Abstract
Microalgae can be applied for wastewater treatment (WWT) because of their potential to assimilate nutrients. The recent interest in using wastewater as a medium for algae biomass generation is considered as a promising biological process from environmental and economic points of view. Despite the promising research findings on microalgae for WWT at the laboratory scale, the large-scale microalgae-based WWT process is reliable only in outdoor systems that still need further investigation. In this book chapter, we provide an overview and the most up-to-date information on outdoor cultivation of microalgae for WWT, discussing the progress and the important operational factors in outdoor culture.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In algae cultivation, one of the important economic constraints for biomass production is the cost of the nutrient media. Therefore, endeavors are being made to exchange the costlier nutrient media with less expensive supplemental sources. Among current solutions is the utilization of various sorts of wastewater for biomass production. Thus, in recent decades algae research has gained interest mainly oriented to the cultivation of algae in wastewater for cost-effective microalgal biofuel production and waste remediation (Diniz et al. 2016; Salama et al. 2017; Shchegolkova et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2014). The commercial use of algal cultures with application to WWT spans about 70 years. Currently, great interest is being evidenced all over the world including the USA, Australia, Taiwan, Mexico, and Thailand. The utilization of algae in WWT systems for nutrient removal was investigated earlier by Oswald et al. in 1957; wastewaters mainly provide water as well as a large number of necessary nutrients for algae cultivation. Algae are a photosynthetic microorganism with the capacity of converting solar energy into biomass and taking up nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from wastewater (Lam and Lee 2012; Salama et al. 2017). The photosynthetic process produces O2, which is essential in wastewater to allow aerobic bacteria to break down organic contaminants.
Many studies have shown that nutrient removal from wastewater using microalgae is applicable to various wastewater types including municipal (Álvarez-díaz et al. 2017; Liu and Ruan 2014), domestic (Cabanelas et al. 2013; Dahmani et al. 2016), agro-industrial (Posadas et al. 2014a), piggery (Yuan et al. 2013), and food processing (Lu et al. 2015).
Coupling WWT with algae cultivation has been reported to be a good economically viable opportunity (Delrue et al. 2016, 2018) for cost reduction for biomass production as well as for water treatment, which provides an opportunity for clean water production in areas of limited water supply, with a very realistic possibility for utilization in the desert environment and hot arid regions (Fig. 1).
To mass develop microalgae with WWT, a variety of issues, mostly technical and economic, must be considered: finding suitable strains of algae, assessing nutrient content to determine readily available forms for algal uptake, determining the presence of biological inhibitories such as fungal and viral infection, solids content and turbidity for wastewater, competition between different microorganism populations, and environmental factors.
Well-balanced formulas of wastewater are necessary to realize maximal growth potential and high removal rate; with most necessary nutrients, municipal wastewaters offer a suitable option as artificial media for algae cultivation. However, inhibitory and toxic substances in the wastewater may smother the development of algal species. Furthermore, not all cultures are suitable for mass cultivation in open systems because of contamination, thus limiting species that can be used for cultivation on a large scale. Finding strains well adapted to cultivation in open ponds through screening of indigenous species or acclimation could provide a solution to this problem. Additional carbon sources (carbon dioxide, for example) from flue gases and different nutrients might be essential for unbalanced wastewater nutrition, especially the N/P ratio.
WWT using various algae strains has been extensively studied indoors at a laboratory scale, needing to be scaled up to outdoors applications to provide an inexpensive process; however, many factors such as illumination, temperature, and seasonal changes can be a challenge (Rawat et al. 2013; Zhu et al. 2016). To the best of our knowledge, only a few pilot plants have been successfully constructed throughout the world, mainly located in high-irradiance areas (Fig. 2).
2 Algae Culture from the Laboratory to Outdoors
Research on microalgae culture in wastewater has increased. The larger part of this exploration is done on a laboratory scale using artificial light, competent technicians, and controlled growth conditions. However, the transfer of results from laboratory research to outdoor production needs further investigation to adjust and optimize the growth kinetics and nutrient uptake parameters.
Biomass productivity and photosynthetic activity are dependent not only on the total amount of solar energy impinging on the culture surface, but also on the various key factors such as pH, nutrients, salinity, and temperature (Cabello et al. 2015; Mahdy 2016). At the laboratory scale, culturing algae for WWT using real and different types of wastewater, many strains have been identified and high nutrient removal efficiency achieved. Even though a strain may grow well in laboratory cultures under particular incubation conditions (e.g., room temperature and relatively low light intensities), there is no warranty that it will grow efficiently in outdoor systems (García et al. 2017), as these are subject to variable seasonal water temperatures and fluctuations in light throughout the day (Tan et al. 2015). In any case, it is difficult to exploit results obtained in the laboratory to determine outdoor operating conditions. Table 1 shows some experiements conducted under outdoor conditions using various media and systems.
3 Challenges in Using Microalgae for WWT
The use of microalgae or microalgae–bacteria symbiosis has been demonstrated to provide a good treated water quality by removing organic matter and nutrients including nitrogen, phosphorus, hazardous contaminants, heavy metals, and also even for the removal of a specific pollutant (Ma et al. 2014; Olguín 2012).
The main challenges for the application of microalgae for WWT are the variation of cultivation condition and the harvesting of the algae biomass, the result of the settling characteristics and operational conditions. The concentration and composition of the organic material in the influent subjected to daily and seasonal variation must be considered in the design: the hydraulic retention time must be optimized and reduced to face environmental and nutrient fluctuations. Selection of the desired species, and finding and fixing an optimal ratio of algae/bacteria, and micropollutants removal, and a need for external CO2 present additional obstacles.
Although there are several studies on this topic, additional research is needed to prove the effectiveness of microalgae-based WWT systems at full scale as perspectives for coming years and a promising alternative for the WWT process.
4 Effect of Wastewater Composition
The raw sewage/untreated wastewater composition and characteristics vary depending on the source and the location, and contain in their composition the main nutrients necessary for the growth of microalgae (Table 2).
In recent years, the cultivation of various microalgae strains in various raw wastewaters based on agricultural, municipal, and industrial sources was successful (Álvarez-díaz et al. 2017; Ayre et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2013) (Fig. 3).
Urban/municipal wastewaters are a mix of a small percentage of industrial with domestic influents, mainly containing small amounts of suspended and dissolved organic and inorganic solids. Among the organic substances present in sewage are carbohydrates, lignin, fats, proteins, soaps, synthetic detergents, and various natural and synthetic organic chemicals from the processing industries. Most of the municipal wastewater is rich in nutrients such as phosphorus, ammonia, nitrogen, and a variety of inorganic substances, for example, calcium, chlorine, sulfur, magnesium, phosphate, and potassium. However, a number of potentially toxic elements such as chromium, silver, mercury, iron, gold, zinc, lead, copper, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, tin, selenium, aluminum, cobalt, manganese, and molybdenum could be present where algae are able to accumulate these toxic elements, when they are present in small concentrations.
Accumulating processes take place by diverse mechanisms that depend on the species of microalgae and heavy metal ions; diverse factors significantly influence the fixation of heavy metals including the chemical substance concentration, pH, temperature, and accessibility of nutrients in the medium (Kumar et al. 2015; Talebi 2016).
It should be noted that several studies have shown that microalgae biomass has very effective performance for the reduction and elimination of various kinds of pollutants. A range of microalgae strains has been reported to have a potential efficiency of removal of a heavy metal; for example, Chlorella vulgaris is able to remove almost 100% of Cu and Fe and more than 60% of Zn, Pb, and Ni when cultured in urban wastewater (Kumar et al. 2015). The elimination of heavy metals in microalgae is mediated by two simultaneous mechanisms: passive and active. Passive mechanisms such as ion exchange, chemisorption, and adsorption occur at the cell surface, are frequently reversible and kinetically fast (Chojnacka et al. 2005). However, active mechanisms for heavy metal removal imply intracellular and extracellular (Ozturk et al. 2014).
Dishwashing liquids and shampoos are mainly constituted of surfactants, discharged into sewage wastewater. A few studies have reported their effect on algae growth (nutrient uptake); inhibition and toxic effect was observed for cationic and anionic surfactants with a concentration exceeding 1 mg/l. However, toxicities of non-ionic surfactant range from 0.003 to 18 mg/l; for example, 0.17–0.69 mg/l of sodium dodecyl sulfate is a minimum inhibitory concentration of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Groot 1990).
Utilization of microalgae for municipal WWT could be very effectively implemented for small communities where the variations in the effluent concentration could be minimized and controlled.
5 Agricultural Wastewater
Ranges of wastewaters are produced by the agriculture industry. The nutrient concentrations are wholly source dependent; a few studies showed the feasibility of the algal treatment of piggery, dairy, and poultry wastewater.
Agriculture wastewater is characterized by high nutrient concentrations, which may lead to algae being unable to grow. WW is very rich in pollutants such as ammoniacal nitrogen and phosphorus as well as having significant chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration. The majority of studies report the important need for dilution (50%) for appropriate microalgae growth (Ayre et al. 2017) and a freshwater supply. High ammonia concentrations and high turbidity can be among the major challenges for long-term outdoor microalgae cultivation.
In poultry wastewater, total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) are generally more than 280 mg/l, with a COD exceeding 6000 mg/l; outdoor culture requires diluted poultry media and selection of the right algal strain to avoid photoinhibition. Studies conducted indoors showed that Arthrospira platensis cannot survive and grow and was significantly inhibited in 20× and 25× diluted poultry WW; however, Chlorella vulgaris displayed better growth in 10× diluted media (Markou et al. 2016).
The outdoor culture of Scenedesmus sp. using diluted effluent from a chicken manure biogas plant (25×) has been reported; ammonium and orthophosphate uptake were achieved at 90% but COD and nitrate at more than 50% (Lu et al. 2015).
Increasing use of pesticides, insecticides, antibiotics, and other fertilizers in agriculture will have a significant impact on microalgae growth and the kinetic nutrient uptake process for large-scale application.
6 Industrial Wastewater
Industrial WWT is not simple because its composition fluctuates and may contain poorly biodegradable components and high organic matter content (Dvořák et al. 2014). The characteristics of industrial wastewater and the presence of toxic components vary according to the type of activity that generated the pollution. Wastewater from slaughterhouses includes copper and zinc; petroleum industry wastewater contains benzene, naphthalene, nonylphenol, toluene, and xylene. Plastic plant waste contains octylphenol and chromium; the textile finishing sector produces waters rich in tribulphosphate, naphthalene, xylene, copper, and zinc. The manufacture of biocides or phytosanitary products pollutes the water with arsenic, chromium, copper, and zinc.
Industrial wastewater generally contains many heavy metals compared to municipal wastewater, but less phosphorus and nitrogen. For this purpose, it is necessary to use microalgae species or strains that effectively adsorb heavy metals.
Research studies are devoted to the removal of heavy metals and organic pollutants from microalgae grown in industrial WW. However, the high concentrations of organic toxins and heavy metals present in industrial wastewater tend to limit the possibilities of microalgae cultivation following the inhibition of microalgae growth.
A very few studies have reported outdoor culture using industrial wastewater because of its complex composition. Usha et al. (2016) studied the removal of organic pollution and nutrient rejects from paper and pulp mill effluent in an open outdoor pond diluted with distilled water (60%) using a Scenedesmus sp. strain; removal of up to 89% and 75% of COD and biological oxygen demand (BOD), respectively, was achieved. NO3-N and PO4-P removal up to 65% and 71.29%, respectively, were observed at the end of 28 days.
The scaleup for outdoor removal in industrial wastewater needs further investigation; indoor cultured studies showed removal efficiency.
7 Systems for Outdoor Microalgae Cultivation
Microalgae cultivation systems are one of the important aspects of biomass productivity. For this, numerous types of algal cultivation systems are developed (Fig. 4); the majority of them are based on closed or open systems. Based on the literature, it is impossible today to compare the performance of different outdoor systems because the reactors are not located in the same places, the mode of operations and measurements are different, and there are several cultivated strains.
7.1 Open Systems
A stabilization pond of wastewater is a basin at a designed depth in the ground for the treatment of wastewater. They are used to treat a variety of WW under broad weather conditions and are cost-effective to provide WWT when land is available. Moreover, their operation is very easy it requires minimum maintenance. These ponds are generally used preferably in areas with a warm climate. Raceway ponds are widely used for large-scale algal biomass production.
The algae ponds used in the WWT plants are constructed in a suitable form for the location; the mixing is generally achieved by a gravity flow. The Werribee WWT plant in Melbourne is one of the largest algal ponds for WWT with a surface area of 11,000 ha. Winckelmann et al. (2015) reported a successful study in an arid desert for cultures of indigenous algae using wastewater in open ponds (38 cm deep, 80 cm wide, 4 m long). However, Ayre et al. (2017) reported outdoor cultivation of microalgae on undiluted anaerobic digested waste using 1 m2 fiberglass paddlewheel-driven raceway ponds during the winter. Many disadvantages have been observed, such as ammonia lost to the atmosphere or an undesirable contamination of the culture during long-term growth.
Major wastewater pond systems are large shallow ponds, tanks, raceway ponds, and circular ponds (Ugwu et al. 2008). The most popular type for microalgae cultivation and WWT is the raceway pond (de Godos et al. 2014). However, some major limitations can affect biomass productivity in open ponds, such as evaporative losses, easily contaminated cultures, photoinhibition in the summer, light used by the cells, and diffusion of CO2.
However, the working depth is one of the most important design parameters of a raceway pond. Working with a shallow depth can exposure the algae to high temperature, especially during the summer, but a too great pond depth can prevent efficient light penetration. The optimal depth can be determined according to the quality and quantity of light penetrating, taking into account wastewater turbidity, which induces light-scattering processes and attenuation.
The hydraulic retention time (HRT), defined as the time that a wastewater remains inside the pond before it is evacuated, is an important factor that determines the efficiency and the cost-effectiveness of wastewater treatment. Many authors have suggested keep the HRT long enough to reach a maximum algae growth rate with high nutrient uptake and prevent nutrient limitation (Kim 2014). The HTR should be connected to seasonal variation and WW composition. HTR in the summer must be shorter than in the winter, because for a high nutrient reduction in the summer compared to the winter studies have reported that the removal efficiency of phosphorus and nitrogen with Scenedesmus obliquus was 20% higher in the summer (Lu et al. 2016).
7.2 Closed Systems
Various closed systems that have been designed for algae culture include tubular, flat-plate, and bag reactors; usually photobioreactors have better light penetration. Most of the closed systems are attractive for cultivation of algae for high-value product. High biomass productivity with minimal contamination has been reported, but a closed system not adapted for algae WWT use because of the high cost of maintenance and the need of more technical knowledge.
The design principles of most bioreactors used for WWT are derived from and similar to the pure culture systems: closed photobioreactors (PBRs) are generally considered to be too complicated to promote to a large scale. Tubular bubble column photobioreactors of 40 l were used for Chlorella zofingiensis outdoor culture in artificial wastewater in southern China with temperature varying between 20.6 ° and 30.8 °C; a biomass yield of 17.4 g m−2 day−1 was achieved (Zemke et al. 2013).
Vertical flat-plate PBR supplemented with municipal wastewater have been reported. Although the experiment was performed indoors under controlled conditions of illumination and temperature, 99% of TN and TP was removed with Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus (Salama et al. 2017).
8 Limiting Factors in Outdoor Cultivation
Two competitive processes are responsible for the production of algal biomass: respiration and photosynthesis. However, the outdoor cultivation for nutrient removal from wastewater may depend on various abiotic and biotic factors such as algal species, nutrients, location, season, temperature, and irradiance, amount of rain, and/or wind and turbidity.
To maximize algal productivity, the different growth factors must be maintained. Nutrients can be controlled by adding wastewater as a medium into the culture. However, light intensity, temperature, and evaporation depend on solar irradiation, location, and season, and therefore cannot be controlled during outdoor cultivation.
The following section describes how the different growth factors predict algal productivity in outdoor cultivation.
8.1 Light Limitation and Photoinhibition
Outdoors, depending on the location of the crop and because of seasonal changes, the algae are exposed to irradiation that changes with time, different levels of illumination, and daily fluctuations. The effectiveness of photosynthesis is influenced by the fluctuation in light conditions with regard to intensity, wavelength, and duration. It is essential to evaluate each parameter to determine the optimal light condition that yields maximal productivity.
The intensity and availability of light is the major factor in the growth and productivity of photosynthetic microorganisms. Low light intensity leads to growth limitation whereas light intensity can inhibit the growth process: this phenomenon is known as photoinhibition (Barber 1992; Han 2002). Excess light intensity imposes a serious limitation on photosynthetic efficiency, particularly when coupled with high oxygen level and/or a temperature that is not optimal (Tredici and Zittelli 1998).
In a single day, light intensity changes from zero to saturated or oversaturated light levels. Therefore, the outdoor production of microalgae is light limited at the beginning and end of the day and light saturated in the middle of the day. Furthermore, light intensity also varies throughout the year, leading to complex operational processes in outdoor culture.
Microalgae have developed protective mechanisms to accommodate the changes in light intensity. Photo-acclimation is a process in which the microalgae reduce their photosynthetic pigment content as a way to protect the photosynthetic apparatus against increased irradiance (Sousa et al. 2013). The chlorophyll content per cell varies in relationship to the surrounding light environment (Sousa et al. 2013). Chlorophyll increases in the light-limited phase until the cells become optically dark and decrease under the light-saturated phase, resulting in more transparent cells (Simionato et al. 2011; Sousa et al. 2013). When exposed to strong illumination, microalgae protect their photosynthetic capacity by decreasing chlorophyll content and increasing carotenoid content in their pigmentation. This phenomenon occurs only with a limited number of microalgae, such as Haematococcus pluvialis and Dunaliella salina.
In most cases, however, chlorophylls and carotenoids decrease when microalgae are exposed to high light intensities, and as a result, the cells gradually turn from green to yellow to orange because the degradation of chlorophylls is usually more rapid than that of carotenoids. The increase in carotenoid content allows algae to dissipate excited chlorophyll energy and remove reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus maintaining the photosystem structure and functions. At very strong illumination, protective mechanisms will not be able to overcome the excess of electrons, ROS accumulation, and singlet oxygen formation, resulting in the death of algal cells (Simionato et al. 2011; Sousa et al. 2013).
In an outdoor culture system, in addition to the total amount of solar energy received on the growing surface that is important for biomass productivity, the amount of energy available at the cell level is necessary for good production (concepts of “light regime” and “light per cell”) (Chaumont 1993). However, the decrease in photosynthetic activity is explained by an enzymatic inactivation caused by high temperature, high irradiance, or both. Scenedesmus obtusiusculus showed a linear response of photosynthetic activity for irradiances in the range of 8–300 μE m−2 s−1, which remains constant until an irradiance of 970 μE m−2 s−1. At high irradiances (1600–2360 μE m−2 s−1), photoinhibition was observed at temperatures above 35 °C. At high irradiance (1000 μE m−2 s−1), photoinhibition has been reported for Synechococcus, Haematococcus, Chlorella, Phaedolactinum, and an Scenedesmus almeriensis strain (Revah and Morales 2015).
Photosynthesis of most algal species is saturated at a solar radiation level of 200 μE m−2 s−1, which is about 10–17% of summer/winter maximum outdoor light intensity (Park et al. 2011).
The culture density and algal strain affect the light saturation level; the algal productivity from incident solar radiation can be estimated from the maximum efficiency of photosynthetic conversion of algae. For this, it is necessary to study the influence of light on the growth of any particular strain. Algal productivity could be determined from the average solar radiation photoinhibitory process that can result in a loss in biomass productivity and nutrient removal efficiency. This problem can be solved by shading the culture such that the incident photon flux decreases and by avoiding a culture of microorganisms in the heating systems.
8.2 Temperature Limitation
In the closed system, especially in the photobioreactor, the temperatures increase with increasing solar radiation and air temperatures. The heat is transferred mainly through radiation, air radiation, direct and diffuse solar radiation; heat is transferred to the medium through natural or forced convection in case of mixing.
In the outdoor culture system, geographic location will define the maximum temperature that algae may be exposed to and be able to grow and survive; in high insolation, temperature can reach 40 °C.
Economically, temperature control for outdoor large-scale ponds is impossible, as temperature varies during the day and with season; thus, the algal strain should be chosen to tolerate a broad range of temperature as well as showing high productivity and nutrient removal during the year in summer when the pond achieves a high temperature in arid areas, especially at night or in the winter when the pond may freeze over.
8.3 Evaporation
High evaporation rate is one of the main problems of outdoor algae ponds and is most often seen as a limitation. Evaporation is a surface process, mainly influenced by air temperature, relative humidity, and wind. Evaporation from algae ponds can be estimated from standard evaporation (“Pan A”). The factors affecting evaporation rate are temperature, surface area, humidity of air, and wind speed. However, algae ponds are much shallower and mechanically mixed, and thus are expected to increase in evaporation rates. In most of the areas considered suitable for algae culture the evaporation rate is found to be high, which can affect the “blow-down” ratio (BDR) and induce salinity and nutrient concentration variations. Freshwater evaporation rate in some tropical regions is found to be 0.01 m3 m−2 day−1, or 10 mm per day (Chisti 2012). On the other hand, the composition and nature of the wastewater affect the evaporation rate. The evaporation rate decreases as the solids and the concentrations chemical increase. Under the same environmental condition, the evaporation rate of seawater and wastewater from a pond is generally a little less than the evaporation rate of freshwater.
In reality, a microalgae strain can survive and grow at peak summer temperatures but it develops less well during winter days. For this, the solution is to deploy different strains of microalgae under different climatic variations of the year (different seasonal crops). We can assume the use of alternate microalgal cultivation with seasonal changes for seamless continuity in biomass production over the year (Kenny and Flynn 2017).
9 Conclusion
Much knowledge on the use of microalgae for WWTs has been validated and proved. The removal efficiency of a nutrient or specific pollutant from a different type of wastewater by several microalgae strains has been tested and studied. Although few data on outdoor cultivation performance are available, it appears that selecting the locations for algal cultivation using WWT indeed provides economic and environmental advantages that will, therefore, require careful optimization and assessment. However, further research for performing an algae-based WWT process is still needed to answer to the future challenges such as technical and economic feasibility at an outdoor large scale, optimization of hydraulic retention time, contamination control, and harvesting of algae biomass.
References
Arbib Z, Ruiz J, Álvarez-Díaz P, Garrido-Pérez C, Barragan J, Perales JA (2013) Long term outdoor operation of a tubular airlift pilot photobioreactor and a high rate algal pond as tertiary treatment of urban wastewater. Ecol Eng 52:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.089
Ayre JM, Moheimani NR, Borowitzka MA (2017) Growth of microalgae on undiluted anaerobic digestate of piggery effluent with high ammonium concentrations. Algal Res 24:218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.03.023
Álvarez-díaz PD, Ruiz J, Arbib Z, Barragán J, Garrido-pérez MC, Perales JA (2017) Freshwater microalgae selection for simultaneous wastewater nutrient removal and lipid production. Algal Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.02.006
Barber J (1992) Too much of a good thing: light can be bad for photosynthesis. Trends Biochem Sci 17:61–66
Bhattacharjee M, Siemann E (2015) Low algal diversity systems are a promising method for biodiesel production in wastewater fed open reactors. Algae 30:67–79. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2015.30.1.067
Cabanelas ITD, Ruiz J, Arbib Z, Chinalia FA, Garrido-Pérez C, Rogalla F, Nascimento IA, Perales JA (2013) Comparing the use of different domestic wastewaters for coupling microalgal production and nutrient removal. Bioresour Technol 131:429–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.152
Cabello J, Toledo-Cervantes A, Sanchez L, Revah S, Morales M (2015) Effect of the temperature, pH and irradiance on the photosynthetic activity by Scenedesmus obtusiusculus under nitrogen replete and deplete conditions. Bioresour Technol 181:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.034
Chaumont D (1993) Biotechnology of algal biomass production: a review of systems for outdoor mass culture. J Appl Phycol 5:593–604
Chojnacka K, Chojnacki A, Górecka H (2005) Biosorption of Cr3+, Cd2+ and Cu2+ ions by blue-green algae Spirulina sp.: kinetics, equilibrium and the mechanism of the process. Chemosphere 59:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.005
Chu H, Tan X, Zhang Y, Yang L, Zhao F, Guo J (2015) Continuous cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa using anaerobic digested starch processing wastewater in the outdoors. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.030
Craggs R, Sutherland D, Campbell H (2012) Hectare-scale demonstration of high rate algal ponds for enhanced wastewater treatment and biofuel production. J Appl Phycol 24:329–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9810-8
Chisti, Y. (2012). Raceways-based production of algal crude oil. In: C. Posten & C. Walter (Eds.), Microalgal biotechnology: Potential and production (pp. 113–146). de Gruyter, Berlin
de Godos I, Blanco S, García-Encina PA, Becares E, Muñoz R (2010) Influence of flue gas sparging on the performance of high rate algae ponds treating agro-industrial wastewaters. J Hazard Mater 179:1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.112
de Godos I, Blanco S, García-Encina PA, Becares E, Muñoz R (2009a) Long-term operation of high rate algal ponds for the bioremediation of piggery wastewaters at high loading rates. Bioresour Technol 100:4332–4339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.016
de Godos I, González C, Becares E, García-Encina PA, Muñoz R (2009b) Simultaneous nutrients and carbon removal during pretreated swine slurry degradation in a tubular biofilm photobioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1825-3
de Godos I, Mendoza JL, Acién FG, Molina E, Banks CJ, Heaven S, Rogalla F (2014) Evaluation of carbon dioxide mass transfer in raceway reactors for microalgae culture using flue gases. Bioresour Technol 153:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.087
Dahmani S, Zerrouki D, Ramanna L, Rawat I, Bux F (2016) Cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa in outdoor open raceway pond using domestic wastewater as medium in arid desert region. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.019
Delrue F, Álvarez-Díaz DP, Fon-Sing S, Fleury G, Sassi J-F (2016) The environmental biorefinery: using microalgae to remediate wastewater, a win–win paradigm. Energies 9:132. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9030132
Diniz GS, Silva AF, Araújo OQF, Chaloub RM (2016) The potential of microalgal biomass production for biotechnological purposes using wastewater resources. J Appl Phycol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0976-3
Dvořák L, Lederer T, Jirků V, Masák J, Novák L (2014) Removal of aniline, cyanides and diphenylguanidine from industrial wastewater using a full-scale moving bed biofilm reactor. Process Biochem 49:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2013.10.011
De Francisci D, Su Y, Iital A, Angelidaki I (2018) Evaluation of microalgae production coupled with wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 39:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1308441
García-gonzález M (2013) Conditions for open-air outdoor culture of Dunaliella salina in southern Spain. J Appl Phycol 15:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023892520443
García D, Posadas E, Grajeda C, Blanco S, Martínez-Páramo S (2017) Comparative evaluation of piggery wastewater treatment in algal- bacterial photobioreactors under indoor and outdoor conditions. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.135
González-Fernández C, Mahdy A, Ballesteros I, Ballesteros M (2016) Impact of temperature and photoperiod on anaerobic biodegradability of microalgae grown in urban wastewater. Int Biodeter Biodegr 106:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.09.016
Groot D (1990) Chronic toxicities of surfactants and detergent builders to algae: a review and risk assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 20:123–140
Guccione A, Biondi N, Sampietro G, Rodolfi L, Bassi N, Tredici MR (2014) Chlorella for protein and biofuels: from strain selection to outdoor cultivation in a Green Wall Panel photobioreactor. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:84
Han BP (2002) A mechanistic model of algal photoinhibition induced by photodamage to photosystem. II. J Theor Biol 214:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2468
Henkanatte-gedera SM, Selvaratnam T, Karbakhshravari M, Myint M, Nirmalakhandan N, Van Voorhies W, Lammers PJ (2017) Removal of dissolved organic carbon and nutrients from urban wastewaters by Galdieria sulphuraria: laboratory to field scale demonstration. Algal Res 4:450–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.08.001
Kenny P, Flynn KJ (2017) Physiology limits commercially viable photoautotrophic production of microalgal biofuels. J Appl Phycol 29:2713–2727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1214-3
Kim H (2014) Nutrient removal and biofuel production in high rate algal pond using real municipal wastewater. J Microbiol Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1312.12057
Kumar KS, Dahms H, Won E, Lee J, Shin K (2015) Ecotoxicology and environmental safety microalgae – a promising tool for heavy metal remediation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:329–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.019
Lam MK, Lee KT (2012) Potential of using organic fertilizer to cultivate Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Appl Energy 94:303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.075
Ledda C, Villegas GIR, Adani F, Fernández FGA, Grima EM (2015) Utilization of centrate from wastewater treatment for the outdoor production of Nannochloropsis gaditana biomass at pilot-scale. Algal Res 12:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.08.002
Liu Y, Ruan R (2014) Effect of wastewater-borne bacteria on algal growth and nutrients removal in wastewater-based algae cultivation system. Bioresour Technol 167:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.087
Lu Q, Zhou W, Min M, Ma X, Chandra C, Doan YTT, Ma Y, Zheng H, Cheng S, Griffith R, Chen P, Chen C, Urriola PE, Shurson GC, Gislerød HR, Ruan R (2015) Bioresource technology: growing Chlorella sp. on meat processing wastewater for nutrient removal and biomass production. Bioresour Technol 198:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.133
Lu Q, Zhou W, Min M, Ma X, Ma Y, Chen P, Zheng H, Doan YTT, Liu H, Chen C, Urriola PE, Shurson GC, Ruan R (2016) Mitigating ammonia nitrogen deficiency in dairy wastewaters for algae cultivation. Bioresour Technol 201:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.029
Ma X, Zhou W, Fu Z, Cheng Y, Min M, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Chen P, Ruan R (2014) Effect of wastewater-borne bacteria on algal growth and nutrients removal in wastewater-based algae cultivation system. Bioresour Technol 167:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.087
Mahdy AA (2016) Impact of temperature and photoperiod on anaerobic biodegradability of microalgae grown in urban wastewater. Int Biodeter Biodegr 106:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.09.016
Markou G, Iconomou D, Muylaert K (2016) Applying raw poultry litter leachate for the cultivation of Arthrospira platensis and Chlorella vulgaris. Algal Res 13:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.11.018
Matamoros V, Gutiérrez R, Ferrer I, García J, Bayona JM (2015) Capability of microalgae-based wastewater treatment systems to remove emerging organic contaminants: a pilot-scale study. J Hazard Mater 288:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.002
Olguín EJ (2012) Dual purpose microalgae–bacteria-based systems that treat wastewater and produce biodiesel and chemical products within a biorefinery. Biotechnol Adv 30:1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.05.001
Oswald WJ, Gotaas HB (1957) Photosynthesis in sewage treatment. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 122:73–105
Ozturk S, Aslim B, Suludere Z, Tan S (2014) Metal removal of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides by uronic acid content and monosaccharide composition. Carbohydr Polym 101:265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.040
Park JB, Craggs RJ, Shilton AN (2011) Wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds for biofuel production. Bioresour Technol 102:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.158
Posadas E, Bochon S, Coca M, García-González MC, García-Encina PA, Muñoz R (2014a) Microalgae-based agro-industrial wastewater treatment: a preliminary screening of biodegradability. J Appl Phycol 26:2335–2345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0263-0
Posadas E, García-Encina PA, Domínguez A, Díaz I, Becares E, Blanco S, Muñoz R (2014b) Enclosed tubular and open algal-bacterial biofilm photobioreactors for carbon and nutrient removal from domestic wastewater. Ecol Eng 67:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.007
Posadas E, del Mar Morales M, Gomez C, Acién FG, Muñoz R (2015a) Influence of pH and CO2 source on the performance of microalgae-based secondary domestic wastewater treatment in outdoors pilot raceways. Chem Eng J 265:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.059
Posadas E, Muñoz A, García-González MC, Muñoz R, García-Encina PA (2015b) A case study of a pilot high rate algal pond for the treatment of fish farm and domestic wastewaters. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90:1094–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4417
Rawat I, Ranjith Kumar R, Mutanda T, Bux F (2013) Biodiesel from microalgae: a critical evaluation from laboratory to large scale production. Appl Energy 103:444–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.004
Revah S, Morales M (2015) Effect of the temperature, pH and irradiance on the photosynthetic activity by Scenedesmus obtusiusculus under nitrogen replete and deplete conditions. Bioresour Technol 181:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.034
Rodolfi L, Zittelli GC, Biondi N, Bonini G, Tredici MR, Padovani G (2009) Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:100–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22033
Salama E, Kurade MB, Abou-shanab RAI, El-dalatony MM (2017) Recent progress in microalgal biomass production coupled with wastewater treatment for biofuel generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.091
Shchegolkova N, Shurshin K, Pogosyan S, Voronova E, Matorin D, Karyakin D (2018) Microalgae cultivation for wastewater treatment and biogas production at Moscow wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.088
Simionato D, Sforza E, Corteggiani Carpinelli E, Bertucco A, Giacometti GM, Morosinotto T (2011) Acclimation of Nannochloropsis gaditana to different illumination regimes: effects on lipids accumulation. Bioresour Technol 102:6026–6032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.100
Sousa C, Compadre A, Vermuë M, Wijffels R (2013) Effect of oxygen at low and high light intensities on the growth of Neochloris oleoabundans. Algal Res 2:122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2013.01.007
Sutherland DL, Turnbull MH, Craggs RJ (2014) Increased pond depth improves algal productivity and nutrient removal in wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds. Water Res 53:271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.025
Talebi AF (2016) Potential use of algae for heavy metal bioremediation, a critical review. J Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.059
Tan X-B, Yang L-B, Zhang Y-L, Zhao F-C, Chu H-Q, Guo J (2015) Chlorella pyrenoidosa cultivation in outdoors using the diluted anaerobically digested activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 198:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.025
Tan X, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Yang L, Zhang W (2017) Enhanced lipid and biomass production using alcohol wastewater as carbon source for Chlorella pyrenoidosa cultivation in anaerobically digested starch wastewater in outdoors. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.152
Tredici MR, Zittelli GC (1998) Efficiency of sunlight utilization: tubular versus flat photobioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 57:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980120)57:2<187::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-J
Ugwu CU, Aoyagi H, Uchiyama H (2008) Photobioreactors for mass cultivation of algae. Bioresour Technol 99:4021–4028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.046
Usha MT, Chandra TS, Sarada R, Chauhan VS (2016) Removal of nutrients and organic pollution load from pulp and paper mill effluent by microalgae in outdoor open pond. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.060
Van Den Hende S, Beelen V, Bore G, Boon N, Vervaeren H (2014) Up-scaling aquaculture wastewater treatment by microalgal bacterial flocs: from lab reactors to an outdoor raceway pond. Bioresour Technol 159:342–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.113
Villegas GIR, Fiamengo M, Fernández FGA, Grima EM (2017) Outdoor production of microalgae biomass at pilot-scale in seawater using centrate as the nutrient source. Algal Res 25:538–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.06.016
Winckelmann D, Bleeke F, Thomas B, Elle C, Klöck G (2015) Open pond cultures of indigenous algae grown on non-arable land in an arid desert using wastewater. Int Aquat Res 7:221–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40071-015-0107-9
Woertz I, Feffer A, Lundquist T, Nelson Y (2009) Algae grown on dairy and municipal wastewater for simultaneous nutrient removal and lipid production for biofuel feedstock. J Environ Eng 135:1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000129
Wu Y, Hu H, Yu Y, Zhang T, Zhu S, Zhuang L, Zhang X, Lu Y (2014) Microalgal species for sustainable biomass/lipid production using wastewater as resource: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:675–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.026
Yuan Z, Wang Z, Takala J, Hiltunen E, Qin L, Xu Z, Qin X, Zhu L (2013) Scale-up potential of cultivating Chlorella zofingiensis in piggery wastewater for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 137:318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.144
Zemke PE, Sommerfeld MR, Hu Q (2013) Assessment of key biological and engineering design parameters for production of Chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyceae) in outdoor photobioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:5645–5655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4919-5
Zhu L, Wang Z, Takala J, Hiltunen E, Qin L, Xu X, Qin Z, Yuan Z (2013) Scale-up potential of cultivating Chlorella zofingiensis in piggery wastewater for biodiesel production. Bioresource technology, 137:318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.144
Zhu L, Wang Z, Shu Q, Takala J, Hiltunen E, Feng P, Yuan Z (2013) Nutrient removal and biodiesel production by integration of freshwater algae cultivation with piggery wastewater treatment. Water Res 47:4294–4302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.004
Zhu LD, Xu ZB, Qin L, Wang ZM, Hiltunen E, Li ZH, Xu ZB, Qin L, Wang ZM, Hiltunen E, Oil ZHL (2016) Oil production from pilot-scale microalgae cultivation: an economics evaluation. Energy Source Part B Econ Plann Policy 11:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2015.1052594
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zerrouki, D., Henni, A. (2019). Outdoor Microalgae Cultivation for Wastewater Treatment. In: Gupta, S.K., Bux, F. (eds) Application of Microalgae in Wastewater Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13913-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13913-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13912-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13913-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)