Abstract
This chapter aims to examine how mass protests affected processes of sociopolitical changes in Russia and China in the case of Hong Kong and Turkey. All three countries (with certain exceptions in the case of Hong Kong) are characterized as authoritarian states where blast of mass protests happened during the period 2011–2017. In each case, the situation with authoritarian rule has different aspects: Russia slowly moves from a democratic hybrid regime to authoritarianism since 2003 under control of President Vladimir Putin; In Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is trying to unite the nation around his figure and changing political regime to achieve undisputed power; and Hong Kong was under British rule till 1999 and returned into China on a particular agreement that the political regime established during the “colonial” period, which will not be reduced to all-China conditions. Nevertheless, different pathways led to similar results—shrinking space for independent political institutions and violations of fundamental rights and freedoms are not tolerated by the part of society in all three countries. Without working mechanisms to launch policy change, citizens choose protests as a way to show authorities their disagreement and anger over the authoritarian manner of policy-making.
We argue that in these countries, activists and citizens were able to organize themselves around a discourse of policy change, to form a “protest public,” unsatisfied with the political regime; and then, due to the reaction of the state, to create alternative democratic practices in sociopolitical activity. With such a strategy, a “protest public” could be considered as an actor of change, whose role is to create democratic innovations to oppose strict and repressive policies maintained by the state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Head of Central Electoral Commission of Russian Federation.
- 2.
Reference to Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
- 3.
Neologism originating in the Gezi Park protests, coined from Prime Minister Erdogan’s use of the term çapulcu (roughly translated as “marauders”) to describe the protestors.
- 4.
Irina Soboleva is a PhD in political science.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Ucer, M. (2015). The ups and downs of Turkish growth, 2002–2015: Political dynamics, the European Union and the institutional slide. NBER Working Paper No. 21608.
Anufriev, A., & Zaytsev, D. (2016). “Protest Publics” in Egypt and Turkey from 2011 till present days: Assessment of impact on political changes. Comparative Politics (Russia), 2(23), 34–47.
Belyaeva, N., & Dzhibladze, A. (2014). “Public” as a “social actor” vs “public” as a “target audience”: Conceptual connection between “the public” and “civil society”. In E. Yasin (Ed.), XIV April international scientific conference on the problems of economic development and society (Vol. 2, pp. 377–389). Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics.
Freedom House. (2013). Freedom on the Net in Turkey. Retrived December 20, 2018, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2013/turkey
Incenoglu, I. (2014). The Gezi resistance and its aftermath: A radical democratic opportunity? Soundings, 57, 23–34.
Levada Center. (2015). Ноябрьские рейтинги одобрения и доверия. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://www.levada.ru/2015/11/25/noyabrskie-rejtingi-odobreniya-i-doveriya-3/
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). Democracy index 2012: Democracy is at a standstill. Retrieved December 21, 2018, from https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex12
Transformation Index. (2016). BTI 2016 regional report Middle East and North Africa. The Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrived December 20, 2018, from https://www.btiproject.org/fileadmin/files/BTI/Downloads/Reports/2016/pdf_regional/BTI_2016_Regionalbericht_MENA.pdf
Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Ogan, C. L., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2014, June). Evolution of online user behavior during a social upheaval. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science (pp. 81–90). ACM.
Volkov, D. (2012). Putinism under siege: The protesters and the public. Journal of Democracy, 23, 55–62.
Uldanov, A. (2016). Protest public as a source of civic initiatives: On the example of mass protests in Russia 2011–2012. Право и политика, 3, 388–396.
Zhuravlev, O., et al. (2014). Индивидуализм и солидарность в новых российских гражданских движениях. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 12(2), 185–200. Retrived December 20, 2018, from https://jsps.hse.ru/article/view/3384
Media and Web Resources
BBC News. (2013). Turkey protests: Erdogan meets Gezi park activists. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22898228
CNN. (2017). Three years after Umbrella Movement, Hong Kongers back on the streets. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from https://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/01/asia/hong-kong-protest-umbrella/index.html
Freedom House. (2017). Freedom in the world report, 2017. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2017
Open Democracy. (2013). Gezi spirit and forums. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://www.opendemocracy.net/%C4%B0rem-%C4%B0nceo%C4%9Flu/gezi-spirit-and-forums#_ftn7
Posta. (2013). Yeni internet fenomeni Chappuling. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from http://www.posta.com.tr/turkiye/HaberDetay/Yeni-internet-fenomeni%2D%2DChapulling.htm?ArticleID=180614
Quartz. (2014, October 1). Beijing has a harshly worded message for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://qz.com/274141/beijing-just-sent-a-chilling-message-to-hong-kongs-umbrella-revolution/
Reuters. (2013). Turkish PM Erdogan calls for end to protests as clashes flare. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/01/us-turkey-protests-idUSBRE94U0J920130601
Systemic Peace. (2017). Polity IV Individual Country Regime trends. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2017). Democracy index. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from https://infographics.economist.com/2017/DemocracyIndex/
The Guardian. (2014, September 29). Under the umbrellas: What do Hong Kong’s protesters want from China? Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/29/hong-kong-democracy-protests-china-umbrellas-police
The Japan Times. (2014, April 4). As Hong Kong protests turn violent, rival camps square off in gritty Mong Kok neighborhood. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/10/04/asia-pacific/politics-diplomacy-asia-pacific/hong-kong-protests-turn-violent-rival-camps-square-gritty-mong-kok-neighborhood/#.W0XlvXbhBaR
The New-York Times. (2011, December 6). Russia cracks down on antigovernment protests. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/world/europe/jailing-opposition-leaders-russia-moves-to-quell-election-protests.html?_r=1
World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank indicators database. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
РИА новости. (2012). Акции протеста в России после выборов 4 декабря. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from https://ria.ru/spravka/20120505/641687472.html
Лента. (2012, December 6). Анатомия слива протеста. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://lenta.ru/articles/2012/12/06/protest1/
Новая Газета. (2011). События 5-6 декабря. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from http://www.novayagazeta.ru/politics/49879.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The chapter was prepared within the framework of the Academic Fund Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2016–2017 (grant № 17-05-0018) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100.”
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uldanov, A., Davtyan, T., Alekseenkov, F. (2019). Protest Publics as Democratic Innovators in Authoritarian Environments. In: Belyaeva, N., Albert, V., Zaytsev, D.G. (eds) Protest Publics. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05475-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05475-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05474-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05475-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)