Abstract
Stochastic electrodynamics and random electrodynamics are the names given to a particular version of classical electrodynamics. This purely classical theory is Lorentz’s classical electron theory(1) into which one introduces random electromagnetic radiation (classical zero-point radiation) as the boundary condition giving the homogeneous solution of Maxwell’s equations. The theory contains one adjustable parameter setting the scale of the random radiation, and this parameter is chosen in terms of Planck’s constant,h = 2πℏ. Many of the researchers(2–70) working on stochastic electrodynamics hope that it will provide an accurate description of atomic physics and replace or explain quantum theory. At the very least the theory makes available new tools for calculating van der Waals forces, and it deepens our understanding of the connections between classical and quantum theories.(71)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Notes
H. A. Lorentz,The Theory of Electrons, Dover, New York (1952). This is a republication of the 2nd edition of 1915.
P. Braffort, M. Spighel, and C. Tzara,C.R. Acad. Sci. 239, 157 (1954).
P. Braffort and C. Tzara,C.R. Acad. Sci.239, 1779 (1954).
T. W. Marshall,Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A276, 475 (1963).
T. W. Marshall,Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.61, 537 (1965).
T. W. Marshall,Nuovo Cimento 38, 206 (1965).
T. W. Marshall,Izv. Vyssh. Uchelon. Zavedo Fiz.12, 34, (1968).
T. W. Marshall and P. ClaverieJ. Math. Phys.to be published.
P. Braffort, M. Surdin, and A. Taroni,C.R. Acad. Sci.261, 4339 (1965).
L. L. Henry and T. W. Marshall,Nuovo Cimenta 41, 188 (1966).
M. Surdin, P. Braffort, and A. Taroni,Nature 210, 405 (1966).
P. Braffort and A. Taroni,C.R. Acad. Sci.264, 1437 (1967).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev.174, 1631 (1968).
. T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev.174, 1764 (1968).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev.180, 19 (1968).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev.182, 1374 (1969).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev.185, 2039 (1969).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev.186, 1034 (1969).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. (N.Y.) 56, 474 (1970).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. D1,1526(1970)
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. D1,2257(1970)
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. D5,1799(1972)
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. D6,314(1972)
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. D7,1832(1973)
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 9, 2078 (1974).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. D 11, 790 (1975).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. D 11, 809 (1975).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 11, 1650 (1975).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 13, 2832 (1976).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 18, 1228 (1978).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 18, 1238 (1978).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 19, 1112 (1979).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 19, 3635 (1979).
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A. to be published.
T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A11,to be published.
E. Santos,An. Re. Soc. Esp. Fis. Quim. Ser. A 64, 317 (1968).
E. Santos,Lett. Nuovo Cimenta 4, 497 (1972).
E. Santos,J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 15, 1954 (1974).
E. Santos,Nuovo Cimenta B 19, 57 (1974).
E. Santos,Nuovo Cimenta B 22, 201 (1974).
E. Santos,An. Fis.71, 329 (1975).
P. Braffort,C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. B 270, 12 (1970).
M. Surdin,C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. B 270, 193 (1970).
M. Surdin,Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 15, 203 (1971).
M. Surdin,Int. J. Theor. Phys.4, 117 (1971).
M. Surdin,Int. J. Theor. Phys.8, 183 (1973).
M. Surdin,Int. J. Theor. Phys.9, 185 (1974).
M. Surdin,C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. B 280, 337 (1975).
M. Surdin,Phys. Lett. A 58, 370 (1976).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Nuovo Cimento B 10, 592 (1972).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Phys. Lett. A 47, 183 (1974).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Rev. Mex. Fis.23, (1974).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Found. Phys.5, 355 (1975).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Phys. Lett. A 56, 253 (1976).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Rev. Mex. Fix.25, I (1976).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,J. Math. Phys.18, 1612 (1977).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Phys. Lett. A62, 389 (1977).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,Found. Phys.8, 191 (1978).
L. de la Pena-Auerbach and A. M. Cetto,J. Math. Phys.20, 469 (1979).
O. Theimer,Phys. Rev. D 4, 1597 (1971).
O. Theimer and P. R. Peterson,Phys. Rev. D 10, 3962 (1974).
O. Theimer and P. R. Peterson,Nuovo Cimento Lett.13, 279 (1975).
O. Theimer and P. R. Peterson,Phys. Rev. D 14, 656 (1976).
P. Claverie and S. Diner,C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. B 280, 1 (1975).
P. Claverie and S. Diner, inLocalization and Delocalization in Quantum Chemistry, Vol. II, Eds. O. Chalvet, R. Daudel, S. Diner, and J. P. Malrieu, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland (1976).
P. Claverie and S. Diner,Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 1, 73 (1976).
P. Claverie and S. Diner,Int. J. Quantum Chem.12, Suppl. 1, 41 (1977).
A. F. Kracklauer,Phys. Rev. D 14, 654 (1976).
S. M. Moore,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 20, 676 (1977).
L. Pesquera and E. Santos,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 20, 308 (1977).
Several reviews of stochastic electrodynamics are already available. See References 26 and 64
P. W. Milonni,Phys. Rep.25,I (1976), Section 5.
A. Einstein and L. Hopf,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 33, 1 105 (1910);
A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 47, 879 (1915).
M. von Laue,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 47, 853 (1915).
In Reference 1, note 6 (p. 240) gives Lorentz’s explicit assumption regarding the boundary conditions.
M. Planck,Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges.13, 138 (1911).
W. Nernst,Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges.18, 83 (1916).
A. Einstein and O. Stern,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 40, 551 (1913).
See reference 76, pp. 89–90.
See reference 76, p. 116.
T. A. Welton,Phys. Rev.74, 1157 (1948).
H. B. G. Casimir,K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Versl. Gewon. Vergad. Afd. Natuvrkd.51, 793 (1948).
. H. B. G. Casimir,J. Chim. Phys. Phys. Chim. Biol.46, 407 (1949).
The random character of the radiation is discussed in References 72 and 73
M. Planck,Theory of Heat Radiation, Dover, New York (1959).
A modern treatment is that of S. O. Ricein Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes, Ed. N. Wax, Dover, New York (1954), p. 133.
F. London,Z. Phys.63, 245 (1930).
M. J. Sparnaay,Physica (Utrecht) 24, 751 (1958).
E. M. Purcell,Electricity and Magnetism, McGraw-Hill, New York (1965), p. 370.
See, for example, L. Rosenfeld,Theory of Electrons, Dover, New York (1965), pp. 45–47.
See J. H. van Vleck,The Theory of Electric and Magnetic Susceptibilities, Oxford University Press, London (1932), p. 94;
D. C. Mattis,The Theory of Magnetism, Harper and Row, New York (1965), p. 21.
See also References 27 and 31 for alternative calculations of diamagnetism.
SSee, for example, E. Nelson,Phys. Rev.150, 1079 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boyer, T.H. (1980). A Brief Survey of Stochastic Electrodynamics. In: Barut, A.O. (eds) Foundations of Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0671-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0671-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0673-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0671-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive