Abstract
The treatment of needs in assessing economic equity is a subject that arouses strong feelings. Very different approaches have been adopted in the study of this subject. There are those who regard differences in needs as sufficient grounds for rejecting any analysis of income inequality. For them to try to compare one distribution of income, Y1,…, Y h with another, Y1*,…, Y h *, is without meaning, since the people concerned may have quite different needs. ‘Welfare’ depends not just on income but also on other dimensions. Precisely what other dimensions we should take into account is open to debate, but most people would agree on certain factors such as health, handicap, age or family size. Arrow gives the example of ‘the haemophiliac who needs about $4,000 worth per annum of coagulant therapy to arrive at a state of security from bleeding at all comparable to that of the normal person’, an example he contrasts with the ‘facetious’ one of a person who is ‘desperate without pre-phylloxera clarets and plovers’ eggs’ (1973, p. 254).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J. (1971) ‘A Utilitarian Approach to the Concept of Equality in Public Expenditure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85: 409–15.
Arrow, K. J. (1973) ‘Some Ordinalist—Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice’, Journal of Philosophy, 70: 245–63.
Atkinson, A. B. (1970) ‘On the Measurement of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 244–63.
Atkinson, A. B. and F. Bourguignon (1982) ‘The Comparison of Multi-Dimensioned Distributions of Economic Status’, Review of Economic Studies, 49: 183–201.
Basu, K. (1980) Revealed Preference of Government(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Gronau, R. (1983) ‘Some Thoughts on the Measurement and Welfare Implications of Adult Equivalence Scales’, unpublished.
Hadar, J. and W. R. Russell (1974) ‘Stochastic Dominance in Choice under Uncertainty’, in M. S. Balch, D. L. McFadden and S. Y. Wu (eds) (1974) Essays on Economic Behaviour Under Uncertainty(Amsterdam: North-Holland) Chapter 5, pp. 135–50.
Lazear, E. P. and R. T. Michael (1980) ‘Family Size and the Distribution of Real Per Capita Income’, American Economic Review, 70: 91–107.
Pollak, R. A. and T. J. Wales (1979) ‘Welfare Comparisons and Equivalence Scales’, American Economic Review, 69: 216–21.
Rawls, J. (1982) ‘Social Unity and Primary Goods’, in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds) (1982) Utilitarianism and Beyond(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 159–85.
Robbins, L. (1938) ‘Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment’, Economic Journal, 48: 635–41.
Sen, A. K. (1970) ‘Degrees of Cardinality and Aggregate Partial Orderings’, Econometrica, 43: 393–409.
Sen, A. K. (1973) On Economic Inequality(Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Shorrocks, A. F. (1983) ‘Ranking Income Distributions’, Economica, 50: 3–17.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 George R. Feiwel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F. (1987). Income Distribution and Differences in Needs. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07359-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07357-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)