Abstract
The safety and regulatory needs to detect small drug-induced changes in the QT interval have created many challenges for the design and analysis of “thorough” QT studies. The measurement techniques available, the correlation between the RR interval and the QT interval, and the high variability in the QT interval have made the detection of changes in the QT interval difficult, and the verification of a lack of an effect on the QT interval even more difficult. The purpose of this chapter is to provide statistical and empirical rationales for key elements of study design, and statistical analysis that will control for sources of QT variability and will enhance study sensitivity. We will identify study design and statistical techniques to reduce QT variability, discuss the assumptions inherent in many of the choices available in study design, and recommend study designs based on these principles.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Experimental Drug
- Statistical Analysis Plan
- Parallel Group Design
- Heart Rate Correction
- False Negative Conclusion
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Morganroth J, Brozovich FV, McDonald JT, Jacobs RA. Variability of the QT measurement in healthy men, with implications for selection of an abnormal QT value to predict drug toxicity and proarrhythmia. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:774–776.
Molnar J, Zhang F, Weiss J, Ehlert FA, Rosenthal JE. Diurnal pattern of QTc interval: How long is prolonged? J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:76–83.
Widerlov E, Jostell KG, Claesson L, Odlind B, Keisu M, Freyschuss U. Influence of food intake on electrocardiograms of healthy male volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999;55:619–624.
Browne KF, Prystowsky E, Heger JJ, Chilson DA, Zipes DP. Prolongation of the Q-T interval in man during sleep. Am J Cardiol 1983;52:55–59.
Vrancianu R, Filcescu V, Ionescu V, Groza P, Persson J, Kadefors R, Petersen I. The influence of day and night work on the circadian variations of cardiovascular performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982;48:11–23.
Lande G, Funck-Brentano C, Ghadanfar M, Escande D. Steady-state versus non-steady-state QT-RR relationships in 24-hour Holter recordings. PACE 2000;23:293–302.
Extramiana F, Maison-Blanche P, Badilini F, Pinoteau J, Deseo T, Coumel P. Circadian modulation of QT rate dependence in healthy volunteers. Gender and age differences. J Electrocardiol 1999;32:33–43.
Rautaharju PM, Zhou SH, Wong S, Calhoun HP, Berenson BS, Prineas R, Davignon A. Sex differences in the evolution of the electrocardiographic QT interval with age. Can J Cardiol 1992;8:690–695.
Ahnve S, Vallin H. Influence of heart rate and inhibition of autonomic tone on the QT interval. Circulation 1982;65:435–439.
Roden DM. Drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval. New Engl J Med 2004;350:1013–1022.
Camm AJ, Janse MJ, Roden DM, Rosen MR, Cinca J, Cobbe SM. Congenital and acquired long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1232–1237.
Sun H, Chen P, Kenna L, Lee P. The chaotic QT interval variabilities on risk assessment trial designs. Clin Pharm Ther 2004;75:P55.
Lee SH, Sun H, Chen P, Doddapaneni S, Hunt J, Malinowski H. Sensitivity/reliability of the timematched baseline subtraction method in assessment of QTc interval prolongation. Clin Pharm Ther 2004;75:P56.
Summary Basis of Approval, moxifloxacin hydrochloride, April 21, 2001. FDA document.
Hnatkova K, Malik M. “Optimum” formulae for heart rate correction of the QT interval. PACE 1999;1683-1687.
Malik M, Farbom P, Batchvarov V, Hnatkova K, Camm AJ. Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: Implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval. Heart 2002;87:220–228.
Batchvarov VN, Ghuran A, Smetana P, Hnatkova K, Harries M, Dilaveris P, Camm AJ, Malik M. QT-RR relationship in healthy subjects exhibits substantial intersubject variability and high intrasubject stability. Am J Physiol 2002;282:H2356–H2363.
Dmitrienko A, Smith B. Repeated-measures models in the analysis of QT interval. Pharmaceut Statist 2003;2:175–190.
The Clinical Evaluation of QT/QTc Interval Prolongation and Proarrhythmic Potential for Non-Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Preliminary Concept Paper, November 15, 2003. http://cdernet.cder.fda.gov/QTWG/QT%20Workshop/qt4jam.pdf.
Badilini F, Maison-Blanche P, Childers R, Coumel P. QT interval analysis on ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings: A selective beat averaging approach. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999;37:71–79.
Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Non-parametric Statistical Methods, Wiley Series, 1999, pp. 125–133.
Kenna LA, Parekh A, Jarugula V, Chatterjee DJ, Sun H, Kim MJ, Ortiz S, Hunt JP, Malinowski H. Experience evaluating QT prolongation data. Clin Pharm Ther 2004;75:P7.
Ahn C, Jung S-H. Efficiency of general estimating equations estimators of slopes in repeated measurements: Adding subjects or adding measurements? Drug Info J 2003;37:309–316.
Points to Consider: The Assessment of the Potential for QT Interval Prolongation by Non-Cardiovascular Medicinal Products. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, EMEA, December 17, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hollister, A.S., Montague, T.H. (2005). Statistical Analysis Plans for ECG Data. In: Morganroth, J., Gussak, I. (eds) Cardiac Safety of Noncardiac Drugs. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-884-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-884-7_14
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-515-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-884-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)