Abstract
Three interrelated puzzles have been haunting my work on speech errors, almost since it began in 1965. The awareness puzzle is one, and it consists of two parts. Part 1 of the awareness puzzle concerns relations between awareness and the “adjustments” or accommodations that often follow the production of errors. For example, the speaker who misproduced “cow tracks” as “track cowz” (Garrett, 1980; see also MacKay, 1979) selected the appropriate context-dependent plural unconsciously from among the three alternatives that English allows (/z/, /ez/, and /s/) for the transposed word track. The unconscious nature of these ”context-sensitive accommodations” indicates that speakers can choose unconsciously among alternative outputs, contrary to the proposal of Reason (1984) and others that unconscious processes are inflexible and that only conscious processes are sensitive to context and capable of choice. Context-sensitive accommodations also undermine Marcel’s proposal (1983) that choice among actions can serve as a criterion for consciousness. The puzzle is how these unconscious choices are made.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Baars, B. J. (1980). On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Baars, B. J. (1983). Conscious contents provide the nervous system with coherent global information. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Scwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 3). New York: Plenum Press.
Baars, B. J. (1985). Can involuntary slips reveal one’s state of mind?—With an addendum on the problem of assessing repression. In M. Toglia & T. M. Shlechter (Eds.), New directions in cognitive science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baars, B. J., & Motley, M. T. (1976). Spoonerisms as sequencer conflicts: Evidence from artificially elicited speech errors. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 467–484.
Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Dell, G. (1980). Phonological and lexical encoding in speech production: An analysis of naturally occurring and experimentally elicited speech errors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
Eriksen, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540–551.
Fairbanks, G., & Guttman, N. (1958). Effects of delayed auditory feedback upon articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1, 12–22.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52.
Garnham, A., Shillcock, R. C, Brown, G. D. A., Mill, A. I. D., & Cutler, A. (1982). Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 251–263). Amsterdam: Mouton.
Garrett, M. F. (1980). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Gazdar, G. (1981). Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 155–184.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1984). Spontaneous self-repairs in speech: Processes and representations. In M. P. R. Van den Broecke & A. Cohen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 105–111). Dordrecht: Foris.
MacKay, D. G. (1966). To end ambiguous sentences. Perception and Psychophysics, 1, 426–436.
MacKay, D. G. (1969). Effects of ambiguity on stuttering: Towards a theory of speech production at the semantic level. Kybernetik, 5, 195–208.
MacKay, D. G. (1970). Mental diplopia: Towards a model of speech perception at the semantic level. In G. D’Arcais & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), Recent advances in psycholinguistics (pp. 76–100). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
MacKay, D. G. (1971). Stress pre-entry in motor systems. American Journal of Psychology, 84(1), 35–51.
MacKay, D. G. (1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 210–227.
MacKay, D. G. (1973). Complexity in output systems: Evidence from behavioral hybrids. American Journal of Psychology, 86(4), 785–806.
MacKay, D. G. (1974). Aspects of the syntax of behavior: Syllable structure and speech rate. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 642–657.
MacKay, D. G. (1978). Speech errors inside the syllable. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
MacKay, D. G. (1979). Lexical insertion, inflection and derivation: creative processes in word production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8(5), 477–498.
MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.
MacKay, D. G. (1983). A theory of the representation and enactment of intentions with applications to the problems of creativity, motor equivalence, speech errors, and auto-maticity in skilled behavior. In R. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 217–230). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
MacKay, D. G. (1985). A theory of the representation, organization, and timing of action with implications for sequencing disorders. In E. A. Roy (Ed.), Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders (pp. 267–308). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer.
MacKay, D. G. (1988). Theoretical and empirical relations between perception, action, and cognition. Perception and Action Report #147, Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Bielefeld, FRG. Also in O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), (1990), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 269–303). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
MacKay, D. G., & Bever, T. G. (1967). In search of ambiguity. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 193–200.
MacKay, D. G., & Bowman, R. W. (1969). On producing the meaning in sentences. American Journal of Psychology, 82(1), 23–39.
MacKay, D. G., & Konishi, T. (1980). Personification and the pronoun problem. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), The voices and words of women and men. London: Pergamon Press.
Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1197–1239.
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Meringer, R. (1908). Aus dem Leben der Sprache. Berlin: Behrs Verlag.
Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1979). Effects of cognitive set upon laboratory induced verbal (Freudian) slips. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 421–432.
Motley, M. T., Camden, C, & Baars, B. J. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 578–594.
Motley, M. T., Baars, B. J., & Camden, C. T. (1983). Experimental verbal slip studies: A review and an editing model of language encoding. Communication Monographs, 50, 79–101.
Motley, M. T., Camden, C., & Baars, B. T. (1983). Polysemantic lexical access: Evidence from laboratory induced double-entendres. Communication Monographs, 50, 193–205.
Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 361–394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., Vyas, S. M., & Fearnley, S. (1975). Programming sequences of complex responses. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dormic (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 5, pp. 317–395). London: Academic Press.
Reason, J. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 109–136). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sokolov, Y. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.
Treiman, R. (1983). The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games. Cognition, 15, 49–74.
Wickelgren, W. (1979). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mackay, D.G. (1992). Errors, Ambiguity, and Awareness in Language Perception and Production. In: Baars, B.J. (eds) Experimental Slips and Human Error. Cognition and Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1166-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1164-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive