 7.5 | 12 | 33.9 | South Asia |
VI003755 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 22 | 48 | 44 | 7.3 | 11.6 | 35.7 | South Asia |
VI003760 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 25 | 56 | 47 | 7.2 | 11.8 | 33.7 | South Asia |
VI003785 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 25 | 40 | 43 | 8 | 14.4 | 36.5 | South Asia |
VI003795 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 19 | 47 | 49 | 6.9 | 12.4 | 40.4 | South Asia |
VI003801 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 27 | 41 | 45 | 8.1 | 12.2 | 48.8 | South Asia |
VI003882 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 15 | 35 | 40 | 6.6 | 10 | 29.03 | Southwest Asia |
VI003886 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 25 | 45 | 43 | 7.6 | 10.4 | 41.47 | South Asia |
VI003886 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 23 | 35 | 43 | 7.5 | 9.6 | 39.04 | South Asia |
VI003893 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 35 | 53 | 53 | 6.9 | 11.6 | 38.08 | South Asia |
VI003894 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 20 | 58 | 43 | 7.4 | 12 | 31.73 | South Asia |
VI003907 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 19 | 19 | 40 | 7.4 | 11.8 | 35.07 | Southwest Asia |
VI003914 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 23 | 50 | 43 | 6.6 | 11.4 | 33.53 | South Asia |
VI003925 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 19 | 40 | 43 | 7 | 11.6 | 26.04 | South Asia |
VI003927 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 26 | 53 | 46 | 6.5 | 10.6 | 30.69 | South Asia |
VI003929 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 23 | 35 | 40 | 6.1 | 10.4 | 27.88 | South Asia |
VI003942 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 19 | 32 | 40 | 5.7 | 8.6 | 31.31 | Southwest Asia |
VI003944 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 17 | 40 | 40 | 7.3 | 11 | 41.42 | Southwest Asia |
VI003947 | 4.9 | 2 | 23 | 46 | 40 | 7.6 | 11.4 | 42.72 | South Asia |
VI003948 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 23 | 43 | 40 | 7.6 | 12 | 34.05 | South Asia |
VI003951–2 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 15 | 46 | 40 | 8.3 | 14.4 | 36.95 | South Asia |
VI003954 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 24 | 35 | 40 | 6.9 | 11 | 36.55 | South Asia |
VI003957 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 28 | 59 | 43 | 6.8 | 11 | 32.88 | South Asia |
VI003958 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 25 | 41 | 43 | 7.5 | 12 | 33.92 | South Asia |
VI003959 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 26 | 56 | 43 | 7.4 | 11.8 | 31.55 | South Asia |
VI004006 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 16 | 52 | 43 | 6.8 | 13.2 | 30.76 | South Asia |
VI004010 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 20 | 50 | 43 | 7.7 | 10.6 | 37.28 | South Asia |
VI004024 | 5 | 1.7 | 19 | 51 | 47 | 8.4 | 11.4 | 50.5 | Oceania/Pacific |
VI004044_1 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 16 | 38 | 43 | 7.1 | 11.8 | 30.78 | South Asia |
VI004045 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 19 | 40 | 43 | 7.6 | 13.4 | 27.4 | South Asia |
VI004048_1 | 4 | 1.4 | 16 | 33 | 39 | 6.6 | 11.4 | 25.76 | South Asia |
VI004069 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 25 | 50 | 43 | 7.7 | 12.8 | 38.24 | South Asia |
VI004096 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 25 | 53 | 53 | 6.9 | 10.8 | 30.15 | South Asia |
VI004096_1 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 30 | 59 | 53 | 7.3 | 10.8 | 32.04 | South Asia |
VI004129 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 19 | 26 | 43 | 5.4 | 9.4 | 25.66 | unknown |
VI004138 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 19 | 49 | 40 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 39.96 | South Asia |
VI004145 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 14 | 28 | 40 | 5.8 | 10.2 | 32 | Southwest Asia |
VI004184 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 7.8 | 12.6 | 34.3 | Europe |
VI004243_2 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 19 | 24 | 40 | 6.6 | 10.4 | 37.4 | Southwest Asia |
VI004244 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 30 | 24 | 44 | 6.2 | 9.4 | 34.4 | South Asia |
VI004297 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 18 | 25 | 40 | 6.1 | 10.2 | 37.5 | Southwest Asia |
VI004302 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 16 | 25 | 46 | 6.3 | 10.4 | 38.2 | Southwest Asia |
VI004307 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 19 | 23 | 40 | 6.4 | 10.8 | 37.1 | Southwest Asia |
VI004312 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 21 | 27 | 39 | 7.2 | 11.2 | 38.1 | South Asia |
VI004347_1 | 4 | 1.5 | 20 | 22 | 40 | 6.1 | 10.6 | 36.8 | South Asia |
VI004351 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 20 | 18 | 41 | 6.5 | 10 | 34.3 | South Asia |
VI004423 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 18 | 21 | 40 | 5.8 | 9.2 | 34 | Southwest Asia |
VI004432 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 20 | 26 | 40 | 6 | 9 | 37.1 | Southwest Asia |
VI004480 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 17 | 20 | 41 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 34.4 | Southwest Asia |
VI004639 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 19 | 29 | 39 | 6.2 | 8.8 | 36 | Southwest Asia |
VI004666 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 15 | 35 | 40 | 7.3 | 10.8 | 35.2 | Southwest Asia |
VI004691 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 19 | 29 | 40 | 6.4 | 11.2 | 36.7 | Southwest Asia |
VI004694 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 19 | 35 | 40 | 6.4 | 10.2 | 37.9 | Southwest Asia |
VI004710 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 19 | 29 | 43 | 6.9 | 9.8 | 40.7 | Southwest Asia |
VI004734 | 4 | 1.6 | 16 | 20 | 40 | 5.3 | 6.2 | 38.3 | Southwest Asia |
VI004743 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 24 | 59 | 48 | 7.1 | 10 | 32.5 | South Asia |
VI004789 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 24 | 54 | 47 | 7.7 | 11.8 | 32.7 | South Asia |
VI004810 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 15 | 33 | 46 | 7.3 | 10.6 | 36.8 | South Asia |
VI004811 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 19 | 36 | 47 | 6.9 | 11.2 | 30.4 | South Asia |
VI004822 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 22 | 42 | 45 | 7 | 10.4 | 29.7 | South Asia |
VI004838 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 15 | 48 | 45 | 6.6 | 12.2 | 33.8 | South Asia |
VI004842 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 21 | 47 | 47 | 7.4 | 11.8 | 34.4 | South Asia |
VI004853 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 17 | 46 | 43 | 7.1 | 11.8 | 34 | South Asia |
VI004871 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 21 | 46 | 48 | 7 | 11 | 36.8 | South Asia |
VI004877 | 4 | 1.4 | 21 | 48 | 48 | 7.9 | 12 | 35.7 | South Asia |
VI004915 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 16 | 42 | 45 | 6.8 | 11.4 | 42.7 | South Asia |
VI004931 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 21 | 46 | 46 | 7.4 | 10.4 | 36.4 | Southwest Asia |
VI004933 | 5 | 1.7 | 22 | 60 | 46 | 7.9 | 11.4 | 36.6 | Southwest Asia |
VI004934 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 21 | 56 | 46 | 6.8 | 10.8 | 36.1 | Southwest Asia |
VI004937 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 25 | 59 | 46 | 7.3 | 11 | 35.4 | Southwest Asia |
VI004942 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 21 | 47 | 46 | 7.6 | 11 | 41.8 | Southwest Asia |
VI004954 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 25 | 49 | 44 | 7.7 | 11.8 | 47.1 | Southwest Asia |
VI004956 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 19 | 54 | 46 | 7.8 | 11.6 | 36.2 | Southwest Asia |
VI004957 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 21 | 53 | 47 | 7.5 | 11 | 35.5 | Southwest Asia |
VI004958 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 18 | 49 | 47 | 7.8 | 11.6 | 41.1 | Southwest Asia |
VI004965 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 23 | 46 | 45 | 7.6 | 10.8 | 32.1 | Southwest Asia |
VI004968 | 5 | 1.7 | 20 | 51 | 45 | 6.7 | 10 | 33.8 | Southwest Asia |
VI004969 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 23 | 52 | 45 | 6.7 | 10.6 | 34.8 | Southwest Asia |
VI004973 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 21 | 57 | 47 | 7.3 | 10 | 30.9 | South Asia |
VI005022 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 16 | 57 | 46 | 6.2 | 8.8 | 33.3 | South Asia |
VI005024 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 19 | 78 | 48 | 5.6 | 7.6 | 48.1 | East Asia |
VI005030 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 66 | 90 | 60 | 7.9 | 10.6 | 36.1 | Central America |
VI005041 | 5.8 | 1.8 | 20 | 39 | 46 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 64.6 | unknown |
VI005066 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 14 | 34 | 46 | 7.7 | 10.4 | 34.9 | South Asia |
VI014178 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 67 | 94 | 64 | 8.3 | 11.8 | 33 | Africa |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ha, J., Lee, SH. (2019). Mung Bean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) Breeding. In: Al-Khayri, J., Jain, S., Johnson, D. (eds) Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Legumes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23400-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23400-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23399-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23400-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)