Abstract
Technologies can change societies but also law designing the rules for living together. If technological developments go fast and deep, even disruptive effects are possible. The digitization of the last 20 years had an impact on the markets and on competition law in various respects. In a first phase online transactions became feasible. Data ownership and privacy as new values further impacted the antitrust parameters environment in a second phase. The most disruptive effects, however, have been caused by the recent and newest technologies, namely the new infrastructures (distributed ledger technologies) as well as by algorithms and artificial intelligence. The contribution outlines the developments and particularly discusses the major challenges to which competition law is exposed in the present technological environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For an early general overview of the online markets see Weber (2013), pp. 1 et seqq.
- 2.
Graef (2015), pp. 487/88.
- 3.
Indeed the phenomenon of two-sided markets is not as new as acknowledged by some scholars.
- 4.
Haucap and Heimeshof (2013), p. 3.
- 5.
OECD (2018).
- 6.
Weber (2013), p. 2.
- 7.
In two-sidedonline markets some services are typically offered free of charge to users (see Sect. 2.4 below).
- 8.
Haucap and Heimeshof (2013), p. 3.
- 9.
Weber (2013), p. 3.
- 10.
Whish and Bailey (2018), p. 189, p. 213 and p. 220.
- 11.
See also Weber (2011), pp. 51 et seqq.
- 12.
Weber (2013), pp. 3–4.
- 13.
Edlin and Harris (2013), p. 9.
- 14.
Edlin and Harris (2013), p. 9.
- 15.
Weber (2013), p. 4.
- 16.
Acquisti et al. (2016).
- 17.
Weber (2014), p. 175.
- 18.
Weber (2013), p. 4.
- 19.
Geradin and Kuschewsky (2013).
- 20.
Graef (2015), pp. 487–488.
- 21.
See below Sect. 3.1.
- 22.
See also Weber (2013), p. 5.
- 23.
See also Weber (2013), p. 5.
- 24.
For a general overview of the relations between big data analyses and competition law see Ezrachi and Stucke (2016), pp. 11 et seqq.
- 25.
Thouvenin et al. (2017), pp. 125 et seqq.
- 26.
Weber (2017a), p. 150.
- 27.
- 28.
For further details see Weber and Thouvenin (2018), pp. 54–55.
- 29.
- 30.
Weber (2017a), pp. 152–153.
- 31.
Weber (2017a), p. 153.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
COM(2015) 634 final (December 9, 2015).
- 35.
Monopolkommission (2015), p. 201.
- 36.
Kilian (2012), p. 173.
- 37.
- 38.
Reference to the problems in case of developing viable regulations is also made by Capobianco and Gonzaga (2017), p. 6.
- 39.
Weber (2014), p. 182.
- 40.
Weber (2014), pp. 178–179.
- 41.
Weber (2016), pp. 66 et seqq.
- 42.
Rolf H. Weber and Florent Thouvenin, Rechtsgutachten zuhanden des Bundesamters für Justiz, Möglichkeit der Einführung eines Datenportabilitätsrechts im schweizerischen Recht und zur Rechtslage bei Personal Information Management Systems (PIMS), 22. Dezember 2017, verfügbar https://www.bakom.admin.ch/bakom/de/home/digital-und-internet/big-data.html.
- 43.
Weber (2017b), nos. 23 et seqq.
- 44.
- 45.
OECD et al. (2017), pp. 3–4.
- 46.
OECD et al. (2017), pp. 4–5.
- 47.
Petit (2017), p. 362.
- 48.
- 49.
Ezrachi and Stucke (2017), pp. 1784–1787.
- 50.
Ezrachi and Stucke (2017), pp. 1787–1789.
- 51.
Ezrachi and Stucke (2017), pp. 1789–1794.
- 52.
Ezrachi and Stucke (2017), pp. 1795–1808.
- 53.
OECD et al. (2017), p. 29.
- 54.
For further details see OECD et al. (2017), pp. 27 et seqq.
- 55.
OECD et al. (2017), pp. 32–33 and 34.
- 56.
US Association for Computing Machinery.
- 57.
- 58.
See art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- 59.
Heinemann and Gebicka (2016), p. 439.
- 60.
Harrington and Harker (2017).
- 61.
- 62.
OECD et al. (2017), p. 23.
- 63.
OECD et al. (2017), p. 30.
- 64.
- 65.
OECD (2017b), p. 43.
- 66.
Vestagher (2017).
- 67.
Ezrachi and Stucke (2017), p. 1801.
- 68.
Ezrachi and Stucke (2017), pp. 1799 and 1806.
References
Acquisti A, Taylor CR, Wagman L (2016) The economics of privacy. J Econ Lit 54:442–492
Capobianco A, Gonzaga P (2017) Algorithms and competition: friends or foes? Compet Policy Int Antitrust Chronicle 1:1–6
Edlin AS, Harris RG (2013) The role of switching costs in antitrust analysis: a comparison of Microsoft and Google. Yale J Law Technol 15(2):169–213
Ezrachi A, Stucke ME (2016) Virtual competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Ezrachi A, Stucke ME (2017) Artificial intelligence & collusion: when computers inhibit competition. Univ Illinois Law Rev 2017:1775–1809
Geradin D, Kuschewsky M (2013) Competition law and personal data: preliminary thoughts on a complex issues, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2216088. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
Graef I (2015) Market definition and market power in data: the case of online platforms. World Compet Law Econ Rev 38(4):473–506
Harrington JE Jr, Harker PT (2017) Developing competition law for collusion by autonomous price-setting agents, Discussion Paper. The Wharton School, Pennsylvania. 22 August
Haucap J, Heimeshof U (2013) Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization? Discussion Paper, Düsseldorf
Heinemann A, Gebicka A (2016) Can computer form cartels? About the need for European Institutions to revise the concertation doctrine in the information age. J Eur Compet Law Pract 7:431–441
Kilian W (2012) Personal data: the impact of emerging trends in the information society – how the marketability of personal data should affect the concept of data protection law. Comp Law Rev Int 13(6):169–175
Monopolkommission (2015) Wettbewerbspolitik: Herausforderung digitale Märkte, Baden-Baden
OECD (2017a) Algorithms and collusion, competition policy in the digital age. OECD, Paris. (publication based on OECD. 2017b)
OECD (2017b) Directorate for financial and enterprise affairs, competition committee, algorithms and collusion – background note by the secretariat. OECD, Paris. 9 June
OECD (2018) Rethinking antitrust tools for multi-sided platforms. OECD, Paris. 6 April
OECD, Ezrachi A, Stucke ME (2017) Algorithmic collusion: problems and counter-measures – Note. OECD, Paris. 31 May
Petit N (2017) Antitrust and artificial intelligence: a research agenda. J Eur Compet Law Pract 8:361–362
Picht PG, Freund B (2018) Competition (law) in the era of algorithms, Max Planck institute for innovation and competition Research Paper No. 18–10, Munich
Rubinstein IS (2013) Big data: the end of privacy or a new beginning? Int Data Priv Law 3(2):74–87
Tene O, Polonetsky J (2013) Big data for all: privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwest J Technol Intellect Prop 11(5):239–273
Thouvenin F, Weber RH, Früh A (2017) Data ownership: taking stock and mapping the issues. In: Dehmer, Emmert-Streib (eds) Frontiers in data science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 111–145
Vestagher M (2017) Algorithms and competition. Remarks by the European Commission for Commissioner at the Bundeskartellamt 18th conference on competition, Berlin, 16 March.
Weber RH (2011) Competition law versus FRAND-terms in IT-markets. World Compet Law Econ Rev 34:51–71
Weber RH (2013) Competition law issues in the online world, 20th St. Gallen International Law Forum, April, Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2341978. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
Weber RH (2014) Information at the crossroads of competition and data protection law. ZWeR 2:169–183
Weber RH (2016) Data portability and big data analytics: new competition policy challenges. Concorrenza e Mercato 23:59–72
Weber RH (2017a) Data ownership in platform markets. In: Belli, Zingales (eds) Platform regulations, Rio de Janeiro, pp 147–162
Weber RH (2017b) Blockchain als rechtliche Herausforderung, Weblaw Jusletter, 18 May
Weber RH, Thouvenin F (2018) Dateneigentum und Datenzugangsrechte – Bausteine der Informationsgesellschaft? Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht:43–74
Whish R, Bailey D (2018) Competition law, 9th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
World Economic Forum (2011) Personal data: the emergence of a new asset class
World Economic Forum (2014) Rethinking personal data: a new lens for strengthening trust
Acknowledgment
This contribution benefitted from valuable comments by Dr. Alfred Früh, Postdoctoral Researcher and Managing Director of the Center for Information Technology, Society, and Law at the University of Zurich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weber, R.H. (2019). Disruptive Technologies and Competition Law. In: Mathis, K., Tor, A. (eds) New Developments in Competition Law and Economics. Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11611-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11611-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11610-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11611-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)