The advent of genetic technologies has sparked a variety of questions about their legal, ethical, and social consequences. Issues of discrimination, better medicine, moral status, access, familial obligations, ethnic affiliations, and parental duties are discussed in relation to genetic testing, gene transfer, and genetic enhancement. In the midst of new discoveries and new debates, bioethicists strive to achieve a balance between a responsibility to contemplate theoretical possibilities that might result from current technological advances and a responsibility to convey whether such theoretical possibilities could come to be. (Parens, 2004) The purpose of this chapter is to argue that bioethicists dealing with genetic enhancement technologies are failing to achieve this balance. This failure stems, in part, from an inadequate understanding of human biology. Not only do proponents and critics of genetic enhancement have erroneous presuppositions about the role of genes in human biology, they also espouse incorrect beliefs about knowledge production in the biological sciences. I will conclude by showing some of the problematic consequences that might follow from failing to achieve this balance between a concern for theoretical possibilities related to genetic enhancement and a responsibility to evaluate the feasibility of those promises.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Agar, N., 2004, Liberal Eugenics, Blackwell, Malden, MA.
Annas, G., Andrews, L., and Isasi, R., 2002, Protecting the endangered human: toward an interna-tional treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alterations, Am. J. Law Med. 28 (2-3):151-178.
Becker, K. G., 2004, The common variants/multiple disease hypothesis of common complex genetic disorders, Med. Hypo. 62(2):309-317.
Bostrom, N., 2003, Human genetic enhancement: a transhumanist perspective, J. Val. Inq. 37(4):493-506.
Chakravarti, A., and Little, P., 2003, Nature, nurture and human disease, Nature 421(6921):412-414.
Cummings, M., 2003, Human Heredity, 6th ed., Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA.
Dennis, C., 2003, Epigenetics and disease: altered states, Nature 421(6924):686-689.
Dunar, A., and Waring, S., 1999, Power to Explore, NASA History Office, Washington, DC, 1999.
Dupré, J., 2001, Human Nature and the Limits of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.
Flegal, K. M., Graubard, B. I., Williamson, D. F., and Gail, M. H., 2005, Excess Deaths Associated With Underweight, Overweight, and Obesity, JAMA 293(15):1861-1867.
Fukuyama, F., 2002, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.
Gannett, L., 1997, Tractable genes, entrenched social structures, Biol. and Phil. 12(3):403-419.
Gard, M., 2005, The Obesity Epidemic; Science, Morality and Ideology, Routledge, New York.
Gifford, F., 2002, Understanding genetic causation and its implications for ethical issues in human genetics, in: Mutating Concepts, Evolving Disciplines: Genetics, Medicine, and Society, R. Ankeny and L. Parker, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 109-125.
Glannon, W., 2002, Identity, prudential concern, and extended lives, Bioethics 16(3):266-283.
Habermas, J., 2003, The Future of Human Nature, Polity, Cambridge, UK.
Han, P. K. J., 2002, Conceptual and moral problems of genetic and non-genetic preventive inter-ventions, in: Mutating Concepts, Evolving Disciplines: Genetics, Medicine, and Society, R. Ankeny and L. Parker, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 265-286.
Harris, J., 2000, Essays on science and society: Intimations of immortality, Science 288 (5463):59.
Harris, J., 2004, Immortal ethics, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1019:527-34.
Hayflick, L., 2004, Anti-aging’ is an oxymoron,” J. Gero. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 59(6): B573-578.
Hudson, J., 2000, What kinds of people should we create? J. Appl. Phil. 17(2):131-143.
Hughes, J., 2004, Citizen Cyborg, Westview Press, New York.
Jiang, Y. H., Bressler, J., and Beaudet, A. L., 2004, Epigenetics and human disease, Annu. Rev. Geno. Hum. Gen. 5:479-510.
Kaplan, J., 2000, The Limits and Lies of Human Genetic Research, Routledge, New York.
Kass, L., 2003, Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness, HarperCollins, New York.
Kass, L. R., 2001, L’Chaim and its limits: why not immortality? First Things 113:17-24.
Miller, R. I., 2002, Extending life: scientific prospects and political obstacles, Milb. Q. 80(1):155-174.
Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. S., Stroup, D. F., and Gerberding, J, L., 2004, Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000, JAMA. 291(10):1238-1245.
Oliver, J. E., 2005, Fat Politics: The Real Story Behind America’s Obesity Epidemic, Oxford University Press, New York.
Olshansky, S. J., Hayflick, L., and Perls, T., 2004, Anti-aging medicine: the hype and the reality—part II, J. Gero. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 59(7):649-651.
Parens, E., 2004, Genetic differences and human identities. On why talking about behavioral genetics is important and difficult, Hast. Cent. Repo. 34(1):S4-35.
Paulesu, E., et al., 2001, Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity, Science 291(5511):2165-2167.
Risch, N., 2002, Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium, Nature 405(6788):847-856.
Savulescu, J., 2005, New breeds of humans: the moral obligation to enhance, Repr. Biom. Onli. 10(1):S36-9.
Senior, V., Marteau, T. M., and Peters, T. J., 1999, Will genetic testing for predisposition for dis-ease result in fatalism? A qualitative study of parents’ responses to neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia, Social Sci. Med. 48(12):1857-1860.
Silver, L., 1997, Remaking Eden How Genetic Engineering and Cloning Will Transform the American Family, Avon Books, New York.
Sock, G., 2002, Redesigning Humans: Our Inevitable Genetic Future, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
Turner, L., 2004, Biotechnology, bioethics, and anti-aging interventions, Trends Biotech. 22(5):210-221.
Vineis, P., Schulte, P., and McMichael, A.J., 2001, Misconceptions about the use of genetic tests in populations, Lancet 357(9257):709-712.
Weiss, K. M., 2005, Cryptic causation of human disease: reading between the (germ) lines, Trends Genet. 21(2):82-88.
Wilkie, A., 2001, Genetic prediction: what are the limits?, Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. Biom. Sci. 32(4):619-633.
Wilmoth, J. R., 2000, Demography of longevity: past, present, and future trends, Exp Gero. 35(9-10):1111-1129.
Wright, A. J., Weinman, J., and Marteau, T. M., 2003, The impact of learning of a genetic predis-position to nicotine dependence: an analogue study, Toba. Cont. 12(2):227-230.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Melo-Martín, I. (2008). Designing People: A Post-Human Future?. In: Philosophy and Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6590-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6591-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)