Abstract
The fractional calculus of variations is a subject under strong research. Different definitions for fractional derivatives and integrals are used, depending on the purpose under study. The fractional operators in this paper are defined in the sense of Jumarie. This allows us to work with functions which are non-differentiable. We present necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for fractional problems of the calculus of variations with a Lagrangian density depending on the free end-points.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Fractional Derivative
- Fractional Operator
- Fractional Calculus
- Lagrangian Density
- Fractional Differential Equation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
The fractional calculus (FC) is one of the most interdisciplinary fields of mathematics, with many applications in physics and engineering. The history of FC goes back more than three centuries, when in 1695 the derivative of order \(\alpha = 1/2\) was described by Leibniz. Since then, many different forms of fractional operators were introduced: the Grunwald–Letnikov, Riemann–Liouville, Riesz, and Caputo fractional derivatives [23, 34, 38]) and the more recent notions see [11, 19, 24, 25]. Fractional calculus is nowadays the realm of physicists and mathematicians, who investigate the usefulness of such non-integer order derivatives and integrals in different areas of physics and mathematics (see, e.g., [10, 18, 23]). It is a successful tool for describing complex quantum field dynamical systems, dissipation, and long-range phenomena that cannot be well illustrated using ordinary differential and integral operators (see, e.g., [15, 18, 24, 36]). Applications of FC are found in classical and quantum mechanics, field theories, variational calculus, and optimal control (see, e.g., [14, 17, 20]).
The calculus of variations is an old branch of optimization theory that has many applications both in physics and geometry. Apart from a few examples known since ancient times such as Queen Dido’s problem (reported in The Aeneid by Virgil), the problem of finding optimal curves and surfaces has been posed first by physicists such as Newton, Huygens, and Galileo. Their contemporary mathematicians, starting with the Bernoulli brothers and Leibniz, followed by Euler and Lagrange, invented the calculus of variations of a functional in order to solve those problems. Fractional calculus of variations (FCV) unifies the calculus of variations and the fractional calculus, by inserting fractional derivatives into the variational integrals. This occurs naturally in many problems of physics or mechanics, in order to provide more accurate models of physical phenomena. The FCV started in 1996 with the work of Riewe [36]. Riewe formulated the problem of the calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and obtained the respective Euler–Lagrange equations, combining both conservative and nonconservative cases. Nowadays the FCV is a subject under strong research. Different definitions for fractional derivatives and integrals are used, depending on the purpose under study. Investigations cover problems depending on Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives (see, e.g., [6, 15, 16, 32]), the Caputo fractional derivative (see, e.g., [1, 7, 28, 30]), the symmetric fractional derivative (see, e.g., [24]), the Jumarie fractional derivative (see, e.g., [4, 5, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27]), and others [2, 11, 14]. For applications of the FCV we refer the readers to [15, 20, 24, 35]. Although the literature of FCV is already vast, much remains to be done.
In this paper we study problems of FCV which are defined in terms of the Jumarie fractional derivatives and integrals. The Euler–Lagrange equations for such problems with and without constraints were recently shown in [4]. Here we develop further the theory by proving necessary optimality conditions for more general problems of FCV with a Lagrangian that may also depend on the unspecified end-points y(a), y(b). More precisely, the problem under our study: to extremize a functional which is defined in terms of the Jumarie fractional operators and having no constraint on y(a) and/or y(b). The novelty is the dependence of the integrand L on the a priori unknown final values y(a), y(b). The new natural boundary conditions (8.5)–(8.6) have important implications in economics (see [12] and the references therein).
The paper is organized as follows. Section 8.2 presents the necessary definitions and concepts of Jumarie’s fractional calculus. Our results are formulated, proved, and illustrated through examples in Sect. 8.3. Main results of the paper include necessary optimality conditions with the generalized natural boundary conditions (Theorem 8.1) that become sufficient under appropriate convexity assumptions (Theorem 8.2). We finish with Sect. 8.4 by providing conclusions.
2 Fractional Calculus
For an introduction to the classical fractional calculus we refer the readers to [23, 31, 34, 38]. In this section we briefly review the main notions and results from the recent fractional calculus proposed by Jumarie [19, 20, 21].
Definition 8.1.
Let \(f : [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be a continuous function. The Jumarie fractional derivative of f is defined by
where \(\Gamma (z) ={ \int \nolimits \nolimits }_{0}^{\infty }{t}^{z-1}{\mathrm{e}}^{-t}\,\mathrm{d}t\). For positive α, one will set
for 0 < α < 1, and
The Jumarie fractional derivative has the following property:
-
The αth derivative of a constant is zero.
-
Assume that 0 < α ≤ 1, then the Laplace transform of f (α) is
$$\mathcal{L}\{{f}^{(\alpha )}(t)\} = {s}^{\alpha }\mathcal{L}\{f(t)\} - {s}^{\alpha -1}f(0).$$ -
\({(g(t)f(t))}^{(\alpha )} = {g}^{(\alpha )}(t)f(t) + g(t){f}^{(\alpha )}(t),\quad 0 < \alpha < 1\).
Example 8.1.
Let f(t) = t γ. Then \({f}^{(\alpha )}(x) = \Gamma (\gamma + 1){\Gamma }^{-1}(\gamma + 1 - \alpha ){t}^{\gamma -\alpha }\), where 0 < α < 1 and γ > 0.
Example 8.2.
The solution of the fractional differential equation
is
with the notation \(\alpha ! := \Gamma (1 + \alpha )\).
The integral with respect to (dt)α is defined as the solution of the fractional differential equation
which is provided by the following result.
Lemma 8.1.
Let f(t) denote a continuous function. The solution of the (8.1) is defined by the equality
Example 8.3.
Let f(t) = 1. Then ∫0 t(dτ)α = t α, 0 < α ≤ 1.
Example 8.4.
The solution of the fractional differential equation
is
One can easily generalize the previous definitions and results for functions with a domain [a, b]:
and
For the discussion to follow, we will need the following formula of integration by parts:
where \(\alpha ! := \Gamma (1 + \alpha )\).
3 Main Results
Let us consider the functional defined by
where \(L(\cdot,\cdot,\cdot,\cdot,\cdot ) \in {C}^{1}([a,b] \times {\mathbb{R}}^{4}; \mathbb{R})\) and x → ∂ 3 L(t) has continuous α-derivative. The fractional problem of the calculus of variations under consideration has the form
Using parentheses around the end-point conditions means that the conditions may or may not be present.
Along the work we denote by ∂ i L, i = 1, …, 5, the partial derivative of function L( ⋅, ⋅, ⋅, ⋅, ⋅) with respect to its ith argument.
The following lemma will be needed in the next subsection.
Lemma 8.2.
Let g be a continuous function and assume that
for every continuous function h satisfying \(h(a) = h(b) = 0\) . Then \(g \equiv 0\).
Proof.
Can be done in a similar way as the proof of the standard fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations (see, e.g., [40]).
3.1 Necessary Conditions
Next theorem gives necessary optimality conditions for the problem (8.3).
Theorem 8.1.
Let y be an extremizer to problem (8.3). Then, y satisfies the fractional Euler–Lagrange equation
for all x ∈ [a,b]. Moreover, if y(a) is not specified, then;
if y(b) is not specified, then;
Proof.
Suppose that y is an extremizer of \(\mathcal{J}\) and consider the value of \(\mathcal{J}\) at a nearby function \(\tilde{y} = y + \epsilon h\), where \(\epsilon \in \mathbb{R}\) is a small parameter and h is an arbitrary continuous function. We do not require h(a) = 0 or h(b) = 0 in case y(a) or y(b), respectively, is free (it is possible that both are free). Let \(j(\epsilon ) = \mathcal{J} (y + \epsilon h)\). Then a necessary condition for y to be an extremizer is given by j′(0) = 0. Hence,
where ( ⋅) = x, y(x), y (α)(x), y(a), y(b). Using integration by parts (8.2) to the second term we get
We first consider functions h such that \(h(a) = h(b) = 0\). Then, by the Lemma 8.2 we deduce that
for all x ∈ [a, b]. Therefore, in order for y to be an extremizer to the problem (8.3), y must be a solution of the fractional Euler–Lagrange equation (8.4). But if y is a solution of (8.4), the first integral in expression (8.8) vanishes, and then condition (8.7) takes the form
If y(a) = y a and y(b) = y b are given in the formulation of problem (8.3), then the latter equation is trivially satisfied since \(h(a) = h(b) = 0\). When y(b) is free, then (8.6) holds, when y(a) is free, then (8.5) holds, since h(a) or h(b) is, respectively, arbitrary.
In the case L does not depend on y(a) and y(b), by Theorem 8.1 we obtain the following result.
Corollary 8.1.
[4 , Theorem 1] Let y be an extremizer to problem
Then, y satisfies the fractional Euler–Lagrange equation
for all x ∈ [a,b]. Moreover, if y(a) is not specified, then;
if y(b) is not specified, then;
Observe that if α goes to 1, then the operators \(\frac{{\mathrm{d}}^{\alpha }} {\mathrm{d}{x}^{\alpha }}\), (dx)α could be replaced with \(\frac{\mathrm{d}} {\mathrm{d}x}\) and dx. Thus, in this case we obtain the corresponding result in the classical context of the calculus of variations (see [29, Corollary 1], [12, Theorem 2.1]).
Corollary 8.2.
[29 , Corollary 1] If y is a local extremizer for
then
for all x ∈ [a,b]. Moreover, if y(a) is free, then;
and if y(b) is free, then
3.2 Sufficient Conditions
In this section we prove sufficient conditions for optimality. Similarly to what happens in the classical calculus of variations, some conditions of convexity (concavity) are in order.
Definition 8.2.
Given a function L, we say that L({x}, y, z, t, u) is jointly convex (concave) in (y, z, t, u), if ∂ i L, i = 2, …, 5, exist and are continuous and verify the following condition:
where ( ⋅) = (x, y, z, t, u), for all (x, y, z, t, u), \((x,y + {y}_{1},z + {z}_{1},t + {t}_{1},u + {u}_{1})\) \(\in [a,b] \times {\mathbb{R}}^{4}\).
Theorem 8.2.
Let L({x},y,z,t,u) be a jointly convex (concave) in (y,z,t,u). If y 0 satisfies conditions (8.4)–(8.6), then y 0 is a global minimizer (maximizer) to problem (8.3).
Proof.
We shall give the proof for the convex case. Since L is jointly convex in (y, z, t, u) for any continuous function y 0 + h, we have
where ( ⋅) = x, y 0(x), y 0 (α)(x), y 0(a), y 0(b). We can now proceed analogously to the proof of Theorem 8.1. As the result we get
since y 0 satisfies conditions (8.4)–(8.6). Therefore, we obtain \(\mathcal{J} ({y}_{0} + h) \geq \mathcal{J} ({y}_{0})\).
3.3 Examples
We shall provide examples in order to illustrate our main results.
Example 8.5.
Consider the following problem
The Euler–Lagrange equation associated to this problem is
Let \(y = {x}^{\alpha } + b\), where \(b \in \mathbb{R}\). Since \({y}^{(\alpha )} = \Gamma (\alpha + 1)\), it follows that y is a solution of (8.9). In order to determine b we use the generalized natural boundary conditions (8.5)–(8.6), which can be written for this problem as,
Hence, \(\tilde{y} = {x}^{\alpha } + 1\) is a candidate solution. We remark that the \(\tilde{y}\) is not differentiable in [0, 1].
Example 8.6.
Consider the following problem:
where \(\gamma,\lambda \in {\mathbb{R}}^{+}\). For this problem, the fractional Euler–Lagrange equation and the generalized natural boundary conditions (see Theorem 8.1) are given, respectively, as
Solving (8.11)–(8.13) we obtain that
is a candidate for minimizer. Observe that problem (8.10) satisfies assumptions of Theorem 8.2. Therefore \(\bar{y}\) is a global minimizer to this problem. We note that when α goes to 1 problem (8.10) tends to
with the solution
4 Conclusion
In recent years fractional calculus has played an important role in various fields such as physics, chemistry, biology, economics, modeling, identification, control theory and signal processing (see, e.g., [3, 9, 13, 25, 26, 33, 37]). The fractional operators are non-local, therefore they are suitable for constructing models possessing memory. This gives several possible applications of the FCV, e.g., in describing non-local properties of physical systems in mechanics (see, e.g., [10, 24, 35]) or electrodynamics (see, e.g., [8, 39]). The Jumarie fractional derivative is quite suitable to describe dynamics evolving in a space which exhibit coarse-grained phenomenon. When the point in this space is not infinitely thin but rather has a thickness, then it would be better to replace dx by (dx)α, 0 < α < 1, where α characterizes the grade of the phenomenon. The fractal feature of the space is transported on time, and so both space and time are fractal. Thus, the increment of time of the dynamics of the system is not dx but (dx)α. In this note we generalize some previous results of the FCV (which are defined in terms of the Jumarie fractional derivatives and integrals) by proving optimality conditions for problems of FCV with a Lagrangian density depending on the free end-points. The advantage of using the Jumarie fractional derivative lies in the fact that this derivative is defined for continuous functions, non-differentiable (see, Example 8.5). Note that the integrand in problem (8.3) depends upon the a priori unknown final values y(a) and y(b). The present paper indicates how such problems may be solved.
References
Agrawal OP (2006) Fractional variational calculus and the transversality conditions. J Phys A 39:10375–10384
Almeida R, Torres DFM (2009) Calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and fractional integrals. Appl Math Lett 22:1816–1820
Almeida R, Torres DFM (2009) Hölderian variational problems subject to integral constraints. J Math Anal Appl 359:674–681
Almeida R, Torres DFM (2011) Fractional variational calculus for nondifferentiable functions. Comput Math Appl 61:3097–3104
Almeida R, Malinowska AB, Torres DFM (2010) A fractional calculus of variations for multiple integrals. Application to vibrating string. J Math Phys 51:033503
Atanacković TM, Konjik S, Pilipović S (2008) Variational problems with fractional derivatives: Euler–Lagrange equations. J Phys A 41:095201
Baleanu D (2008) Fractional constrained systems and caputo derivatives. J Comput Nonlinear Dynam 3:199–206
Baleanu D, Golmankhaneh AK, Golmankhaneh AK, Baleanu, M.C. (2009) Fractional electromagnetic equations using fractional forms. Int J Theor Phy. 48:3114–3123
Baleanu D, Guvenc ZB, Machado JAT (2010) New Trends in Nanotechnology and Fractional Calculus Applications, Springer Science Business Media
Carpinteri A, Mainardi F (1997) Fractals and fractional calculus in continuum mechanics. Springer, Vienna
Cresson J (2007) Fractional embedding of differential operators and Lagrangian systems. J Math Phys 48:033504
Cruz PAF, Torres DFM, Zinober ASI (2010) A non-classical class of variational problems. Int J Math Model Numerical Optimisation 1:227–236
Debnath L (2003) Recent applications of fractional calculus to science and engineering. Int J Math Math Sci 54:3413–3442
El-Nabulsi RA, Torres DFM (2007) Necessary optimality conditions for fractional action-like integrals of variational calculus with Riemann–Liouville derivatives of order (α, β). Math Meth Appl Sci 30:1931–1939
El-Nabulsi RA, Torres DFM (2008) Fractional actionlike variational problems. J Math Phys 49:053521
Frederico GSF, Torres DFM (2007) A formulation of Noether’s theorem for fractional problems of the calculus of variations. J Math Anal Appl 334:834–846
Frederico GSF, Torres, DFM (2008) Fractional conservation laws in optimal control theory. Nonlinear Dynam 53:215–222
Hilfer R (2000) Applications of fractional calculus in physics. World Scientific Publishing, River Edge
Jumarie G (2005) On the representation of fractional Brownian motion as an integral with respect to (dt)a. Appl Math Lett 18:739–748
Jumarie G (2007) Fractional Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the optimal control of nonrandom fractional dynamics with fractional cost function. J Appl Math Comput 23:215–228
Jumarie G (2009) Table of some basic fractional calculus formulae derived from a modified Riemann–Liouville derivative for non-differentiable functions. Appl Math Lett 22:378–385
Jumarie G (2010) Analysis of the equilibrium positions of nonlinear dynamical systems in the presence of coarse-graining disturbance in space, J Appl Math Comput 32:329–351
Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ (2006) Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Klimek M (2002) Lagrangean and Hamiltonian fractional sequential mechanics. Czechoslovak J Phys 52:1247–1253
Kolwankar KM, Gangal AD (1997) Holder exponents of irregular signals and local fractional derivatives. Pramana J Phys 48:49–68
Machado JAT, Silva MF, Barbosa RS, Jesus IS, Reis CM, Marcos MG, Galhano AF (2010) Some applications of fractional calculus in engineering. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, doi:10.1155/2010/639801
Malinowska AB, Sidi Ammi MR, Torres DFM (2010) Composition functionals in fractional calculus of variations, Commun Frac Calc 1:32–40
Malinowska AB, Torres DFM (2010) Generalized natural boundary conditions for fractional variational problems in terms of the Caputo derivative. Comput Math Appl 59:3110–3116
Malinowska AB, Torres DFM (2010) Natural Boundary Conditions in the Calculus of Variations. Math Meth Appl Sc. 33:1712–1722
Malinowska AB, Torres DFM (2011) Fractional calculus of variations for a combined Caputo derivative. Fract Calc Appl Anal 14(4), in press
Miller KS, Ross B (1993) An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. Wiley, New York
Odzijewicz T, Torres DFM 2010 Calculus of variations with fractional and classical derivatives. In: Podlubny I, Vinagre Jara BM, Chen YQ, Feliu Batlle V, Tejado Balsera I (ed) Proceedings of FDA’10, The 4th IFAC Workshop on Fractional Differentiation and its Applications, Badajoz, Spain, p. 5, 18–20, Article no. FDA10-076
Ortigueira MD, Machado JAT (2006) Fractional calculus applications in signals and systems. Signal Process 86:2503–2504
Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA
Rabei EM, Ababneh BS (2008) Hamilton-Jacobi fractional mechanics. J Math Anal Appl 344:799–805
Riewe F (1996) Nonconservative Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. Phys Rev E 53:1890–1899
Ross B (1975) Fractional calculus and its applications, Springer, Berlin
Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI (1993) Fractional integrals and derivatives. Translated from the 1987 Russian original, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon
Tarasov VE (2008) Fractional vector calculus and fractional Maxwell’s equations. Ann Phy 323:2756–2778
van Brunt B (2004) The calculus of variations. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
This work is partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the Systems and Control Group of the R&D Unit CIDMA, and partially by BUT Grant S/WI/2/2011. The author is grateful to Delfim F. M. Torres for inspiring discussions and useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malinowska, A.B. (2012). Fractional Variational Calculus for Non-differentiable Functions. In: Baleanu, D., Machado, J., Luo, A. (eds) Fractional Dynamics and Control. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0457-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0457-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0456-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0457-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)