Abstract
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as noncylic pain of at least 6 months duration, severe enough to cause disability or seek medical attention, occurring in locations such as the pelvis, anterior abdominal wall at or below the umbilicus, lower back, or buttocks. The pathophysiology of CPP is complex. The pain generator may include the viscera (e.g., bladder, bowel), neuromuscular system (e.g., pudendal neuralgia, piriformis syndrome), or the gynecological system (e.g., endometriosis). Pathophysiological processes, both peripherally and centrally combined with psychological factors most likely contribute to the clinical picture. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach to management is recommended. As part of this management plan, neural blockade and injection of muscles within the pelvis play both a diagnostic and therapeutic role.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Introduction
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as noncylic pain of at least 6 months duration, severe enough to cause disability or seek medical attention, occurring in locations such as the pelvis, anterior abdominal wall at or below the umbilicus, lower back, or buttocks.1 The pathophysiology of CPP is complex. The pain generator may include the viscera (e.g., bladder, bowel), neuromuscular system (e.g., pudendal neuralgia, piriformis syndrome), or the gynecological system (e.g., endometriosis). Pathophysiological processes, both peripherally and centrally combined with psychological factors most likely contribute to the clinical picture.2 Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach to management is recommended.2 As part of this management plan, neural blockade and injection of muscles within the pelvis play both a diagnostic and therapeutic role.2
The technique of neural blockade has changed considerably in the past several decades. In the past, clinicians were not able to reliably visualize nerves. The methods of choice in the past were either landmark-based (blind) or equipment-guided techniques. The latter are indirect methods providing surrogate markers (such as bony landmarks for the nerve in fluoroscopy) or electrophysiological changes (such as nerve stimulation or electromyography). Both of them have intrinsic limitations in precisely locating a soft tissue structure. The introduction and increasing use of ultrasound to assist in needle placement and injection have provided the pain clinician with many benefits compared to previous modalities. Among the advantages of ultrasound are improved visualization of the nerve and surrounding vascular, bony, muscular, and visceral structures, more precise deposition of medication in the vicinity of the nerve of interest, real-time guidance on needle advancement, thereby improving target and reducing inadvertent damage to surrounding neurovascular structures, and the ability to better identify intravascular and intraneuronal injection.3 Furthermore, the relatively easy access, portability, and lack of radiation exposure make ultrasonography an attractive imaging modality for the interventional pain physician.4 – 8
This chapter concentrates on anatomy, sonoanatomy, and ultrasound-guided techniques for needle placement of the following structures associated with CPP: (1) ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves; (2) piriformis muscle; and (3) pudendal nerve.
Ilioinguinal, Iliohypogastric, and Genitofemoral Nerves
The ilioinguinal (II), iliohypogastric (IH), and genitofemoral (GF) nerves are known as the “border nerves,” providing sensory innervation to the skin lying between the thigh and abdomen.9 Due to their location and variable course, these nerves are susceptible to injury in surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen. Injury to the II and IH nerves is a known risk in open appendectomy incisions, postinguinal herniorrhaphy, low-transverse incisions (e.g., Pfannenstiel incision), and during trocar insertion for laparoscopic surgery of the abdomen and pelvis.10 – 14 There are multiple mechanisms by which these nerves may be injured. Direct nerve trauma with or without neuroma formation, compression of the nerve with scar tissue or hematoma, and suturing of the nerve into fascial closure or mesh incorporation are several possible mechanisms.15, 16
Patients presenting with pain secondary to irritation of these nerves usually complain of groin pain which may radiate to the scrotum or testicle in males, the labia majora in women, and the medial aspect of the thigh.5 One review has identified chronic pain after inguinal repair to be as high as 54%.17 Furthermore, one third of these patients report moderate to unbearable pain.17 Blockade of the II and IH nerves are often performed to provide intra and postoperative analgesia for hernia repair.18 In addition, blockade of these nerves serves a diagnostic and therapeutic purpose in patients complaining of chronic pain in this nerve distribution.5, 6, 8
Anatomy
The II and IH nerves originate from the ventral rami of L1 with contributing filaments from T12.9, 19 The IH nerve emerges along the upper lateral border of psoas major (Figure 16.1). The nerve then crosses quadratus lumborum inferolaterally traveling to the iliac crest.9 At a point midway between the iliac crest and 12th rib, the nerve pierces the transversus abdominis muscle superior to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS).19 The IH nerve then runs inferomedially, piercing the internal oblique muscle above the ASIS.19 From this point, the nerve runs between the internal and external oblique muscles, piercing the external oblique aponeurosis approximately 1 in. above the superficial inguinal ring.9 As the nerve courses between the abdominal oblique muscles, it divides into lateral and anterior cutaneous branches.12 The lateral cutaneous branch provides sensory innervations to the skin of the gluteal region.19 The anterior cutaneous branch supplies the skin over the hypogastric region, including the skin over the lower region of the rectus abdominis muscle.19 The II nerve emerges along the lateral border of psoas major, inferior to the IH nerve (Figure 16.1).19 The II runs parallel and below the IH nerve. In contrast to the IH nerve, the ilioinguinal nerve pierces the internal oblique at its lower border, and then passes between the crura of the superficial inguinal ring, anterior to the spermatic cord.9, 19 The nerve provides sensory fibers to the skin over the root of penis and scrotum (mons pubis and labium majus) and superomedial thigh region.19
It should be noted from observation of the course of the nerves from imaging and cadaver studies, the most consistent area (90%) both II and IH nerves are found is at the point midway between the iliac crest and 12th rib, where the nerves are located between the TA and IO muscles.19, 20
The GF nerve arises from the L1 and L2 nerve roots.9 The nerve travels anteriorly, passing through the psoas muscle at the level of the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae.9 It then runs on the ventral surface of the muscle, under the peritoneum and behind the ureter.21 The nerve divides into the genital and femoral branches above the level of the inguinal ligament (Figure 16.1).21 This point of division is variable. The genital branch passes through the deep inguinal ring providing motor innervation to the cremaster muscle and sensory fibers to the scrotum.9, 21 The course of this nerve in relation to the spermatic cord in the inguinal canal is varied, with ventral, dorsal, inferior locations9, 22 or as part of the cremaster muscle.21 In females, the genital branch runs with the round ligament supplying mons pubis and labium majus.9 The femoral branch follows the external iliac artery, passing through fascia lata providing sensory innervations to the skin of the femoral triangle.9
Success, consistency, and reliability in blockade of the border nerves with blind techniques have been poor.23, 24 This is likely due to the high degree of anatomic variability in not only the course of the nerves but also their branching patterns, areas of penetration of the fascial layers, and dominance patterns.8 The above description of the II and IH nerve anatomy may only be consistent in 41.8% of patients.25 Furthermore, the sites at which the II and IH nerves pierce the abdominal wall muscle layers are significantly variable.14 However, by far the most consistent location of the II and IH nerves is lateral and superior to the ASIS where the nerves are found between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscular layers.5, 6, 8, 19
Literature Review on the Injection Techniques for Ilioinguinal, Iliohypogastric, and Genitofemoral Nerve Block
A number of injection techniques for II and IH nerves have been described and virtually all are landmark-based.26 – 28 Unfortunately, all these techniques suggest a needle entry anterior to the ASIS (Figure 16.2), where the anatomy of these nerves is highly variable. Thus, the failure rates with those techniques range between 10% and 45%.18, 23, 24, 29 Furthermore, the misguided needle may result in femoral nerve blockade30 and bowel perforation and pelvic hematoma.31 – 33
There are two key elements contributing to the improvement in success rate. One is to perform the injection cephalad and posterior to the ASIS, where both the II and IH nerves (>90%) can be consistently found between the TA muscles at this point.19 The other, is the use of ultrasound for the guidance of injection. Techniques utilizing ultrasound to inject the II and IH nerves have been published.5, 8, 34, 35 The accuracy of ultrasound guidance has been validated in a cadaver study with the injection site superior to ASIS and the block success rate was 95%.34 The success of using ultrasound to guide II and IH nerve blockade has been replicated in the clinical setting. Based on visualization of the abdominal muscles, fascial planes, and the deep circumflex iliac artery, the authors were able to demonstrate a clinically successful block in all their cases based on sensory loss corresponding to the II and IH nerves following injection.35, 36 The ease and importance of identifying the abdominal muscle planes before attempting to visualize the nerves have been supported by a study assessing the training of anesthesiologists with little experience in using ultrasound to assist in needle placement.37
Neural blockade of the GF nerve is not commonly performed. Review of the literature yields that techniques described in the past were blind and rely on the pubic tubercle, inguinal ligament, inguinal crease, and femoral artery as landmarks.38, 39 One of the blind methods involves infiltration of 10 ml local anesthetic immediately lateral to the pubic tubercle, caudad to the inguinal ligament.40 In another method, a needle is inserted into the inguinal canal to block the genital branch.39 The latter method can only be reliably performed during surgery.39 The blind techniques described are essentially infiltration techniques and rely on high volumes of local anesthetic for consistent results.40
Ultrasound-guided blockade of the genital branch of the GF nerve has been described in several review articles.5, 6, 8 The genital nerve is difficult to visualize and blockade is achieved by identification of the inguinal canal.5, 6, 8 In males, the GF nerve may travel within or outside the spermatic cord. Thus, the local anesthetic and steroid are deposited both outside and within the spermatic cord.5, 6, 8
Ultrasound-Guided Technique of Ilioinguinal, Iliohypogastric,and Genitofemoral Nerve
Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerves
When performing II and IH nerve blockade under ultrasound guidance, it is important to clearly identify the abdominal wall muscle layers: EO, IO, and TA. The patient is placed in the supine position. Both nerves are relatively superficial, thus a high-frequency (6–13 MHz) linear probe will provide optimal visualization. The recommended area for initial scanning is posterior and superior to the ASIS. The probe should be placed perpendicular to the direction of the II and IH nerves (which is usually parallel to the inguinal ligament) with the lateral edge on top of the iliac crest (Figure 16.3). At this position, the iliac crest will appear as a hyperechoic structure adjacent to which will appear the three muscular layers of the abdominal wall (Figure 16.4). Below the TA, peristaltic movements of the bowel may be detected. The probe may need to be tilted either caudad or cephalad to optimize the image. Once the muscular layers are identified, the II and IH nerves will be found in the split fascial plane between the IO and TA muscle layers. Both nerves should be within 1.5 cm of the iliac crest at this site, with the II nerve closer to the iliac crest.34 The nerves are usually in close proximity to each other25 and located on the “upsloping” split fascia close to the iliac crest. In some cases, the nerves may run approximately 1 cm apart.8 The deep circumflex iliac artery which is close to the two nerves in the same fascial layer can be revealed with the use of color Doppler (Figure 16.4). A neural structure within the fascial split may also be seen medial and on the flat part of the IO and TA muscle junction. This is the subcostal nerve and if mistaken for the II and IH nerve, the nerve blockade will result in aberrant distribution of anesthesia.
Once satisfied with visualization of the nerves, a 22-guage spinal needle is advanced to the nerves under real-time guidance. Either an out-of-plane or in-plane technique may be used although an in-plane technique is favored by the authors. The needle is advanced so the tip lies in the split fascial plane between the IO and TA muscles and adjacent to the II and IH nerves (Figure 16.4). At this point, hydrodissection with normal saline can confirm adequate position of the needle tip and spread within the fascial plane. In some cases, the nerves may be difficult to visualize. In this situation, injectate may be deposited in the fascial plane between the TA and IO muscles, ensuring satisfactory medial and lateral spread.36 The injectate usually consists of 6–8 ml of local anesthetic (bupivacaine 0.5%) and steroid (depo-medrol 40 mg). The desired result is observation of spread of the solution in the split fascial plane to surround both nerves.
Genital Branch of Genitofemoral Nerve
The genital branch of the GF nerve cannot be visualized directly. The major structure that is sought on scanning is the inguinal canal and its content (spermatic cord in males or the round ligament in females).
The patient is positioned supine and a linear US probe with high frequency (6–13 MHz) is used. Initially, the probe is placed in the transverse plane below the inguinal ligament. In this plane, the femoral artery is identified and positioned in the middle of the screen. The probe is then rotated so that the artery lies in the long axis (Figure 16.3). The ultrasound probe is then moved cranially to trace the femoral artery until it dives deep into the abdomen to become the external iliac artery (Figure 16.5). At this point, an oval or circular structure may be seen superficial to the femoral artery. This structure is the inguinal canal and contains the spermatic cord in men and the round ligament in women. The probe may be moved slightly medial to trace the spermatic cord or round ligament. In males, arterial pulsations may be visible within the spermatic cord. These pulsations represent the testicular artery and artery to the vas deferens. This may be confirmed by the use of color Doppler. The blood vessels may be made more prominent by asking the patient to perform a Valsalva maneuver, which increases blood flow through the pampiniform plexus. In addition to the arteries, a thin tubular structure within the spermatic cord may also be visible, which is the vas deferens. In females, the round ligament can be difficult to visualize and the target is the inguinal canal.
An out-of-plane technique is used to guide needle placement. The needle is inserted on the lateral aspect of the probe. The needle is directed to pierce the deep abdominal fascia and into the inguinal canal (Figure 16.5). Once the needle has pierced the fascia, hydrodissection with normal saline confirms spread within the inguinal canal. A volume of 4 ml of solution is deposited within the inguinal canal but outside the spermatic cord with another 4 ml deposited inside the spermatic cord. The reason for dividing the injection is due to the anatomic variability of the genital branch. The local anesthetic solution should not contain epinephrine as there is a risk of vasoconstriction of the testicular artery. In addition to local anesthetic, steroids may be added for cases with chronic pain. In females, 8 ml of the solution will be deposited into the inguinal canal.
Piriformis Syndrome
Piriformis syndrome is an uncommon cause of pain occurring in the back, buttock, or hip.41 – 44 Typically, pain is felt in the region of the sacroiliac joint, greater sciatic notch, and piriformis muscle with radiation down the lower limb similar to sciatica.45 The pain is exacerbated by walking, stooping, or lifting.46 On physical examination, there may be gluteal atrophy and tenderness on palpation, pain on stretching of the piriformis muscle, and a positive Lasegue sign.45, 46 Often, it is a diagnosis of exclusion with clinical assessment and investigations necessary to rule out pathology of the lumbar spine, hips, and sacroiliac joint.46, 47
Often, piriformis syndrome will improve with a conservative regimen of physical therapy and simple analgesic pharmacotherapy. For those patients not responding, more interventional therapy may be required in the form of muscle injections or surgery.48 The piriformis muscle may be injected with local anesthetic and steroid49 which will also aid in diagnosis if therapeutically successful. Furthermore, botulinum toxin has been injected into the piriformis muscle with evidence of longer periods of analgesia.50, 51 In those cases, in which there is failure to improve after three injections, surgical release of the piriformis muscle should be considered.41
Anatomy
The origin of the piriformis muscle is via fleshy digitations on the ventral surface of the S2 to S4 vertebrae (Figure 16.6).44 Running laterally anterior to the sacroiliac joint, the piriformis muscle exits the pelvis through the greater sciatic foramen.45 At this point, the muscle becomes tendinous inserting into the upper border of the greater trochanter as a round tendon.47 The piriformis functions as an external rotator of the lower limb in the erect position, an abductor when supine, and a weak hip flexor when walking.47
All neurovascular structures exiting the pelvis to the buttock pass through the greater sciatic foramen.47 The superior gluteal nerve and artery pass superior to the piriformis.47 Inferior to the piriformis lie the inferior gluteal artery and nerve, the internal pudendal artery, the pudendal nerve, nerve to obturator internus, posterior femoral cutaneous nerve, nerve to quadratus lumborum, and the sciatic nerve.47 The anatomical relationship between the piriformis muscle and sciatic nerve is variable. Most commonly (78–84%), the sciatic nerve passes below the piriformis muscle.52, 53 Less frequently (12–21%), the nerve is divided, passing through and below the muscle.53 Less common variations are the divided nerve passing through and above the piriformis; the divided nerve passing above and below the muscle; undivided nerve passing above piriformis; or undivided nerve passing through the muscle.52, 53 The close relationship of the piriformis muscle to the sciatic nerve explains why patients experiencing piriformis syndrome may also experience symptoms of sciatic nerve irritation.43
Literature Review on Piriformis Muscle Injections
There have been reports of different techniques utilized to inject the piriformis muscle, including fluoroscopy,49 CT,54 and MRI55 to assist with accurate needle placement within the muscle. Electrophysiologic guidance has been used alone and in conjunction with the above modalities.51, 56, 57 Irrespective of whether EMG guidance is used, fluoroscopically guided piriformis muscle injections depend on the presence of a characteristic intrapiriformis contrast pattern to confirm needle placement within the piriformis muscle (Figure 16.7),49 which has been shown to be unreliable.58 A validation study with cadavers suggested that the fluoroscopically guided contrast-controlled injection was only accurate in guiding an intrapiriformis injection in 30% of the injections.58 In cases where the needle was incorrectly placed, the usual final position of the needle was within the gluteus maximus muscle, which overlies piriformis.
In contrast, ultrasound is seen as an attractive imaging technique as it provides visualization of the soft tissue and neurovascular structures, and allows real-time imaging of needle insertion toward the target.59 Multiple reports of ultrasound-guided piriformis muscle injection have been published with similar techniques described.4, 5, 58, 60, 61 The accuracy of needle placement with ultrasound was recently validated in a cadaveric study suggesting an accuracy of 95%.58
Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Piriformis Muscle Injection
The patient is placed in the prone position. A low-frequency (2–5 Hz) curvilinear probe is held in the transverse plane and initially positioned over the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS). The transducer is then moved laterally to visualize the ilium, which will be identifiable as a hyperechoic line descending diagonally across the screen from the superomedial to inferolateral corners (Figure 16.8). Once the ilium is visualized, the probe is orientated in the direction of the piriformis muscle and moved in a caudad direction until the sciatic notch is found (Figure 16.8). At the sciatic notch level, the hyperechoic shadow of the bone will disappear from the medial aspect and two muscle layers will be visible: the gluteus maximus and the piriformis (Figure 16.8). Confirmation of the piriformis muscle can be made by having an assistant rotating the hip externally and internally with the knee flexed. This movement will demonstrate side to side gliding of the piriformis muscle on ultrasound. It is important to identify the sciatic notch, as failure to do so may lead the practitioner to mistakenly identify one of the other external hip rotators (e.g., the gemelli muscles) as piriformis.
Due to the depth of the muscle, a 22-guage, 120 mm nerve stimulating needle is used. The authors recommend the concomitant use of a nerve stimulator to avoid unintentional injection of the sciatic nerve, as the passage of the sciatic nerve in this territory is variable as described above. In addition, the use of a nerve stimulator also allows identification of the needle tip within the piriformis muscle by the visualization of piriformis muscle twitches on the monitor.
An in-plane technique is used with the needle being inserted on the medial aspect of the probe and passing laterally into the muscle belly of the piriformis in the sciatic notch. If intramuscular injection is the objective, the needle should be slowly advanced further until strong contractions of the piriformis muscle are evident on the monitor. A small volume of normal saline (0.5 ml) may be injected to confirm position within the muscle. Once satisfied with needle position, a small volume (1–2 ml) of medication (either a mixture of 1 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 40 mg depo-medrol or 50 units of Botulinum toxin A diluted in 1 ml of normal saline) may be injected into the muscle.
Pudendal Neuralgia
The pudendal nerve supplies the anterior and posterior urogenital areas (clitoris, penis, vulva, and perianal area).62 – 64 Pudendal neuralgia refers to CPP where pain is experienced in these regions innervated by the pudendal nerve.62 Typically, the pain is exacerbated by sitting and may be reduced by lying on the nonpainful side, standing, and sitting on a toilet seat.65 On physical examination, there may be evidence of hypoesthesia, hyperalgesia, or allodynia in the perineal area.65 The pain may be reproduced or exaggerated when pressure is applied against the ischial spine during a vaginal or rectal examination. Pudendal nerve block is an important tool in the diagnosis of this condition.66
Often the cause of the symptoms in patients suffering from pudendal neuralgia will not be readily identifiable. However, bicycle riding,67 vaginal delivery,68, 69 countertraction devices in orthopedic surgery,70, 71 pelvic trauma,70 and intensive athletic activity72 are recognized risk factors in the development of pudendal neuralgia. There are two anatomical regions in which the pudendal nerve is susceptible to entrapment along its path: (1) the interligamentous plane, which lies between the sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligaments at the level of the ischial spine73; (2) Alcock’s canal.74
Anatomy
The pudendal nerve contains both motor and sensory fibers.75 Relative to the major nerves of the extremities, the pudendal nerve is thin (0.6–6.8 mm) and is situated deep within the body, surrounded by fatty tissue.76 The nerve arises from the anterior rami of the second, third, and fourth sacral nerves (S2, S3, and S4)75 and passes through the greater sciatic notch.76 Once out of the pelvis, the pudendal nerve travels ventrally in the interligamentous plane between the sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligament at the level of the ischial spine (Figure 16.6).62, 77 At this level, 30–40% of pudendal nerves will be two- or three-trunked.62, 78, 79 Within the interligamentous plane, the pudendal artery is located lateral to the pudendal nerve in the vast majority of cases (90%).76 This region is of clinical importance as the nerve may be compressed between the sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments.73 Furthermore, elongation of the ischial spine due to repetitive muscular forces represents a potential source of microtrauma affecting the pudendal nerve.72
Following its passage between the two ligaments, the pudendal nerve swings anteriorly to enter the pelvis through the Alcock’s canal of the lateral ischiorectal fossa.78 – 80 Alcock’s canal is a fascial sheath formed by the duplication of the obturator internus muscle, underlying the plane of levator ani.78 At this site, the pudendal nerve is also susceptible to entrapment either by the fascia of the obturator internus or by the falciform process of the sacrotuberous ligament.74
As the pudendal nerve travels through the ischiorectal fossa, it gives off three terminal branches: the dorsal nerve of the penis, inferior rectal nerve, and the perineal nerve. The dorsal nerve of the penis runs lateral to the dorsal artery and deep dorsal vein of the penis, terminating in the glans penis.77, 81, 82 The course of the nerve under the subpubic arch makes it susceptible to compression by the saddle nose of a bicycle.83 The inferior rectal nerve supplies the external anal sphincter.77, 81, 82 The remaining portion of the pudendal nerve trunk becomes the perineal nerve which continues to supply sensation of the skin of the penis (clitoris), perianal area, and the posterior surface of the scrotum or labia majora.82 The perineal nerve also provides motor supply to the deep muscles of the urogenital triangle.81, 82
Literature Review on the Pudendal Nerve Injections
There are two anatomical regions at which blockade of the pudendal nerve may be performed: the interligamentous plane73 and Alcock’s canal.74
The pudendal nerve has been blocked by various routes in the literature. These include the transvaginal84, transperineal,85, 86 and transgluteal approaches.87 The transgluteal approach is popular allowing blockade at the ischial spine and Alcock’s canal. Traditionally, fluoroscopy has been used to guide needle placement, using the ischial spine as a surrogate landmark.62 The needle is placed medial to the ischial spine which corresponds to the course of the pudendal nerve at this level.87, 88 The major limitation of fluoroscopy is that it cannot accurately demonstrate the interligamentous plane.5, 8 At the level of the ischial spine, the pudendal artery lies between the pudendal nerve and the pudendal artery in the majority of cases (76–100%).7, 76 Therefore, injectate may not spread to the pudendal nerve using this landmark. In addition, the potential proximity of the sciatic nerve at this level makes it susceptible to the anesthetic if spread of the injectate is not visualized in real time. Furthermore, the depth for needle insertion cannot be assessed with fluoroscopy.
Both ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scan are ideal for visualizing the interligamentous plane as they identify all the important landmarks: ischial spine, sacrotuberous ligament, sacrospinous ligament, pudendal artery, and the pudendal nerve.8 Furthermore, it also allows visualization of the sciatic nerve and other vascular structures, so more selective needle placement and blockade can occur. Ultrasound has the advantage of avoiding exposing the patient to radiation and is more accessible to clinicians. While early reports only described ultrasound visualization of the pudendal nerve,76, 89 the actual technique of blockade has been reported in greater detail recently.5, 7, 8 A consistent feature of published techniques on ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve blockade is identifying the ischial spine and its medial aspect which contains the sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligaments, internal pudendal artery, and pudendal nerve.5 – 8
At the level of Alcock’s canal, ultrasound cannot accurately identify or guide needle placement. CT guidance is the only form of imaging which can accurately guide the needle into the canal.90
Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Pudendal Nerve Injection
Pudendal nerve blockade at the level of the ischial spine with ultrasound guidance is performed via the transgluteal approach with the patient in the prone position. The aim of scanning is to identify the ischial spine and therefore reliably identify the interligamentous plane which will appear on its medial aspect. A curvilinear probe (2–5 Hz) is recommended for scanning due to the depth of the nerve. Scanning begins with the probe held in the transverse plane over the PSIS, a technique similar to that of scanning the piriformis muscle (Figure 16.8). The probe is then moved caudad until the piriformis muscle is identified as described above for the piriformis muscle injection. At this level the ischium can be identified as a curved hyperechoic line. The probe is then moved further caudad to identify the ischial spine. The following four features will help to identify the level of the ischial spine (Figure 16.8):
The ischial spine will appear as a straight hyperechoic line as opposed to the ischium which is a curved hyperechoic line.
The sacrospinous ligament will be visualized as a hyperechoic line lying medial and in contact with the ischial spine. The sacrospinous ligament, however, does not cast an anechoic shadow deep to its image, as opposed to that casted by bone structures.
The piriformis muscle will disappear. Deep to the gluteus maximus lies the sacrotuberous ligament. Although it is difficult to differentiate between this ligament and the fascial plane of the gluteus maximus, the sacrotuberous ligament can be felt easily as the needle is advancing through this thick ligament.
The internal pudendal artery can be seen, usually situated on the medial portion of the ischial spine. This can be confirmed with color Doppler.
The pudendal nerve will lie medial to the pudendal artery at this level. However, due to the depth and the small diameter of the nerve it may be difficult to visualize. On dynamic scan, the sciatic nerve and inferior gluteal artery can be seen lateral to the ischial spine tip. Visualization of these structures is important because if these are mistaken for the internal pudendal artery, sciatic nerve blockade will result.
Once satisfied with the identification of the ischial spine, pudendal artery, and the interligamentous plane, a 22-guage, 120 mm insulated peripheral nerve stimulating needle is inserted from the medial aspect of the probe. The target is for the needle tip to be situated between the sacrotuberous ligament and sacrospinous ligament. Due to the depth of the pudendal nerve, it is helpful to insert the needle several centimetres medial to the medial edge of the probe to reduce the steepness of the needle path and therefore assist in visualization of the needle tip as it passes to the target site. The needle is advanced so that it will pass through the sacrotuberous ligament, on the medial side of the pudendal artery. As the needle is passing through the sacrotuberous ligament, increased resistance will be felt. Once the needle is through, the resistance will diminish. A small volume of normal saline is injected to confirm position within the interligamentous plane. The pudendal nerve itself will be difficult to visualize due to a combination of its depth,7, 76 small diameter,62, 76, 79 and possibility of anatomical division into two or three trunks.62, 78, 79
If hydrodissection confirms adequate spread within the interligamentous plane and no intravascular spread, a mixture of local anesthetic and steroid may be injected. In the author’s experience, a mixture of 4 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 40 mg of steroid (depo-medrol) is commonly injected and clinical signs of pudendal nerve blockade are present shortly after. During injection, the clinician should ensure that there is a spread of the injectate medial to the pudendal artery and that the injectate does not pass too far laterally past the artery. Excessive lateral spread may result in inadvertent sciatic nerve blockade. It is recommended that the patient is assessed for signs of successful blockade following the procedure. This may be achieved simply by assessing sensation to pin prick and alcohol swab in the perineal area ipsilateral to site of blockade. Successful blockade will result in reduced sensation to both stimuli in this region.
Conclusion
Ultrasound is a valuable tool for imaging peripheral structures, guiding needle advancement, and confirming the spread of injectate around the target tissue, all without exposing healthcare providers and patients to the risks of radiation. In patients with CPP, the target structures for the interventional procedures can be well visualized with the use of ultrasound. Most of the ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in CPP have been validated and thus allow the accurate performance of these procedures.
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Chronic pelvic pain: ACOG practice bulletin no. 51. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:589–605.
Fall M, Baranowski AP, Elniel S, et al. EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. Eur Urol. 2010;57:35–48.
Chan VWS. A Practical Guide to Ultrasound Imaging for Regional Anesthesia. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Toronto Printing; 2009.
Smith J, Hurdle M-F, Locketz AJ, Wisniewski SJ. Ultrasound-guided piriformis injection: technique description and verification. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1664–1667.
Peng PWH, Tumber PS. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for patients with chronic pelvic pain – a description of techniques and review of the literature. Pain Physician. 2008;11:215–224.
Bellingham GA, Peng PWH. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for chronic pelvic pain. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2009;13:171–178.
Rofaeel A, Peng P, Louis I, et al. Feasibility of real-time ultrasound for pudendal nerve block in patients with chronic perineal pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(2):139–145.
Peng P, Narouze S. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in pain medicine: a review of anatomy, sonoanatomy, and procedures. Part I nonaxial structures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(5):458–474.
Rab M, Ebmer J, Dellon AL. Anatomic variability of the ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerve: implications for the treatment of groin pain. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(6):1618–1623.
Cardosi RJ, Cox CS, Hoffman MS. Postoperative neuropathies after major pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):240–244.
Luijendijk RW, Jekel J, Storm RK, et al. The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann Surg. 1997;225(14):365–369.
Choi PD, Nath R, Mackinnon SE. Iatrogenic injury to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in the groin: case report, diagnosis, and management. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;37(1):60–65.
Sippo WC, Burghardt A, Gomez AC. Nerve entrapment after Pfannenstiel incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(2):420–421.
Whiteside JL, Barber MD, Walters MD, Falcone T. Anatomy of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in relation to trocar placement and low transverse incisions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(16):1574–1578.
Grosz CR. Iliohypogastric nerve injury. Am J Surg. 1981;142(5):628.
Lantis JC II, Schwaitzberg SD. Tack entrapment of the ilioinguinal nerve during laparoscopic hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9(3):285–289.
Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith EC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA. A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(1):48–54.
Lim SL, Ng Sb A, Tan GM. Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block revisited: single shot versus double shot technique for hernia repair in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(3):255–260.
Mandelkow H, Loeweneck H. The iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves. Distribution in the abdominal wall, danger areas in surgical incisions in the inguinal and pubic regions and reflected visceral pain in their dermatomes. Surg Radiol Anat. 1988;10(2):145–149.
Jamieson RW, Swigart LL, Anson BJ. Points of parietal perforation of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in relation to optimal sites for local anaesthesia. Q Bull Northwest Univ Med Sch. 1952;26(1):22–26.
Liu WC, Chen TH, Shyu JF, et al. Applied anatomy of the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve in open inguinal herniorrhaphy. Eur J Surg. 2002;168(3):145–149.
Ducic I, Dellon AL. Testicular pain after inguinal hernia repair: an approach to resection of the genital branch of genitofemoral nerve. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(2):181–184.
Thibaut D, de la Cuadra-Fontaine JC, Bravo MP, et al. Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks: where is the anesthetic injected? Anesth Analg. 2008;107(2):728–729.
Weintraud M, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al. Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks in children: where do we administer the local anesthetic without direct visualization. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(1):89–93.
al-Dabbagh AK. Anatomical variations of the inguinal nerves and risks of injury in 110 hernia repairs. Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;24(2):102–107.
Brown DL. Atlas of Regional Anesthesia. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1999.
Waldman SD. Atlas of Interventional Pain Management. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2004.
Katz J. Atlas of Regional Anesthesia. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1985.
van Schoor AN, Boon JM, Bosenberg AT, Abrahams PH, Meiring JH. Anatomical considerations of the pediatric ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(5):371–377.
Lipp AK, Woodcock J, Hensman B, Wilkinson K. Leg weakness is a complication of ilio-inguinal nerve block in children. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(2):273–274.
Johr M, Sossai R. Colonic puncture during ilioinguinal nerve block in a child. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(5):1051–1052.
Amory C, Mariscal A, Guyot E, Chauvet P, Leon A, Poli-Merol ML. Is ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block always totally safe in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13(2):164–166.
Vaisman J. Pelvic hematoma after an ilioinguinal nerve block for orchialgia. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(4):1048–1049.
Eichenberger U, Greher M, Kirchmair L, Curatolo M, Morigg B. Ultrasound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve: accuracy of a selective new technique confirmed by anatomical dissection. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(2):238–243.
Gofeld M, Christakis M. Sonographically guided ilioinguinal nerve block. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(12):1571–1575.
Hu P, Harmon D, Frizelle H. Ultrasound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block: a pilot study. Ir J Med Sci. 2007;176(2):111–115.
Ford S, Dosani M, Robinson AJ, et al. Defining the reliability of sonoanatomy identification by novices in ultrasound-guided pediatric ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blockade. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1793–1798.
Broadman L. Ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves. In: Gay SG, ed. Regional Anesthesia. An Atlas of Anatomy and Techniques. St Louis, MA: Mosby; 1996:247–254.
Conn D, Nicholls B. Regional anaesthesia. In: Wilson IH, Allman KG, eds. Oxford Handbook of Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:1055–1104.
NYSORA. Genitofemoral Nerve Block. <http://nysora.com/peripheral_nerve_blocks/classic_block_techniques/3081-genitofemoral>; 2009. Accessed 11.12.09.
Parziale JR, Hudgins TH, Fishman LM. The piriformis syndrome. Am J Orthop. 1996;25(12):819–893.
Barton PM. Piriformis syndrome: a rational approach to management. Pain. 1991;47(3):345–352.
Durrani Z, Winnie AP. Piriformis muscle syndrome: an underdiagnosed cause of sciatica. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991;6(6):374–379.
Hallin RP. Sciatic pain and the piriformis muscle. Postgrad Med. 1983;74(2):69–72.
Benzon HT, Katz JA, Enzon HA, Iqbal MS. Piriformis syndrome anatomic considerations, a new injection technique, and a review of the literature. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(6):1442–1448.
Robinson D. Piriformis syndrome in relations to sciatic pain. Am J Surg. 1947;73:335–358.
Papadopoulos EC, Khan SN. Piriformis syndrome and low back pain: a new classification and review of the literature. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(1):65–71.
Benson ER, Schutzer SF. Posttraumatic piriformis syndrome: diagnosis and results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(7):941–949.
Fishman S, Caneris O, Bandman T, Audette J, Borsook D. Injection of the piriformis muscle by fluoroscopic and electromyographic guidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23(6):554–559.
Lang AM. Botulinum toxin type B in piriformis syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(3):198–202.
Fishman L, Konnoth C, Rozner B. Botulinum neurotoxin type B and physical therapy in the treatment of piriformis syndrome: a dose finding study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(1):42–50.
Pecina M. Contribution to the etiological explanation of the piriformis syndrome. Acta Anat. 1979;105(2):181–187.
Beason LE, Anson BJ. The relation of the sciatic nerve and its subdivisions to the piriformis muscle. Anat Rec. 1937;70:1–5.
Fanucci E, Masala S, Sodani G, et al. CT-guided injection of botulinic toxin for percutaneous therapy of piriformis muscle syndrome with preliminary MRI results about denervative process. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(12):2543–2548.
Filler A, Haynes J, Jordan S, et al. Sciatic pain of non-disc origin and piriformis syndrome: diagnosis by magnetic resonance neurography and interventional magnetic resonance imaging with outcome of resulting treatment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(2):99–115.
Fishman LM, Dombi GW, Michaelson C, et al. Piriformis syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome – a 10 year study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3):295–301.
Fishman LM, Andersen C, Rosner B. Botox and physical therapy in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81(12):936–942.
Finoff JT, Hurdle MFB, Smith J. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopically guided contrast controlled piriformis injections. A cadaveric study. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(8):1157–1163.
Koski JM. Ultrasound-guided injections in rheumatology. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(9):2131–2138.
Broadhurst NA, Simmons ND, Bond MJ. Piriformis syndrome: correlation of muscle morphology with symptoms and signs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2036–2039.
Huerto AP, Yeo SN, Ho KY. Piriformis muscle injection using ultrasonography and motor stimulation – report of a technique. Pain Physician. 2007;10(5):687–690.
Robert R, Prat-Pradal D, Labat JJ, et al. Anatomic basis of chronic perineal pain: role of the pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(2):93–98.
Benson JT, Griffis K. Pudendal neuralgia, a severe pain syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1663–1668.
Amarenco G, Kerdraon J, Bouju P, et al. Treatments of perineal neuralgia caused by involvement of the pudendal nerve. Rev Neurol. 1997;153(5):331–334.
Peng PWH, Antolak SJ Jr, Gordon AS. Pudendal neuralgia. In: Pukall C, Goldstein GI, Goldstein A, eds. Female Sexual Pain Disorders. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:112–118.
Labat JJ, Riant T, Robert R, et al. Diagnostic criteria for pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment (Nantes criteria). Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(4):306–310.
Leibovitch I, Mor Y. The vicious cycling: bicycling related urogenital disorders. Eur Urol. 2005;47(3):277–287.
Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(9):770–779.
Lien KC, Morgan DM, Delancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Pudendal nerve stretch during vaginal birth: a 3D computer simulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1669–1676.
Soulie M, Vazzoler N, Seguin P, Chiron P, Plante P. Urological consequences of pudendal nerve trauma during orthopedic surgery: review and practical advice. Prog Urol. 2002;12(3):504–509.
Amarenco G, Ismael SS, Bayle B, Denys P, Kerdraon J. Electrophysiological analysis of pudendal neuropathy following traction. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(1):116–119.
Antolak S, Hough D, Pawlina W, Spinner RJ. Anatomical basis of chronic pelvic pain syndrome: the ischial spine and pudendal nerve entrapment. Med Hypotheses. 2002;59(3):349–353.
Labat JJ, Robert R, Bensignor M, Buzelin JM. Neuralgia of the pudendal nerve. Anatomo-clinical considerations and therapeutical approach. J Urol (Paris). 1990;96(5):329–344.
Amarenco G, Lancoe Y, Ghnassia RT, Goudal H, Pernigot M. Alcock’s canal syndrome and perineal neuralgia. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1988;144(8–9):523–526.
Juenemann K-P, Lue TF, Scmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Clinical significance of sacral and pudendal nerve anatomy. J Urol. 1988;139(1):74–80.
Gruber H, Kovacs P, Piegger J, Brenner E. New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: topographic basics. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(9):1376–1380.
Mahakkanukrauh P, Surin P, Vaidhayakarn P. Anatomical study of the pudendal nerve adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament. Clin Anat. 2005;18(3):200–205.
Shafik A, Doss SH. Pudendal canal: surgical anatomy and clinical implications. Am Surg. 1999;65(2):176–180.
O’Bichere A, Green C, Phillips RK. New, simple approach for maximal pudendal nerve exposure: anomalies and prospects for functional reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(7):956–960.
Thompson JR, Gibbs S, Genadry R, Burros L, Lambrou N, Buller JL. Anatomy of pelvic arteries adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: importance of the coccygeal branch of the inferior gluteal artery. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(6):973–977.
Shafik A, el-Sherif M, Youssef A, Olfat ES. Surgical anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its clinical implications. Clin Anat. 1995;8(2):110–115.
Schraffordt SE, Tjandra JJ, Eizenberg N, Dwyer PL. Anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its terminal branches: a cadaver study. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(1–2):23–26.
Sedy J, Nanka O, Belisova M, Walro JM, Jarolim L. Sulcus nervi dorsalis penis/clitoridis: anatomic structure and clinical significance. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):1079–1085.
Bowes WA. Clinical aspects of normal and abnormal labour. In: Resnick R, Creasy RK, eds. Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1989:510–546.
Naja Z, Ziade MF, Lonnqvist PA. Nerve stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(1):62–68.
Imbelloni LE, Viera EM, Gouveia MA, Netinho JG, Spirandelli LD, Cordeiro JA. Pudendal block with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(10):1656–1661.
Prat-Pradal D, Metge L, Gagnard-Landra C, Mares P, Dauzat M, Godlewski G. Anatomical basis of transgluteal pudendal nerve block. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31(4):289–293.
Choi SS, Lee PB, Kim YC, Kim HJ, Lee SC. C-arm guided pudendal nerve block: a new technique. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(5):553–556.
Kovacs P, Gruber H, Piegger J, Bodner G. New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: ultrasonographic technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(9):1381–1385.
Hough DM, Wittenberg KH, Pawlina W, et al. Chronic perineal pain caused by pudendal nerve entrapment: anatomy and CT-guided perineural injection technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(2):561–567.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chan, CW., Peng, P.W.H. (2011). Ultrasound-Guided Blocks for Pelvic Pain. In: Narouze, S. (eds) Atlas of Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in Interventional Pain Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1681-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1681-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1679-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1681-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)