Technical artifacts are embedded in social systems and, to some extent, even shape them. This chapter inquires, then, whether designing artifacts may be regarded as a contribution to social design. I explicate a concept of general design that conceives design as the type fixation of a complex entity. This allows for an analysis of different contributions to the design of social systems without favoring the intended effects of artifacts on a system over those effects that actually show up. First, the clear-cut case of socio-technical systems is considered. Here, functions of artifacts can be planned fairly precise. In societies, in contrast, the actual functions of an artifact can hardly be predicted, which is due to strong self-organizing processes. Nevertheless artifact design can be shown to contribute to the design of the system also in this case.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Achinstein, P., 1970, Function statements, Phil. Sci. 44:341-367.
Allen, C., and Bekoff, M., 1995, Biological function, adaptation, and natural design, Phil. Sci. 62:609-622.
Allen, C., Bekoff, M., and Lauder, G., eds., 1998, Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Banathy, B. H., 1998, Evolution guided by design: a systems perspective, Syst. Res. 20:161-172.
Buller, D. J., 2002, Function and design revisited, in: Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, A. Ariew, R. Cummins, and M. Perlman, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 222-243.
Buller, D. J., ed., 1999, Function, Selection, and Design. SUNY Press, New York.
Callon, M., 1986, Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, in: Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, The Sociological Review 32, J. Law, ed., Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 196-233.
Checkland, P., 1981, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, New York; quoted from the new ed., Chichester 1999.
Cummins, R., 1975, Functional analysis, J. Phil. 72:741-765.
Davies, P. S., 2001, Norms of Nature: Naturalism and the Nature of Functions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Emery, F. E., and Trist, E. L., 1960, Socio-technical systems, reprinted in: Systems Thinking: Selected Readings, F. E. Emery, ed., Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1969, pp. 281-296.
Houkes, W., Vermaas, P. E., Dorst, K., and de Vries, M. J., 2002, Design and use as plans: an action-theoretical account, Des. Stud. 23:303-320.
Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. J., 2005, Evolution in Four Dimensions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kitcher, P., 1993, Function and design, Midw. Stud. Phil. 18:379-397.
Krohs, U., 2004, Eine Theorie biologischer Theorien, Springer, Berlin.
Krohs, U., 2005, Biologisches Design, in: Philosophie der Biologie: Eine Einführung, U. Krohs and G. Toepfer, eds., Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 52-69.
Krohs, U., 2007, Functions as based on a concept of general design, (Synthese forthcoming).
Laszlo, A., 2001, The epistemological foundations of evolutionary systems design, Syst. Res. 18:307-321.
Latour, B., 1988, The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lauder, G. V., 1982, Historical biology and the problem of design, J. Theor. Biol. 97:57-67.
Lewens, T., 2004, Organisms and Artifacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Malinowski, B., 1941, A scientific theory of culture, in: A Scientific Theory of Culture and other Essays, B. Malinowski H. Cairns, with a preface by, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 1960, pp. 1-144.
Merton, R. K., 1947, The machine, the worker and the engineer, Science 105; reprinted in: Social Theory and Social Structure, R. K. Merton, revised and enlarged edition, 1957, The Free Press, Glencoe, pp. 562-573.
Millikan, R. G., 1984, Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Müller, G. B., and Newman, S. A., eds., 2003, Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pickering, A., 1995, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Popper, K., 1971, The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Preston, B., 2000, The functions of things: a philosophical perspective on material culture, in: Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture, P. M. Graves-Brown, ed., Routledge, London, pp. 22-49.
Ropohl, G., 1999, Philosophy of socio-technical systems, Techne 4:59-71.
Searle, J. R., 1995, The Construction of Social Reality, The Free Press, New York.
Trist, E. L., and Bamford, K. W., 1951, Some social and psychological consequences of the long-wall method of coal getting, Hum. Rel. 4:3-38.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krohs, U. (2008). Co-Designing Social Systems by Designing Technical Artifacts: A Conceptual Approach. In: Philosophy and Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6590-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6591-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)