Abstract
The meniscus plays an integral role in the knee with several unique functions, most notably to protect the chondral surfaces via load transmission and distribution. Given that meniscal integrity highly correlates with joint health, an awareness of meniscal anatomy and its insertions, meniscal biology, and meniscal biomechanics is paramount for the treating physician. This chapter will help the reader to better understand the (i) anatomy of the menisci with an emphasis on anatomic root attachments, (ii) microstructure and biology of meniscal tissue, and (iii) biomechanical properties of meniscal tissue and their clinical relevance following meniscal injury.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In the United States, a meniscal tear is the most common diagnosis among patients undergoing knee arthroscopy [1, 2]. Clinically, patients with meniscal deficiency or tears have been shown to progress to early joint degeneration and osteoarthritis [1, 2], revealing the essential chondroprotective role of this structure in the knee joint. The meniscus optimizes load transmission across the knee by increasing joint congruency, thereby increasing contact area and decreasing point loading. Further, the menisci serve as important shock absorbers in the knee, as meniscal tissue is more elastic than articular cartilage and absorbs stress caused by impact loading [3]. The menisci also help to stabilize the knee joint [1], as the medial and lateral menisci function as secondary stabilizers for anterior-posterior translation and rotatory motion, respectively.
While early treatment of meniscal tears focused primarily on the removal of the injured tissue, recent attention on detrimental long-term consequences following partial or total meniscectomy has led to increased attempts at meniscus repair whenever possible. Although meniscal repairs have a higher reoperation rate than meniscectomy, repairs have been reported to result in better long-term patient-reported outcomes, improved activity levels, and slower progression to osteoarthritis [4,5,6]. Therefore, understanding and preserving meniscal integrity are crucial to maintain the long-term health of the knee joint.
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the (i) anatomy of the menisci with an emphasis on anatomic root attachments, (ii) microstructure and biology of meniscal tissue, and (iii) biomechanical properties of meniscal tissue and their clinical relevance following meniscal injury.
Anatomy
The medial meniscus is a semilunar sheet of fibrocartilage localized between the medial femoral and medial tibial condyle (Fig. 2.1). It covers up to 60% of the articular surface of the medial tibial condyle, with an average width of 9–10 mm and average thickness of 3–5 mm [7]. The medial meniscus has a strong attachment to the surrounding structures (medial collateral ligament (MCL) , posteromedial capsule ) and therefore is less mobile than the lateral meniscus.
The lateral meniscus is more circular and covers a larger portion of the articular surface than the medial meniscus (up to 70%) (Fig. 2.1). The average width of the lateral meniscus is 10–12 mm, with an average thickness of 4–5 mm. The meniscus itself is grooved laterally for the popliteus tendon, which separates the meniscus from the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) .
There are several supplemental attachments to the menisci that may play a role in stabilization of meniscal tissue. The transverse intermeniscal ligament connects the medial and lateral menisci anteriorly. The coronary ligaments connect the menisci to the capsule posteriorly and are stronger on the medial side than the lateral side, helping to explain the increased rigidity of the medial meniscus compared with the lateral meniscus. Finally, the meniscofemoral ligaments originate from the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (Fig. 2.2a, b). They are composed of two distinct ligamentous structures, the ligament of Humphrey, which lies anterior to the PCL (Fig. 2.2a), and the ligament of Wrisberg, posterior to the PCL (Fig. 2.2a, b). These structures help to stabilize the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus.
The menisci are anchored to the bone anteriorly and posteriorly by their strong root attachments. The clinical importance of maintaining meniscal root integrity has been well-documented in the literature. In a biomechanical study, Allaire et al. reported a significant 25% increase in medial compartment contact pressure following a PMMR tear [8]. Several other studies have corroborated these findings [9, 10], as a complete root tear biomechanically simulates a meniscectomized knee, thereby increasing the risk for (often rapid) progression of osteoarthritis. A thorough knowledge of the precise anatomical location and area of each root is vital for the surgeon to successfully perform anatomic meniscal root repairs .
The structural properties of the four meniscal roots have also been described in the literature [11], with each root containing strong, central fibers as well as peripheral, supplemental fibers that increase the surface area, strength, and stiffness of each root (Table 2.1). Anatomically, the medial tibial eminence (MTE) apex is the most reproducible osseous landmark for identification of the posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) attachment (Fig. 2.3a). The center of the PMMR is approximately 10 mm posterior and 1 mm lateral to the MTE [12]. The most proximal PCL tibial attachment fibers (located 8 mm lateral from the center of the PMMR) and the medial tibial plateau articular cartilage inflection point (4 mm lateral to the root) are two other consistent landmarks to identify the root attachment (Fig. 2.3a).
The posterior lateral meniscal root (PLMR) attachment can also be identified using the apex of the lateral tibial eminence (LTE) , which is the most consistent landmark (Fig. 2.3b). The center of the PLMR is consistently found to be 4 mm medial and 1.5 mm posterior to the LTE. According to Johannsen et al. [12], the center of the PLMR is located 4 mm medial to the lateral tibial plateau articular cartilage edge and 13 mm anterior to the most proximal edge of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial attachment (Fig. 2.3b). These findings help the surgeon when identifying the proper anatomic location during a meniscal root repair.
Microstructure/Biology
Understanding the microstructure of the meniscus helps to explain its complex biomechanical properties and function. The meniscus is mainly comprised of water (up to 75%) and collagen (20–25%, 90% type I) and a minority of other elements including proteoglycans, matrix glycoproteins, and elastin [13,14,15,16,17].
Each meniscus is composed of three layers (Fig. 2.4). A more superficial layer is in direct contact with the articular surface and is composed of randomly oriented collagen fibers mixed with a lubricating layer of proteoglycans, allowing for a low frictional surface [18, 19]. Deep to this layer is the middle stratum, which is composed of a lamellar layer containing collagen fibers extending radially (externally), with internal fibers intersecting at various angles, creating a mesh to provide rigidity to the tissue [19]. Finally, the inner layer is composed of large circumferential fibers, with the majority located in the internal and external circumference of the menisci because the middle portion experiences more uniform compressive stress and minimal radial stress (Fig. 2.4) [20, 21]. These circumferential fibers undergo significant tensile or “hoop” stresses when axially loaded [20, 22,23,24,25].
Biomechanical Properties
Several unique biomechanical principles contribute to the complex function of the menisci. These include viscoelasticity, permeability, creep, stress relaxation, ultimate tensile load, and shear stiffness, with each principle playing a vital role in the biomechanical response of meniscal tissue to compression, tension, and shear stresses (Fig. 2.5).
-
Viscoelasticity : Due to the unique three-layered anatomy described above, the tissue properties of the menisci change throughout an applied load; i.e., they exhibit both viscous and elastic properties. This transition occurs in a time-dependent fashion, beginning in the elastic phase and shifting to the viscous phase during loading. The elastic phase is due to the meniscus collagenous-proteoglycan structure. Conversely, the viscous phase is due to its permeability and water content [20, 26, 27]. When a compressive load is applied to the menisci, the elastic phase initiates, with the meniscal tissue exhibiting an elastic response and compressing the menisci. Simultaneously, fluid extrudes slowly, which accommodates the compressive load without excess deformation, hence beginning the viscous phase [28, 29]. Under compression, meniscal permeability determines the rate at which fluid is extruded. Meniscal permeability is much lower than articular cartilage, allowing for slow extrusion and helping to maintain meniscal shape and integrity during axial loads [27, 28, 30]. Thus, menisci maintain their load-bearing capacity during gait by resisting fluid loss [17, 31, 32], which inhibits compression and helps to maintain their shape.
-
Response to Compression : Creep and stress relaxation are two related characteristics of viscoelastic behavior [28]. After the initial load is applied and fluid is extruded from the menisci, the compressive load is resisted, known as “creep. ” [20, 28] This results in a diminished rate of compression over time. When the menisci are compressed and held, the tissue relaxes, and the load required to maintain the given compression decreases. This is referred to as “stress relaxation .” Further, when a compressive load is applied to the menisci, an axial load redistributes “hoop stresses” to the circumferential fibers of the menisci, extending to their attachments on the tibia and femur [20, 23,24,25]. As the femur compresses down, the menisci extrude peripherally due to their wedge shape, causing a radially oriented tangential force [33]. This peripheral extrusion is prevented by the anterior and posterior meniscal root attachments, as described above. When a root tear occurs clinically, these forces are unopposed, resulting in a functionally meniscectomized state with a significant increase in contract stress occurring in the respective compartment [8] and thereby increasing the risk of progression to osteoarthritis.
-
Response to Tension : When menisci undergo tensile forces (stretching forces), elongation occurs relatively fast because collagen fibers are relaxed [34]. After the initial phase, there is a linear relationship between elongation and the load applied, followed by a drastic decrease in elongation as fibers begin to fail and tear [35]. The maximum load the menisci can maintain in tension before failure is referred to as the ultimate tensile load. The tensile properties can change depending on the location of the menisci.
-
Response to Shear : Shear stiffness is defined as the capacity of the meniscus to resist a change of its shape. In this regard, menisci have a lower shear stiffness compared to the articular cartilage and bone, thereby allowing the menisci to maintain optimal congruency between the tibia and the femur through a full range of motion, ensuring equal load distribution [20].
In Vivo Biomechanics
Synchronized motion of the menisci during knee range of motion allows for a maximum congruency over the articulating surfaces, thereby decreasing contact stress within the joint and optimizing congruency and stability [36]. For example, the translation of the lateral meniscus is twice that of the medial meniscus [37], with greater translation of the anterior horns compared to the posterior horns. This is critical because the femoral condyles’ articulating shape with the menisci changes during flexion and extension, causing the anterior and posterior horns to drift apart during full extension and closer together during flexion [27]. The anterior horns allow movement to accommodate this, while the posterior horns are more secure and stable, restricting excess movement [36]. Approximately 85% of the weight-bearing load is transmitted in knee flexion with the horns closer together, while 50% is transmitted in extension with the horns further apart [3]. Further, during internal rotation of the tibia, the lateral meniscus translates posteriorly, while the medial meniscus translates anteriorly [38]. These reciprocal functions allow the menisci to maximize contact area with the articular surfaces, reduce point stresses, and avoid chondral damage or injury over time [27].
Clinically, patients with lateral meniscal deficiency demonstrate worse outcomes compared to patients with medial meniscal deficiency [1, 2]. This may be a consequence of the less congruent, more convex articular surfaces of the lateral femoral condyle and lateral tibial plateau, as well as the greater degree of translation of the lateral meniscus, suggesting a crucial role of the lateral meniscus in maintaining lateral joint integrity [24, 37]. Further, the lateral meniscus absorbs 70% of load while the medial meniscus only 50% [3], again helping to elucidate the clinical significance of the lateral meniscus.
The aforementioned differences in translation of each meniscus may also help to explain the role of the menisci as secondary stabilizers within the knee joint. The medial meniscus is an important secondary restraint to anterior tibial translation [28, 39, 40]. This can be explained by the decreased mobility of the medial meniscus, as the medial meniscus is less mobile with approximately 50% translation compared to the lateral meniscus and therefore is more stable in an anterior-posterior direction. The medial meniscus is also postulated to have a “wedge” effect created by compression on the posterior horn during loading, further preventing anterior displacement [41]. The joint stabilizing capability of the medial meniscus is most apparent in ACL-deficient knees. Following medial meniscectomy in the ACL-deficient knee, there is a significant increase in anterior tibial translation after an anterior tibial load is applied, compared to ACL-deficient knees with an intact medial meniscus [41, 42]. These findings corroborate the vital role of the medial meniscus as a secondary stabilizer of anterior-posterior translation of the knee.
In contrast, due to its increased mobility and translation , the lateral meniscus is thought to play a lesser role in anterior-posterior stabilization [41, 43, 44], but it has been found to play a greater role in anterolateral rotatory stability [45]. The lateral meniscus has also been suggested to play an important secondary role in restraining combined axial and rotatory loads [45].
Conclusion
The meniscus plays an integral role in the knee with several chondroprotective and stabilizing functions. A thorough understanding of meniscal anatomy, biology, and biomechanics is vital to understand the complex structure and function of the medial and lateral menisci.
References
Raber DA, Friederich NF, Hefti F. Discoid lateral meniscus in children. Long-term follow-up after total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1579–86.
McNicholas MJ, Rowley DI, McGurty D, Adalberth T, Abdon P, Lindstrand A, Lohmander LS. Total meniscectomy in adolescence. A thirty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:217–21.
Messner K, Gao J. The menisci of the knee joint. Anatomical and functional characteristics, and a rationale for clinical treatment. J Anat. 1998;193(Pt 2):161–78.
Starke C, Kopf S, Petersen W, Becker R. Meniscal repair. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1033–44.
Vaquero J, Forriol F. Meniscus tear surgery and meniscus replacement. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6:71–89.
Yoon KH, Park KH. Meniscal repair. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014;26:68–76.
LaPrade RF, Arendt EA, Getgood A, Faucett SC. The menisci: a comprehensive review of their anatomy, biomechanical function and surgical treatment. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2017.
Allaire R, Muriuki M, Gilbertson L, Harner CD. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1922–31.
Bhatia S, Civitarese DM, Turnbull TL, LaPrade CM, Nitri M, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF. A novel repair method for radial tears of the medial meniscus: biomechanical comparison of Transtibial 2-tunnel and double horizontal mattress suture techniques under cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:639–45.
LaPrade CM, Jansson KS, Dornan G, Smith SD, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF. Altered tibiofemoral contact mechanics due to lateral meniscus posterior horn root avulsions and radial tears can be restored with in situ pull-out suture repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:471–9.
Ellman MB, LaPrade CM, Smith SD, Rasmussen MT, Engebretsen L, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF. Structural properties of the meniscal roots. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1881–7.
Johannsen AM, Civitarese DM, Padalecki JR, Goldsmith MT, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF. Qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis of the posterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2342–7.
Wirth CJ. The meniscus—structure, morphology and function. Knee. 1994;1:171–2.
Tissakht M, Ahmed AM. Tensile stress-strain characteristics of the human meniscal material. J Biomech. 1995;28:411–22.
Djurasovic M, Aldridge JW, Grumbles R, Rosenwasser MP, Howell D, Ratcliffe A. Knee joint immobilization decreases aggrecan gene expression in the meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:460–6.
Fox AJ, Wanivenhaus F, Burge AJ, Warren RF, Rodeo SA. The human meniscus: a review of anatomy, function, injury, and advances in treatment. Clin Anat. 2015;28:269–87.
Sweigart MA, Zhu CF, Burt DM, DeHoll PD, Agrawal CM, Clanton TO, Athanasiou KA. Intraspecies and interspecies comparison of the compressive properties of the medial meniscus. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32:1569–79.
Schumacher BL, Schmidt TA, Voegtline MS, Chen AC, Sah RL. Proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) synthesis and immunolocalization in bovine meniscus. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:562–8.
Petersen W, Tillmann B. Collagenous fibril texture of the human knee joint menisci. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1998;197:317–24.
Andrews SJ, Adesida AB, Abusara Z, Shrive NG. Current concepts on structure-function relationships in the menisci. Connect Tissue Res. 2017;58:271–81.
Petersen W, Tillmann B. Funktionelle anatomie der menisken des kniegelenks kollagenfasertextur und biomechanik. Arthroskopie. 1998;11:133–5.
Zhu W, Chern KY, Mow VC. Anisotropic viscoelastic shear properties of bovine meniscus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;306:34–45.
Shrive NG, O’Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW. Load-bearing in the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;131:279–87.
Fairbank TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948;30B:664–70.
Bullough PG, Munuera L, Murphy J, Weinstein AM. The strength of the menisci of the knee as it relates to their fine structure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52:564–7.
Fithian DC, Kelly MA, Mow VC. Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:19–31.
Proctor CS, Schmidt MB, Whipple RR, Kelly MA, Mow VC. Material properties of the normal medial bovine meniscus. J Orthop Res. 1989;7:771–82.
McDermott ID, Masouros SD, Amis AA. Biomechanics of the menisci of the knee. Curr Orthop. 2008;22:193–201.
Spilker RL, Donzelli PS, Mow VC. A transversely isotropic biphasic finite element model of the meniscus. J Biomech. 1992;25:1027–45.
Favenesi J, Shaffer J, Mow V. Biphasic mechanical properties of knee meniscus. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1983;8:57.
Joshi MD, Suh JK, Marui T, Woo SL. Interspecies variation of compressive biomechanical properties of the meniscus. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:823–8.
Hacker S, Woo S, Wayne J, Kwan M. Compressive properties of the human meniscus. Tran Annu Meet Orthop Res Soc. 1992:627.
Kummer B. 38. Anatomie und Biomechanik des Kniegelenksmeniscus. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1987;372:241–6.
Viidik A. Functional properties of collagenous tissues. Int Rev Connect Tissue Res. 1973;6:127–215.
Butler DL, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Zernicke RF. Biomechanics of ligaments and tendons. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1978;6:125–81.
Vedi V, Williams A, Tennant SJ, Spouse E, Hunt DM, Gedroyc WM. Meniscal movement. An in-vivo study using dynamic MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:37–41.
Aagaard H, Verdonk R. Function of the normal meniscus and consequences of meniscal resection. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9:134–40.
Bylski-Austrow DI, Ciarelli MJ, Kayner DC, Matthews LS, Goldstein SA. Displacements of the menisci under joint load: an in vitro study in human knees. J Biomech. 1994;27:421425–3431.
Bargar WL, Moreland JR, Markolf KL, Shoemaker SC, Amstutz HC, Grant TT. In vivo stability testing of post-meniscectomy knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;150:247–52.
Arno S, Hadley S, Campbell KA, Bell CP, Hall M, Beltran LS, Recht MP, Sherman OH, Walker PS. The effect of arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy on tibiofemoral stability. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:73–9.
Levy IM, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The effect of medial meniscectomy on anterior-posterior motion of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:883–8.
Allen CR, Wong EK, Livesay GA, Sakane M, Fu FH, Woo SL. Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:109–15.
Lerer D, Umans H, Hu M, Jones M. The role of meniscal root pathology and radial meniscal tear in medial meniscal extrusion. Skelet Radiol. 2004;33:569–74.
Thompson WO, Thaete FL, Fu FH, Dye SF. Tibial meniscal dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:210–5; discussion 215–6.
Musahl V, Citak M, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Bedi A, Pearle AD. The effect of medial versus lateral meniscectomy on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1591–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ellman, M.B., Chahla, J. (2019). Meniscus: Biomechanics and Biology. In: Yanke, A., Cole, B. (eds) Joint Preservation of the Knee. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01491-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01491-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01490-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01491-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)