Abstract
The term meta-research covers all systematic attempts to critically assess a research field or a research question—especially its theory, methodology and findings based on a transparently recorded sample of primary research articles in pertinent scientific journals. Although there is hardly any tradition of meta-analytic literature reviews in the field of media and telecommunication policy, such analysis is a useful, valuable and feasible research method in order to establish the state of research on a certain subject. It should be seen as an appropriate means to integrate elaborated research projects and to allow a holistic and critical perspective. Therefore, the following contribution aims to suggest a meta-analytic literature review for policy topics on the meso-level by demonstrating strengths and limits of this approach. It starts with an explanation of how to conduct such an analysis, followed by an explanatory example on network neutrality. The contribution concludes with the most vital points emphasizing the pros and cons of a meta-analytic literature review.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Note * References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analytic literature review.
Allen, M. (2009). Meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 398–407.
Bauer, J. M., & Obar, J. A. (2014). Reconciling political and economic goals in the net neutrality debate. The Information Society, 30(1), 1–19*.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Hoggins, J., & Rothstein, H. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis (5th ed.). Southern Gate: Wiley.
Carpenter, C. (2017). Meta-analysis. In Communication research methods (M. Allan, Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Othman, D., & Benkler, Y. (2015). Score another one for the Internet? The Role of the Networked Public Sphere in the U.S. Net Neutrality Policy Debate. Cambridge: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University*.
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
Hart, J. A. (2011). The net neutrality debate in the United States. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(4), 418–443*.
Herman, B. D., & Kim, M. (2014). The Internet defends itself: The network neutrality debate on the web. The Information Society, 30(1), 31–44*.
Holliday, A. (2016). Doing & writing qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Kim, M., Chung, C. J., & Kim, J. H. (2011). Who shapes network neutrality policy debate? An examination of informal subsidizers in the mainstream media and at congressional and FCC hearings. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 314–324*.
Kim, S. T., & Weaver, D. (2002). Communication research about the Internet: A thematic meta-analyis. New media & society, 4(4), 518–538*.
Krone, J. (2012). Netzneutralität im Kontext von bandbreitenintensiven Massenmedien und Multimediadiensten. Policy-Formulierungen in der EU 27. In J. Krone & T. Pellegrini (Eds.), Netzneutralität und Netzbewirtschaftung (pp. 37–73). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft*.
Lee, K. S., Sang, Y., & Xu, W. W. (2015). The shaping of the network neutrality debate: Information subsidizers on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1544–1562*.
Musiani, F., & Löblich, M. (2016). The net neutrality debate from the public sphere perspective. In S. Simpson & M. Puppis (Eds.), European media policy for the twenty-first century: Assessing the past, setting agendas for the future (pp. 161–174). New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group*.
Perse, E. (2007). Meta-analysis: Demonstrating the power of mass communication. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), In mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 467–488). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Picard, R. G. (2016). Isolated and particularized: The state of contemporary media and media policy research. Javnost—The Public, 23(2), 135–152.
Powell, A., & Cooper, A. (2011). Net neutrality discourses: Comparing advocacy and regulatory arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom. The Information Society, 27(5), 311–325*.
Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., Burrell, N., Allen, M., & Bryant, J. (Eds.). (2007). Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Quail, C., & Larabie, C. (2010). Net neutrality: Media discourses and public perception. Global Media Journal—Canadian Edition, 3(1), 31–50*.
Ringquist, E. (2013). Meta-analysis for public management and policy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rogers, E. (1985). Methodology for meta-research. In H. H. Greenbaum, S. A. Hellweg, & J. W. Walter (Eds.), Organizational communication: Abstract, analysis, and overview (Vol. 10, pp. 13–33). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Schünemann, W. J., Steiger, S., & Stiert, S. (2015). The net neutrality debate on Twitter. Internet Policy Review, 4(4), 1–15.
Verständig, D. (2016). Digitale Öffentlichkeiten und Netzneutralität. In J. Fromme, F. Kiefer, & J. Holze (Eds.), Mediale Diskurse, Kampagnen, Öffentlichkeiten. Medienbildung und Gesellschaft (pp. 35–54). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien*.
Further Reading
Allen, M. (2009). Meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 398–407.
Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Rogers, E. (1985). Methodology for meta-research. In H. H. Greenbaum, S. A. Hellweg, & J. W. Walter (Eds.), Organizational communication: Abstract, analysis, and overview (Vol. 10, pp. 13–33). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meier, W.A. (2019). Meta-Analysis. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16064-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16065-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)