Abstract
Strontium, a highly reactive alkaline earth metal, is very stable in natural occurrence minerals; however, the mobility of its isotope 90Sr produced from the nuclear fallout is one of the deadly fission products. Celestite, SrSO4, is the most important primary source of it following the exploitation via either the black ash or direct leach process. For which, the illustration of the thermal and aqueous chemistry of strontium is very crucial. In the case of 90Sr, its separation from the other radionuclide, most specifically over the 137Cs from the high-level waste (HLW) of fission products, is vital, converting the HLW to low-level waste (LLW). Liquid-liquid (solvent) extraction technology has been widely accepted for the efficient separation and recovery of strontium from the fission products, as the radionuclide already remains in its soluble form therein the waste solution. Interaction strategy between the metal ion and dipole from the donor atom of crown ether is prominently being used, whereas the poorly hydrated anions of dicarbollide, a boron cluster with a π-bonded trivalent cobalt ion, form ion-pair neutral compounds in the extraction process. In this chapter, the extraction processes of strontium from both natural mineral and synthetic source of the waste fission solution are being discussed, which includes the process technology, adopted techniques behind the technology, crucial points, and key parameters.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Strontium (Sr) is a highly reactive alkaline earth metal. The occurrence of natural strontium is stable, but the mobility of its synthetic isotope 90Sr obtained from the nuclear fallout is one of the most harmful fission products [1, 2]. Therefore, the extraction of strontium can also be divided mainly into two parts: (1) minerals, commonly the celestite and strontianite (as shown in Fig. 1), and (2) spent fuels of nuclear fission containing 90Sr [3, 4], which has been focused primarily in this chapter.
2 Extraction from the Primary Minerals
Celestite or say celestine (SrSO4) is the main mineral source of strontium that commonly exists in highly gypsiferous soils. The preferential occurrence in decalcified parts of the groundmass suggests its resultant formation of calcite dissolution without getting affected by the conditions resulting in the dehydration and rehydration of gypsum minerals [3]. The carbonate mineral, strontianite (SrCO3), is another principal mineral of strontium albeit limited and sometimes mixed with celestite. Strontium predominantly as its carbonate salt is largely produced from Sr concentrates by following either black ash or direct leach process.
2.1 Extraction by a Black Ash Process
In the first process, the water-soluble species of strontium sulfide is formed via calcinating the celestite with coal fines in a rotary kiln at a higher temperature ~1100°C to expel out oxygen by forming the CO2. Thus obtained soluble sulfide of strontium is subjected to dissolve in water and filtered, where the residue contains most of the metal impurities as their insoluble sulfides. The presence of silicon and iron compounds has found to be problematic in this process as they can form water-insoluble silicates and ferrites, respectively, during the calcination process [5,6,– 7]. The filtrate is treated with soda ash or carbon dioxide to yield the precipitates of SrCO3 product. Nevertheless, this is the most widely used process, treating approximately 3 lakh tonnes annually [8]; the formation of SrCO3 during calcination causing the insoluble loss of strontium during water leaching is the major disadvantage of this process. Moreover, an energy-intensive process generating the undesirable pollution by-products such as CO2 and H2S is also not favorable from operational and environmental aspects [9].
The occurrence of calcination reactions in the black ash process can be given as:
However, the Gibbs free energy versus temperature data as shown in Fig. 2 for Eqs. (1) and (2) is thermodynamically possible at approximately 500°C; but if corroborated by the formation of CO and CO2 from carbon, it can be depicted that the occurrence of Eq. (2) is relatively more favorable than Eq. (1) at a temperature slightly below the 1200°C. Thus the formation of the calcined product according to Eq. (1) can be mainly due to often an increased temperature zone than the maintained value while dealing with carbon at high temperature.
The dissolution reaction of calcined product in water can be written as follows:
Actually Eq. (3) occurs in two steps:
Therefore, it has been found that the progress of Eq. (3) mainly depends on the solubility of Sr(OH)2 by easier decomposition of SrS into hot water (as Eq. 3). The use of CO2 instead of Na2CO3 and the introduction of oxygen in carbonation column can increase the yield and purity of the product within a shorter carbonation time [10].
2.2 Extraction by Direct Leach Process
Using the direct leach process in the commercial production of SrCO3, the beneficiation of celestite simply involves crushing, sizing, acid washing (for dissolving impurities of CaCO3, BaCO3, and iron oxide), and sometimes flotation to obtain the concentrates that contain more than 90% SrSO4 [5]. A typical example of celestite beneficiation is given in Table 1 [11]. Thereafter the concentrates are directly leached in carbonate solution using a mechanically stirred tank at moderate temperatures (90–95°C) to yield the SrCO3.
Depending upon the celestite grade and the application, SrCO3 can be used directly or subjected to further purification [6, 11, 12]. Dissolution in HCl followed by pH neutralization of the solution is carried out for removal of iron impurity as its precipitate along with silica. After filtration, the SrCl2 solution is subjected to another precipitation with soda ash to yield SrCO3 of high purity [7]. Alternatively, the impure SrCO3 is calcined at 1400°C to obtain SrO, which is then dissolved in water to separate SiO2, Fe2O3, Ca(OH)2, and Al2O3. The filtered solution of Sr(OH)2 is treated with carbon dioxide to yield the SrCO3 product. In the latter process of purification, the barium carbonate with a little tendency to decompose during calcination can also be eliminated. However, the direct leach process yields a relatively impure product (~95% SrCO3) as compared to the black ash process; it has been considered the simpler process of low cost with by-products of commercial interest [6, 11]. The reactions involved in a direct conversion of celestite to carbonate species followed by purification steps can be given as below:
For leaching:
For purification via acid treatment:
For purification via calcination:
Further, the strontium metal can be produced either by the thermal reduction of strontium oxide and aluminum metal and distillation of elemental strontium on a cooled plate or by the electrolysis of a fused bath of SrCl2 and ammonium/potassium chloride following the reactions [8, 13]:
It needs to be mentioned here that low recovery and purity are the main reasons for comparatively being the less industrial use of the direct leach process; hence, this process is widely being studied to understand the direct conversion phenomena of celestite to its high-yield product. Below some of the most influential factors are briefly discussed.
2.2.1 Aqueous Chemistry for Leaching the Strontium
A difference in solubility products between SrSO4 (3.2 × 10−7) and SrCO3 (1.1 × 10−10) is the main driving force for the leaching reaction of Eq. (4) [14]; hence, their apparent solubility in terms of Sr ion concentration can be expressed as:
The solubility calculated for a reaction system of Na2CO3: SrSO4 from 1.0 to 1.2 (mole ratio) given in Fig. 3 indicates that regardless of the value of mole ratio, the solubility of SrSO4 is maximum in absence of SO4 2− ions and decreases with an increase in sulfate with the progress of leaching [11]. In contrast, the solubility of SrCO3 increases with consuming the CO3 2− ions. Leaching proceeds to the end of the reaction; the solubility of CO3 2− eventually becomes similar to the SO4 2− ions, which substantially decreases the driving force of leaching reaction. It can be handled by an excess of Na2CO3 in solution to keep leaching in progress.
The studies by Iwai and Toguri [15] and Sutarno et al. [7] have clearly established that the stoichiometric conversion of celestite to SrCO3 (at Na2CO3: SrSO4 = 1:1) occurs only above solution pH 9.0 (as shown in Fig. 4). The influential pH for carbonate leaching has been corroborated by the dissociation constant values of H2CO3 [7, 11, 15, 16]:
2.2.2 Parametric Influences on Direct Leach Process of Celestite
Castillejos and co-workers [16] have shown that the rate of reaction significantly increases with increasing carbonate concentration in solution. The fitted parabolic rate constants indicated the leaching is controlled by the diffusion of NaCO3 − into the pores of the thickening product layer. Notably, leaching celestite in >0.1 M Na2CO3 solution at 10 g L−1 pulp density caused a decrease in reaction rate due to a lower diffusivity with an increased dense product layer [15, 16]. It has been observed that under a stoichiometric Na2CO3 dosage and mild temperature, large conversion fractions are achievable, but not all. An entire conversion has found to be possible with a risen temperature (from 25 to 75°C) under the similar condition (as shown in Fig. 5). The calculated activation energy of 64.1 and 70.05 kJ mole−1 in different studies has revealed the transport through chemically controlled conversion reaction [17] and the effective diffusivity of carbonate ions fell in the range of 1.2 × 10−9 to 6.7 × 10−8 cm2 s−1. Studies on the effect of stirring speed and particle size have favorably demonstrated a high speed (>550 rpm) and small particle size (58 μm) follows shrinking-core model leaching is controlled by product layer reaction [16].
2.2.3 Other studies
Besides the direct soda ash leach process of celestite, several alternatives have been explored either to increase the yield or purity of SrCO3 product. HCl leaching of celestite showed the activation energy of 68.8 kJ mole−1 for the process in 8.25 × 10−3 M BaCl2 solution equilibrated with 0.5 M HCl, and the reaction rate has found to be inversely proportional to the particle size which increases as 0.19, 0.70, and 0.73 powers of the Ba2+, Cl−, and H+, respectively [18]. A high purity of 98% celestite has been achieved by Dogan et al. [19], while a Turkish concentrate (~95% SrSO4) cleaning was performed with 50% H2SO4 and 1–3% HNO3 at 40–50°C. Using dry mechanochemical conversion of celestite with Na2CO3 in a planetary-type ball mill indicated the degree SrCO3 formation increased (>90%) with milling time above 30 min [20]. The milled powders leached in water at room temperature followed by washing with 1 M HCl give a desirable product of SrCO3, whereas Bingol et al. [21] used the activated SrSO4–(NH4)2CO3 mixtures to yield the conversion product of 98.1% SrCO3 [21].
3 Extraction of Radionuclide 90Sr from the HLW of Fission Products
In the processing of spent fuel of nuclear fission, the majority of heat load and radiation in the repository is mainly due to the high-level waste (HLW) of fission products. Approximately 27 tonnes of spent fuel is taken annually from the core of 1000 MWe nuclear reactor [22] that can be regarded entirely as waste (in the USA and Canada) or can be reprocessed (up to 97% in Europe and Japan). 137Cs and 90Sr with their relatively short half-lives of 30 and 28.8 years, respectively, contribute a larger heat load in HLW [23,24,25]. Therefore, the separation of 137Cs and 90Sr is potentially required to allow their management as a single product with reduced waste volume, saving repository capacity, and shortened the time for subsurface storage until they have decayed sufficiently to be disposed of as low-level waste (LLW). Additionally, the recovered 137Cs and 90Sr can be used as a radiation source in radiotherapy and micropower generator [26, 27]. Various methods (like solvent extraction, ion exchange, adsorption, precipitation, and membrane technology) have been studied and upscaled for the separation of 137Cs and 90Sr from HLW [24, 26,27,28,29,30]. Each of them has own limitations in their application, as given in Table 2 [31, 32]. In terms of stability and applicability for handling a large amount of radionuclide waste, below the prominent one, solvent extraction is being discussed in this chapter (for biosorption studies on strontium, please see Chap. 4).
3.1 Solvent Extraction
The flexibility in stage design and regeneration of organic, convenience in combining with other processes, and easiness to be scaled up are the inherent properties of solvent extraction (SX) to gain more attention in fuel reprocessing, which in fact is invariably being used at present [33]. Selection of appropriate extractant is the vital factor of SX; hence, below the SX of 90Sr is divided on the basis of extractant used in the separation and recovery process. The compounds developed and widely used in strontium extraction have been given in Fig. 6 [30].
3.1.1 Crown Ethers
Crown ethers are highly selective compounds to interact with metal ions, which arise due to the interactions between the charged metal ion and dipole from the donor atom of crown ether [33]. The selectivity is primarily dependent on the suitability of the size of metal ions with the cavity of particular crown ether. The effect of electrostatic induction as the additional electron withdrawing or donating groups, the presence of altering heteroatoms (P, S, N, and O) within the crown ether, and types of solvents have the major role in the extraction process. Various electron donating and withdrawing substituents, including the alkyl groups (like halogen, methyl, nitro, and amine groups), have been introduced to modify the properties (like solubility and electronic property) of crown ether and are used in the extraction of 90Sr [25, 34]. For instance, 15-crown-5 (15C5) or 18-crown-6 (18C6) are strongly hydrophilic; hence, aryl or alkyl group must be added to enhance their lipophilicity for making them suitable to be used in SX, e.g., dicyclohexano-18-crown-6 (DC18C6) or dibenzo-21-crown-7 (DB21C7) [35]. The extraction of strontium from a nitrate solution by crown ethers can commonly be presented as below (where m and n are an integer value):
The rigid benzocrown ethers are effective in the extraction of monovalent cations, whereas the cyclohexano crowns are more suitable for divalent cations. The cis-syn-cis, cis-anti-cis, and trans-syn-trans isomers of DC18C6 exhibited the most efficient extractant (D Sr = 24.8) from nitric acid solution. The trans-syn-trans of DC 18C6 yields maximum extraction at a higher acidity, however, with only a 14.3 value of distribution coefficient. Using DC18C6 (0.1 M in chloroform) and DB21C7 (0.1 M in nitrobenzene with the addition of phosphomolybdic acid), the extraction of strontium and cesium could be quantitatively achieved, respectively [36]. The value of distribution coefficient decreases more with an increase in nitric acid concentration in the aqueous solution, as the D Cs and D Sr with bis-(4,4′(5′)-[1-hydroxy-2-ethylhexyl]-benzo)-18-crown-6 and bis-(4,4′(5′)-[1-hydroxyheptyl]cyclohexano)-18-crown-6 (0.02 M concentration of both crown ether in the mixture of 0.1 M nonyl-naphthalenesulfonic acid or TBP–kerosene) were only 1.6 and 1.98 from a 3 M HNO3 solution. The back-extraction of both metals required multiple stages of stripping with a dilute HNO3 solution [37,38,39]. In a similar type of studies by Dietz et al. [40, 41] with a higher acidic solution (4 M HNO3), the most efficient result (D Cs = 4) was with 0.1 M di-tert-butyl-benzo-21C7 diluted in methylpentanone and, as for the strontium, evidenced the role of dissolved water therein the diluents. The highest selectivity for cesium over sodium was with 21C7 derivatives; however, the efficient extractant was 4,4′-(5′)-di-[(1-hydroxy-ethylhexyl)-benzo]-18C6 associated with 0.2 M TBP, yielding D Cs = 30. It showed that none of the investigated compounds gave the desired combination of selectivity, efficiency, solubility, and stability. The examined dependency on nitrate ion for strontium extraction with various crown ethers revealed the contribution of two moles NO3 − and the relation with associated cations found in the order of Mg2+ > Al3+ > Na+ [42]. The extraction behavior of crown ethers from a lower 1.0 HNO3 solution to the higher 10.0 M HNO3 solution is given in Table 3.
Horwitz et al. [43,44,45] used DC18C6 and its dimethyl or di-tert-butyl derivatives in various oxygenated and aliphatic diluents, for the SX of strontium from acidic solutions. The highest D Sr obtained with n-pentanol and n-hexanol could be corroborated to the metal cation extraction with the water contents combined in the diluent. Due to this, the diluent does not require the complete removal of the hydration shell of the nitrate associated with strontium for its mass transfer in the organic phase. Subsequently, the process, namely, “SREX” (stands for strontium extraction) was proposed using the di-tert-butyl-cyclohexano-18C6 diluted in 0.2 M 1-octanol from >1 M HNO3 solution. A good chemical and radiochemical stability showed by the organic constituents required three extraction stages for quantitative extraction (99.7%) of strontium in the SREX process. A trial on Na-bearing waste solution revealed that the interferences caused by the alkali and alkaline earth cations (like Na+, K+, Ca2+) did not affect the extraction efficiency of Sr2+. Nevertheless taking the di-tert-butyl-cyclohexano-18C6 (0.15 M) in 1.2 M TBP/Isopar L as (diluents), the co-extraction of strontium and lead followed by their selective stripping (using 16 centrifugal contactors) did not give the desired results. A poor selectivity and low extraction were observed due to the building up of metal cations into the organic phase as their insufficient stripping from the loaded organic after the extraction stages.
Combining the Cs extraction (CSEX) with SREX process using the bis-4,4′(5′)[(2-hydroxy-alkyl)-benzo]-18-crown-6 and bis-4,4′(5′)[(tert-butyl)cyclohexano]-18-crown-6 diluted in the mixture of 1.2 M TBP, lauryl nitrile, and Isopar-L, the process enables 99.99% cesium and strontium recovery from the waste solution containing 3.78 M HNO3, 0.486 M Al, 0.778 M Ca, 0.225 M Zr, and 0.015 M Na [46]. Lumetta et al. [47, 48] used di-tert-butyl-cyclohexano-18C6 in octanol for selective extraction of strontium after the extraction of lanthanides and actinides by CMPO (Octyl-phenyl-N,N-diisobutyl carbamoyl methyl phosphine oxide) yielding the decontamination factors that exceeded 7800. A relation between D Sr and water contents into the various organic phases (constituted of DC18C6 in alcohols and DB18C6 derivatives in nitrobenzene 4,4′(5′)-dinonaoyl-dibenzo-18C6, 4,4′(5′)-dihexanoyl-benzo-18C6, 4,4′(5′)-di-acetyl-benzo-18C6, di-tert-butylbenzo-18C6, dibenzo-18C6) revealed the highest D Sr with the mixture of butanol and octanol in a ratio of 80:20 [49, 50], whereas the highest D Cs could be achieved with ditert-benzo-18C6 in addition with phosphotungstic acid albeit the low solubility of it in nitrobenzene is disadvantageous. Strontium extraction carried out with 15C5/dicarbollide diluted in nitrobenzene from HClO4 with dibenzo-18C6/dicarbollide also diluted in C6H5NO2 enabled to get the extraction constants of metal-organic complexes [51, 52]. Also, the highest D sr and selectivity on the extraction of strontium over calcium was obtained with 15-crown-5 and with 15-benzo- and dibenzocrown-5; 12C4 and 18C6 have found to be less effective.
3.1.1.1 Extraction Influenced by the Diluents and Irradiation Effect
In most of the cases, the diluents comprise the larger part of a solvent. Therefore, proper selection of diluents is almost as crucial as selecting a suitable extractant because of the physical and chemical effects that the diluents can exhibit and also meet the environmental and safety requirements in an SX process [53]. Using the DtBuCH18C6, Mohapatra et al. [54] have investigated the effects of several diluents (including toluene, n-octanol, benzene, t-butyl benzene, o-dichlorobenzene, n-dodecane, chloroform, n-hexane, and the binary mixtures) on strontium extraction from a nitrate solution. A correlation between the Sr extraction and Schmidt’s diluent parameter has been determined, which is formulated by the various physical properties of the diluents (polarizability, H-bonding, viscosity, polarity, Hildebrand’s solubility parameter, etc.). Using DCH18C6 with several diluents (chlorobenzene, chloroform, dichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, n-octanol, nitrobenzene, and its mixtures with benzene), Gupta et al. [55] found higher D Sr values for aromatic and chlorinated diluents with their higher dielectric constants. But due to safety concern in the nuclear process, these diluents are not recommended to be used, and, alternatively, a diluent mixture of TBP + dodecane + n-octanol (in the proportionate ratio of 30:20:50 vol.%) can be used. Use of dinitriles (glutaronitrile, succinonitrile, malononitrile, and adiponitrile) and diluents with DCH18C6 leads to form the solvated cationic complexes into the organic phase, resulting in an increased efficiency of strontium extraction [56].
The strong radiation by the 90Sr, 137Cs, and other radionuclide elements of the nuclear waste solution, exhibiting the irradiation effect on SX system during the operation, must be addressed [57]. The extractant and diluents in contact with the radioactive waste adversely affect the performance of organic that includes the efficiency, distribution, and separation factors and the recyclability of the organic solvents. The investigated irradiation effect on DCH18C6 with different diluents (chloroform, n-octanol, toluene, and cyclohexane) has been given in Fig. 7 [58]. The radiolytic degradation of DCH18C6 in all of the diluents, certainly with different degree, was observed, in which it was least in toluene and highest in chloroform. Exposure to γ-radiation could cause a darkening of solvent (0.12 M HCCD and 0.027 M PEG-400 in phenyltrifluoromethylsulfone) due to the formation of a water-soluble radiolytic product [59]. The value of D Sr gets decreased with an increasing absorbed dosage; however, stripping was unaffected. In a study with the organic phase (0.025 M DtBuCH18C6 in n-octanol or in the mixture of 20:80 vol% n-octanol/toluene), the irradiated organic phase with diluent mixture showed an improvement in strontium extraction up to a dose of 40 mrad, due to the increased uptake of acid into the organic phase [60]. A reduction in partitioning of Sr2+ to crown ether ionic liquids, [C(4)mim][PF6] and [C(4)mim][NTf2] phase, has been observed due to the formation of proton ion during γ-radiation of the ionic liquids, which can be handled by additional water washing step [61,62,63]. Interestingly, all the removal of Sr2+ ions from nuclear waste solution occurs via the irradiated [C4mim][NTf2] and via precipitation not by extraction with the organic phase. The precipitates as irradiation product identified as SrSO3 and/or SrSO4, depending on the contact time [63].
3.1.1.2 Complexed Structure into the Organic Phase
For a better understanding of extraction mechanism, the study on structure formation of metal ion complexed with the organic extractant can be helpful. Adopting the small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) methodology, Chiarizia et al. [64] investigated the extraction behavior of strontium from a LiNO3 solution by using the di-n-octylphosphoric acid (HDOP) and compared with HDOP/DCH18C6 mixture in toluene. The addition of DCH18C6 showed a synergistic effect on extraction with increased efficiency than that of with HDOP alone. The SANS analysis revealed that the extraction with HDOP alone in large stoichiometric excess predominantly forms the Sr(H(DOP)2)2 complex solvated into the organic phase (as shown in Fig. 8a). It is similar to the structure that was reported for the aggregates formation with HDEHP [65]. When Sr2+ is wrapped by the DCH18C6 ligand, its interaction with the next two dimmers of HDOP becomes more difficult and prefers to reorient itself as the mononuclear complex schematically is shown in Fig. 8b for the cis-syn-cis isomer of DCH18C6. Hence, the addition of crown ether takes part in the complex formation in the ratio of 1:2 for DCH18C6: HDOP while extracting one molecule of Sr2+. The large aggregates by HDOP alone could not be observed in both the cis-syn-cis and cis-anti-cis isomers of DCH18C6. The structure shown in Fig. 8b is quite supporting to that of the structural study carried out by Burns and Kessler [66] for the bis(dibutylphosphato)aquastrontuim-18crown-6, in which, the 9-coordinated Sr2+ ion is revealed to be complexed with six oxygen atoms of the crown ether, two monodentate dibutyl phosphato ions, and one molecule of H2O. Although a 10-coordinated Sr2+ can be found in [Sr(cis-syn-cis-DCHI8C6)(NO3)2]·CCI4 and [Sr(cis-syn-cis-DCHI8C6)(TMA)2]·H2O [67], the 9-coordinated Sr2+ ion appears to be more suitable for accounting the orientational flexibility of solution complexes [64].
3.1.2 Dicarbollides
Dicarbollide is a boron cluster with a π-bonded cobaltic ion. It was originally prepared by Hawthorne in 1965 and studied for cesium extraction, later used in the extraction of strontium by adding the polyethylene glycols (PEGs) to yield the synergistic effect [23, 29, 30]. The chemical and radiation stability possess the uses of dicarbollides in radionuclide’s extraction even from the waste solution of very high acid concentration [68]. The poorly hydrated anions of dicarbollide associated with cations forming the ion-pair neutral compounds have greater solubility in polar-dissociating diluents like nitrobenzene than the water [30]. Its lipophilic anion is difficult to protonate and allows metal cations to be discriminated by their Gibbs energies of transfer. The extraction of strontium from a highly acidic solution can commonly be presented as below (where, m and n are an integer value):
The extraction of 90Sr from the nitric acid medium is carried out by dicarbollide anion {[π-(3)-1,2-B9C2H11]2Co} diluted in polar nitrobenzene. The addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG, HO–(C2H4O)n–H mainly the lipophilic p-nonylphenyl-nonaethylene glycol, Slovafol 909 HO–(C2H4O)9–C6H4–C9H19) to the dicarbollide can remove the water molecules surrounding the metal cations to improve its transfer to the organic phase. Dicarbollides display good stability toward irradiation; however, only effective in diluents of toxic nature like nitrobenzene and releasing halides during the reprocessing can raise the corrosion problem for the system. Using a diluent without nitro group, diethylene glycol ditetrafluoropropyl is proposed; Slovafol addition can lead to the extraction of 90Sr and 137Cs from 2 M HNO3 solution. Tetrahexyl-dicarbollide in aromatic hydrocarbon diluents exhibits comparable distribution coefficients to that of the dicarbollide in nitrobenzene. With a negligible loss into the aqueous phase, the equilibrium constant value of 1.7 was obtained for strontium, which was 800 and 0.5 for cesium and sodium ions, respectively [69,70,71]. Using tetrahexyl-dicarbollide in diethylbenzene for extracting the cesium and strontium from alkaline media yielded a diminished distribution coefficient with respect to increasing alkalinity of the solution. The value of D Sr could be changed from 30 to 7 when NaOH concentration varied from 0.01 to 1.0 M. Using the chlorinated cobalt dicarbollide in nitrobenzene and carbon tetrachloride mixture, with the addition of 1 vol.% Slovafol 909, a 99.8% recovery for 90Sr yielded the decontamination factor of above 500 [72].
Notably, the extracted 90Sr and 137Cs from the HLW are usually taken together for the final geological disposal; hence, their co-extraction can be advantageous [30]. The Universal Extraction (UNEX) process is a relatively well studied co-extraction process using dicarbollide and phosphorylated polyethylene glycols (PPEGs) diluted in m-nitrobenzotrifluoride (MNBTF) [73,74,75]. The organic phase constituted of the mixture of dicarbollide, PEG, and carbamoylmethyl phosphine oxide (CMPO) diluted in phenyltrifluoromethyl sulfone can be adopted for the simultaneous extraction of 90Sr and 137Cs from highly acidic media, along with the lanthanides and actinides. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) or the guanidine carbonate solution can be used for the effective stripping of extracted metals [76]. Law et al. [77] demonstrated the improved UNEX process with simulated and genuine acidic liquid tank waste, as shown in Fig. 9, in which the suppression iron and zirconium in co-extraction with the strontium and cesium was achieved by adding a certain amount of HF, yielding efficiencies of 99.4% 90Sr and 99.99% 137Cs along with >99% actinides. But looking on the requirement of actinide separation for transmutation in the process of advanced nuclear fuel cycling, the co-extraction of actinides is not preferable; hence, the later use of FS-13 with 0.08 M dicarbollide +0.6 vol.% PEG-400 could significantly suppress the actinide over co-extraction of 99.9% strontium and 97.4% cesium [78].
4 Conclusions
Celestite (SrSO4) and strontianite (SrCO3) are the main mineral source of strontium and predominantly being recovered as its carbonate salt by following the black ash or direct leach process. Nevertheless, the black ash process is widely used; the formation of SrCO3 during calcination leads to the strontium loss, while leaching in water is found to be disadvantageous for the energy-intensive process. On contrary, the direct leach process yields a relatively impure product (~95% SrCO3) as compared to the black ash process, but it is a low-cost simple process with by-products of commercial interests. There has been a plenty of researches devoted to strontium extraction from minerals; however, a high yield with the increased purity has still many scopes for new research to extract strontium from geo-environment.
At the same time, removal of radioactive and heat-emitting 90Sr and 137Cs from nuclear wastes and spent-fuel solutions is of great importance not only for the spent-fuel reprocessing and sustainable management of nuclear but also for the recovery of these two metals. As the requirement of radionuclide removal is still under discussion with respect to its economic aspects, the R&D on their recovery as value-added products will surely be beneficial for a further technical road map of the spent-fuel reprocessing. The solvent extraction has been potentially demonstrated for the simultaneous separation of cesium and strontium, mainly the CSEX/SREX process, and a combined crown ether/calixarene process. The stability of CSEX crown ether in HNO3 solution, however, limits its use in an industrial process, and without any further development, the CSEX/SREX process is not a feasible option for advanced fuel cycle initiatives. An improved stability of the extractant in presence of HNO3 must be addressed by the new research on these processes. In summary, the solvent extraction is a reasonable choice for strontium separation and recovery in advance fuel cycling, and more developments in this area can be well-expected in the near future.
References
Pathak P, Singh DN, Pandit GG, Rakesh RR (2016a) Guidelines for quantification of geomaterial-contaminant interaction. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 20:04015012
Pathak P, Singh DN, Apte PR, Pandit GG (2016b) Statistical analysis for prediction of distribution coefficient (k d) of soil-contaminant system. J Environ Eng 142:1–11
Mees F, Tursina TV (2010) Salt minerals in saline soils and salts crusts. In: Stoops G, Marcelino V, Mees F (eds) Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and Regoliths. Elsevier, pp 441–469
Ober J (2014) Mineral resource of the month: strontium. Earth, American Geosciences Institute. Retrieved from https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/mineral-resource-month-strontium
Collings RK, Andrew PRA (1988) Summary Report No. 2: Celestite. In: CANMET Rep. 88-3E
Stein DL (1973) Extraction of strontium values from celestite concentrate at the Kaiser plant in Nova Scotia. In: Gray TJ (ed) International Conference on Strontium Containing Compounds, Atlantic Industrial Research Inst, Halifax, Canada, pp 1–8
Sutarno, R Lake, RH, Bowman WS (1970) The extraction of strontium from the mineral celestite. Mineral Sciences Division, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Res Rep R-223, pp l–20
MacMillan JP, Park JW, Gerstenberg R, Wagner H, Köhler K, Wallbrecht P (2002) Strontium and strontium compounds. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Kemal M, Arslan V, Akar A, Canbazoglu M (1996) Production of SrCO3 by black ash process: determination of reductive roasting parameters. In: Kemal M, Arslan V, Canbazoglu M (eds) Changing scopes mineral processing. CRC press, Boca Raton, p 401
Erdemoglua M, Canbazoglub M (1998) The leaching of SrS with water and the precipitation of SrCO3 from leach solution by different carbonating agents. Hydrometallurgy 49:135–150
Carrillo FR, Uribe A, Castillejos AH (1995) A laboratory study of the leaching of celestite in a Pachuca tank. Miner Eng 8:495–509
Trew LJ (1973) Purification of strontium carbonate. US Patent 3741691
Grover AK, Joshi MN (1983) Aluminothermic preparation of strontium metal. In: Bose DK, Krishnamurthy N, Mehta OK (eds) Proceedings of the symposium on metallothermic processes in metal and alloy extraction, Nagpur, India, pp 65–78
Bard AJ (1966) Chemical equilibrium. Harper and Row, New York
Iwai M, Toguri JM (1989) The leaching of celestite in sodium carbonate solutions. Hydrometallurgy 22:87–100
Castillejos AHE, Cruz del FPB, Uribe AS (1996) The direct conversion of celestite to strontium carbonate in sodium carbonate aqueous media. Hydrometallurgy 40:207–222
Habashi F (1969) Extractive metallurgy, general principles, vol 1. Science Publishers, Paris
Aydogan S, Erdemoğlu M, Aras A, Uçar G, Özkan A (2006) Dissolution kinetics of celestite (SrSO4) in HCl solution with BaCl2. Hydrometallurgy 84:239–246
Dogan H, Koral M, Kocakusak S (2004) Acid leaching of Turkish celestite concentrate. Hydrometallurgy 71:379–383
Setoudeh N, Welham NJ, Azami SM (2010) Dry mechanochemical conversion of SrSO4 to SrCO3. J Alloy Compd 492:389–391
Bingol D, Aydoğan S, Bozbaş SK (2012) Production of SrCO3 and (NH4)2SO4 by the dry mechanochemical processing of celestite. J Ind Eng Chem 18:834–838
Pathak P, Sharma S (2018) Sorption isotherms, kinetics, and thermodynamics of contaminants in Indian soils. J Environ Eng 10:1–9
Dozol JF, Dozol M, Macias RM (2000) Extraction of strontium and cesium by dicarbollides, crown ethers and functionalized calixarenes. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 38:1–22
Pathak P (2017) An assessment of strontium sorption onto bentonite buffer material in waste repository. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:8825–8836
Todd TA, Batcheller TA, Law JD, Herbst RS (2004) Cesium and strontium separation technologies: literature review, INEEL/EXT-04-01895. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls
Fukushima S, Inoue T, Ozeki S (1999) Postoperative irradiation of pterygium with Sr-90 eye applicator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43:597–600
Gemmill WJ (1971) Miniaturized radioisotope generator. US Patent No. 3566124
IAEA-International Atomic Energy Agency (1993) Feasibility of separation and utilization of cesium and strontium from high level liquid waste. Technical Report Series No. 356, Vienna
Schulz WW, Bray LA (1987) Solvent extraction recovery of by product 137Cs and 90Sr from HNO3 solutions. Sep Sci Technol 22:191–214
Xu C, Wang J, Chen J (2012) Solvent extraction of strontium and cesium: a review of recent progress. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 30:623–650
Rahman ROA, Ibrahium HA, Hung YT (2011) Liquid radioactive wastes treatment: a review. Water 3:551–565
Rana D, Matsuura T, Kassim MA, Ismail AF (2013) Radioactive decontamination of water by membrane processes — a review. Desalination 321:77–92
Tachimori S (2010) Overview of solvent extraction chemistry for reprocessing. In: Moyer BA (ed) Ion exchange and solvent extraction, vol 19. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–63
Pannell KH, Yee W, Lewandos GS, Hambrich DC (1977) Electronic substituent effects upon the selectivity of synthetic ionophores. J Am Chem Soc 99:1457–1461
McDowell WJ, Moyer BA, Case GN, Case FI (1986) Metal ions by organic cation exchangers synergized by macrocycles: factors relating to macrocycle size and structure. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 4:217–236
Bryan JC, Sachleben RA, Lavis JM, Davis MC, Burns JH, Hay BP (1998) Structural aspects of rubidium ion selectivity by tribenzo-21-crown-71a. Inorg Chem 37:2749–2755
Gerow IH, Davis MW (1979) The use of 24-crown-8’s in the solvent extraction of CsNO3 and Sr(NO3)2. Sep Sci Technol 14:395–414
Gerow IH, Smith JE, Davis MW (1981) Extraction of Cs+ and Sr2+ from HNO3 solution using macrocyclic polyethers. Sep Sci Technol 16:519–548
Shuler RG, Bowers CB, Smith Jr JE, Van Brunt V, Davis Jr MW (1985) The extraction of cesium and strontium from acidic high activity nuclear waste using a PUREX process compatible organic extractant. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 3:567–604
Dietz ML, Horwitz EP, Jensen MP, Rhoads S, Bartsch RA, Palka A, Krzykewski J (1996b) Substitution effects in the extraction of cesium from acidic nitrate media using macrocyclic polyethers. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 14:357–384
Dietz ML, Horwitz EP, Rhoads S, Bartsch RA, Krzykewski J (1996a) Extraction of cesium from acidic nitrate media using macrocyclic polyethers: the role of organic phase water. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 14:1–12
Shehata FA (1994) Extraction of strontium from nitric acid solutions by selected crown ethers. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 185:411–417
Horwitz EP, Dietz ML, Fisher DE (1990a) Extraction of strontium from nitric acid solutions using dicyclohexano-18-crown-5 and its derivatives. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 8:557–572
Horwitz EP, Dietz ML, Fisher DE (1990b) Correlation of the extraction of strontium nitrate by a crown ether with the water content of the organic phase. Sol Extr Ion Exch 8:199–208
Horwitz EP, Dietz ML, Fisher DE (1991) SREX: a new process for the extraction and recovery of strontium from acidic nuclear waste streams. Sol Extr Ion Exch 9:1–25
Horwitz EP, Dietz ML, Leonard RA (1997) Advanced integrated solvent extraction systems. In: Gephart JM (ed) Efficient separations and processing (ESP) crosscutting program FY 1991 technical exchange meeting, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Lumetta GJ, Wagner MJ, Carlson CD (1996) Actinide, strontium, and cesium removal from Hanford radioactive tank sludge. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 14:35–60
Lumetta GJ, Wagner MJ, Jones EO (1995) Separation of strontium-90 from Hanford high-level radioactive waste. Sep Sci Technol 30:1087–1101
Kumar A, Mohapatra PK, Pathak PN, Manchanda VK (1997) Dicyclohexano 18 crown 6 in butanol-octanol mixture: a promising extractant of Sr(II) from nitric acid medium. Talanta 45:387–395
Kumar A, Mohapatra PK, Manchanda VK (1998) Extraction of cesium-137 from nitric acid medium in the presence of macrocyclic polyethers. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 229:169–172
Novy P, Vanura P, Makrlik E (1998) Extraction of 85Sr by the nitrobenzene solution of bis-1,2-dicarbollylcobaltate in the presence of dibenzo-18-crown-6. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 231:65–68
Valentova Z, Vanura P, Makrlik E (1997) Extraction of microamounts of strontium by a nitrobenzene solution of bis-1,2-dicarbollylcobaltate in the presence of 15-crown-5. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 224:45–48
Ritcey GM, Ashbrook AW (1984) Solvent extraction part I. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Mohapatra PK, Lakshmi DS, Manchanda VK (2006) Diluent effect on Sr(II) extraction using di-tert-butyl cyclohexano 18 crown 6 as the extractant and its correlation with transport data obtained from supported liquid membrane studies. Desalination 198:166–172
Gupta KK, Achuthan PV, Ramanujam A, Mathur JN (2003) Effect of diluents on the extraction of Sr2+ from HNO3 solutions with dicyclohexano-18-crown-6. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 21:53–71
Lamb JD, Nazarenko AY, Hansen RJ (1999) Novel solvent system for metal ion separation: improved solvent extraction of strontium(II) and lead(II) as dicyclohexano-18-crown-6 complexes. Sep Sci Technol 34:2583–2599
Mincher BJ, Modolo G, Mezyk SP (2009) Review article: the effects of radiation chemistry on solvent extraction: 2. A review of fission-product extraction. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 27:331–353
Takagi N, Izumi Y, Ema K, Yamamoto T, Nishizawa K (1999) Radiolytic degradation of a crown ether for extractability of strontium. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 17:1461–1471
Mincher BJ, Herbst RS, Tillotson RD, Mezyk SP (2007) Gamma-radiation effects on the performance of HCCD–PEG for Cs and Sr extraction. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 25:747–755
Raut DR, Mohapatra PK, Manchanda VK (2010) Extraction of radio-strontium from nitric acid medium using di-tert-butyl cyclohexano18-Crown-6 (DTBCH18C6) in toluene-1-octanol diluent mixture. Sep Sci Technol 45:204–211
Yuan LY, Peng J, Xu L, Zhai ML, Li JQ, Wei GS (2008) Influence of gamma-radiation on the ionic liquid [C(4)mim][PF6] during extraction of strontium ions. Dalton Trans 45:6358–6360
Yuan LY, Peng J, Xu L, Zhai ML, Li JQ, Wei GS (2009a) Radiation effects on hydrophobic ionic liquid [C(4)mim][NTf2] during extraction of strontium ions. J Phys Chem B 113:8948–8952
Yuan LY, Xu C, Peng J, Xu L, Zhai ML, Li JQ, Wei GS, Shen XH (2009b) Identification of the radiolytic product of hydrophonic ionic liquid [C(4)mim][NTf2] during removal of Sr2+ from aqueous solution. Dalton Trans 38:7873–7875
Chiarizia R, Urban V, Thiyagarajan P, Bond AH, Dietz ML (2000) Small angle neutron scattering investigation of the species formed in the extraction of Sr(II) by mixtures of di-n-octylphosphoric acid and dicyclohexano-18-crown-6. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 18:451–478
Thiyagarajan P, Diamond H, Danesi PR, Horwitz EP (1987) Small-angle neutron-scattering studies of cobalt(II) organophosphorus polymers in deuteriobenzene. Inorg Chem 26:4209–4212
Burns JH, Kessler RM (1986) Structural and molecular mechanics studies of bis(dibutylphosphato)aquastrontuim-18crown-6 and analogous alkaline-earth-metal complexes. Inorg Chem 26:1370–1375
Burns JH, Bryan SA (1988) Complexes of strontium and barium dimethylpropanoates with dicyclohexano-18-crown-6(A) ether. Acta Cryst C 44:1742–1749
Romanovsky VN (2002) Management of accumulated high level waste at the Mayak Production Association in the Russian Federation. In: Issues and trends in radioactive waste management, Proceedings of an International Conference, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 359–372
Miller RL, Pinkerton AB, Abney KD, Kinkead SA (1997) US Patent No 5603074
Miller RL, Pinkerton AB, Hurlburt PK, Abney KD (1995a) Extraction of cesium and strontium into hydrocarbon solvents using tetra-C-alkyl cobalt dicarbollide. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 13:813–827
Miller RL, Pinkerton AB, Hurlburt PK (1995b) 209th ACS national meeting. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 2088, p 823
Galkin BY, Esimantovskii VM, Lazarev LN, Lyubtsev RI, Romanovskii VN, Shishkin L, Kyrsh KM, Rais I, Selucky P (1998) Abstract in International Solvent Extraction Conference (ISEC 88) Moscow, USSR
Esimantovski VM, Galkin BY, Lazarev LN, Lyubtsev RI, Romanovskii VN, Shishkin DN, Dzekun EG (1992) Technological tests of HAW partitioning with the use of chlorinated cobalt dicarbolyde (CHCODIC). Management of Secondary Wastes. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Waste Management—92, Tucson, AZ, pp 801–804
Herbst RS, Law JD, Todd TA, Romanovskiy VN, Smirnov IV, Babain VA, Esimantovskiy VN, Zaitsev BN (2003) Development of the universal extraction (UNEX) process for the simultaneous recovery of Cs, Sr, and actinides from acidic radioactive wastes. Sep Sci Technol 38:2685–2708
Luther TA, Herbst RS, Peterman DR, Tillotson RD, Garn TG, Babain VA, Smirnov IV, Stoyanov ES, Antonov NG (2006) Some aspects of fundamental chemistry of the universal extraction (UNEX) process for the simultaneous separation of major radionuclides (cesium, strontium, actinides, and lanthanides) from radioactive wastes. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 267:603–613
Romanovskiy VN, Smirnov IV, Babain VA, Todd TA, Herbst RS, Law JD, Brewer KN (2001) The universal solvent extraction (UNEX) process. I. Development of the UNEX process solvent for the separation of cesium, strontium, and the actinides from acidic radioactive waste. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 19:1–21
Law JD, Herbst RS, Todd TA, Romanovskiy VN, Babain VA, Esimantovskiy VM, Smirnov IV, Zaitsev BN (2001) The universal solvent extraction (UNEX) process. II. Flowsheet development and demonstration of the UNEX process for the separation of cesium, strontium, and actinides from actual acidic radioactive waste. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 19:23–36
Herbst RS, Law JD, Todd TA, Romanovskii VN, Babain VA, Esimantovski VM, Zaitsev BN, Smirnov IV (2002) Development and testing of a cobalt dicarbollide based solvent extraction process for the separation of cesium and strontium from acidic tank waste. Sep Sci Technol 37:1807–1831
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Srivastava, R.R., Ilyas, S. (2020). Strontium Extraction from the Geo-environment. In: Pathak, P., Gupta, D. (eds) Strontium Contamination in the Environment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 88. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15314-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15314-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15313-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15314-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)